際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo

epug_33

S
Simon Kettle

This document discusses how GIS can be used to increase efficiency and accuracy in oil spill planning and mitigation. It describes how GIS was used to streamline the financial responsibility assessment process for offshore drilling, reducing the work time from 4 hours to under 5 minutes, a 98% decrease. The document also outlines other areas where GIS could potentially be applied, such as environmental impact assessments, spill response planning, and pipeline routing. Overall, the document promotes the benefits of GIS for improving workflows and decision making in environmental management and regulation of offshore oil and gas operations.

1 of 35
Downloaded 10 times
Using ArcGIS to increase productivity and accuracy in meeting oil spill planning and mitigation Simon Kettle Exprodat Consulting Ltd. Adam Jones Environmental Manager
Summary Introduction GIS Application to DECC Legislation Financial Responsibility Analysis Conclusions 1 2 3 4 5 The Environmental Process Page 2
Introduction Start of a GIS for Environment GIS is becoming an important tool Viewing Analysing Integrating Sharing Image from: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/8486571.stm Page 3
Objectives Identify areas for GIS in Environment Deployment of GIS data Workflows Improve workflow efficiency Development of tools Production of easily accessible GIS maps and data Improve workflows Increase Accuracy Maximise Efficiency Page 4
The Environmental Process Planning and Preparation Monitoring Oil and Chemical Spill response Decommissioning Petroleum Operation Notifications (PON) Page 5
Planning and Preparation: Environmental Impact Assessment An assessment of the possible impacts that a proposed project may have on the environment. Consent to Drill Well Oil Pollution Emergency Plan (OPEP) Financial Responsibility Assessment Chemical Permit Application Environmental Statement Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) Page 6
Environmental Impact Assessment: GIS and applying for Petroleum Operations DECC Environmental Regulations 1999 Required within distances : Fisheries Coastlines Protected Areas Transport Routes Areas of Seismic Sensitivity Coull, K.A., Johnstone, R., and S.I. Rogers. 1998. Fisheries Sensitivity Maps in British Waters. Published and distributed by UKOOA Ltd. Ellis, J.R., Milligan, S.P., Readdy, L., Taylor, N. and Brown, M.J. 2012. Spawning and nursery grounds of selected fish species in UK waters. Sci. Ser. Tech. Rep., Cefas Lowestoft, 147: 56 pp. Page 7
Environmental Impact Assessment: GIS and applying for Petroleum Operations DECC Environmental Regulations 1999 Required within distances : Fisheries Coastlines Protected Areas Transport Routes Areas of Seismic Sensitivity Coull, K.A., Johnstone, R., and S.I. Rogers. 1998. Fisheries Sensitivity Maps in British Waters. Published and distributed by UKOOA Ltd. Ellis, J.R., Milligan, S.P., Readdy, L., Taylor, N. and Brown, M.J. 2012. Spawning and nursery grounds of selected fish species in UK waters. Sci. Ser. Tech. Rep., Cefas Lowestoft, 147: 56 pp. Page 8
Environmental Impact Assessment: GIS and applying for Petroleum Operations DECC Environmental Regulations 1999 Required within distances : Fisheries Coastlines Protected Areas Transport Routes Areas of Seismic Sensitivity Coull, K.A., Johnstone, R., and S.I. Rogers. 1998. Fisheries Sensitivity Maps in British Waters. Published and distributed by UKOOA Ltd. Ellis, J.R., Milligan, S.P., Readdy, L., Taylor, N. and Brown, M.J. 2012. Spawning and nursery grounds of selected fish species in UK waters. Sci. Ser. Tech. Rep., Cefas Lowestoft, 147: 56 pp. Page 9
Planning and Preparation: Financial Responsibility Assessment The assurance that operators and co-ventures have the financial resources to respond, control and compensate for any unintended and uncontrolled release of hydrocarbons from a well. Consent to Drill Well Oil Pollution Emergency Plan (OPEP) Financial Responsibility Assessment Chemical Permit Application Environmental Statement Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) Page 10
