Evaluation question 3
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
1 like•188 views
The document summarizes feedback received from an audience of 15 people who viewed a documentary, listened to a radio trailer, and looked at a double page spread created by the author. The audience completed an anonymous 12 question survey. The author tallied the feedback and presented it in graphs showing what aspects of the projects the audience liked and suggested changing. Overall, the feedback was positive, with most audience members enjoying the documentary and radio trailer and not wanting to change anything. The feedback will help the author improve future media projects.
1 of 16
Download to read offline
Recommended
Audience research
Audience researchlowriwilliams
Ìý
A questionnaire was conducted to gain insight into what people want from music videos. It asked 16 questions about music preferences, how people access and listen to music, and their opinions on music videos, artists' images, and album packaging. Most respondents reported enjoying listening to music, preferring pop, rock, and rap genres, and accessing music daily on YouTube or iTunes. Many felt an artist's image and branding should be consistent across music videos, album packaging, and advertising.Questionnaire Chart
Questionnaire Chartsophchapperz
Ìý
The document appears to be the results of a survey about a music video. Respondents indicated that the video suits the indie/alternative genre, most would watch it all the way through, some would change things, a narrative may have made it more effective, it has an unconventional look, and many would watch it again.Questionnaire Chart
Questionnaire Chartsophchapperz
Ìý
The document appears to be the results of a survey about a music video. Respondents indicated that the video suits the indie/alternative genre, most would watch it all the way through, some would change things, a narrative may have made it more effective, it has an unconventional look, and many would watch it again.Audience feedback graphs
Audience feedback graphspreverm1
Ìý
The document appears to be feedback from audience questionnaires about a country music magazine. Respondents answered questions about whether they liked the cover, contents page, double page spread, and overall production. Overall, most respondents indicated that they liked the design elements, thought the magazine looked professional, and would consider purchasing it.How did you attract
How did you attractniamh_l
Ìý
The document summarizes feedback from audience members who viewed the opening sequence of a student film. Questionnaires and interviews were conducted after the screening. Based on the feedback, most audience members did not understand the storyline or feel that the opening sequence set up the film well. They also had issues with the titles, sound, and editing. However, the genre of the film was clear. The students will make changes to address the issues, like developing the story more and improving editing.A2 Media Evaluation- Question 3
A2 Media Evaluation- Question 3sophiedainty171
Ìý
The candidate learned the following from audience feedback on their music video, magazine advert, and digipak:
- Most of the audience preferred a music video shot in a variety of locations rather than the same location. They felt the black and white style was effective but some color may have improved certain parts of the video.
- Feedback on the magazine advert and digipak was mostly positive, though some felt the video and packaging could be improved in aspects like lighting, close-ups, and screen dimensions.
- Ratings of the video, advert and digipak ranged from 5-10 on a scale of 1-10, with the highest ratings for the magazine advert and most room for improvement felt forHow did you attract
How did you attractReeyahh Miller'
Ìý
The document summarizes audience feedback from a screening of an opening film sequence. Survey questions addressed whether the editing was clear, the storyline understandable, the genre identifiable, the sound and images worked well together, and if it felt like a beginning. Most audience members agreed the editing, storyline, sound/images worked well and it felt like a beginning, though some disagreed. Overall the feedback was positive.How did you attract the audience
How did you attract the audiencegabz93
Ìý
The document summarizes the results of a survey of 21 people who viewed an opening film sequence. Based on their responses, the majority agreed that the editing suited the film and helped establish the genre. Most people were also able to identify that it was an opening sequence and understood the storyline. The sound worked well with the images. All viewers were able to determine the genre of the film from the opening. Overall the feedback was positive but some suggested improving the visual style like lighting.Question four
Question foura2columnd12
Ìý
Most of the research for the documentary was conducted online and through services like Netflix. Planning included creating a schedule and storyboard. Final Cut Express was used to edit footage, though exporting was sometimes problematic. InDesign allowed professional magazine layout but had a steep learning curve. Garageband was too simple for the radio trailer. Hardware like video cameras, microphones, and headphones were also needed.
