際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
Fi
            a lm
        au vo ote
            di lun ch
Lu
                 ov ta N
   xe               is ry e
      m               ua E th
        bo                 l s CL erl
           ur
              g,              ec m an
                 31               to o ds
                    M               r de :
                      ar                li
                         ch
                            20            n
                               11           th
                                              e
Introduction


G辿raldine Vooren  Legal Counsel
(Images for the Future)

Leontien Bout  General Legal Counsel

EYE Film Institute Netherlands


Representing:

Association des Cin辿math竪ques Europ辿ennes
(ACE)
Introduction



 Digitization project Images for the Future

 Clearing practice at EYE Film Institute Netherlands

 VoD Platform Filmotech: voluntary ECL model

 Negotiating with collecting societies

 Recommendations for legislation
Digitization project Images for the Future



 Dutch archives received 119 million EURO from the Dutch Government

 Goal: maximum availability of the audiovisual material to the general public

 Conservation, Digitization, Contextualization and Access of 22.510 hours of
film, 2.9 million photographs
Digitization project Images for the Future


Clearing Team (since February 2008):


 Legal Counsel


 Historian


 Volunteer
Digitization project Images for the Future


Clearing Results (since February 2008)


 Total of films cleared: 3033 titles

  - Public Domain              546 titles
  - Orphan Works               1459 titles
  - Contracting Party EYE      418 titles
  - License Agreements         610 titles
Film Clearing at EYE


Research & data storage:

 Legal Assessment

 Diligent Search Guidelines for Orphan Works

 Development of a Data Management System


Getting Permission:

 Negotiations with Rights Management Societies
  (Film / Film-related material / Photographs)

 The Battle for Signatures
VoD Platform Filmotech


 Public-private partnership:

  - Film & TV Archives
  - Producers Association
  - Unions, Guilds
  - Film Fund
  - Film Festival
  - Ministry of Culture
  - Collecting Societies

 Streaming Video-on-demand platform

 Entire Dutch Film Collection

 Launch: April 7th, 2011
VoD Platform Filmotech

Repartition:

 10 % of each paid view to collecting societies

 Contract with producer (contains indemnification)
remaining 90%:

 - 65 % to licensor
 - 35 % running costs platform Filmotech

 Contract with heirs (contains no indemnification)
remaining 90%

- 50 % licensor
- 15 % reservation for third-party claims
- 35 % running costs platform
VoD platform Filmotech


Voluntary ECL Model:

 Search for rights holders by EYE

 Individual license agreements with producers

 Collective license agreement regarding other
rightsholders with Rights Management Societies

 EYE provides contact information regarding
rightsholders to Rights Management Societies
 for repartition
VoD Platform Filmotech


Voluntary ECL model:

Contracting parties Filmotech B.V. /
Rights Management Societies:

 Performing Artists (NORMA)

 Writers (LIRA)

 Directors (VEVAM)

 Producers (SEKAM )

 Music Composers (BUMA / STEMRA)
VoD Platform Filmotech


ECL Filmotech / Rights Management Societies


Contract information:

 Permission for those represented by RMS

 Indemnification for those not represented by RMS

 Indemnification also applies to orphan works

 Opt-out possibility for non- represented rightsholders

 Duration: three years plus automatic renewal
Negotiating with Rights Management
Societies (Filmotech)


Voluntary ECL Model, pitfalls:

 No one-stop shop for all rightsholders

 Negotiations time-consuming (three years)

 Not all filmmakers are represented by Rights
Management Societies

 Applicable only to royalty-based license agreement
Negotiating with Rights Management
Organizations (Photographs)


 Pictoright representing visual artists

 Our goal: one lump sum for entire collection unlimited
in time

 Their offer: - clearing only non-studio material
               - two year limitation
               - costs: 15.000 Euro per year
Recommendations:


Implementation of European legislation allowing for:

 Mandatory exceptions for publicly funded institutions:

- Digitization and online use of Orphan works
(educational / research purposes)
 - Digitization for preservation purposes and online
access on the premises for copyrighted material

