際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
THE POWER OF CUSTOMER VALUES
WITH SOCIAL MEDIA IN THE MARKET
SEGMENTATION
JeffreyTsai
Since Social media becomes a buzz
word, there are many users to .
2
Increased exposure for companies business is the
marketers use social media for sale the things.
Source: http://www.pagetraf鍖cbuzz.com/learn-companies-connecting-social-media/17235/
Learning from the markets, recognizing the
group of customer patterns still a critical
job for marketers
Because marketers must have the vision to see the value of customers
According to Woodruff (1997)
a customer perceived preference for and evaluation of those products
attributes, attribute performances, and consequences arising from use that
facilitate (or block) achieving the customers goals and purposes in use
situations by Woodruff
Segmentation
Identifying meaningfully
different groups of
customers
Targeting
Selecting which segment to
serve
Positioning
Implementing chosen image
and appeal to chosen
segment
Marketers
Customers
STP is a familiar
strategic approach
in Modern
Marketing.
Segmentation, Targeting and Positioning (STP)
Process
Recency
Frequency
Money
When did the customer
last make a purchase?
How often is the customer
making purchases?
What is the customers
return rate?
RFM models is a scoring model and do not explicitly provide a dollar number for
customer value. However, RFM are important past purchase variables that should be
good predictors of future purchase behavior of customers. (Gupta et al., 2005)
RFM Model
We used practical data
combining RFM model and
the STP strategy with data-
mining in CRM & Social
Media.
CRM Records
FB Interactive
Records
RFM Scores
Calculations
Social interactive Fanspage
CRM shopping category
Customer
Segmentation
Association Rules
&
Jaccard Coef鍖cient
Data
Presentation
Customer
Targeting
Modularity Algorithm
&
Betweenness Centrality
Data
Preprocessing
Customer
Positioning
Research Process
K-means
+
Gathering the 2,456
customers trading records
between Jan. and Apr. from
CRM database
Crawling over 4,000
fanspages interactive
records from Facebook
Data Gathering
CRM Records
FB Interactive records
Data Format
Facebook_ID Post_time page_id page_name post_id
100000998715544 2015/1/1 152905932107 152905932107_10152635799292108
1786662017 2015/1/1 152905932107 152905932107_10152635799292108
100001469254677 2015/1/1 127628276929 127628276929_10152470414971930
100000802633627 2015/1/1 127628276929 127628276929_10152478522571930
100007917434130 2015/1/1 127628276929 127628276929_10152478522571930
Facebook_ID Money Among Date Product name Product category
100000144441048 840 1 2015/1/1 12
100000199943019 699 1 2015/1/1 6
100000144441048 150 1 2015/1/1
( .159)2015
100000998715544 238 1 2015/1/1
101
100000998715544 227 1 2015/1/1
( ) :
Connections
https://www.facebook.com/127628276929/posts/10152470414971930
Data Preprocessing
Unit: Month
CRM
Facebook
1st day of next month
- trading date
E.g. : 2/1 - 1/1 = 31
Accumulating a
months BUY frequency
E.g. : 1/1 to 1/31
bought 5 books
Accumulating a
months spending
E.g. : Accumulating
5 times spending = 1000
1st day of next month
- visiting date
Accumulating a
months frequency
of put the like
Accumulating a months
interactive CW Pages
posts / Accumulating a
months total visiting
fanspage
E.g. : 2/1 - 1/20 = 11
E.g. : 1/1 to 1/31
push the like button
4 times
E.g. : 10 CW pages posts
/ Accumulating100 posts
= 0.1
Facebook ID
CRM Facebook
R F M R F M
1438706957 9.333 9 2783 18 1 0.018
1667846450 27.024 1 587.5 12.333 5.667 0.103
100000294682354 6 5 1553 31 0 0
636098539 3.548 1 1980 31 0 0
100000193167290 18.617 4 774 22 1 0.007
1018548854 5 2 585 4.75 20.25 0.292
The result of Data Preprocessing
near end of
month
Spend
money
number
of books
near middle
of month
visiting
weight
number of
interaction
RFM Scores
We based on the 80/20 rules to segment the data into 鍖ve different levels
Locating the buy times
1st level score = 3.0
2nd level score = 8.0
3rd level score=13.0
4th level score = 20.0
The range of scores
Reader <= 3.0 = 1
3.0 < Reader <= 8.0 = 2
8.0 < Reader <=13.0 = 3