Media Analysis of Magazine Articles
Media Analysis of Magazine Articlesa2columnd12
Ìý
This document provides an analysis of the layout and design elements used across two magazine article spreads about television programs. The spreads utilize various techniques to engage readers such as large colorful headers, witty subheaders, rule of thirds composition, related images placed near corresponding text, and boxes with cast information. The goal is to quickly inform readers about the programs and entice them to watch through visual interest and brief informative snippets.Media
Mediaa2columnd12
Ìý
The document discusses how the filmmakers analyzed conventions used in camera work, sound, editing, and composition in other documentaries to inform their own documentary production. They studied techniques like handheld camera for interviews and tripod shots for formal interviews. They also applied conventions like background music, rule of thirds framing, fading transitions, and voiceovers in their documentary and radio trailer to make their pieces more professional. The conclusion states they adhered to documentary, radio, and magazine conventions without challenging norms.Evaluation question 2
Evaluation question 2a2columnd12
Ìý
The document discusses the effectiveness of combining a documentary on cyberbullying with ancillary texts, including a double page article spread and radio trailer. It finds that using consistent quotes, images, and content across the different mediums creates brand recognition and reinforces the key messages without giving too much information away. Both the double page spread and radio trailer are intended to pique audience interest in the documentary and educate them on cyberbullying issues. The products are found to complement each other well while leaving viewers wanting to learn more from the full documentary.Evaluation question 1
Evaluation question 1a2columnd12
Ìý
The document discusses how a student media project used and developed conventions of real media forms while also challenging some conventions. The project involved creating a TV documentary, radio trailer, and double page magazine spread about cyber bullying. While most conventions were followed, such as interviews and camera shots, some were challenged, like using fades between clips instead of straight cuts. Overall the goal was to make the pieces look professional while allowing some flexibility.Evaluation - Question Three
Evaluation - Question ThreeShaf Rahman
Ìý
The document summarizes feedback from 15 people who viewed the documentary, listened to the radio trailer, and read the magazine article. Most said they would continue watching the full documentary. Responses to the quality of interviews and flow of the documentary were positive. While most felt the sound suited the topic, some thought the music was too upbeat. Minor changes like adding background music and speeding up the start were suggested. All felt the documentary effectively raised awareness of cyberbullying as intended. The radio trailer and article were also well-received except a few thought the trailer too slow. Gaining audience perspective provided useful insights and confirmed the documentary met its goal of informing viewers about cyberbullying.Evaluation 3
Evaluation 3a2columne12
Ìý
The document summarizes feedback from an audience questionnaire about a documentary. Key findings include:
- Respondents generally rated the documentary highly in holding attention and having balanced sound.
- All respondents said they could relate to the documentary and found the expert interview extracts informative, despite being younger than the target age.
- Respondents also positively rated the double page article layout, use of conventions, and radio trailer.
- Feedback suggests minor improvements could be made to sound levels, color use, and including more extracts in the radio trailer. Overall though, the audience feedback was positive about how the documentary and supporting materials were put together.Evaluation Question 3
Evaluation Question 3a2colc13
Ìý
The document summarizes audience feedback from questionnaires distributed during the planning and evaluation of a documentary project. The questionnaires provided information that helped shape the documentary, such as focusing on the topic of cannabis legalization and airing it on Channel 4 based on audience preferences. Feedback on the completed documentary, radio advertisement, and magazine spread was overwhelmingly positive, showing that the products achieved their goals of being informative, professional, and entertaining for the target audience. While the data from questionnaires was mostly quantitative, focus groups could have provided more qualitative insight. Minor issues like inconsistent sound levels and a few spelling errors were noted, but overall the audience feedback was very helpful for creating audience-focused and successful final products.Evaluation question three
Evaluation question threea2columne12
Ìý
The audience feedback provided useful insights for the documentary makers. Most viewers found the documentary, double page spread article, and radio trailer engaging and well-put together. However, some noted that adding more sports footage and ensuring balanced sound levels could further improve the documentary. While most colors were effective, some felt more variety in the article's colors was needed. Extracting additional quotes for the radio trailer may also strengthen it. Overall, the feedback confirmed that the intended professional tone was achieved across all three final products.Q3
Q3a2colc13
Ìý
The document summarizes feedback from an audience questionnaire about a documentary, radio trailer, and magazine produced by the author. The feedback showed that the background music and voiceover in the radio trailer were well-received by 90% and 100% of viewers respectively. However, 10% of viewers did not feel the radio trailer prompted them to watch the documentary. Similarly for the magazine, 80% found it eye-catching but 20% did not, and only 60% wanted to watch the documentary based on the magazine. For the documentary itself, 90% found the music relevant and every viewer felt they learned something, but 10% lost interest at times. The voiceover was clear to all viewers.Question 3
Question 3asmediag12
Ìý
The document provides feedback from questionnaires distributed to the target audience of a documentary project. For the documentary, most of the audience found the opening suitable and attention-grabbing. They enjoyed the stock footage, reconstruction, and expert interviews. For the radio trailer, most rated it highly and found the voiceover clear though the music could be too loud. Regarding the double page spread, most were engaged by the dramatic image and would watch the documentary based on it. Overall, the project was quite successful but could be improved by adding more interviews and images.Question 3
Question 3Grace Matthews
Ìý
The document summarizes feedback from an audience questionnaire about 3 media products: a radio trailer, double page spread, and documentary. Key findings include:
1) The radio trailer received poor ratings and was found boring and dull by most participants.
2) The double page spread was more appealing and successful at attracting interest in the documentary compared to the radio trailer.
3) There was uncertainty among participants about whether the documentary adequately addressed its topic and questions about the effects of social media on youth. Most would not want to watch the full documentary.Question 3 
Question 3 Lucyrutter21
Ìý
The document summarizes feedback from an audience on a student's documentary, radio trailer, and TV guide about the effects of social media on education. Key findings include:
- The majority of audiences said they would continue watching the documentary and found the topic interesting. They also felt they learned from it.
- Audiences felt the documentary and radio trailer looked professional and had appropriate sound levels, though these could be improved.
- Music choice received mixed feedback but audiences understood the challenges in finding suitable music.
- Audiences said the most effective parts of the radio trailer were the facts and statistics.
