![Courseware
What suggestions do you have for enhancing the courseware?
james.kusi@nypa.gov Require more than One day training since there are a lot to learn
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 7 separate those who are less familiar with excel. Have prereqs. For instance, if you do not know how to minimize a worksheet, maybe you
shouldn't be learning about formulas just yet.
Overall Satisfaction
Overall, how satisfied are you with this training course? (check only one) [Student Data]
MLouridas@lanterman.org Somewhat satisfied
miniguez@life.arizona.edu Very satisfied
james.kusi@nypa.gov Very satisfied
cgonzalez@sunmechanical.net Very satisfied
tevasquez@maranaaz.gov Very satisfied
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 1 8 Very satisfied
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 1 Very satisfied
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 7 Somewhat dissatisfied
damion.parham@hm.com Somewhat satisfied
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 9 Very satisfied
Business Results
Based on your response to the prior question, estimate how much of the improvement will be a direct result of this training.
MLouridas@lanterman.org 20%
miniguez@life.arizona.edu 40%
james.kusi@nypa.gov 90%
cgonzalez@sunmechanical.net 100%
tevasquez@maranaaz.gov 100%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 1 8 50%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 1 100%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 7 0%
damion.parham@hm.com 40%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 9 90%
Estimate how much you expect your job performance related to the course subject matter to improve in the next 12 months.
Include in your estimate any performance improvements due to this training, as well as all other factors like onthe job
experience, incentives, and process improvements. (For example, if you feel that you can improve your performance by
20% in the next 12 months based on this training plus all other factors, enter 20% here.)
MLouridas@lanterman.org 50%
miniguez@life.arizona.edu 40%
james.kusi@nypa.gov 90%
cgonzalez@sunmechanical.net 100%
tevasquez@maranaaz.gov 90%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 1 8 40%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 1 100%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 7 80%
- 5 / 9 -](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/049f6404-def1-4024-ae16-18a3f8a5416e-151111020318-lva1-app6892/85/Excel-2010-Part-2-5-320.jpg)
![damion.parham@hm.com 50%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 9 90%
Environment
Comments (Environment):
tevasquez@maranaaz.gov Classroom was a little warm.
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 7 Having a mix of levels in one class slows down the process and ultimately ran out of time.
General Questions
Other (please specify) [What was your main objective for completing this training?]:
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 1 To learn more about how to use excel
Response Rate
Form Type Evaluations
Sent
Evaluations
Received
Response
Rate
Post Event 10 10 100.00%
Report Recommendations
Interpreting the Report
Below are tips to help you understand the information in the report. For additional information, please click the Help tab above the report.
Summarizes scores from each student for selected question categories and questions; compare and analyze scores for all students that completed evaluations.
Student comments provide additional insight into the scores displayed within the report.
Determine the students’ overall perceived value derived specifically from training to proactively manage future training events.
Recommended Actions
Below are recommended next steps to take after reviewing the information in this report. Additionally, you'll find links to automatically run complementary reports for
drillingdown further into the data or analyzing the information in another way.
If any learner rated the class much lower than others, and the learner provided an email address, follow up with that person to gather additional feedback regarding the
scores. Share that feedback with instructor and course managers as areas for improvement.
If any learner rated the class much higher than others, especially in the areas of job impact or business results, follow up with those learners to gether additional feedback
on how they were able to maximize their use of what they learned on the job. Share this feedback with course managers to ensure they share the knowledge with future
learners to maximize job impact and business results.
Schedule this report to be emailed automatically to the course and instructor managers on a daily basis so they are able to review performance on a regular basis.
Recommended Links
Run the Learner Comments report to review all the qualitative feedback for specific approaches to make the learning more effective and impactful.
Run the Quick Question report to summarize the scalebased and multiplechoice answers for all of the evaluations.
Run the Performance to Goals report to view how these results compared to your goals.