13.0 < Reader <= 20.0 = 4
Reader > 20.0 = 5
The distribution of the RFM scores
Scores
level
CRM Facebook
R F M R F M
1 177 2080 215 1431 2245 1629
2 699 306 737 166 146 347
3 768 64 810 319 37 211
4 554 5 535 438 22 179
5 258 1 159 102 6 90
a lot among readers
don't read CWs
Facebook
The result of RFM Scores
Facebook ID
CRM Facebook CRM_scores Facebook_scores
R F M R F M R F M R F M
1438706957 9.333 9 2783 18 1 0.018 4 3 4 3 1 1
1667846450 27.024 1 587.5 12.333 5.667 0.103 2 1 2 3 1 2
100000294682354 6 5 1553 31 0 0 4 2 4 1 1 1
636098539 3.548 1 1980 31 0 0 5 1 4 1 1 1
100000193167290 18.617 4 774 22 1 0.007 3 2 3 2 1 1
1018548854 5 2 585 4.75 20.25 0.292 4 1 2 4 2 4
They arent active user in each CW Fanspage
Customer segmentation: K-means
Num. of observations
Clustering
1 428
2 896
3 497
4 635
Clustering result
Clustering
1 2 3 4
CRM
R 2.9 2.71 3.27 3.29
F 1.18 1.06 1.22 1.34
M 2.92 2.16 2.83 3.89
Facebook
R 3.48 1.06 3.74 1.08
F 1.43 1 1.25 1
M 3.84 1.03 1.78 1.05
1. High Disseminating value, normal shopping value
2. Both shopping & disseminating is low
3. High shopping value, normal disseminating value
4. High shopping value, low disseminating value
Loyal readers,
sometimes buy
some books
Not loyal
customers
loyal buyer,
sometimes reader
from Facebook
Loyal Buyers
Shopping RFM
Disseminating RFM
1
2
3
4
?
18
Facebook_ID
CRM Facebook
Clusters
R F M R F M
1438706957 4 3 4 3 1 1 3
1667846450 2 1 2 3 1 2 3
100000294682354 4 2 4 1 1 1 4
636098539 5 1 4 1 1 1 4
100000193167290 3 2 3 2 1 1 4
1018548854 4 1 2 4 2 4 1
Customer Targeting
Facebook_ID Clusters
Visiting Fanspages
(Likes)
Buy Categories
1438706957 3 FB1, FB2, FB3 C1, C2
1667846450 3 FB2, FB3, FB5, FB6 C2, C3, C4
100000294682354 4 FB2, FB5, FB6, FB8 C2, C3, C4
636098539 1 FB1, FB4, FB5, FB7 C1, C3, C4, C5
Hybrid the social interactive Fanspage & CRM shopping categories
The customers are concerning the
Fanspages Posts
5652
3754
3053
2717
cheers 2212
2149
1362
1257
952
928
877
managertoday 855
766
676
630
 616
nexttv 567
552
smart 537
High Disseminating value, normal shopping value
Customer Positioning
The result of 1st clustering : 428
Design & Stylish
Parenting
Traveling
Complex
Parenting
Health & education
Cheer
Health
Magazine
Traveling
Parenting
Illustrator
Celebrity
Cosmetic
Design
Business
Customer Positioning
The result of 1st clustering : 428
The customers are concerning the
Fanspages Posts
519
410
tripass 367
322
voguetaiwan 306
275
_crm 247
245
icook 228
213
goodlife 208
184
183
(
)
182
_crm
164
_crm 162
goodtv 158
157
_crm
145
141
Foundation & Volunteer
Political
Traveling
Magazines
New Tech & Entrepreneur
Customer Positioning
The result of 2nd clustering : 896
Despite both shopping & disseminating is low, they sometimes buy the books from the Internet
Customer Positioning
The result of 2nd clustering : 896
Magazine & Health
Family & Parenting
Education
Parenting
Cooking
Cosmetic
The customers are concerning the
Fanspages Posts
icook 4986
4380
3411
2861
mamaclub 2584
2490
2362
2347
voguetaiwan 2172
2170
sisy'sworldnews
2093
1918
1801
qqmei 1681
1635
( ) 1628
cheers 1606
-
lessonsfrommovies
1505
tripass 1410
1380
Magazine
Parenting & cooking
Customer Positioning
The result of 3rd clustering : 497
Political
Celebrity
Womens talk
Illustrator
High shopping value, normal
disseminating value
Customer Positioning
The result of 3rd clustering : 497
Parenting & Living
Womens talk
Financial
Health
Parenting
Cooking
Traveling
Celebrity
Investment
Soul
Illustrator
Health
Celebrity
Political
New Tech & Entrepreneur
Illustrator
The customers are concerning
the Fanspages Posts
_crm 650
gracetw 332
_crm 282
212
_crm 184
vivianhsu 182
_crm 182
icook 175
165
159
158
duncandesign 156
133
133
130
janethsieh 114
yilan 109
pansci 109
2xpeople2 108
Customer Positioning
The result of 4th clustering : 635
High shopping value, low
disseminating value
Customer Positioning
The result of 4th clustering : 635
Investment
Stylish
Parenting
Cooking
Cosmetic
Celebrity
Financial & Magazine
Parenting
Conclusions
1. We established a hybrid method to combine the CRM
and social media data.