- Audiences said the TV guide images and main heading would encourage them to read the article or watchAudience feedback for slideshare
Audience feedback for slideshareErik Apter
Ìý
The document discusses using peer feedback to review and improve a coursework project. The authors used various feedback methods, including face-to-face reviews, video reviews on social media platforms like YouTube, and questionnaires. Based on the feedback received, they made changes like refilming a character's part and replacing the black background in the opening video sequence. A questionnaire of 20 people provided generally positive feedback on the title sequence, target age range, magazine, and DVD cover representations.Audience feedback results q3 
Audience feedback results q3 lucy_reynolds
Ìý
The document summarizes audience feedback from questionnaires given to classmates about a documentary, radio trailer, and print advert. Key findings include:
- The title, opening sequence, and script of the documentary effectively conveyed the topic to most viewers. Some felt the opening was too fast or much at once.
- The majority found the voiceover clear but a few thought it was unclear in sections. Most felt the documentary was relevant to the target 16-25 age range.
- Most interested in watching the full documentary after 5 minutes due to the engaging narrative. Aspects like mise-en-scene and camerawork received positive ratings.
- The radio trailer and print advert effectively conveyed the documentary topic and would attract mostEvaluation q3 
Evaluation q3 Sabriya_
Ìý
The document summarizes feedback from test audiences on a horror movie trailer:
- Viewers generally liked how realistic the trailer seemed, particularly the locations, sounds effects, and transitions. Most understood what was happening in the trailer.
- When asked on a scale of 1-10, editing received an average rating of 8, indicating only small improvements were needed. Locations were deemed to reinforce the horror theme.
- The favorite part was an unexpected moment where the killer disappears behind a van at a bus stop. Some disliked the darkness in the forest scenes. Most said they would watch the full movie.Evaluation q3 - what have you learnt from your audience feeddback?
Evaluation q3 - what have you learnt from your audience feeddback?Sabriya_
Ìý
The document summarizes feedback from test audiences on a horror movie trailer:
- Viewers generally liked how realistic the trailer seemed, particularly the locations, sounds effects, and transitions. Most understood what was happening in the trailer.
- When asked on a scale of 1-10, editing received an average rating of 8, indicating only small improvements were needed. Test audiences also felt the locations reinforced the horror theme.
- The favorite part was an unexpected moment where the killer disappears behind a van at a bus stop. Some disliked the darkness in the forest scenes. Most said they would watch the full movie and felt the trailer followed genre conventions.What have you learned from your audience feedback
What have you learned from your audience feedbacka2columnd12
Ìý
The document summarizes audience feedback from 25 people on a documentary, magazine spread, and radio trailer about cyberbullying produced by the author's group. The feedback was mostly positive, though some felt more facts were needed upfront in the documentary and the magazine layout lacked professional quality. Most said the interviews, music, and radio trailer prompted them to want to watch the full documentary.Audience Feedback
Audience FeedbackLaurenArrowsmith
Ìý
The document summarizes audience feedback from 10 people on a documentary. 100% said they would continue watching after 5 minutes and found it interesting and professionally made. 9/10 thought it looked like a professional documentary. 9/10 said the camera work and editing made it look professional. 8/10 thought the voiceover made sense while 2/10 thought it could be more conversational. 100% thought the music fit well. Strengths included interviews and cuts while weaknesses included some shaky cuts and brief/quiet music. 90% would not change anything about the documentary. Feedback on related materials was also positive.Audience Feedback 2
Audience Feedback 2LaurenArrowsmith
Ìý
The document summarizes audience feedback from 10 people on a documentary. 100% said they would continue watching after 5 minutes and found it interesting and professionally made. 9/10 thought it looked like a professional documentary. 9/10 said the camera work and editing made it look professional. 8/10 thought the voiceover made sense while 2/10 thought it could be more conversational. 100% thought the music fit well. Strengths included interviews and cuts while weaknesses included some shaky cuts and brief/quiet music. 90% would not change anything about the documentary. Feedback on the print advert and radio trailer was also positive.Question 3
Question 3katiesheard
Ìý
The document summarizes feedback from 20 people on a documentary and its related radio trailer and print advert. Key findings include:
- 18/20 people said they would watch the full documentary due to the intriguing topic. Interviews were the most popular feature.
- The radio trailer was effective at making people want to watch the documentary, with strengths being the interesting clips.
- The print advert was also very successful at making people want to watch the documentary due to the striking main image.
