Evem amsterdam
- 1. Validity of the EVEM scale in assessing the integrity of Motivational Interviewing delivered in Primary Health Care settings Manuel Camp鱈単ez, Jes炭s Manuel Novo, Juan Carlos Arboni辿s, Josep Maria Bosch, Luis ngel P辿rula, Remedios Mart鱈n Communication and Health Group of the Spanish Society of Family Physicians (SEMFYC).
- 2. why? . brief encounters . nonverbal behavior . several targets . other medical demands
- 5. face, content and consensus validity . 16 experts, 3 Delphi rounds . 25 items, 0-2 Likert scale
- 8. inter-rater reliability Cohens Kappa Indexes Very good (>0.8) Good (0.61-0.8) Moderate (0.4- 0.6)
- 9. Intraclass Correlation Coefficients Very good (>0.9) Good (0.71-0.9) Moderate (0.51- 0.7) global ICC was 0.967 inter-rater reliability
- 10. . Cronbachs alpha was 0.967 internal consistency
- 11. factor analysis . 2 dimensions explained 75.8% of the variance found
- 12. . 14 items, 0-4 likert scale refining of the scale
- 13. Intraclass Correlation Coefficients Very good- moderate Acceptable Low what if we train somebody in its use?
- 14. . global ICC was 0.82 (0.72 - 0.96) . internal consistency (alpha) was 0.917 to 0.979 what if we train somebody in its use?
- 15. . empathy, positioning, coherence with positioning, open questions, reflective listening, summaries, affirmation, objectives, action plan, avoinding discord, evocation, collaboration, authonomy support and compassion what does it look like?
- 17. whats different? empathy, avoiding discord positioning, coherence with positioning, reflective listening, affirmation, objectives, action plan, evocation, collaboration, authonomy support compassion open questions, summaries,
- 18. thank you!!!