Evaluation
Download as PPTX, PDF0 likes129 views
The document discusses how the author gained audience feedback on their media product. [1] They created an audience questionnaire and had peers watch their draft music video to get feedback. [2] Feedback from the questionnaire helped with initial ideas, while filming reactions identified specific moments audiences liked and disliked. [3] The author learned they should have held focus groups, posted their draft online to get more varied feedback, and created the questionnaire earlier to inform ancillary tasks.
1 of 9
Download to read offline
Recommended
1st draft evaluation
1st draft evaluationCarla Smith
油
This document discusses how the author gained audience feedback on their media product. They created an audience questionnaire to understand what their target audience likes in music videos. They also filmed peers watching their draft video and asked for feedback on what was liked and disliked. This feedback helped the author decide specific changes, such as improving the clarity of the story. The author concluded that holding focus groups and getting a wider range of online feedback would have been better approaches for future projects.Evaluation question 3
Evaluation question 3Carla Smith
油
The document discusses how the author gained audience feedback on their music video ideas and draft. [1] They created an audience questionnaire to understand what their target audience likes in music videos and also filmed peers watching their draft video to get reactions. [2] This feedback helped them decide on specific elements for their video and the overall atmosphere. [3] In the future, they would hold focus groups, get wider feedback on social media, and create the questionnaire earlier to better inform their project.Evaluation question 3
Evaluation question 3morgan newsam
油
The student conducted research through questionnaires to understand what their target audience, mid-to-late teens, liked in music videos. They found that the audience preferred videos with storylines over solely performance-based videos. During filming and editing, they focused on including elements their research showed the audience enjoyed like close-ups, bright colors, and a relatable storyline about a couple's first date. After releasing the video, a follow-up questionnaire found that the target audience on average rated it 7/10 and enjoyed the storyline, though wanted to see more of the band. The student determined that focusing on the audience's preferences through research led to creating a video they found engaging and would recommend.Media doc audience feedback without graphs or radio and print ad
Media doc audience feedback without graphs or radio and print ademilylydiaparis
油
The group uploaded their media clips to YouTube and shared the links on Facebook and Twitter to collect audience feedback. They noticed that while the clips were receiving many views, they were only getting one comment on YouTube. To get more responses, one member directly texted friends for feedback, which worked well to ensure responses. The feedback was generally positive and consistent, praising the variety of interviews. However, some noted the lack of male perspectives early on and issues with audio quality. Going forward, the group learned they need a better gender balance and to be more careful of audio issues during filming.Evaluation question 3
Evaluation question 3laurengorman
油
Lauren gained feedback on her music video project by distributing anonymous surveys and interviewing her class. The feedback was positive overall, with most people rating the video an 8 out of 10. Respondents confirmed that the video fit the pop genre due to its bright colors and costumes. They enjoyed the color scheme, different shots, scenes, and group shots most as these kept them engaged. Areas for improvement included lip syncing, adding more shots with the boyfriends, improving lighting, and strengthening the dance routine. Overall, Lauren learned that the audience enjoyed the video and auxiliary materials. They felt the images captured the group's fun personalities. While most elements fit the pop genre, not including a full dance routine or boyfriend shots wasEvaluation question 3
Evaluation question 3KirstyMcMunn
油
The document discusses feedback received on a music video and promotional package. Questionnaires and interviews were used to gather feedback. Interviews found that audiences preferred narrative videos over performance videos. Feedback also showed that younger audiences spend more time watching online media. While some felt the artist was important to include, others felt the song's meaning was more important. There was mixed feedback on aspects like a split screen effect and an argument scene. Positives included eye-catching elements and professional actors. Negatives included issues with a split screen and argument scene that lacked context. Overall, the feedback helped identify areas for improvement and informed further development of the promotional package.William's Evaluation - Question 2
William's Evaluation - Question 2Group3media2017
油
The document discusses how the author gathered and incorporated feedback from their target audience of teenagers aged 12 to 18 to improve their media project. They conducted a survey, interviews, and a showcase screening to understand what the audience wanted and evaluate their work. Feedback revealed issues like poor sound quality in one trailer section and unnatural acting that were addressed. Regular informal feedback also helped fix problems like unrealistic head movement in a scene. Considering the target audience's needs and feedback allowed the author to create a final product better suited for their demographic.Question 3
Question 3lenrickgreaves
油
The document discusses feedback received on various aspects of a gospel music project from target audiences:
1) Initial feedback helped select one song over another based on lyrics and sound being more positive and youthful.
2) Rough cut feedback noted successful themes/motifs but needed tighter lip syncing and more shots of featured artist.
3) Print product mock-ups received positive feedback, but one complex collage idea was too ambitious and replaced.