Financial Responsibility Assessment: Process Complete Modelling work for OPEP (e.g. OSCAR, OILMAP, OSIS) Use modelling outputs to determine the risk band for the well Operator submits calculations Operator collects all data and sums the total Financial Requirement needed Page 11
Financial Responsibility Assessment: Analysis Requirments and outputs Category Assessment High Score 3 Points Medium Score 2 Points Low Score 1 Points Length of Coastline Identify the length of coastline oiled in miles Greater than 100 miles Between 10 and 100 miles 10 miles or less Fisheries Identify the number of ICES squares transited Greater than 5 Between 1 and 5 1 or less Aquaculture Identify number of Aquaculture sites on impacted coastline Greater than 30 Between 5 and 30 5 or less Shoreline Oil Volume Identify the volume of oil to come ashore (m3) Greater than 5000m3 Between 1000m3 and 5000m3 Less than 1000m3 Derived from Guidance Note to UK Offshore Oil and Gas Operators on the Demonstration of Financial Responsibility Before Consent May be Granted for Exploration and Appraisal Wells on the UKCS Issue 1, November 2012 Page 12
Financial Responsibility Assessment: Requirements Data Coastline polygon, ICES Rectangles, Trajectory polygon, Well Location, Oil Volume, Aquaculture Sites Analysis Applications 4 key analyses, Accuracy and Precision Analysis Considerations Length of Coastline, Number of ICES Rectangles, Aquaculture and Oil volume Page 13
Financial Responsibility Assessment: Analysis considerationscoordinate reference systems Page 14
Financial Responsibility Assessment: Analysis considerationscoordinate reference systems Page 15
Financial Responsibility Assessment: Analysis considerationscoordinate reference systems Page 16
Financial Responsibility Assessment: Data considerationtrajectory accuracy Page 17
Financial Responsibility Assessment: Analysis considerationgeometry and influence on analysis Page 18
Financial Responsibility Assessment: Analysis considerationcoastline intersection 304 Km Page 19
Financial Responsibility Assessment: Analysis presentationprecision Page 20
Financial Responsibility Assessment: Analysis presentationprecision Page 21
Financial Responsibility Assessment: Analysis presentationprecision Page 22
Financial Responsibility Assessment: Data considerationsaquaculture UK Data from Marine Scotland National Marine Plan InteractivePage 23
Financial Responsibility Assessment: Data considerationsaquaculture UK Data from Marine Scotland National Marine Plan InteractivePage 24
Financial Responsibility Assessment: Analysis considerationsaquaculture 26 sites Page 25
Financial Responsibility Assessment: Data considerationsfisheries International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) Statistical Rectangles Page 26
Financial Responsibility Assessment: Analysis considerationsfisheries 7 Rectangles Page 27
Financial Responsibility Assessment: Analysis Requirments and outputs Category Assessment High Score 3 Points Medium Score 2 Points Low Score 1 Points Length of Coastline Identify the length of coastline oiled in miles Greater than 100 miles Between 10 and 100 miles 10 miles or less Fisheries Identify the number of ICES squares transited Greater than 5 Between 1 and 5 1 or less Aquaculture Identify number of Aquaculture sites on impacted coastline Greater than 30 Between 5 and 30 5 or less Shoreline Oil Volume Identify the volume of oil to come ashore (m3) Greater than 5000m3 Between 1000m3 and 5000m3 Less than 1000m3 Derived from Guidance Note to UK Offshore Oil and Gas Operators on the Demonstration of Financial Responsibility Before Consent May be Granted for Exploration and Appraisal Wells on the UKCS Issue 1, November 2012 Page 28