- Overall, the products were rated highly professional and showed good continuity across the supernatural theme.More Related Content
Viewers also liked (6)
Question four
Question foura2columnd12
Ìý
Most of the research for the documentary was conducted online and through services like Netflix. Planning included creating a schedule and storyboard. Final Cut Express was used to edit footage, though exporting was sometimes problematic. InDesign allowed professional magazine layout but had a steep learning curve. Garageband was too simple for the radio trailer. Hardware like video cameras, microphones, and headphones were also needed.Media Analysis of Magazine Articles
Media Analysis of Magazine Articlesa2columnd12
Ìý
This document provides an analysis of the layout and design elements used across two magazine article spreads about television programs. The spreads utilize various techniques to engage readers such as large colorful headers, witty subheaders, rule of thirds composition, related images placed near corresponding text, and boxes with cast information. The goal is to quickly inform readers about the programs and entice them to watch through visual interest and brief informative snippets.Media
Mediaa2columnd12
Ìý
The document discusses how the filmmakers analyzed conventions used in camera work, sound, editing, and composition in other documentaries to inform their own documentary production. They studied techniques like handheld camera for interviews and tripod shots for formal interviews. They also applied conventions like background music, rule of thirds framing, fading transitions, and voiceovers in their documentary and radio trailer to make their pieces more professional. The conclusion states they adhered to documentary, radio, and magazine conventions without challenging norms.Evaluation question 2
Evaluation question 2a2columnd12
Ìý
The document discusses the effectiveness of combining a documentary on cyberbullying with ancillary texts, including a double page article spread and radio trailer. It finds that using consistent quotes, images, and content across the different mediums creates brand recognition and reinforces the key messages without giving too much information away. Both the double page spread and radio trailer are intended to pique audience interest in the documentary and educate them on cyberbullying issues. The products are found to complement each other well while leaving viewers wanting to learn more from the full documentary.Evaluation question 1
Evaluation question 1a2columnd12
Ìý
The document discusses how a student media project used and developed conventions of real media forms while also challenging some conventions. The project involved creating a TV documentary, radio trailer, and double page magazine spread about cyber bullying. While most conventions were followed, such as interviews and camera shots, some were challenged, like using fades between clips instead of straight cuts. Overall the goal was to make the pieces look professional while allowing some flexibility.Similar to Evaluation question 3 (20)
Evaluation - Question Three
Evaluation - Question ThreeShaf Rahman
Ìý
The document summarizes feedback from 15 people who viewed the documentary, listened to the radio trailer, and read the magazine article. Most said they would continue watching the full documentary. Responses to the quality of interviews and flow of the documentary were positive. While most felt the sound suited the topic, some thought the music was too upbeat. Minor changes like adding background music and speeding up the start were suggested. All felt the documentary effectively raised awareness of cyberbullying as intended. The radio trailer and article were also well-received except a few thought the trailer too slow. Gaining audience perspective provided useful insights and confirmed the documentary met its goal of informing viewers about cyberbullying.Evaluation 3
Evaluation 3a2columne12
Ìý
The document summarizes feedback from an audience questionnaire about a documentary. Key findings include:
- Respondents generally rated the documentary highly in holding attention and having balanced sound.
- All respondents said they could relate to the documentary and found the expert interview extracts informative, despite being younger than the target age.
- Respondents also positively rated the double page article layout, use of conventions, and radio trailer.
- Feedback suggests minor improvements could be made to sound levels, color use, and including more extracts in the radio trailer. Overall though, the audience feedback was positive about how the documentary and supporting materials were put together.Evaluation Question 3
Evaluation Question 3a2colc13
Ìý
The document summarizes audience feedback from questionnaires distributed during the planning and evaluation of a documentary project. The questionnaires provided information that helped shape the documentary, such as focusing on the topic of cannabis legalization and airing it on Channel 4 based on audience preferences. Feedback on the completed documentary, radio advertisement, and magazine spread was overwhelmingly positive, showing that the products achieved their goals of being informative, professional, and entertaining for the target audience. While the data from questionnaires was mostly quantitative, focus groups could have provided more qualitative insight. Minor issues like inconsistent sound levels and a few spelling errors were noted, but overall the audience feedback was very helpful for creating audience-focused and successful final products.Evaluation question three
Evaluation question threea2columne12
Ìý
The audience feedback provided useful insights for the documentary makers. Most viewers found the documentary, double page spread article, and radio trailer engaging and well-put together. However, some noted that adding more sports footage and ensuring balanced sound levels could further improve the documentary. While most colors were effective, some felt more variety in the article's colors was needed. Extracting additional quotes for the radio trailer may also strengthen it. Overall, the feedback confirmed that the intended professional tone was achieved across all three final products.Q3
Q3a2colc13
Ìý
The document summarizes feedback from an audience questionnaire about a documentary, radio trailer, and magazine produced by the author. The feedback showed that the background music and voiceover in the radio trailer were well-received by 90% and 100% of viewers respectively. However, 10% of viewers did not feel the radio trailer prompted them to watch the documentary. Similarly for the magazine, 80% found it eye-catching but 20% did not, and only 60% wanted to watch the documentary based on the magazine. For the documentary itself, 90% found the music relevant and every viewer felt they learned something, but 10% lost interest at times. The voiceover was clear to all viewers.Question 3
Question 3asmediag12
Ìý
The document provides feedback from questionnaires distributed to the target audience of a documentary project. For the documentary, most of the audience found the opening suitable and attention-grabbing. They enjoyed the stock footage, reconstruction, and expert interviews. For the radio trailer, most rated it highly and found the voiceover clear though the music could be too loud. Regarding the double page spread, most were engaged by the dramatic image and would watch the documentary based on it. Overall, the project was quite successful but could be improved by adding more interviews and images.Question 3
Question 3Grace Matthews
Ìý
The document summarizes feedback from an audience questionnaire about 3 media products: a radio trailer, double page spread, and documentary. Key findings include:
1) The radio trailer received poor ratings and was found boring and dull by most participants.