4) Complete package feedback from a new target group on WhatsApp praised professionalism but noted the artist's message on the CD cover could be clearer.Evaluation 3
Evaluation 3PreciousCaitlyn
油
- The document discusses gathering feedback from a target audience of 12-30 year olds for a short film about a character undergoing chemotherapy.
- Pre-production, the filmmakers created an online questionnaire to understand how the audience felt about the title, narrative, and concept. Most respondents were 12-16 years old.
- Based on feedback, the filmmakers expanded the number of relatable characters.
- Post-production, another questionnaire gathered feedback on adjustments made. Social media was used to promote to the young adult audience.
- Receiving criticism of initial work helped improve ancillary materials and the film. The filmmaker incorporated feedback to create a stronger final product.Evaluation 3
Evaluation 3PreciousCaitlyn
油
The document discusses the filmmakers' target audience research and feedback gathering process. Their target audience was males and females aged 12-30 based on the film's 12A rating. They created pre-production and post-production questionnaires to gather feedback on the title, narrative, characters, and overall film. Most respondents were aged 12-16, so they focused social media marketing on platforms popular with teenagers. Receiving and applying this audience feedback helped strengthen the film and ancillary materials.Evaluation- Question 3
Evaluation- Question 3cw00531169
油
The document summarizes feedback received from audiences on a documentary about sweets. The feedback was overall positive and showed that the documentary was more informative than entertaining, though the main purpose was to inform. Some negative feedback noted that cutaways sometimes lacked relevance and the print ad was less professional than other parts. Going forward, the creator would conduct more research, improve cutaway relevance, and ensure consistent professional quality across productions.Chris evaluation 3
Chris evaluation 3BBRCMedia
油
The document discusses feedback received on various parts of a music video project. For the initial song idea, feedback indicated the chosen song did not fit the group's style and suggested rap music instead. The group then selected the song "Whole Lotta Lovin" by Travis Scott. Feedback on a proposed album digipack was mostly positive, though some said it was boring. Teacher feedback on magazine ads helped improve a dull first draft. Peer feedback on an early edit of the music video said it was over-edited; the group simplified the edit while keeping branding colors. Feedback on the second draft said it was polished enough as a final product.Q3.
Q3.victoriakadri
油
The document discusses feedback received from the target audience of a documentary produced by the author. The feedback focused on how well the documentary followed conventions of the genre, with positive feedback on the use of cutaways and editing transitions. Audience members also felt the inclusion of the production logo made the documentary seem professional. However, feedback indicated that phone interviews included in the documentary were weak and not enjoyable to watch. Overall, the author felt the documentary was successful in engaging the target audience, while also learning areas for improvement in future productions.Evaluation Q3 Survey Monkey
Evaluation Q3 Survey Monkeyyasminthompson01
油
The document summarizes feedback received from an audience on a music video. It discusses the demographics of the respondents, their ratings of the video, and their opinions on how well the visuals matched the song. The feedback validated some of the creative choices made in the video, such as matching the visuals to the lyrics, and helped identify areas for improvement, like scenes that were too dark or overexposed. Overall the feedback improved the creators' confidence in the video by highlighting what worked well and providing suggestions to make it even stronger.Evaluation Question 3
Evaluation Question 3Rolandthe88
油
What have you learned from your audience feedback?
Why does the film industry spend so much time and money test screening films to invited audiences or finding out what audiences like through market research?
Who are your audience? Justify this with reference to your primary and secondary audience research.
At what stages did you ask your audience questions or get their feedback?
How did you get this feedback?
How did you use this feedback? Was it useful? Did you make any changes to your work because of it?