Report Criteria
Reporting Date: Nov 1 2015 to Nov 30 2015
Form Type: Follow Up;
Instructor Survey;
Post Event
Category: Additional Questions;
Business Results;
Courseware;
Environment;
General Questions;
- 8 / 9 -](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/049f6404-def1-4024-ae16-18a3f8a5416e-151111020318-lva1-app6892/85/Excel-2010-Part-2-8-320.jpg)
Excel 2010 Part 2
- 1. Class Summary Run By: Carrie Williams (cwilliams@nhsocal.com) MTM Tool: Class Summary Date Run: Nov 10 2015 From Saved Query: No Date: Nov 9 2015 Instructor(s): Williams Course: Excel 2010 Part 2 Learning Provider: New Horizons Southern California Location: New Horizons Tucson (Learning Partner) Client: Public Class Summary Student Instructor Courseware Business Results Additional Questions Learning Effectiveness Environment A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 1 8 8.80 8.86 8.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 1 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 7 9.00 5.43 4.00 4.00 4.00 8.00 A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 9 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 cgonzalez@sunmechanical.net 9.00 8.86 9.00 9.00 8.00 9.00 damion.parham@hm.com 8.80 7.86 8.00 7.00 8.00 8.00 james.kusi@nypa.gov 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 miniguez@life.arizona.edu 9.00 9.00 8.00 9.00 8.00 9.00 MLouridas@lanterman.org 9.00 9.00 9.00 7.00 9.00 8.00 tevasquez@maranaaz.gov 9.00 8.86 8.00 9.00 8.00 8.50 Average 8.96 8.49 8.10 8.10 8.10 8.65 Summary (cont) Student Average A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 1 8 8.82 A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 1 9.00 A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 7 6.53 A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 9 9.00 cgonzalez@sunmechanical.net 8.88 damion.parham@hm.com 8.12 james.kusi@nypa.gov 9.00 miniguez@life.arizona.edu 8.88 MLouridas@lanterman.org 8.76 tevasquez@maranaaz.gov 8.76 Average 8.58 Instructor Student The instructor was knowledgeable about the subject. Participants were encouraged to take part in class discussions. Instructor overall The instructor''s presentation skills were adequate. The instructor provided realworld experiences and examples. Average A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 1 8 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 8.00 8.80 A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 1 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 7 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 9 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 cgonzalez@sunmechanical.net 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 damion.parham@hm.com 9.00 9.00 8.00 9.00 9.00 8.80 james.kusi@nypa.gov 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 miniguez@life.arizona.edu 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 MLouridas@lanterman.org 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 tevasquez@maranaaz.gov 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 Average 9.00 9.00 8.90 9.00 8.90 8.96 - 1 / 9 -
- 2. Courseware Student Clarity of the training content Technical depth of the training content The material was organized logically. Effectiveness of the labs in reinforcing the knowledge/skills learned in the modules Relevance of the labs to real world job situations Time dedicated to activities such as discussions, practices, and labs (as opposed to lecture) A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 1 8 9.00 9.00 9.00 8.00 9.00 9.00 A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 1 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 7 9.00 3.00 3.00 5.00 7.00 2.00 A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 9 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 cgonzalez@sunmechanical.net 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 8.00 damion.parham@hm.com 7.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 7.00 8.00 james.kusi@nypa.gov 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 miniguez@life.arizona.edu 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 MLouridas@lanterman.org 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 tevasquez@maranaaz.gov 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 8.00 Average 8.80 8.30 8.30 8.40 8.60 8.00 Courseware (cont) Student Language quality of the courseware (grammar, terminology, style) Average A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 1 8 9.00 8.86 A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 1 9.00 9.00 A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 7 9.00 5.43 A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 9 9.00 9.00 cgonzalez@sunmechanical.net 9.00 8.86 damion.parham@hm.com 9.00 7.86 james.kusi@nypa.gov 9.00 9.00 miniguez@life.arizona.edu 9.00 9.00 MLouridas@lanterman.org 9.00 9.00 tevasquez@maranaaz.gov 9.00 8.86 Average 9.00 8.49 Business Results Student This training will improve my job performance. Average A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 1 8 8.00 8.00 A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 1 9.00 9.00 A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 7 4.00 4.00 A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 9 9.00 9.00 cgonzalez@sunmechanical.net 9.00 9.00 damion.parham@hm.com 8.00 8.00 james.kusi@nypa.gov 9.00 9.00 miniguez@life.arizona.edu 8.00 8.00 MLouridas@lanterman.org 9.00 9.00 tevasquez@maranaaz.gov 8.00 8.00 Average 8.10 8.10 Additional Questions Student How well did this training meet your expectations? Average - 2 / 9 -
