際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
Law MCR
Miranda v.
Arizona
By Imaan Virani
and Maya
Koparkar
Agenda
History of the Crime and Police Investigation
Important People in Case
The Trial
Legal Issue
Impact on Society at the Time
Place in Legal History
What Are Miranda Rights?
Miranda Rights
History of the Crime and
Police Investigation
Presentation on a Famous Legal Case: Miranda vs. Arizona
The Interrogation
Important People in the Case
Important People
Ernesto Miranda
Arrested in Phoenix in 1963
Unstable childhood
In and out of jail as a young man
Miranda decision was reversed
Retried and convicted without confession
Made money selling signed Miranda cards
Stabbed to death in 1976
Important People
Chief Justice Earl Warren
Former Governor of California
Ran for Vice President
Appointed to Supreme Court in
1953
Led Supreme Court to liberal
decisions in landmark cases
Died in 1974
Important People
Michael Vignera
Roy Allan Stewart Carl Calvin Westover
Arrested for robbery and
murder
Sentenced to death
Arrested for robbery
Sentenced to 30 years in
prison
Arrested for first-degree robbery
Sentenced to 30-60 years in prison
REVERSED
REVERSED
REVERSED
REVERSED
UPHELD
UPHELD
The Trial
Presentation on a Famous Legal Case: Miranda vs. Arizona
A Brief Summary of Escobedo
1964: Accused, Danny Escobedo, denied right to counsel
and confessed
Previous cases only enforced 6th amendment rights after
being charge
Court extended these rights - statement was inadmissible
Only applied under a strict set of conditions
1966 - over 150 requests for review
1964- Arizona Supreme Court
(Appeal)
DEFENCE: Confession was involuntary and rights were
not safeguarded
Conviction was UPHELD
1965- US Supreme Court
Trial
Writ of Certiorari: Review of case
Legal Issue
Is it necessary for a detained
suspect to be aware of and
understand their Fifth and
Sixth Amendment Rights
prior to questioning?
Does the police interrogation
of an individual violate their
Fifth and Sixth Amendment
Rights if they are not notified
of the rights given to them
within these amendments?
Arriving at the Majority
Opinion
Presentation on a Famous Legal Case: Miranda vs. Arizona
Dissenting Opinion
Written by Justice John Marshall Harlan
Utopian concept of voluntary
No physical/psychological brutality
Miranda gave statement freely
Proper procedures were followed
Impact on Society at the Time
Impact on Society at the Time
Miranda Cards
Changed the treatment of those arrested
Police and investigators opposed practise
Incidences of police brutality/abuse of power have
decreased
Section 3501
You have the right to
remain silent.
Anything you say can and
will be used against you in
a court of law.
You have the right to talk to
a lawyer and have present
with you while being
questioned.
If you cannot afford to hire
a lawyer, one will be
appointed to represent you
before any questioning if
you wish.
You can decide at any time
to exercise these rights and
not answer any questions or
make any statements.
Place in Legal History
Presentation on a Famous Legal Case: Miranda vs. Arizona
Presentation on a Famous Legal Case: Miranda vs. Arizona
Presentation on a Famous Legal Case: Miranda vs. Arizona
Miranda in the Future
potential alternatives
for protecting the privilege which
might be devised by Congress or
the States.
Thank you for being a great
audience!
Up Next: Multiple Choice Questions

More Related Content

Presentation on a Famous Legal Case: Miranda vs. Arizona

  • 1. Law MCR Miranda v. Arizona By Imaan Virani and Maya Koparkar
  • 2. Agenda History of the Crime and Police Investigation Important People in Case The Trial Legal Issue Impact on Society at the Time Place in Legal History
  • 5. History of the Crime and Police Investigation
  • 9. Important People Ernesto Miranda Arrested in Phoenix in 1963 Unstable childhood In and out of jail as a young man Miranda decision was reversed Retried and convicted without confession Made money selling signed Miranda cards Stabbed to death in 1976
  • 10. Important People Chief Justice Earl Warren Former Governor of California Ran for Vice President Appointed to Supreme Court in 1953 Led Supreme Court to liberal decisions in landmark cases Died in 1974
  • 11. Important People Michael Vignera Roy Allan Stewart Carl Calvin Westover Arrested for robbery and murder Sentenced to death Arrested for robbery Sentenced to 30 years in prison Arrested for first-degree robbery Sentenced to 30-60 years in prison REVERSED REVERSED REVERSED REVERSED UPHELD UPHELD
  • 14. A Brief Summary of Escobedo 1964: Accused, Danny Escobedo, denied right to counsel and confessed Previous cases only enforced 6th amendment rights after being charge Court extended these rights - statement was inadmissible Only applied under a strict set of conditions 1966 - over 150 requests for review
  • 15. 1964- Arizona Supreme Court (Appeal) DEFENCE: Confession was involuntary and rights were not safeguarded Conviction was UPHELD
  • 16. 1965- US Supreme Court Trial Writ of Certiorari: Review of case
  • 18. Is it necessary for a detained suspect to be aware of and understand their Fifth and Sixth Amendment Rights prior to questioning?
  • 19. Does the police interrogation of an individual violate their Fifth and Sixth Amendment Rights if they are not notified of the rights given to them within these amendments?
  • 20. Arriving at the Majority Opinion
  • 22. Dissenting Opinion Written by Justice John Marshall Harlan Utopian concept of voluntary No physical/psychological brutality Miranda gave statement freely Proper procedures were followed
  • 23. Impact on Society at the Time
  • 24. Impact on Society at the Time Miranda Cards Changed the treatment of those arrested Police and investigators opposed practise Incidences of police brutality/abuse of power have decreased Section 3501
  • 25. You have the right to remain silent.
  • 26. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.
  • 27. You have the right to talk to a lawyer and have present with you while being questioned.
  • 28. If you cannot afford to hire a lawyer, one will be appointed to represent you before any questioning if you wish.
  • 29. You can decide at any time to exercise these rights and not answer any questions or make any statements.
  • 30. Place in Legal History
  • 34. Miranda in the Future potential alternatives for protecting the privilege which might be devised by Congress or the States.
  • 35. Thank you for being a great audience! Up Next: Multiple Choice Questions