際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo

Extended Collective Licensing - the view of a national library

Europeana Licensing
Europeana Licensing

Presentation given by Ben White of the British Library at the Europeana Connect Extended Collective Licensing workshop in Luxembourg

1 of 25
Downloaded 16 times
Extended Collective Licensing the view of a national library. Benjamin White, Head of Intellectual Property British Library
Extended Collective Licensing - the view of a national library
The British Library Collection 150 millions items 35km of music shelving (357 years to listen 9-5. 3 minutes of new music collected every minute.) 12km added a year from legal deposit.
British Library Mass Digitisation Collections 4 million pages of 17th 19th Century Newspapers 25 million pages of out-of-copyright books 1800 1900 2000 days of Sound Recordings 85,000 books from the 19th century
What is Mass Digitisation? Minimal or ideally no weeding top left hand corner to bottom right. Intellectual creation by curators of a thematically aligned collection. A whole historical collection or a part of a historical collection.
Text: 24 pt Bullet Bullet Bullet
Unique and rare material
Extended Collective Licensing - the view of a national library
Why digitise? Not because its there but Increasingly digital targets for cultural bodies; Educational, research and cultural benefits for ! citizens; Stimulate further artistic creativity in turn; Promote business and technology innovations.
! Europe can become a leader in the distribution of digital content, and as part of this change, our digital heritage is an important component. ! Oranges Vision The Migration of Digital Content to Open Markets. ! Comit辿 des Sages Hearing October 2010.
19th Century Study of In-Copyright Material excluded from Digitisation Total Number of titles excluded from digitisation as in- copyright = 865 Number of titles theoretically available for purchase = 173 Number of titles available in print on demand format = 140 Number in stock = 1
Extended Collective Licensing - the view of a national library
Public Domain pre 1923 in America.
Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 則2(1) The owner of the copyright in a work of any description has the exclusive right to do the acts (specified in Chapter II), as the acts restricted by the copyright in a work of that description.
Mass Digitisation Strong correlation between commercially valuable works and ability to efficiently clear rights. Research libraries interested in rare, unique, less common material including unpublished material. Inevitably this means that rights clearance issues are manifold.
Extended Collective Licensing - the view of a national library
Orphan Works - evidence Broadcast / unpublished sound recordings high? > 90% Film 21% of film in European film archives orphan. (60% of these are over 60 years old.) ARROW 2011 study of 140 titles from 1870 2010. 31% are Orphan Works.
Rights Clearance BBC estimate 12 hours to clear one hours worth of film. ARROW study shows that simultaneous rights clearance of 140 titles on average took 4 hours per book. To clear rights for the 500,000 estimated 20th century out of commerce works at the BNF it would take one person over 1200 years to clear (with no weekends).
Rights Clearance Framework and its effect on Digitisation Stick to public domain and contribute to the blackhole of the 20th Century. Only cover commercial material with active rightsholders could already be digitised so value questionable unless curated, arranged and presented differently. Spend a lot of time looking for rightsholders and then just take the legal and reputational risk with what you cannot clear.
How do you clear rights en masse in the context of mass digitisation? Extended Collective Licensing but
Issues How does it work across borders? Are collecting societies open, transparent and independently regulated? Is it acceptable to multi-national publishers? Is it acceptable to incumbent commercially active creators and authors? Does it negate all new limitations and exceptions the comfort blanket or sovepute effect and where does that leave the public interest? What happens to the money collected for the unrepresented? Does it create more problems for memory institutions orphan works?
Orphan Works Governmental Licence or an Exception? Much unique material not produced with commercial intent in mind JISC In from the Cold. Is a diligent search more appropriate for certain collections? Ethical problems with commercialising through collecting societies exacerbates problems with re-emerging owners.
What is the solution? No one size fits all.
What are the options for Out of Commerce Works and Orphan Works? Orphan Works Pure Exception US and UK Governmental Licence Canada, Japan, Hungary, UK (?) Licensing Based Solution (Extended) Scandinavia Out-of-Commerce Works Streamlined licensing solution. e.g. ECL
www.bl.uk/ip ben.white@bl.uk