Financial Responsibility Assessment: Results from this analysis Category Assessment High Score 3 Points Medium Score 2 Points Low Score 1 Points Length of Coastline Identify the length of coastline oiled in kilometres 304 - - Fisheries Identify the number of ICES rectangles transited 7 - - Aquaculture Identify number of Aquaculture sites on impacted coastline - 26 - Shoreline Oil Volume Identify the volume of oil to come ashore (m3) - 2,000m3 - Derived from Guidance Note to UK Offshore Oil and Gas Operators on the Demonstration of Financial Responsibility Before Consent May be Granted for Exploration and Appraisal Wells on the UKCS Issue 1, November 2012 Page 29
Financial Responsibility Assessment: Resulting Score Scores added together Banding FR Recommended (100% interest in well) Exempt well category None Not considered necessary 5 or less 1 US $250m financial responsibility demonstrated by the operator to OPOL 6 or 7 2 US $375m (US $125m to address legal liability for pollution remediation and compensation in addition to financial responsibility demonstrated by the operator to OPOL) 8 or 9 3 US $500m (US $250m to address legal liability for pollution remediation and compensation in addition to financial responsibility demonstrated by the operator to OPOL) 10 - 12 4 US $750m (recommendation to demonstrate US $500m to address legal liability for pollution remediation and compensation in addition to financial responsibility demonstrated by the operator to OPOL) Derived from Guidance Note to UK Offshore Oil and Gas Operators on the Demonstration of Financial Responsibility Before Consent May be Granted for Exploration and Appraisal Wells on the UKCS Issue 1, November 2012 Page 30
Financial Responsibility Assessment: GIS Process Work time reduced from 4 hours to < 5 minutes 98 % decrease in time spent on process Page 31
Financial Responsibility Assessment: GIS Process Work time reduced from 4 hours to 5 minutes 98 % decrease in time spent on process Page 32
Other Areas of potential GIS use: Preparation and Planning Geological and Seismic Surveys Habitat Impact Directive, EIA, Fisheries Impact Well Test Environmental Statement, OPEP Offshore Pipeline Construction Environmental Statement, EIA, Fisheries Impacts, Habitat Impact Directive Workover, Offshore Waste Storage and Transfer, Well Suspension, Well Abandonment Page 33
Q & AQuestions & Answers Page 34
Page 35 GIS Consulting GIS Software GIS Training Thank You! Follow Exprodat Page 35 Simon Kettle skettle@exprodat.com

More Related Content

epug_33

  • 1. Using ArcGIS to increase productivity and accuracy in meeting oil spill planning and mitigation Simon Kettle Exprodat Consulting Ltd. Adam Jones Environmental Manager
  • 2. Summary Introduction GIS Application to DECC Legislation Financial Responsibility Analysis Conclusions 1 2 3 4 5 The Environmental Process Page 2
  • 3. Introduction Start of a GIS for Environment GIS is becoming an important tool Viewing Analysing Integrating Sharing Image from: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/8486571.stm Page 3
  • 4. Objectives Identify areas for GIS in Environment Deployment of GIS data Workflows Improve workflow efficiency Development of tools Production of easily accessible GIS maps and data Improve workflows Increase Accuracy Maximise Efficiency Page 4
  • 5. The Environmental Process Planning and Preparation Monitoring Oil and Chemical Spill response Decommissioning Petroleum Operation Notifications (PON) Page 5
  • 6. Planning and Preparation: Environmental Impact Assessment An assessment of the possible impacts that a proposed project may have on the environment. Consent to Drill Well Oil Pollution Emergency Plan (OPEP) Financial Responsibility Assessment Chemical Permit Application Environmental Statement Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) Page 6
  • 7. Environmental Impact Assessment: GIS and applying for Petroleum Operations DECC Environmental Regulations 1999 Required within distances : Fisheries Coastlines Protected Areas Transport Routes Areas of Seismic Sensitivity Coull, K.A., Johnstone, R., and S.I. Rogers. 1998. Fisheries Sensitivity Maps in British Waters. Published and distributed by UKOOA Ltd. Ellis, J.R., Milligan, S.P., Readdy, L., Taylor, N. and Brown, M.J. 2012. Spawning and nursery grounds of selected fish species in UK waters. Sci. Ser. Tech. Rep., Cefas Lowestoft, 147: 56 pp. Page 7