- 3. A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 1 8 9.00 9.00 A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 1 9.00 9.00 A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 7 4.00 4.00 A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 9 9.00 9.00 cgonzalez@sunmechanical.net 9.00 9.00 damion.parham@hm.com 7.00 7.00 james.kusi@nypa.gov 9.00 9.00 miniguez@life.arizona.edu 9.00 9.00 MLouridas@lanterman.org 7.00 7.00 tevasquez@maranaaz.gov 9.00 9.00 Average 8.10 8.10 Learning Effectiveness Student I have learned new knowledge/skills from this training. Average A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 1 8 9.00 9.00 A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 1 9.00 9.00 A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 7 4.00 4.00 A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 9 9.00 9.00 cgonzalez@sunmechanical.net 8.00 8.00 damion.parham@hm.com 8.00 8.00 james.kusi@nypa.gov 9.00 9.00 miniguez@life.arizona.edu 8.00 8.00 MLouridas@lanterman.org 9.00 9.00 tevasquez@maranaaz.gov 8.00 8.00 Average 8.10 8.10 Environment Student The physical environment was conducive to learning. The hardware was setup and functioning appropriately. Average A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 1 8 9.00 9.00 9.00 A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 1 9.00 9.00 9.00 A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 7 7.00 9.00 8.00 A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 9 9.00 9.00 9.00 cgonzalez@sunmechanical.net 9.00 9.00 9.00 damion.parham@hm.com 7.00 9.00 8.00 james.kusi@nypa.gov 9.00 9.00 9.00 miniguez@life.arizona.edu 9.00 9.00 9.00 MLouridas@lanterman.org 7.00 9.00 8.00 tevasquez@maranaaz.gov 8.00 9.00 8.50 Average 8.30 9.00 8.65 Comments Instructor Comments: (Instructor) miniguez@life.arizona.edu great instructor, thank you User Information First Name - 3 / 9 -
- 4. MLouridas@lanterman.org Maria miniguez@life.arizona.edu Maria james.kusi@nypa.gov James cgonzalez@sunmechanical.net Candice tevasquez@maranaaz.gov Teri A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 1 8 Kathryn A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 1 Tina A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 7 Mercedez damion.parham@hm.com Damion A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 9 Mayra Last Name MLouridas@lanterman.org Louridas miniguez@life.arizona.edu Iniguez james.kusi@nypa.gov Kusi cgonzalez@sunmechanical.net Gonzalez tevasquez@maranaaz.gov Vasquez A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 1 8 Fox A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 1 Ruiz A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 7 Wallace damion.parham@hm.com Parham A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 9 Mora Phone Number MLouridas@lanterman.org 2132524956 miniguez@life.arizona.edu 5208704232 james.kusi@nypa.gov 9144191574 cgonzalez@sunmechanical.net (520)7298009 tevasquez@maranaaz.gov 5203821953 A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 1 8 4197868325 A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 1 8016439695 damion.parham@hm.com 6467712984 A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 9 5203821903 What was your main objective for completing this training? MLouridas@lanterman.org Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment) miniguez@life.arizona.edu Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment) james.kusi@nypa.gov Solve a particular problem cgonzalez@sunmechanical.net Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment) tevasquez@maranaaz.gov Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment) A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 1 8 Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment) A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 1 Other damion.parham@hm.com Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment) A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 9 Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment) - 4 / 9 -
- 5. Courseware What suggestions do you have for enhancing the courseware? james.kusi@nypa.gov Require more than One day training since there are a lot to learn A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 7 separate those who are less familiar with excel. Have prereqs. For instance, if you do not know how to minimize a worksheet, maybe you shouldn't be learning about formulas just yet. Overall Satisfaction Overall, how satisfied are you with this training course? (check only one) [Student Data] MLouridas@lanterman.org Somewhat satisfied miniguez@life.arizona.edu Very satisfied james.kusi@nypa.gov Very satisfied cgonzalez@sunmechanical.net Very satisfied tevasquez@maranaaz.gov Very satisfied A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 1 8 Very satisfied A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 1 Very satisfied A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 7 Somewhat dissatisfied damion.parham@hm.com Somewhat satisfied A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 9 Very satisfied Business Results Based on your response to the prior question, estimate how much of the improvement will be a direct result of this training. MLouridas@lanterman.org 20% miniguez@life.arizona.edu 40% james.kusi@nypa.gov 90% cgonzalez@sunmechanical.net 100% tevasquez@maranaaz.gov 100% A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 1 8 50% A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 1 100% A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 7 0% damion.parham@hm.com 40% A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 9 90% Estimate how much you expect your job performance related to the course subject matter to improve in the next 12 months. Include in your estimate any performance improvements due to this training, as well as all other factors like onthe job experience, incentives, and process improvements. (For example, if you feel that you can improve your performance by 20% in the next 12 months based on this training plus all other factors, enter 20% here.) MLouridas@lanterman.org 50% miniguez@life.arizona.edu 40% james.kusi@nypa.gov 90% cgonzalez@sunmechanical.net 100% tevasquez@maranaaz.gov 90% A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 1 8 40% A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 1 100% A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 7 80% - 5 / 9 -