What does the final audience feedback suggest about the success of your marketing campaign?Evaluation question 3 
Evaluation question 3 servais_coulber
油
Whilst completing their first draft, the filmmakers found audience feedback to be key to developing their music video product. They used surveys on Survey Monkey before and during the drafting process to gather feedback on aspects like music genre, clothing, location, pacing of edits, and ways to improve. Sharing the surveys on social media like Facebook allowed them to reach a wider target audience of 15-30 year olds. This feedback helped inform the infrastructure and analysis of their music video.Eval q3
Eval q3jessskinn
油
The document discusses feedback received from target audiences on a music video project. Initial questionnaires helped establish that the target audience preferred a narrative-based video set in countryside locations, featuring varied shot types and a strong, independent female star. Further feedback on rough cuts was positive about specific shots and that the narrative was understood. A final questionnaire found that performance shots clearly identified the star, there were enough close-ups, most understood the narrative, and the editing was clear. Feedback will help strengthen future projects.Q3 - Evaluation
Q3 - Evaluationerinwarren97
油
The document discusses feedback the student received from peers on coursework. They presented drafts to classmates and received suggestions for small improvements. This feedback helped the student think creatively and improve their work. The student also conducted a questionnaire for their documentary project, asking about preferred documentary styles. Most respondents preferred a mix of observational footage and interviews. Based on this feedback, the student decided on a style similar to a particular TV show. They incorporated music and factual narration as suggested. Overall, the peer feedback helped the student understand their audience and create a documentary that met most viewers' preferences.Q3 - Evaluation
Q3 - Evaluationerinwarren97
油
The document discusses feedback the student received from peers on coursework. They presented drafts to classmates and received suggestions for small improvements. This feedback helped the student think creatively and improve their work. The student also conducted a questionnaire for their documentary project, asking about preferred documentary styles. Most respondents preferred a mix of observational footage and interviews. Based on this feedback, the student decided on a style similar to a particular TV show. The feedback ensured the student was creating what their target audience wanted.Media evaluation 3
Media evaluation 3Yume13
油
The document discusses feedback received from audiences on various media projects. It indicates that triangulating questionnaires, interviews, and social media provided both qualitative and quantitative data. Random sampling was also used. Feedback on a music video helped identify what the target audience liked and disliked, allowing improvements. Audience input also helped strengthen the design of promotional materials like a digipak and magazine advert. The document concludes that audience feedback is essential for creating effective media products tailored to target markets.Evaluation task 3(part 3) *revised
Evaluation task 3(part 3) *revisedVSOP_K
油
The document summarizes feedback received from a focus group and online survey about a music video. Key findings include:
- Male focus group members did not like the "girly" scenery in the video, while female members enjoyed the simple scenery.
- Focus groups provide a lot of fast, cheap qualitative data but responses can be influenced by others.
- Online statistics identified the audience's gender but not preferences.
- The video successfully targeted female audiences through its indie pop style with pink/purple colors and balloons.
- Most said they would buy the product (album) after seeing the video, though it did not appeal to some male viewers.Evaluation - Question Three 
Evaluation - Question Three LucyBennett10
油
Through audience feedback on social media platforms and interviews, the document summarizes what was learned about the promotional package created for a band. Feedback indicated that the music video's editing, storyline, and live performance elements were effective overall. The digipak and magazine ad were praised for their simple yet eye-catching designs that matched the retro punk style. Suggestions included making the storyline and genre conventions in the video clearer and redesigning one graphic element digitally for consistency.Evaluation - Question 3
Evaluation - Question 3erinwarren97
油
The document discusses feedback the student received from peers on coursework projects. For ancillary tasks, peers provided feedback by reviewing each other's work and identifying small fixes and improvements. This helped the student think creatively and improve. For a documentary project, the student created a survey to understand audience preferences. Responses showed a preference for a style similar to a factual medical documentary, with music, interviews, and voiceovers. Peer feedback helped the student narrow their documentary choices to better match the target audience.Evaluation 3
Evaluation 3LewisSaunderson
油
The student collected audience feedback on their music video project in several ways, including online surveys, screenshots shared over text, and showing the video to a test group. The feedback was generally positive and helped the student learn that a simple, limited color design was preferred. Viewers also noted the difference in video quality between footage shot on different cameras. While most comments were constructive, the student was pleased with the feedback overall and felt it would help them improve future video projects by better understanding their target audience's expectations.L3 cmpt y2 evaluation template (1)
L3 cmpt y2 evaluation template (1)JayBrown42459
油
This evaluation template guides students to evaluate their projects in a structured way. It prompts students to provide an overview of their project, describe their research, ideas, and outcomes. It also has them reflect on how they felt during the process, challenges they faced, and what they learned. Feedback from peers is discussed. Areas for improvement are identified, such as using more concise interviews. Skills development and next steps are considered, such as searching online for skills tutorials.Evaluation 3
Evaluation 3samjewiss
油
Samantha obtained feedback on her music video, digipak, and magazine advertisement from a focus group of 10 people who evaluated the projects. The focus group consisted mainly of females aged 16-20 from Harlow who listened to acoustic rock. Feedback was positive for elements like props and costumes but identified areas for improvement like some shot types, lighting, and font readability. Overall the projects worked well together capturing the theme of "distance and journey" but could be made more eye-catching and professional with experimentation and technical skills.Media evaluation q3
Media evaluation q3MM161195
油
The document discusses feedback received from test screenings of a film project for a class. It provides details on:
1) Conducting test screenings of a teaser trailer and pitch presentation for a class to get feedback from a target audience of 15-25 year olds.
2) Using the feedback to improve weak points in the teaser, magazine cover, and poster based on audience comments.