  • 8. Environmental Impact Assessment: GIS and applying for Petroleum Operations DECC Environmental Regulations 1999 Required within distances : Fisheries Coastlines Protected Areas Transport Routes Areas of Seismic Sensitivity Coull, K.A., Johnstone, R., and S.I. Rogers. 1998. Fisheries Sensitivity Maps in British Waters. Published and distributed by UKOOA Ltd. Ellis, J.R., Milligan, S.P., Readdy, L., Taylor, N. and Brown, M.J. 2012. Spawning and nursery grounds of selected fish species in UK waters. Sci. Ser. Tech. Rep., Cefas Lowestoft, 147: 56 pp. Page 8
  • 9. Environmental Impact Assessment: GIS and applying for Petroleum Operations DECC Environmental Regulations 1999 Required within distances : Fisheries Coastlines Protected Areas Transport Routes Areas of Seismic Sensitivity Coull, K.A., Johnstone, R., and S.I. Rogers. 1998. Fisheries Sensitivity Maps in British Waters. Published and distributed by UKOOA Ltd. Ellis, J.R., Milligan, S.P., Readdy, L., Taylor, N. and Brown, M.J. 2012. Spawning and nursery grounds of selected fish species in UK waters. Sci. Ser. Tech. Rep., Cefas Lowestoft, 147: 56 pp. Page 9
  • 10. Planning and Preparation: Financial Responsibility Assessment The assurance that operators and co-ventures have the financial resources to respond, control and compensate for any unintended and uncontrolled release of hydrocarbons from a well. Consent to Drill Well Oil Pollution Emergency Plan (OPEP) Financial Responsibility Assessment Chemical Permit Application Environmental Statement Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) Page 10
  • 11. Financial Responsibility Assessment: Process Complete Modelling work for OPEP (e.g. OSCAR, OILMAP, OSIS) Use modelling outputs to determine the risk band for the well Operator submits calculations Operator collects all data and sums the total Financial Requirement needed Page 11
  • 12. Financial Responsibility Assessment: Analysis Requirments and outputs Category Assessment High Score 3 Points Medium Score 2 Points Low Score 1 Points Length of Coastline Identify the length of coastline oiled in miles Greater than 100 miles Between 10 and 100 miles 10 miles or less Fisheries Identify the number of ICES squares transited Greater than 5 Between 1 and 5 1 or less Aquaculture Identify number of Aquaculture sites on impacted coastline Greater than 30 Between 5 and 30 5 or less Shoreline Oil Volume Identify the volume of oil to come ashore (m3) Greater than 5000m3 Between 1000m3 and 5000m3 Less than 1000m3 Derived from Guidance Note to UK Offshore Oil and Gas Operators on the Demonstration of Financial Responsibility Before Consent May be Granted for Exploration and Appraisal Wells on the UKCS Issue 1, November 2012 Page 12
  • 13. Financial Responsibility Assessment: Requirements Data Coastline polygon, ICES Rectangles, Trajectory polygon, Well Location, Oil Volume, Aquaculture Sites Analysis Applications 4 key analyses, Accuracy and Precision Analysis Considerations Length of Coastline, Number of ICES Rectangles, Aquaculture and Oil volume Page 13
  • 14. Financial Responsibility Assessment: Analysis considerationscoordinate reference systems Page 14
  • 15. Financial Responsibility Assessment: Analysis considerationscoordinate reference systems Page 15
  • 16. Financial Responsibility Assessment: Analysis considerationscoordinate reference systems Page 16
  • 17. Financial Responsibility Assessment: Data considerationtrajectory accuracy Page 17
  • 18. Financial Responsibility Assessment: Analysis considerationgeometry and influence on analysis Page 18
  • 19. Financial Responsibility Assessment: Analysis considerationcoastline intersection 304 Km Page 19
  • 20. Financial Responsibility Assessment: Analysis presentationprecision Page 20
  • 21. Financial Responsibility Assessment: Analysis presentationprecision Page 21
  • 22. Financial Responsibility Assessment: Analysis presentationprecision Page 22