2. We found the difference of each clusters, which the
company focuses on.
Thanks for your
attention
This is our web site:
http://leaderboard.ideas.iii.org.tw/home

More Related Content

Emg2015

  • 1. THE POWER OF CUSTOMER VALUES WITH SOCIAL MEDIA IN THE MARKET SEGMENTATION JeffreyTsai
  • 2. Since Social media becomes a buzz word, there are many users to . 2
  • 3. Increased exposure for companies business is the marketers use social media for sale the things. Source: http://www.pagetraf鍖cbuzz.com/learn-companies-connecting-social-media/17235/
  • 4. Learning from the markets, recognizing the group of customer patterns still a critical job for marketers Because marketers must have the vision to see the value of customers
  • 5. According to Woodruff (1997) a customer perceived preference for and evaluation of those products attributes, attribute performances, and consequences arising from use that facilitate (or block) achieving the customers goals and purposes in use situations by Woodruff
  • 6. Segmentation Identifying meaningfully different groups of customers Targeting Selecting which segment to serve Positioning Implementing chosen image and appeal to chosen segment Marketers Customers STP is a familiar strategic approach in Modern Marketing. Segmentation, Targeting and Positioning (STP) Process
  • 7. Recency Frequency Money When did the customer last make a purchase? How often is the customer making purchases? What is the customers return rate? RFM models is a scoring model and do not explicitly provide a dollar number for customer value. However, RFM are important past purchase variables that should be good predictors of future purchase behavior of customers. (Gupta et al., 2005) RFM Model
  • 8. We used practical data combining RFM model and the STP strategy with data- mining in CRM & Social Media. CRM Records FB Interactive Records RFM Scores Calculations Social interactive Fanspage CRM shopping category Customer Segmentation Association Rules & Jaccard Coef鍖cient Data Presentation Customer Targeting Modularity Algorithm & Betweenness Centrality Data Preprocessing Customer Positioning Research Process K-means
  • 9. + Gathering the 2,456 customers trading records between Jan. and Apr. from CRM database Crawling over 4,000 fanspages interactive records from Facebook Data Gathering
  • 10. CRM Records FB Interactive records Data Format Facebook_ID Post_time page_id page_name post_id 100000998715544 2015/1/1 152905932107 152905932107_10152635799292108 1786662017 2015/1/1 152905932107 152905932107_10152635799292108 100001469254677 2015/1/1 127628276929 127628276929_10152470414971930 100000802633627 2015/1/1 127628276929 127628276929_10152478522571930 100007917434130 2015/1/1 127628276929 127628276929_10152478522571930 Facebook_ID Money Among Date Product name Product category 100000144441048 840 1 2015/1/1 12 100000199943019 699 1 2015/1/1 6 100000144441048 150 1 2015/1/1 ( .159)2015 100000998715544 238 1 2015/1/1 101 100000998715544 227 1 2015/1/1 ( ) : Connections
  • 12. Data Preprocessing Unit: Month CRM Facebook 1st day of next month - trading date E.g. : 2/1 - 1/1 = 31 Accumulating a months BUY frequency E.g. : 1/1 to 1/31 bought 5 books Accumulating a months spending E.g. : Accumulating 5 times spending = 1000 1st day of next month - visiting date Accumulating a months frequency of put the like Accumulating a months interactive CW Pages posts / Accumulating a months total visiting fanspage E.g. : 2/1 - 1/20 = 11 E.g. : 1/1 to 1/31 push the like button 4 times E.g. : 10 CW pages posts / Accumulating100 posts = 0.1
  • 13. Facebook ID CRM Facebook R F M R F M 1438706957 9.333 9 2783 18 1 0.018 1667846450 27.024 1 587.5 12.333 5.667 0.103 100000294682354 6 5 1553 31 0 0 636098539 3.548 1 1980 31 0 0 100000193167290 18.617 4 774 22 1 0.007 1018548854 5 2 585 4.75 20.25 0.292 The result of Data Preprocessing near end of month Spend money number of books near middle of month visiting weight number of interaction