3) The feedback being very useful for refining the project and seeing how the target audience initially responds to ideas before further development.Factual proposal
Factual proposalollytaylor1
油
Olly Taylor proposes a documentary web series pilot episode about breakdancing and its impact on culture and people's lives. The target audience is 16-20 years old. Olly has skills in editing, filming, and documentary making from previous projects and will use these skills to create a visually appealing, informative documentary that appeals to a wide audience. Olly will research breakdancing, documentaries, and filmmaking techniques to improve the professionalism and quality of the work. Progress will be evaluated through weekly forms, feedback from peers and teachers, and self-reflection.QUESTION 3 EVALUATION QUESTION 
QUESTION 3 EVALUATION QUESTION 10diapers
油
The document discusses what Kate and Sophia learned from conducting audience research on their music video. They interviewed friends and classmates and received both positive and constructive feedback. The positive feedback indicated that the story was understandable and the message was clear. The constructive feedback focused on improving camerawork and adding another character to clarify the narrative. Conducting audience research helped them identify ways to strengthen the video and ensure the intended message came across clearly.Evaluation Task 3: What have you learned from your audience feedback?
Evaluation Task 3: What have you learned from your audience feedback?Evelyn Wandernoth
油
The document discusses audience feedback received on a music publicity campaign project. It describes conducting research through surveys, focus groups, and getting opinions from peers, teachers, and outsiders. Key feedback included making the website more navigable and including missing elements like the music video. This helped refine the website, music video, and CD design. The feedback showed the transition in the music video was effective but some elements needed clarification. Overall, the feedback process allowed improvements to be made and ensured the project elements worked cohesively together.More Related Content
What's hot (20)
Evaluation 3
Evaluation 3PreciousCaitlyn
油
- The document discusses gathering feedback from a target audience of 12-30 year olds for a short film about a character undergoing chemotherapy.
- Pre-production, the filmmakers created an online questionnaire to understand how the audience felt about the title, narrative, and concept. Most respondents were 12-16 years old.
- Based on feedback, the filmmakers expanded the number of relatable characters.
- Post-production, another questionnaire gathered feedback on adjustments made. Social media was used to promote to the young adult audience.
- Receiving criticism of initial work helped improve ancillary materials and the film. The filmmaker incorporated feedback to create a stronger final product.Evaluation 3
Evaluation 3PreciousCaitlyn
油
The document discusses the filmmakers' target audience research and feedback gathering process. Their target audience was males and females aged 12-30 based on the film's 12A rating. They created pre-production and post-production questionnaires to gather feedback on the title, narrative, characters, and overall film. Most respondents were aged 12-16, so they focused social media marketing on platforms popular with teenagers. Receiving and applying this audience feedback helped strengthen the film and ancillary materials.Evaluation- Question 3
Evaluation- Question 3cw00531169
油
The document summarizes feedback received from audiences on a documentary about sweets. The feedback was overall positive and showed that the documentary was more informative than entertaining, though the main purpose was to inform. Some negative feedback noted that cutaways sometimes lacked relevance and the print ad was less professional than other parts. Going forward, the creator would conduct more research, improve cutaway relevance, and ensure consistent professional quality across productions.Chris evaluation 3
Chris evaluation 3BBRCMedia
油
The document discusses feedback received on various parts of a music video project. For the initial song idea, feedback indicated the chosen song did not fit the group's style and suggested rap music instead. The group then selected the song "Whole Lotta Lovin" by Travis Scott. Feedback on a proposed album digipack was mostly positive, though some said it was boring. Teacher feedback on magazine ads helped improve a dull first draft. Peer feedback on an early edit of the music video said it was over-edited; the group simplified the edit while keeping branding colors. Feedback on the second draft said it was polished enough as a final product.Q3.
Q3.victoriakadri
油
The document discusses feedback received from the target audience of a documentary produced by the author. The feedback focused on how well the documentary followed conventions of the genre, with positive feedback on the use of cutaways and editing transitions. Audience members also felt the inclusion of the production logo made the documentary seem professional. However, feedback indicated that phone interviews included in the documentary were weak and not enjoyable to watch. Overall, the author felt the documentary was successful in engaging the target audience, while also learning areas for improvement in future productions.Evaluation Q3 Survey Monkey
Evaluation Q3 Survey Monkeyyasminthompson01
油
The document summarizes feedback received from an audience on a music video. It discusses the demographics of the respondents, their ratings of the video, and their opinions on how well the visuals matched the song. The feedback validated some of the creative choices made in the video, such as matching the visuals to the lyrics, and helped identify areas for improvement, like scenes that were too dark or overexposed. Overall the feedback improved the creators' confidence in the video by highlighting what worked well and providing suggestions to make it even stronger.Evaluation Question 3
Evaluation Question 3Rolandthe88
油
What have you learned from your audience feedback?
Why does the film industry spend so much time and money test screening films to invited audiences or finding out what audiences like through market research?
Who are your audience? Justify this with reference to your primary and secondary audience research.
At what stages did you ask your audience questions or get their feedback?
How did you get this feedback?