  • 23. Financial Responsibility Assessment: Data considerationsaquaculture UK Data from Marine Scotland National Marine Plan InteractivePage 23
  • 24. Financial Responsibility Assessment: Data considerationsaquaculture UK Data from Marine Scotland National Marine Plan InteractivePage 24
  • 25. Financial Responsibility Assessment: Analysis considerationsaquaculture 26 sites Page 25
  • 26. Financial Responsibility Assessment: Data considerationsfisheries International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) Statistical Rectangles Page 26
  • 27. Financial Responsibility Assessment: Analysis considerationsfisheries 7 Rectangles Page 27
  • 28. Financial Responsibility Assessment: Analysis Requirments and outputs Category Assessment High Score 3 Points Medium Score 2 Points Low Score 1 Points Length of Coastline Identify the length of coastline oiled in miles Greater than 100 miles Between 10 and 100 miles 10 miles or less Fisheries Identify the number of ICES squares transited Greater than 5 Between 1 and 5 1 or less Aquaculture Identify number of Aquaculture sites on impacted coastline Greater than 30 Between 5 and 30 5 or less Shoreline Oil Volume Identify the volume of oil to come ashore (m3) Greater than 5000m3 Between 1000m3 and 5000m3 Less than 1000m3 Derived from Guidance Note to UK Offshore Oil and Gas Operators on the Demonstration of Financial Responsibility Before Consent May be Granted for Exploration and Appraisal Wells on the UKCS Issue 1, November 2012 Page 28
  • 29. Financial Responsibility Assessment: Results from this analysis Category Assessment High Score 3 Points Medium Score 2 Points Low Score 1 Points Length of Coastline Identify the length of coastline oiled in kilometres 304 - - Fisheries Identify the number of ICES rectangles transited 7 - - Aquaculture Identify number of Aquaculture sites on impacted coastline - 26 - Shoreline Oil Volume Identify the volume of oil to come ashore (m3) - 2,000m3 - Derived from Guidance Note to UK Offshore Oil and Gas Operators on the Demonstration of Financial Responsibility Before Consent May be Granted for Exploration and Appraisal Wells on the UKCS Issue 1, November 2012 Page 29
  • 30. Financial Responsibility Assessment: Resulting Score Scores added together Banding FR Recommended (100% interest in well) Exempt well category None Not considered necessary 5 or less 1 US $250m financial responsibility demonstrated by the operator to OPOL 6 or 7 2 US $375m (US $125m to address legal liability for pollution remediation and compensation in addition to financial responsibility demonstrated by the operator to OPOL) 8 or 9 3 US $500m (US $250m to address legal liability for pollution remediation and compensation in addition to financial responsibility demonstrated by the operator to OPOL) 10 - 12 4 US $750m (recommendation to demonstrate US $500m to address legal liability for pollution remediation and compensation in addition to financial responsibility demonstrated by the operator to OPOL) Derived from Guidance Note to UK Offshore Oil and Gas Operators on the Demonstration of Financial Responsibility Before Consent May be Granted for Exploration and Appraisal Wells on the UKCS Issue 1, November 2012 Page 30
  • 31. Financial Responsibility Assessment: GIS Process Work time reduced from 4 hours to < 5 minutes 98 % decrease in time spent on process Page 31
  • 32. Financial Responsibility Assessment: GIS Process Work time reduced from 4 hours to 5 minutes 98 % decrease in time spent on process Page 32
  • 33. Other Areas of potential GIS use: Preparation and Planning Geological and Seismic Surveys Habitat Impact Directive, EIA, Fisheries Impact Well Test Environmental Statement, OPEP Offshore Pipeline Construction Environmental Statement, EIA, Fisheries Impacts, Habitat Impact Directive Workover, Offshore Waste Storage and Transfer, Well Suspension, Well Abandonment Page 33
  • 34. Q & AQuestions & Answers Page 34
  • 35. Page 35 GIS Consulting GIS Software GIS Training Thank You! Follow Exprodat Page 35 Simon Kettle skettle@exprodat.com