The document discusses using social media data and customer relationship management (CRM) data to segment customers. It combines Recency, Frequency, Monetary (RFM) scores from both data sources to cluster customers into four groups: 1) high disseminating value, normal shopping value, 2) both shopping & disseminating is low, 3) high shopping value, normal disseminating value, and 4) high shopping value, low disseminating value. Customer targeting and positioning is then performed based on the clusters to identify which social media pages and product categories each group is most interested in. The hybrid analysis approach provides insights into differences between customer groups.
1 of 28
Download to read offline
More Related Content
Emg2015
1. THE POWER OF CUSTOMER VALUES
WITH SOCIAL MEDIA IN THE MARKET
SEGMENTATION
JeffreyTsai
3. Increased exposure for companies business is the
marketers use social media for sale the things.
Source: http://www.pagetraf鍖cbuzz.com/learn-companies-connecting-social-media/17235/
4. Learning from the markets, recognizing the
group of customer patterns still a critical
job for marketers
Because marketers must have the vision to see the value of customers
5. According to Woodruff (1997)
a customer perceived preference for and evaluation of those products
attributes, attribute performances, and consequences arising from use that
facilitate (or block) achieving the customers goals and purposes in use
situations by Woodruff
6. Segmentation
Identifying meaningfully
different groups of
customers
Targeting
Selecting which segment to
serve
Positioning
Implementing chosen image
and appeal to chosen
segment
Marketers
Customers
STP is a familiar
strategic approach
in Modern
Marketing.
Segmentation, Targeting and Positioning (STP)
Process
7. Recency
Frequency
Money
When did the customer
last make a purchase?
How often is the customer
making purchases?
What is the customers
return rate?
RFM models is a scoring model and do not explicitly provide a dollar number for
customer value. However, RFM are important past purchase variables that should be
good predictors of future purchase behavior of customers. (Gupta et al., 2005)
RFM Model
8. We used practical data
combining RFM model and
the STP strategy with data-
mining in CRM & Social
Media.
CRM Records
FB Interactive
Records
RFM Scores
Calculations
Social interactive Fanspage
CRM shopping category
Customer
Segmentation
Association Rules
&
Jaccard Coef鍖cient
Data
Presentation
Customer
Targeting
Modularity Algorithm
&
Betweenness Centrality
Data
Preprocessing
Customer
Positioning
Research Process
K-means
9. +
Gathering the 2,456
customers trading records
between Jan. and Apr. from
CRM database
Crawling over 4,000
fanspages interactive
records from Facebook
Data Gathering
10. CRM Records
FB Interactive records
Data Format
Facebook_ID Post_time page_id page_name post_id
100000998715544 2015/1/1 152905932107 152905932107_10152635799292108
1786662017 2015/1/1 152905932107 152905932107_10152635799292108
100001469254677 2015/1/1 127628276929 127628276929_10152470414971930
100000802633627 2015/1/1 127628276929 127628276929_10152478522571930
100007917434130 2015/1/1 127628276929 127628276929_10152478522571930
Facebook_ID Money Among Date Product name Product category
100000144441048 840 1 2015/1/1 12
100000199943019 699 1 2015/1/1 6
100000144441048 150 1 2015/1/1
( .159)2015
100000998715544 238 1 2015/1/1
101
100000998715544 227 1 2015/1/1
( ) :
Connections
12. Data Preprocessing
Unit: Month
CRM
Facebook
1st day of next month
- trading date
E.g. : 2/1 - 1/1 = 31
Accumulating a
months BUY frequency
E.g. : 1/1 to 1/31
bought 5 books
Accumulating a
months spending
E.g. : Accumulating
5 times spending = 1000
1st day of next month
- visiting date
Accumulating a
months frequency
of put the like
Accumulating a months
interactive CW Pages
posts / Accumulating a
months total visiting
fanspage
E.g. : 2/1 - 1/20 = 11