2) The double page spread was more appealing and successful at attracting interest in the documentary compared to the radio trailer.
3) There was uncertainty among participants about whether the documentary adequately addressed its topic and questions about the effects of social media on youth. Most would not want to watch the full documentary.Question 3
Question 3 Lucyrutter21
Ìý
The document summarizes feedback from an audience on a student's documentary, radio trailer, and TV guide about the effects of social media on education. Key findings include:
- The majority of audiences said they would continue watching the documentary and found the topic interesting. They also felt they learned from it.
- Audiences felt the documentary and radio trailer looked professional and had appropriate sound levels, though these could be improved.
- Music choice received mixed feedback but audiences understood the challenges in finding suitable music.
- Audiences said the most effective parts of the radio trailer were the facts and statistics.
- Audiences said the TV guide images and main heading would encourage them to read the article or watchAudience feedback for slideshare
Audience feedback for slideshareErik Apter
Ìý
The document discusses using peer feedback to review and improve a coursework project. The authors used various feedback methods, including face-to-face reviews, video reviews on social media platforms like YouTube, and questionnaires. Based on the feedback received, they made changes like refilming a character's part and replacing the black background in the opening video sequence. A questionnaire of 20 people provided generally positive feedback on the title sequence, target age range, magazine, and DVD cover representations.Audience feedback results q3
Audience feedback results q3 lucy_reynolds
Ìý
The document summarizes audience feedback from questionnaires given to classmates about a documentary, radio trailer, and print advert. Key findings include:
- The title, opening sequence, and script of the documentary effectively conveyed the topic to most viewers. Some felt the opening was too fast or much at once.
- The majority found the voiceover clear but a few thought it was unclear in sections. Most felt the documentary was relevant to the target 16-25 age range.
- Most interested in watching the full documentary after 5 minutes due to the engaging narrative. Aspects like mise-en-scene and camerawork received positive ratings.
- The radio trailer and print advert effectively conveyed the documentary topic and would attract mostEvaluation q3
Evaluation q3 Sabriya_
Ìý
The document summarizes feedback from test audiences on a horror movie trailer:
- Viewers generally liked how realistic the trailer seemed, particularly the locations, sounds effects, and transitions. Most understood what was happening in the trailer.
- When asked on a scale of 1-10, editing received an average rating of 8, indicating only small improvements were needed. Locations were deemed to reinforce the horror theme.
- The favorite part was an unexpected moment where the killer disappears behind a van at a bus stop. Some disliked the darkness in the forest scenes. Most said they would watch the full movie.Evaluation q3 - what have you learnt from your audience feeddback?
Evaluation q3 - what have you learnt from your audience feeddback?Sabriya_
Ìý
The document summarizes feedback from test audiences on a horror movie trailer:
- Viewers generally liked how realistic the trailer seemed, particularly the locations, sounds effects, and transitions. Most understood what was happening in the trailer.
- When asked on a scale of 1-10, editing received an average rating of 8, indicating only small improvements were needed. Test audiences also felt the locations reinforced the horror theme.
- The favorite part was an unexpected moment where the killer disappears behind a van at a bus stop. Some disliked the darkness in the forest scenes. Most said they would watch the full movie and felt the trailer followed genre conventions.What have you learned from your audience feedback
What have you learned from your audience feedbacka2columnd12
Ìý
The document summarizes audience feedback from 25 people on a documentary, magazine spread, and radio trailer about cyberbullying produced by the author's group. The feedback was mostly positive, though some felt more facts were needed upfront in the documentary and the magazine layout lacked professional quality. Most said the interviews, music, and radio trailer prompted them to want to watch the full documentary.Audience Feedback
Audience FeedbackLaurenArrowsmith
Ìý
The document summarizes audience feedback from 10 people on a documentary. 100% said they would continue watching after 5 minutes and found it interesting and professionally made. 9/10 thought it looked like a professional documentary. 9/10 said the camera work and editing made it look professional. 8/10 thought the voiceover made sense while 2/10 thought it could be more conversational. 100% thought the music fit well. Strengths included interviews and cuts while weaknesses included some shaky cuts and brief/quiet music. 90% would not change anything about the documentary. Feedback on related materials was also positive.Audience Feedback 2
Audience Feedback 2LaurenArrowsmith
Ìý
The document summarizes audience feedback from 10 people on a documentary. 100% said they would continue watching after 5 minutes and found it interesting and professionally made. 9/10 thought it looked like a professional documentary. 9/10 said the camera work and editing made it look professional. 8/10 thought the voiceover made sense while 2/10 thought it could be more conversational. 100% thought the music fit well. Strengths included interviews and cuts while weaknesses included some shaky cuts and brief/quiet music. 90% would not change anything about the documentary. Feedback on the print advert and radio trailer was also positive.Question 3
Question 3katiesheard
Ìý
The document summarizes feedback from 20 people on a documentary and its related radio trailer and print advert. Key findings include:
- 18/20 people said they would watch the full documentary due to the intriguing topic. Interviews were the most popular feature.