 ECL model for all use by cultural institutions not
covered by these mandatory exceptions
  - Non-commercial use: no fee
  - Commercial use: limited fee

More Related Content

Filmotech Netherlands: a voluntary ECL model in the AV sector

  • 1. Fi a lm au vo ote di lun ch Lu ov ta N xe is ry e m ua E th bo l s CL erl ur g, ec m an 31 to o ds M r de : ar li ch 20 n 11 th e
  • 2. Introduction G辿raldine Vooren Legal Counsel (Images for the Future) Leontien Bout General Legal Counsel EYE Film Institute Netherlands Representing: Association des Cin辿math竪ques Europ辿ennes (ACE)
  • 3. Introduction Digitization project Images for the Future Clearing practice at EYE Film Institute Netherlands VoD Platform Filmotech: voluntary ECL model Negotiating with collecting societies Recommendations for legislation
  • 4. Digitization project Images for the Future Dutch archives received 119 million EURO from the Dutch Government Goal: maximum availability of the audiovisual material to the general public Conservation, Digitization, Contextualization and Access of 22.510 hours of film, 2.9 million photographs
  • 5. Digitization project Images for the Future Clearing Team (since February 2008): Legal Counsel Historian Volunteer
  • 6. Digitization project Images for the Future Clearing Results (since February 2008) Total of films cleared: 3033 titles - Public Domain 546 titles - Orphan Works 1459 titles - Contracting Party EYE 418 titles - License Agreements 610 titles
  • 7. Film Clearing at EYE Research & data storage: Legal Assessment Diligent Search Guidelines for Orphan Works Development of a Data Management System Getting Permission: Negotiations with Rights Management Societies (Film / Film-related material / Photographs) The Battle for Signatures
  • 8. VoD Platform Filmotech Public-private partnership: - Film & TV Archives - Producers Association - Unions, Guilds - Film Fund - Film Festival - Ministry of Culture - Collecting Societies Streaming Video-on-demand platform Entire Dutch Film Collection Launch: April 7th, 2011
  • 9. VoD Platform Filmotech Repartition: 10 % of each paid view to collecting societies Contract with producer (contains indemnification) remaining 90%: - 65 % to licensor - 35 % running costs platform Filmotech Contract with heirs (contains no indemnification) remaining 90% - 50 % licensor - 15 % reservation for third-party claims - 35 % running costs platform
  • 10. VoD platform Filmotech Voluntary ECL Model: Search for rights holders by EYE Individual license agreements with producers Collective license agreement regarding other rightsholders with Rights Management Societies EYE provides contact information regarding rightsholders to Rights Management Societies for repartition
  • 11. VoD Platform Filmotech Voluntary ECL model: Contracting parties Filmotech B.V. / Rights Management Societies: Performing Artists (NORMA) Writers (LIRA) Directors (VEVAM) Producers (SEKAM ) Music Composers (BUMA / STEMRA)
  • 12. VoD Platform Filmotech ECL Filmotech / Rights Management Societies Contract information: Permission for those represented by RMS Indemnification for those not represented by RMS Indemnification also applies to orphan works Opt-out possibility for non- represented rightsholders Duration: three years plus automatic renewal
  • 13. Negotiating with Rights Management Societies (Filmotech) Voluntary ECL Model, pitfalls: No one-stop shop for all rightsholders Negotiations time-consuming (three years) Not all filmmakers are represented by Rights Management Societies Applicable only to royalty-based license agreement
  • 14. Negotiating with Rights Management Organizations (Photographs) Pictoright representing visual artists Our goal: one lump sum for entire collection unlimited in time Their offer: - clearing only non-studio material - two year limitation - costs: 15.000 Euro per year
  • 15. Recommendations: Implementation of European legislation allowing for: Mandatory exceptions for publicly funded institutions: - Digitization and online use of Orphan works (educational / research purposes) - Digitization for preservation purposes and online access on the premises for copyrighted material ECL model for all use by cultural institutions not covered by these mandatory exceptions - Non-commercial use: no fee - Commercial use: limited fee