- 6. damion.parham@hm.com 40% A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 9 90% If you think this training will have a positive impact on your job performance, what areas will be impacted most? Check all that apply. MLouridas@lanterman.org increasing productivity miniguez@life.arizona.edu increasing quality miniguez@life.arizona.edu increasing productivity james.kusi@nypa.gov increasing ability to innovate cgonzalez@sunmechanical.net increasing productivity cgonzalez@sunmechanical.net decreasing time to complete task(s) cgonzalez@sunmechanical.net increasing customer satisfaction cgonzalez@sunmechanical.net increasing employee satisfaction tevasquez@maranaaz.gov increasing quality tevasquez@maranaaz.gov increasing productivity tevasquez@maranaaz.gov increasing ability to innovate tevasquez@maranaaz.gov decreasing time to complete task(s) A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 1 8 increasing productivity A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 1 8 decreasing time to complete task(s) A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 1 decreasing time to complete task(s) damion.parham@hm.com increasing quality A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 9 increasing quality A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 9 increasing productivity A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 9 increasing ability to innovate A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 9 decreasing time to complete task(s) Additional Questions Is this your first time at New Horizons? MLouridas@lanterman.org Yes miniguez@life.arizona.edu No james.kusi@nypa.gov No cgonzalez@sunmechanical.net No tevasquez@maranaaz.gov No A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 1 8 No A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 1 Yes A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 7 Yes damion.parham@hm.com No A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 9 No Would you recommend New Horizons to others? MLouridas@lanterman.org Yes miniguez@life.arizona.edu Yes james.kusi@nypa.gov Yes cgonzalez@sunmechanical.net Yes tevasquez@maranaaz.gov Yes - 6 / 9 -
- 7. A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 1 8 Yes A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 1 Yes A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 7 Yes damion.parham@hm.com Yes A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 9 Yes Other classes you are interested in taking: MLouridas@lanterman.org Excel 2010 Part 3 cgonzalez@sunmechanical.net Excel 4 and 5 damion.parham@hm.com Project Manager Would you be willing to provide a public quote about your experience taking this course? MLouridas@lanterman.org No miniguez@life.arizona.edu Yes cgonzalez@sunmechanical.net No tevasquez@maranaaz.gov Yes A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 1 8 Yes A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 1 Yes A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 7 No damion.parham@hm.com Yes A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 9 No Return on Investment Would you like to be notified about advanced or complementary courses? MLouridas@lanterman.org Yes miniguez@life.arizona.edu Yes james.kusi@nypa.gov Yes cgonzalez@sunmechanical.net No A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 1 8 Yes A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 1 Yes A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 7 Yes damion.parham@hm.com Yes A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 9 Yes Job Impact What percent of your total work time requires the knowledge or skills presented in this training? Please check only one. MLouridas@lanterman.org 50% miniguez@life.arizona.edu 40% james.kusi@nypa.gov 60% cgonzalez@sunmechanical.net 40% tevasquez@maranaaz.gov 60% A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 1 8 50% A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 1 90% A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 7 70% - 7 / 9 -
- 8. damion.parham@hm.com 50% A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 9 90% Environment Comments (Environment): tevasquez@maranaaz.gov Classroom was a little warm. A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 7 Having a mix of levels in one class slows down the process and ultimately ran out of time. General Questions Other (please specify) [What was your main objective for completing this training?]: A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 0 9 1 3 2 1 To learn more about how to use excel Response Rate Form Type Evaluations Sent Evaluations Received Response Rate Post Event 10 10 100.00% Report Recommendations Interpreting the Report Below are tips to help you understand the information in the report. For additional information, please click the Help tab above the report. Summarizes scores from each student for selected question categories and questions; compare and analyze scores for all students that completed evaluations. Student comments provide additional insight into the scores displayed within the report. Determine the students’ overall perceived value derived specifically from training to proactively manage future training events. Recommended Actions Below are recommended next steps to take after reviewing the information in this report. Additionally, you'll find links to automatically run complementary reports for drillingdown further into the data or analyzing the information in another way. If any learner rated the class much lower than others, and the learner provided an email address, follow up with that person to gather additional feedback regarding the scores. Share that feedback with instructor and course managers as areas for improvement. If any learner rated the class much higher than others, especially in the areas of job impact or business results, follow up with those learners to gether additional feedback on how they were able to maximize their use of what they learned on the job. Share this feedback with course managers to ensure they share the knowledge with future learners to maximize job impact and business results. Schedule this report to be emailed automatically to the course and instructor managers on a daily basis so they are able to review performance on a regular basis. Recommended Links Run the Learner Comments report to review all the qualitative feedback for specific approaches to make the learning more effective and impactful. Run the Quick Question report to summarize the scalebased and multiplechoice answers for all of the evaluations. Run the Performance to Goals report to view how these results compared to your goals. Report Criteria Reporting Date: Nov 1 2015 to Nov 30 2015 Form Type: Follow Up; Instructor Survey; Post Event Category: Additional Questions; Business Results; Courseware; Environment; General Questions; - 8 / 9 -