- The radio trailer was effective at making people want to watch the documentary, with strengths being the interesting clips.
- The print advert was also very successful at making people want to watch the documentary due to the striking main image.
- Overall, the products were rated highly professional and showed good continuity across the supernatural theme.EVALUATION QUESTION 3: WHAT HAVE YOU LEARNT FROM YOUR AUDIENCE FEEDBACK ?
EVALUATION QUESTION 3: WHAT HAVE YOU LEARNT FROM YOUR AUDIENCE FEEDBACK ?Grady Wing
Ìý
The document summarizes audience feedback received on a student project to create a music video for a band. It provides 4 questions asked of the target audience to gather feedback on draft versions of the poster, digipack, and video. For each question, sample feedback is shown and what was learned to improve the project. Feedback indicated adding band info, changing text/layout, and improving transitions. Charts show most audience members liked the final versions. Social media feedback on the finished video was also positive, praising effects and flow. The document concludes that audience feedback helped create a better overall product.Evaluation q3
Evaluation q3a2colg13
Ìý
The document discusses feedback received on a television documentary from questionnaires, social media, and focus groups. Questionnaires were used during the planning stage and after the documentary was finished to get feedback from students and parents on what they wanted to see and their thoughts. The documentary was also uploaded to Facebook to get comments. Finally, a focus group was held with the target audience to film their responses. The feedback indicated that the target audience should be just teenagers rather than parents too. It also helped determine which TV channel would be most suitable. The focus group feedback was generally positive and suggested some minor sound balancing improvements.Evaluation q3 new
Evaluation q3 newa2medgroup2
Ìý
The feedback received was generally positive. For the documentary, respondents said it was informative but some felt the background music could have been more suitable. The radio trailer was engaging but some improvements were needed for sound levels in the documentary. The magazine article grabbed some attention but the layout could have been stronger as it failed to keep half of readers interested. Overall, the products promoted each other well but the double page spread was the weakest aspect.Evaluation q3 new
Evaluation q3 newa2medgroup2
Ìý
The student gathered feedback from focus groups and questionnaires on a documentary, magazine spread, and radio trailer they created about the effects of violent video games. The feedback was mostly positive. For the documentary, respondents said it was informative and the language was suitable, though some felt the music could have been better. The magazine spread was seen as less successful, with mixed ratings. The radio trailer intrigued listeners and made them want to watch the documentary. Areas for improvement included the music and sound levels in the documentary.More from a2columnd12 (20)
Codes and conventions of tv mag
Codes and conventions of tv maga2columnd12
Ìý
This document outlines the conventions and layout for a double page spread in a TV magazine such as Radio Times. Key conventions include:
- Using the rule of thirds layout with blocking to avoid blank spaces.
- Including a footer with the magazine name and publication date.
- Using a large, bold headline at the top to catch the reader's attention.
- Employing drop caps at the beginning of text sections.
- Incorporating relevant images to appeal to readers and relate to the article text.
- Adding subheadings to give an overview of the article topic.How did you use media technologies in the
How did you use media technologies in thea2columnd12
Ìý
We used the internet to research our subject and contact interviewees. Websites like BBC News, Google, and music sites provided facts, statistics, and a way to arrange professional interviews. YouTube provided background footage of illegal downloading sites. During construction, we used video recorders, tripods, headphones, and Apple Macs to film, store footage, and ensure sound quality. Editing software like Final Cut Express allowed us to add transitions and create a storyboard to smoothly edit our documentary into its final professional format.Question 3 what have you learned from your
Question 3 what have you learned from youra2columnd12
Ìý
This document summarizes the planning and research stages of a documentary project. In stage 1, questionnaires were conducted with a range of ages to inform the target audience for a second questionnaire. This second questionnaire aimed to get stronger feedback from younger people who engage in illegal downloading. Stage 2 involved testing the documentary and ancillary texts to evaluate if the combination of materials worked well. Feedback graphs show that nearly 100% of viewers would want to continue watching the documentary and that the products were well combined, with only minor suggested improvements.Question 3 what have you learned from your
Question 3 what have you learned from youra2columnd12
Ìý
This document summarizes the research stages of a documentary project about illegal downloading. The researchers conducted two questionnaires, targeting different age ranges, to understand viewers' preferences and experiences with the topic. They found that older people had little to contribute since they did not illegally download, so the second questionnaire focused on younger people. The questionnaires asked about documentary viewing preferences and personal experiences with illegal downloading. After creating the documentary and supplemental materials, further questionnaires were used to gather feedback, which was overwhelmingly positive about the quality and combination of the materials.media evaluation question 1
media evaluation question 1a2columnd12
Ìý
This document discusses design techniques for making articles more visually appealing and engaging for readers. It suggests using large photos, bright headings, and pull quotes in contrasting colors to draw the eye around the page and make the article seem busy and full of information. Videos or clips from the product discussed can give readers a sense of what to expect from the article. The document also notes that challenging conventions, like placing airing times above the text rather than in an image, can make important details clearer for readers.Question 1 for double page spread
Question 1 for double page spreada2columnd12
Ìý
This document summarizes how a media product uses conventions from real TV listings. It features a large main image and smaller images from the documentary spread across the page, using captions to describe each image, following conventions. It also uses a large headline with smaller subtitle in different colors, originally seen in TV listings magazines. Pull quotes are used with brightly colored backgrounds to draw attention, developing a convention seen in other listings. The main article features conventions like drop caps, readable fonts, and subtitles to break up text for easy reading, drawing from conventions in magazines like TV Choice.Question 1 Double page spread