E.g. : 1/1 to 1/31
push the like button
4 times
E.g. : 10 CW pages posts
/ Accumulating100 posts
= 0.1
13. Facebook ID
CRM Facebook
R F M R F M
1438706957 9.333 9 2783 18 1 0.018
1667846450 27.024 1 587.5 12.333 5.667 0.103
100000294682354 6 5 1553 31 0 0
636098539 3.548 1 1980 31 0 0
100000193167290 18.617 4 774 22 1 0.007
1018548854 5 2 585 4.75 20.25 0.292
The result of Data Preprocessing
near end of
month
Spend
money
number
of books
near middle
of month
visiting
weight
number of
interaction
14. RFM Scores
We based on the 80/20 rules to segment the data into 鍖ve different levels
Locating the buy times
1st level score = 3.0
2nd level score = 8.0
3rd level score=13.0
4th level score = 20.0
The range of scores
Reader <= 3.0 = 1
3.0 < Reader <= 8.0 = 2
8.0 < Reader <=13.0 = 3
13.0 < Reader <= 20.0 = 4
Reader > 20.0 = 5
The distribution of the RFM scores
Scores
level
CRM Facebook
R F M R F M
1 177 2080 215 1431 2245 1629
2 699 306 737 166 146 347
3 768 64 810 319 37 211
4 554 5 535 438 22 179
5 258 1 159 102 6 90
a lot among readers
don't read CWs
Facebook
15. The result of RFM Scores
Facebook ID
CRM Facebook CRM_scores Facebook_scores
R F M R F M R F M R F M
1438706957 9.333 9 2783 18 1 0.018 4 3 4 3 1 1
1667846450 27.024 1 587.5 12.333 5.667 0.103 2 1 2 3 1 2
100000294682354 6 5 1553 31 0 0 4 2 4 1 1 1
636098539 3.548 1 1980 31 0 0 5 1 4 1 1 1
100000193167290 18.617 4 774 22 1 0.007 3 2 3 2 1 1
1018548854 5 2 585 4.75 20.25 0.292 4 1 2 4 2 4
They arent active user in each CW Fanspage
16. Customer segmentation: K-means
Num. of observations
Clustering
1 428
2 896
3 497
4 635
Clustering result
Clustering
1 2 3 4
CRM
R 2.9 2.71 3.27 3.29
F 1.18 1.06 1.22 1.34
M 2.92 2.16 2.83 3.89
Facebook
R 3.48 1.06 3.74 1.08
F 1.43 1 1.25 1
M 3.84 1.03 1.78 1.05
1. High Disseminating value, normal shopping value
2. Both shopping & disseminating is low
3. High shopping value, normal disseminating value
4. High shopping value, low disseminating value
Loyal readers,
sometimes buy
some books
Not loyal
customers
loyal buyer,
sometimes reader
from Facebook
Loyal Buyers
21. The customers are concerning the
Fanspages Posts
519
410
tripass 367
322
voguetaiwan 306
275
_crm 247
245
icook 228
213
goodlife 208
184
183
(
)
182
_crm
164
_crm 162
goodtv 158
157
_crm
145
141
Foundation & Volunteer
Political
Traveling
Magazines
New Tech & Entrepreneur
Customer Positioning
The result of 2nd clustering : 896
Despite both shopping & disseminating is low, they sometimes buy the books from the Internet
22. Customer Positioning
The result of 2nd clustering : 896
Magazine & Health
Family & Parenting
Education
Parenting
Cooking
Cosmetic
23. The customers are concerning the
Fanspages Posts
icook 4986
4380
3411
2861
mamaclub 2584
2490
2362
2347
voguetaiwan 2172
2170
sisy'sworldnews
2093
1918
1801
qqmei 1681
1635
( ) 1628
cheers 1606
-
lessonsfrommovies
1505
tripass 1410
1380
Magazine
Parenting & cooking
Customer Positioning
The result of 3rd clustering : 497
Political
Celebrity
Womens talk
Illustrator
High shopping value, normal
disseminating value
24. Customer Positioning
The result of 3rd clustering : 497
Parenting & Living
Womens talk
Financial
Health
Parenting
Cooking
Traveling
Celebrity
Investment
Soul
Illustrator
Health
Celebrity
25. Political
New Tech & Entrepreneur
Illustrator
The customers are concerning
the Fanspages Posts
_crm 650
gracetw 332
_crm 282
212
_crm 184
vivianhsu 182
_crm 182
icook 175
165
159
158
duncandesign 156
133
133
130
janethsieh 114
yilan 109
pansci 109
2xpeople2 108
Customer Positioning
The result of 4th clustering : 635
High shopping value, low
disseminating value
26. Customer Positioning
The result of 4th clustering : 635
Investment
Stylish
Parenting
Cooking
Cosmetic
Celebrity
Financial & Magazine
Parenting
27. Conclusions
1. We established a hybrid method to combine the CRM
and social media data.
2. We found the difference of each clusters, which the
company focuses on.