More Related Content

Extended Collective Licensing - the view of a national library

  • 1. Extended Collective Licensing the view of a national library. Benjamin White, Head of Intellectual Property British Library
  • 3. The British Library Collection 150 millions items 35km of music shelving (357 years to listen 9-5. 3 minutes of new music collected every minute.) 12km added a year from legal deposit.
  • 4. British Library Mass Digitisation Collections 4 million pages of 17th 19th Century Newspapers 25 million pages of out-of-copyright books 1800 1900 2000 days of Sound Recordings 85,000 books from the 19th century
  • 5. What is Mass Digitisation? Minimal or ideally no weeding top left hand corner to bottom right. Intellectual creation by curators of a thematically aligned collection. A whole historical collection or a part of a historical collection.
  • 6. Text: 24 pt Bullet Bullet Bullet
  • 7. Unique and rare material
  • 9. Why digitise? Not because its there but Increasingly digital targets for cultural bodies; Educational, research and cultural benefits for ! citizens; Stimulate further artistic creativity in turn; Promote business and technology innovations.
  • 10. ! Europe can become a leader in the distribution of digital content, and as part of this change, our digital heritage is an important component. ! Oranges Vision The Migration of Digital Content to Open Markets. ! Comit辿 des Sages Hearing October 2010.
  • 11. 19th Century Study of In-Copyright Material excluded from Digitisation Total Number of titles excluded from digitisation as in- copyright = 865 Number of titles theoretically available for purchase = 173 Number of titles available in print on demand format = 140 Number in stock = 1
  • 13. Public Domain pre 1923 in America.
  • 14. Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 則2(1) The owner of the copyright in a work of any description has the exclusive right to do the acts (specified in Chapter II), as the acts restricted by the copyright in a work of that description.
  • 15. Mass Digitisation Strong correlation between commercially valuable works and ability to efficiently clear rights. Research libraries interested in rare, unique, less common material including unpublished material. Inevitably this means that rights clearance issues are manifold.
  • 17. Orphan Works - evidence Broadcast / unpublished sound recordings high? > 90% Film 21% of film in European film archives orphan. (60% of these are over 60 years old.) ARROW 2011 study of 140 titles from 1870 2010. 31% are Orphan Works.
  • 18. Rights Clearance BBC estimate 12 hours to clear one hours worth of film. ARROW study shows that simultaneous rights clearance of 140 titles on average took 4 hours per book. To clear rights for the 500,000 estimated 20th century out of commerce works at the BNF it would take one person over 1200 years to clear (with no weekends).
  • 19. Rights Clearance Framework and its effect on Digitisation Stick to public domain and contribute to the blackhole of the 20th Century. Only cover commercial material with active rightsholders could already be digitised so value questionable unless curated, arranged and presented differently. Spend a lot of time looking for rightsholders and then just take the legal and reputational risk with what you cannot clear.
  • 20. How do you clear rights en masse in the context of mass digitisation? Extended Collective Licensing but
  • 21. Issues How does it work across borders? Are collecting societies open, transparent and independently regulated? Is it acceptable to multi-national publishers? Is it acceptable to incumbent commercially active creators and authors? Does it negate all new limitations and exceptions the comfort blanket or sovepute effect and where does that leave the public interest? What happens to the money collected for the unrepresented? Does it create more problems for memory institutions orphan works?
  • 22. Orphan Works Governmental Licence or an Exception? Much unique material not produced with commercial intent in mind JISC In from the Cold. Is a diligent search more appropriate for certain collections? Ethical problems with commercialising through collecting societies exacerbates problems with re-emerging owners.
  • 23. What is the solution? No one size fits all.
  • 24. What are the options for Out of Commerce Works and Orphan Works? Orphan Works Pure Exception US and UK Governmental Licence Canada, Japan, Hungary, UK (?) Licensing Based Solution (Extended) Scandinavia Out-of-Commerce Works Streamlined licensing solution. e.g. ECL