Question 1 Double page spreada2columnd12
Ìý
This document summarizes how a media product uses conventions from real TV listings. It features a large main image and smaller images spread throughout the page showing scenes from the documentary, using captions to describe the images. It also uses a large headline in a different color than the rest of the text to draw attention, followed by a smaller subtitle. Pull quotes are used with a brightly colored background to make them stand out. The main article features conventions like drop caps, small readable fonts, and subtitles to break up the text for easy reading, mimicking conventions from TV Choice magazine.Question 2
Question 2a2columnd12
Ìý
The ancillary texts of a radio trailer and magazine article were effective at promoting the documentary because they appealed to the same target audience of 13-24 year olds. Both the trailer and article used clips and screenshots from the documentary to link the pieces together. The radio trailer was particularly useful because it could be broadcast on Radio 1, which attracts a young audience, allowing the documentary to be advertised on a platform that provides free music.Media q3
Media q3a2columnd12
Ìý
The document summarizes feedback from a questionnaire given to viewers of a student documentary about cyberbullying. Key findings included:
1) 100% of viewers said they would continue watching the full documentary after seeing the opening.
2) Viewers provided varied feedback on what they liked most, showing different elements appealed to different tastes.
3) Most said they would not change anything, but some suggested interviewing a victim or their family.
4) Viewers unanimously said the sound suited the topic and the documentary was well composed with good flow.
5) All viewers said the documentary made them more aware of cyberbullying.Media question 2
Media question 2a2columnd12
Ìý
The document discusses how three media texts (a documentary, radio trailer, and magazine article) about cyberbullying were linked together. It explains that the same name ("Banter or Bullying?") was used across all three to connect them. Short clips and the same background music from the documentary were included in the radio trailer. The magazine article featured an image from an interview in the documentary and pictures related to social media. While some connections were made, the document concludes that even stronger links, like more documentary images and using the same voiceover, could have been established between the texts.Q4 evaluation
Q4 evaluationa2columnd12
Ìý
During the planning stage, the individual recorded a phone call with an organization using an iPhone and HTC, then used Flash Media Center to convert the file to MP3. Scanners and printers were used to analyze printed information and provide evidence of annotations for the blog.
In the production stage, Apple Mac computers and specialized software like Final Cut Express, GarageBand, and InDesign were used to edit video clips, create a radio trailer and soundtrack, and design documents. A memory stick was used to easily transfer files between computers. Hardware like cameras, microphones, headphones, and a tripod were used to record high quality video and audio.
For evaluation, Microsoft PowerPoint was used to easily transfer presentationsQuestion 1 
Question 1 a2columnd12
Ìý
The document discusses how a media project used, developed, and challenged conventions of real media forms. It summarizes how the student researched documentaries, radio spots, and magazines to identify typical codes and conventions. It then describes how the student incorporated many of these conventions into their documentary project, such as using different camera shots and angles, titles for interviewees, and sound mixing. However, it also notes a few ways the project challenged conventions, such as having a simpler radio spot than typical examples. Overall, the document concludes the project effectively used, developed, and challenged conventions as appropriate for the topic and audience.How did you use media technologies in the
How did you use media technologies in thea2columnd12
Ìý
The document discusses various media technologies used to create a documentary, radio trailer, and magazine spread. These included a video camera to film footage, a microphone for audio recording, headphones to monitor audio levels, Final Cut Express for video editing, Blogger to plan tasks and publish work, ºÝºÝߣshare to share evaluations, YouTube to publish the documentary, Microsoft Word for writing scripts and notes, Garage Band to add background music, and Adobe InDesign to design the magazine spread. While the technologies were generally easy to use, better initial planning of tasks and end goals may have optimized use of the tools.How effective is the combination of your main
How effective is the combination of your maina2columnd12
Ìý
The documentary, radio trailer, and double page spread were created to bring awareness to the issue of cyber bullying among teenagers. The documentary provides footage and interviews that give viewers insight into the impacts of cyber bullying. The radio trailer promotes the documentary by using audio clips. The double page spread features an image from the documentary to pique interest. Together, the pieces effectively target teenagers and clearly convey that the topic is cyber bullying. While the double page spread could be more visually appealing, the combination of media raises awareness of this important issue.In what way does your media product use[1]![In what way does your media product use[1]](https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/inwhatwaydoesyourmediaproductuse1-130224155705-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=560&fit=bounds)
In what way does your media product use[1]a2columnd12
Ìý
This document summarizes a student's media studies coursework on creating a documentary about cyber bullying. The student produced a 5-minute documentary video on the topic, as well as supplementary materials like a double-page magazine spread and 30-second radio trailer. The documentary used real interviews and facts to raise awareness about cyber bullying. While emulating real documentaries and media formats, the student's work also challenged conventions through their own creative elements. The student concluded their projects both developed and challenged forms of real media products.Queston 4
Queston 4a2columnd12
Ìý
We used various media technologies at different stages of creating our documentary. In the planning stage, we used storyboarding and mind maps on paper to decide our topic and plan elements. For research, we used the internet including Wikipedia, news sites, and YouTube. After filming with video cameras and microphones, we edited footage in Final Cut Pro and Garage Band, adding music from iTunes. We exported stills and the finished documentary and radio trailer to our blog.Q3 Evaluation Arun Bhullar
Q3 Evaluation Arun Bhullara2columnd12
Ìý
From receiving audience feedback on various parts of the documentary and promotional materials, the documentarian learned several things:
1) The message and interviews came across clearly but some audio needed adjusting.