How did you use this feedback? Was it useful? Did you make any changes to your work because of it?
What does the final audience feedback suggest about the success of your marketing campaign?Evaluation question 3
Evaluation question 3 servais_coulber
油
Whilst completing their first draft, the filmmakers found audience feedback to be key to developing their music video product. They used surveys on Survey Monkey before and during the drafting process to gather feedback on aspects like music genre, clothing, location, pacing of edits, and ways to improve. Sharing the surveys on social media like Facebook allowed them to reach a wider target audience of 15-30 year olds. This feedback helped inform the infrastructure and analysis of their music video.Eval q3
Eval q3jessskinn
油
The document discusses feedback received from target audiences on a music video project. Initial questionnaires helped establish that the target audience preferred a narrative-based video set in countryside locations, featuring varied shot types and a strong, independent female star. Further feedback on rough cuts was positive about specific shots and that the narrative was understood. A final questionnaire found that performance shots clearly identified the star, there were enough close-ups, most understood the narrative, and the editing was clear. Feedback will help strengthen future projects.Q3 - Evaluation
Q3 - Evaluationerinwarren97
油
The document discusses feedback the student received from peers on coursework. They presented drafts to classmates and received suggestions for small improvements. This feedback helped the student think creatively and improve their work. The student also conducted a questionnaire for their documentary project, asking about preferred documentary styles. Most respondents preferred a mix of observational footage and interviews. Based on this feedback, the student decided on a style similar to a particular TV show. They incorporated music and factual narration as suggested. Overall, the peer feedback helped the student understand their audience and create a documentary that met most viewers' preferences.Q3 - Evaluation
Q3 - Evaluationerinwarren97
油
The document discusses feedback the student received from peers on coursework. They presented drafts to classmates and received suggestions for small improvements. This feedback helped the student think creatively and improve their work. The student also conducted a questionnaire for their documentary project, asking about preferred documentary styles. Most respondents preferred a mix of observational footage and interviews. Based on this feedback, the student decided on a style similar to a particular TV show. The feedback ensured the student was creating what their target audience wanted.Media evaluation 3
Media evaluation 3Yume13
油
The document discusses feedback received from audiences on various media projects. It indicates that triangulating questionnaires, interviews, and social media provided both qualitative and quantitative data. Random sampling was also used. Feedback on a music video helped identify what the target audience liked and disliked, allowing improvements. Audience input also helped strengthen the design of promotional materials like a digipak and magazine advert. The document concludes that audience feedback is essential for creating effective media products tailored to target markets.Evaluation task 3(part 3) *revised
Evaluation task 3(part 3) *revisedVSOP_K
油
The document summarizes feedback received from a focus group and online survey about a music video. Key findings include:
- Male focus group members did not like the "girly" scenery in the video, while female members enjoyed the simple scenery.
- Focus groups provide a lot of fast, cheap qualitative data but responses can be influenced by others.
- Online statistics identified the audience's gender but not preferences.
- The video successfully targeted female audiences through its indie pop style with pink/purple colors and balloons.
- Most said they would buy the product (album) after seeing the video, though it did not appeal to some male viewers.Evaluation - Question Three
Evaluation - Question Three LucyBennett10
油
Through audience feedback on social media platforms and interviews, the document summarizes what was learned about the promotional package created for a band. Feedback indicated that the music video's editing, storyline, and live performance elements were effective overall. The digipak and magazine ad were praised for their simple yet eye-catching designs that matched the retro punk style. Suggestions included making the storyline and genre conventions in the video clearer and redesigning one graphic element digitally for consistency.Evaluation - Question 3
Evaluation - Question 3erinwarren97
油
The document discusses feedback the student received from peers on coursework projects. For ancillary tasks, peers provided feedback by reviewing each other's work and identifying small fixes and improvements. This helped the student think creatively and improve. For a documentary project, the student created a survey to understand audience preferences. Responses showed a preference for a style similar to a factual medical documentary, with music, interviews, and voiceovers. Peer feedback helped the student narrow their documentary choices to better match the target audience.Evaluation 3
Evaluation 3LewisSaunderson
油
The student collected audience feedback on their music video project in several ways, including online surveys, screenshots shared over text, and showing the video to a test group. The feedback was generally positive and helped the student learn that a simple, limited color design was preferred. Viewers also noted the difference in video quality between footage shot on different cameras. While most comments were constructive, the student was pleased with the feedback overall and felt it would help them improve future video projects by better understanding their target audience's expectations.L3 cmpt y2 evaluation template (1)
L3 cmpt y2 evaluation template (1)JayBrown42459
油
This evaluation template guides students to evaluate their projects in a structured way. It prompts students to provide an overview of their project, describe their research, ideas, and outcomes. It also has them reflect on how they felt during the process, challenges they faced, and what they learned. Feedback from peers is discussed. Areas for improvement are identified, such as using more concise interviews. Skills development and next steps are considered, such as searching online for skills tutorials.Evaluation 3
Evaluation 3samjewiss
油
Samantha obtained feedback on her music video, digipak, and magazine advertisement from a focus group of 10 people who evaluated the projects. The focus group consisted mainly of females aged 16-20 from Harlow who listened to acoustic rock. Feedback was positive for elements like props and costumes but identified areas for improvement like some shot types, lighting, and font readability. Overall the projects worked well together capturing the theme of "distance and journey" but could be made more eye-catching and professional with experimentation and technical skills.Media evaluation q3
Media evaluation q3MM161195
油
The document discusses feedback received from test screenings of a film project for a class. It provides details on:
1) Conducting test screenings of a teaser trailer and pitch presentation for a class to get feedback from a target audience of 15-25 year olds.