  • 14. RFM Scores We based on the 80/20 rules to segment the data into 鍖ve different levels Locating the buy times 1st level score = 3.0 2nd level score = 8.0 3rd level score=13.0 4th level score = 20.0 The range of scores Reader <= 3.0 = 1 3.0 < Reader <= 8.0 = 2 8.0 < Reader <=13.0 = 3 13.0 < Reader <= 20.0 = 4 Reader > 20.0 = 5 The distribution of the RFM scores Scores level CRM Facebook R F M R F M 1 177 2080 215 1431 2245 1629 2 699 306 737 166 146 347 3 768 64 810 319 37 211 4 554 5 535 438 22 179 5 258 1 159 102 6 90 a lot among readers don't read CWs Facebook
  • 15. The result of RFM Scores Facebook ID CRM Facebook CRM_scores Facebook_scores R F M R F M R F M R F M 1438706957 9.333 9 2783 18 1 0.018 4 3 4 3 1 1 1667846450 27.024 1 587.5 12.333 5.667 0.103 2 1 2 3 1 2 100000294682354 6 5 1553 31 0 0 4 2 4 1 1 1 636098539 3.548 1 1980 31 0 0 5 1 4 1 1 1 100000193167290 18.617 4 774 22 1 0.007 3 2 3 2 1 1 1018548854 5 2 585 4.75 20.25 0.292 4 1 2 4 2 4 They arent active user in each CW Fanspage
  • 16. Customer segmentation: K-means Num. of observations Clustering 1 428 2 896 3 497 4 635 Clustering result Clustering 1 2 3 4 CRM R 2.9 2.71 3.27 3.29 F 1.18 1.06 1.22 1.34 M 2.92 2.16 2.83 3.89 Facebook R 3.48 1.06 3.74 1.08 F 1.43 1 1.25 1 M 3.84 1.03 1.78 1.05 1. High Disseminating value, normal shopping value 2. Both shopping & disseminating is low 3. High shopping value, normal disseminating value 4. High shopping value, low disseminating value Loyal readers, sometimes buy some books Not loyal customers loyal buyer, sometimes reader from Facebook Loyal Buyers
  • 18. 18 Facebook_ID CRM Facebook Clusters R F M R F M 1438706957 4 3 4 3 1 1 3 1667846450 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 100000294682354 4 2 4 1 1 1 4 636098539 5 1 4 1 1 1 4 100000193167290 3 2 3 2 1 1 4 1018548854 4 1 2 4 2 4 1 Customer Targeting Facebook_ID Clusters Visiting Fanspages (Likes) Buy Categories 1438706957 3 FB1, FB2, FB3 C1, C2 1667846450 3 FB2, FB3, FB5, FB6 C2, C3, C4 100000294682354 4 FB2, FB5, FB6, FB8 C2, C3, C4 636098539 1 FB1, FB4, FB5, FB7 C1, C3, C4, C5 Hybrid the social interactive Fanspage & CRM shopping categories
  • 19. The customers are concerning the Fanspages Posts 5652 3754 3053 2717 cheers 2212 2149 1362 1257 952 928 877 managertoday 855 766 676 630 616 nexttv 567 552 smart 537 High Disseminating value, normal shopping value Customer Positioning The result of 1st clustering : 428 Design & Stylish Parenting Traveling Complex
  • 21. The customers are concerning the Fanspages Posts 519 410 tripass 367 322 voguetaiwan 306 275 _crm 247 245 icook 228 213 goodlife 208 184 183 ( ) 182 _crm 164 _crm 162 goodtv 158 157 _crm 145 141 Foundation & Volunteer Political Traveling Magazines New Tech & Entrepreneur Customer Positioning The result of 2nd clustering : 896 Despite both shopping & disseminating is low, they sometimes buy the books from the Internet
  • 22. Customer Positioning The result of 2nd clustering : 896 Magazine & Health Family & Parenting Education Parenting Cooking Cosmetic
  • 23. The customers are concerning the Fanspages Posts icook 4986 4380 3411 2861 mamaclub 2584 2490 2362 2347 voguetaiwan 2172 2170 sisy'sworldnews 2093 1918 1801 qqmei 1681 1635 ( ) 1628 cheers 1606 - lessonsfrommovies 1505 tripass 1410 1380 Magazine Parenting & cooking Customer Positioning The result of 3rd clustering : 497 Political Celebrity Womens talk Illustrator High shopping value, normal disseminating value
  • 24. Customer Positioning The result of 3rd clustering : 497 Parenting & Living Womens talk Financial Health Parenting Cooking Traveling Celebrity Investment Soul Illustrator Health Celebrity
  • 25. Political New Tech & Entrepreneur Illustrator The customers are concerning the Fanspages Posts _crm 650 gracetw 332 _crm 282 212 _crm 184 vivianhsu 182 _crm 182 icook 175 165 159 158 duncandesign 156 133 133 130 janethsieh 114 yilan 109 pansci 109 2xpeople2 108 Customer Positioning The result of 4th clustering : 635 High shopping value, low disseminating value
  • 26. Customer Positioning The result of 4th clustering : 635 Investment Stylish Parenting Cooking Cosmetic Celebrity Financial & Magazine Parenting
  • 27. Conclusions 1. We established a hybrid method to combine the CRM and social media data. 2. We found the difference of each clusters, which the company focuses on.
  • 28. Thanks for your attention This is our web site: http://leaderboard.ideas.iii.org.tw/home