2) Simple, effective music choices worked well but some elements needed more refinement.
3) Expert interviews helped reinforce the topic but using a variety of experts would have provided more perspectives.
4) The magazine layout and design could have been improved with more planning and attention to conventions.
5) Including clips from the documentary in the radio trailer intrigued listeners but the music and sound levels required further work.Q1 
Q1 a2columnd12
Ìý
The document evaluates the student's media project which included a five minute documentary and two ancillary products on the topic of cyberbullying.
1. The student used several conventions from real media products like Supersize Me in their documentary, such as consistent text styles, positioning of expert interviews, and inclusion of facts/figures. However, they challenged conventions by not including narration for some facts.
2. Feedback showed the combination of the documentary and ancillary texts (a radio trailer and article) effectively promoted the key issues of cyberbullying.
3. Lessons from audiences will help improve future projects.
4. Various media technologies were effectively used for construction, research, planning and evaluationStages of development
Stages of developmenta2columnd12
Ìý
The document describes the process of editing a video project, starting with adding opening clips and vox pops interviews, then arranging the interviews and adding background footage. Additional elements like cutaways, captions, background music, and audio/visual transitions were added last to complete the edited video.Questionnaire 2 overview
Questionnaire 2 overviewa2columnd12
Ìý
The document summarizes feedback from questionnaires about a documentary. Most respondents indicated that the documentary contained suitable footage, had an appealing subject matter, and background music that was relevant. Respondents described the documentary as having both funny and serious elements. The choice of interviewees and vox pops was viewed positively. The magazine article and radio trailer were also seen as appealing. Most said they would want to watch the full documentary after exposure to these promotional materials.Evaluation question 3
- 1. What have you learnt from audience feedback?
- 2. What we did for audience feedback After we had completed our documentary we got a group of 15 people to watch it. We got them to watch the documentary itself, listen to the radio trailer and then look at the double page spread. This meant that we could get feedback from a group of people that don’t particularly know us meaning the answers were going to be truthful and things that we could work for future media projects. We completed a 12 question questionnaire and handed out to the audience and made them answer the questions anonymously. How we gained our audience feedback After we had handed out the questionnaire I looked through the answers and just tallied down the feedback we got for each question, this then meant I could put it into graphs and clearly show what feedback we received, feedback whether it is positive or negative is always useful for a project because it can mean you can work on things that need to be improved but also means you can almost show off things that people like about your projects.
- 3. This is how I first set out the feedback before I moved on to putting it into graphs.
- 4. After watching the 5 minute opening of the documentary, would you continue watching the rest? 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Yes No
- 5. What did you like the most about the documentary? 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Information Music Voxpops Opening Ending
- 6. What would you change anything about the documentary? 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Nothing A lot of text on Structure of the More fades Opening the screen questions
- 7. Do you feel that the sound used in the documentary suited the topic of the documentary? 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Yes No
- 8. Do you think there was a flow in the documentary? Was it composed well? 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Yes No
- 9. Does the documentary make you more aware about the topic of cyber-bullying? 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Yes No
- 10. What did you think about the quality of the interviews? 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Answered the Good Clear High quality question
- 11. Do you think that the radio trailer grabs your attention? And does it link with the documentary? 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Yes Boring
- 12. What do you like about the radio trailer? And if so, is there anything you would change about it? 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Typing sound Vox pop change Longer expert No Yes effect interview
- 13. After listening to the radio trailer, would you want to watch our documentary? 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Yes No
- 14. Does the article interest you? 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Yes No
- 15. Is there anything you dislike about the article? 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Too long Colour schemes Layout No Yes
- 16. Feedback Overall I think the feedback we received was more positive than negative, this is good because it means that the audience like our projects and would watch, listen and read them if they were real. I think feedback is important and I wasn’t surprised by the results because due to the audience giving me the feedback were the target audience which mean they would be interested in our chosen topic, I also think that it’s a topic you want to know about whether you are our target audience or not because its something that should be taken seriously. Feedback means that we can work on our documentary if we had more time to and then make sure that the audience liked everything about the 3 projects but it is good if people don’t like it because everyone has different tastes and ideas. With most people not wanting to change anything about our documentary this could be because they thought that everything worked well together, the only questions that caused different answers were the questions we asked were to do with appearance of the double page spread and the style of documentary and radio trailer, I think that this it because everyone does have different tastes.