2) Using the feedback to improve weak points in the teaser, magazine cover, and poster based on audience comments.
3) The feedback being very useful for refining the project and seeing how the target audience initially responds to ideas before further development.Factual proposal
Factual proposalollytaylor1
油
Olly Taylor proposes a documentary web series pilot episode about breakdancing and its impact on culture and people's lives. The target audience is 16-20 years old. Olly has skills in editing, filming, and documentary making from previous projects and will use these skills to create a visually appealing, informative documentary that appeals to a wide audience. Olly will research breakdancing, documentaries, and filmmaking techniques to improve the professionalism and quality of the work. Progress will be evaluated through weekly forms, feedback from peers and teachers, and self-reflection.Similar to Evaluation (20)
QUESTION 3 EVALUATION QUESTION
QUESTION 3 EVALUATION QUESTION 10diapers
油
The document discusses what Kate and Sophia learned from conducting audience research on their music video. They interviewed friends and classmates and received both positive and constructive feedback. The positive feedback indicated that the story was understandable and the message was clear. The constructive feedback focused on improving camerawork and adding another character to clarify the narrative. Conducting audience research helped them identify ways to strengthen the video and ensure the intended message came across clearly.Evaluation Task 3: What have you learned from your audience feedback?
Evaluation Task 3: What have you learned from your audience feedback?Evelyn Wandernoth
油
The document discusses audience feedback received on a music publicity campaign project. It describes conducting research through surveys, focus groups, and getting opinions from peers, teachers, and outsiders. Key feedback included making the website more navigable and including missing elements like the music video. This helped refine the website, music video, and CD design. The feedback showed the transition in the music video was effective but some elements needed clarification. Overall, the feedback process allowed improvements to be made and ensured the project elements worked cohesively together.Evaluation question three
Evaluation question threejamiefisher1994
油
The document discusses audience feedback that was received throughout the process of creating a music production package. They identified their target audience as being predominantly 17-25 years old, with slightly more males than females. Feedback was collected through questionnaires, surveys, and verbal comments, which helped shape the production package to meet the target audience's likes and demands. The feedback informed the planning and editing of the music video. A second online questionnaire and views on YouTube generated further positive feedback, with only minor changes made in response to comments. Overall, the audience feedback was crucial to producing a video that the target audience would enjoy.Evaluation question 3 finished
Evaluation question 3 finishedjamiefisher1994
油
The document discusses the importance of audience feedback in developing their music production package. They identified their target audience as predominantly 17-25 year olds, with slightly more males than females. They conducted surveys and questionnaires to better understand their target audience and shape their music video and print materials accordingly. The feedback confirmed that their audience preferred the video without lyrics and to be fast-paced. They incorporated audience ideas in planning and editing the video. A second online survey received positive feedback, indicating the video appealed to their target audience. Overall, the document states they realized the importance of audience feedback to create a video their target audience would enjoy.Evaluation question 3
Evaluation question 3lewiscorbett
油
The document discusses audience feedback received on a documentary, radio trailer, and magazine double page spread created by the author. For the documentary, feedback indicated that sound levels needed balancing in some areas and that more "vox pops" could have been included. Feedback on the radio trailer suggested speaking was slightly too fast in places. Criticism of the magazine listing included that it had too much blank space, the main image did not adequately anchor the content, and it lacked color. Overall, the audience feedback provided useful insights that confirmed some choices while also revealing areas that could be improved.Q3
Q3matt1234mh
油
The document discusses feedback received from the audience on a media project. It describes conducting a focus group with the target audience to get in-depth feedback on aspects like location and costumes. A questionnaire was also used to get audience opinions on mock-ups, helping decide which designs to pursue. While social media feedback was positive, it lacked constructive comments. Verbal feedback sessions on video edits proved most useful, providing suggestions to tighten shots, add humor, and avoid obvious endings. This feedback helped strengthen the project.Evaluation Question 3
Evaluation Question 3elaboscabbo
油
The document summarizes feedback received from audiences on student work, including a music video, digipak, and advert. Feedback was received through YouTube comments, Facebook, and interviews. YouTube feedback noted good editing, mise-en-scene, and relatability. Interviews praised the music video's storyline, flow, and genre conventions. Areas for improvement included adding more closure, thoughtful mise-en-scene, and stronger musical links. Students learned that anonymous feedback may provide more honest criticism to further improve their work.A2 Media Audience research - Dilraj Singh
A2 Media Audience research - Dilraj SinghDilzLDN
油
Dilraj Singh conducted audience research through a questionnaire to understand what type of music sixth formers and staff enjoyed. The questionnaire found that most of the intended audience was between 16-18 years old and consisted of equal males and females. It also revealed that the audience prefers finding new music on social media and learning about artists this way. The responses helped the filmmaker understand that the audience would prefer a concept-based music video with a storyline and creative/unique elements that have a deeper meaning. This provided guidance on the type of narrative and style that would appeal most to the intended viewers.Q3; part 2- what have you learned from your audience feedback?
