Evolution genealogy
This document discusses different approaches to historical explanations in philosophy and the human sciences. It outlines problems with purely historical accounts that focus only on continuity, causality and influence over time. It then describes two alternative approaches: 1) Evolutionary explanations, which conceptualize human attitudes as Darwinian adaptations that evolved through natural selection acting on populations over long periods. 2) Genealogical explanations, which track the social and institutional pressures that shaped a particular attitude or value in a specific historical/geographical context, and investigate how categories presented as origins are actually political and institutional effects. The document questions the role and defendability of these approaches from accusations of "genetic fallacy", and how much historical context concepts should
Evolution genealogy
- 1. Untaming Reason Gloria Origgi, InstitutNicod, Paris Roma, 17 aprile 2009 Universit Roma Tre
- 2. History, if viewed as a repository for more than anecdote or chronology, could produce a decisive transformation in the image of science by which we are now possessed T. Kuhn, 1962
- 3. History and Human Science: A need for historical explanations in philosophy and other human sciences Objects of inquiry have an origin that can be located in space and time. Is history the place to look at?
- 4. Problems with historical accounts: Chain of events in terms of continuity, causality and influential cascades Delegitimation of the impact of historical accounts due to the emergence of powerful synchronic methodologies in linguistics, anthropology, psychology
- 6. Questions: What is the role of these approaches in philosophy and, more generally, in human sciences? Are they defendable from the accusation of genetic fallacy, that is, that even if a claim on the origins of an issue is true it is irrelevant for justifying this issue? Are we entitled to look at the genesis of a concept, an attitude, a value in order to explain what kind of thing it is or what can we know about it? How much thick our concepts should be to avoid the shallow abstraction that is so frequently ascribed to timeless philosophical reflection?
- 7. Evolutionary explanations An evolutionary explanation of a human attitude, such as a moral value, a cognitive disposition or a social behavior, conceptualizes this attitude as a selected trait, a darwinian adaptation. It retraces its history in terms of the selective pressure that may have stabilized this trait in a population. One of the major contributions of Darwins theory of natural selection is population-thinking: evolution through natural selection can be explained only at the level of a population.
- 8. Genealogical explanations A genealogical explanation of a human attitude, a moral value, a cognitive disposition or a social behavior is a way of tracking back the social and institutional pressures that have shaped, in a precise historical time and geographical location, the form of that attitude, value etc., as well as our awareness of them and our self-ascriptions of them in describing ourselves and our social world. it is not just a thicker reading of a phenomenon, which simply adds an historical dimension to its understanding: it is a way, as Judith Butler has defined it, of investigating the political stakes in designating as origin and cause those categories that are in fact the effects of institutions, practices, discourses with multiple and diffuse points of origin