Q3; part 2- what have you learned from your audience feedback?maddiepluck
油
The document discusses feedback received at various stages of a film marketing campaign. At the pitch presentation, feedback was positive about the clarity of the idea and taglines, though concerns were raised about filming large party scenes. Rough cut feedback identified needed improvements. The final screening comments on YouTube praised conveying teen drama conventions and intriguing storyline. The feedback throughout helped ensure the film and marketing appealed to the target teenage audience, suggesting the marketing campaign was successful.Q3 part 2- receiving audience feedback
Q3 part 2- receiving audience feedbackmaddiepluck
油
The document discusses feedback received at various stages of a film marketing campaign. At the pitch presentation, feedback was positive about the clarity of the idea and taglines, though concerns were raised about filming large party scenes. Rough cut feedback identified needed improvements. The final screening comments on YouTube praised conveying teen drama conventions and intriguing storyline. The feedback validated that the marketing successfully targeted the intended 16-21 year old audience.Evaluation q 3
Evaluation q 329104zoe
油
Throughout their project, the document discusses how the authors obtained feedback from their target audience at various stages to help shape and refine their music video and ancillary materials. They presented initial ideas to audience members, posted their ideas online to get broader feedback, distributed a questionnaire, held feedback sessions on their first draft, and questioned the audience on memorable aspects of the final video. This audience feedback helped the authors identify popular themes, understand audience preferences, clarify the narrative, and develop memorable elements to establish their artist's brand identity. The feedback ensured their final products matched audience expectations and were clearly positioned within the appropriate music genre conventions.What have you learned from audience feedback
What have you learned from audience feedbackKealanForrest
油
The document discusses audience feedback received at various stages of creating a film trailer, poster, and magazine cover. Initial questionnaires helped shape the trailer content to match audience interests like mystery, action, and darkness. Early trailer feedback identified needed improvements like clarifying confusing scenes. Later positive feedback validated the trailer changes. Poster and cover feedback led to minor adjustments. Overall, engaging the target young male audience provided essential guidance that strengthened the promotional materials.What have you learnt from your audience feedback
What have you learnt from your audience feedbackYasmeen Melius
油
The document discusses feedback received from audiences on various projects. It describes pitching music video and print product ideas to classes and receiving suggestions to consider lighting, locations, and design simplicity. Feedback from a BTEC group confirmed understanding of the music video concept but noted more lip syncing could be added. An online survey provided positive feedback on print product inserts linking to the music video. Overall, the feedback helped improve the projects and see different perspectives.Evaluation Question 3
Evaluation Question 3aragorn337
油
The document discusses feedback received during the production of a music video. [1] Initial audience feedback in pre-production suggested including some narrative or storyline and a masked character. [2] Based on further research, the target audience was found to be interested in a mysterious progressive metal video that went against pop music conventions. [3] Post-production questionnaires indicated the audience was engaged by the video, which featured the masked character and broke conventions as intended.Media Studies - Evaluation Question 3
Media Studies - Evaluation Question 3Aidan Emberton
油
The document discusses how audience feedback shaped the development of a media project at various stages:
- Research identified the target audience as "high aspiration, low economic status" young people interested in rap music.
- Planning incorporated audience preferences like including a message in the video and choosing a suitable font.
- Feedback on preliminary work helped refine techniques like editing to the beat.
- The final product's questionnaire showed most respondents understood the anti-drinking message and felt the multi-media elements were well-matched, suggesting the goals were successfully achieved.Q3 Media Evaluation
Q3 Media Evaluationrhiannc
油
The document discusses methods used to gather target audience feedback for a music video project, including focus groups and questionnaires. It analyzes the effectiveness of these methods and identifies areas for improvement. Specifically, focus groups provided useful insights but could have benefited from more participants with media knowledge. Questionnaires had mixed success due to some irrelevant questions and would have been better conducted digitally. Overall, the feedback informed changes to the narrative and representation, but conducting additional focus groups throughout the process may have further strengthened the project.Evaluation question three
Evaluation question threeLayla Dunthorne
油
The document summarizes the results of a questionnaire and online feedback the creator received about a music video. The feedback showed that most audiences enjoyed the video and thought the length was just right. The balloon scene was commonly cited as the favorite part, while a darker scene was seen as the weakest. Most felt the camera work, editing, genre, and costumes were effective. The feedback provided insights on how to improve future videos.What have you learnt from your audience feedback
What have you learnt from your audience feedbackYasmeen Melius
油
Yasmeen collected feedback on her work from peers through pitches and surveys. The feedback helped her improve her ideas by considering things like lighting, camera shots, and being aware of the public. Her music video was also reviewed by a BTEC group who said it was easy to understand but could have used more lip syncing. Feedback on print products noted that her magazine ad was too simple and dull, while covers were also too simple. However, inserts in her print package that linked to the music video were liked. Overall the feedback from multiple sources helped her gain different perspectives.Evaluation q3
Evaluation q3Stefania Atupe
油
Audience feedback is important for media products as it allows producers to ensure financial success, understand audience desires, tailor products to consumers, improve weaknesses, and market successfully. For films, test screenings allow audiences to view drafts and provide feedback, which helps producers determine what works and what needs changes. While questionnaires provide quantitative data on likes and dislikes, focus groups and test audiences give qualitative feedback on specifics. Social media allows for honest opinions through anonymity. The filmmakers obtained feedback through peer screenings and Instagram polls on posters to improve their film and marketing.Evaluation- Question 3 (Final)
Evaluation- Question 3 (Final)Emily_Field
油
The document discusses the target audience and feedback for a music video. It aimed the video at 16-24 year old females based on a survey. The feedback showed most viewers thought the target audience was successfully portrayed. However, some found the narrative ambiguous. Suggestions included adding characters or shots to clarify the themes of escapism and mental instability. Overall the feedback indicated few improvements were needed and the target marketing was successful.Evaluation
- 2. Q1 In what ways does your media product use, develop or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?
- 3. Q2 How effective is the combination of your main product and ancillary texts?
- 4. What have you learned from your audience feedback? We needed to find out what our target audience liked and disliked not only in music videos but also in our ideas for our music video. Its really important to find out what your audience think because in the end - they are the ones who are going to be judging it, and its also really helpful to gain ideas from people outside of the class who dont have experience of media.
- 5. One way we gained audience feedback was by creating an audience questionnaire to find out what our target audience liked to see in a music video. Another way we gained audience feedback was to film some of our peers watching our draft video and then to film them whilst asking what they did and didnt like about our music video. Doing these things really helped us decide some specific decisions and it gave us an overview of the atmosphere our video should give.
- 6. Audience questionnaire So to get an idea of what our audience liked to see in a music video we created an audience questionnaire this really helped when we were coming up with initial ideas of what to add into our music video. We asked questions that we felt could help us with aspects we were perhaps stuck on or needed specific ideas for such as which of these do you look for and enjoy in a music video? with a choice of answers they could tick! To analyze these we put the answers together and used PowerPoint to add all our findings into an easily readable technology
- 7. Filming reactions So we chose four random people in our year group to take a look at our draft version of our music video, we filmed them watching this so we could look for any specific reactions and then we asked them if there were any particular moments which they liked or disliked. These were really helpful for us, even though to begin with we werent happy with our draft and didnt feel confident in showing any of our peers yet we are really happy we did as it helped us out a lot in what we needed to change in our music video and what was working effectively.
- 8. Basically what we did with the videos is re watched them and noted down specific things that our peers said needed to be changed and what worked well; What we took from their feedback; I understood the story well this was an important factor for us as we had previously been told our story was not clear. Wasnt too cheesy you know its meant to be cheesy again this is something we were worried about and so it was good to know it came across as meant to be cheesy. There were a few blank parts when I thought it had finished we hadnt yet completed filming and still had about 3 shots to film so this is understandable The first time Ryan and Will come in Im not sure if its in sync we looked at this and it seems as we were editing we accidently moved this shot forward a small amount.
- 9. Conclusion; what we learned from audience feedback Overall we both found the audience feedback really helpful however if we were to do this project again heres what we would do differently; - Hold a focus group and ask more in depth questions to our target audience - Post our draft music video on a social networking site such as facebook to get a wider range of views, perhaps of people who dont attend our school and of a wider age range - Create an audience questionnaire prior to creating our ancillary tasks specifically for them as this would have given us more of a starting idea for our digi packs.