The document discusses OSGi and its advantages over traditional Java modularity. OSGi defines bundles as modules with explicit dependencies and versioning, allowing for loose coupling. Each bundle has its own classloader, enabling different versions of dependencies to coexist. OSGi also supports dynamic services to facilitate runtime collaboration between bundles. Popular OSGi implementations include Equinox, Felix, and Knopflerfish. OSGi allows applications to be more modular and flexible compared to traditional Java applications and libraries.
2. Why OSGi?
Javas limitations on modularity
Application > JAR > Package > Type >
Method
JARs are simply a delivery mechanism with
no runtime semantics
JARs have no visibility control
3. Why OSGi? (cont.)
JARs 鍖ght for position on the classpath, FCFS
algorithm, e.g., class overlay, maven is higher versioned
JAR wins
To summarize, Java has no support for de鍖ning or
enforcing dependencies
The consequence is tightly coupled JARs with
multidirectional and even cyclical dependencies
4. Whats OSGi?
OSGi is a dynamic module system for Java
It talks about bundles instead of JARs
Bundle = identity & dependency info + JAR
5. Whats OSGi? (cont.)
OSGi is a dynamic module system for Java
It talks about bundles instead of JARs
Bundle = identity & dependency info + JAR
Application > Bundle > Package > Type > Method
6. OSGi bundle
Identity: unique id + version combination
Dependency: packages containing API must
be explicitly export; bundles including code
that uses this API must have a matching
import
7. OSGi bundle (cont.)
with these visibility constraints, a strong basis of
loosely coupled module system is achieved
each bundle has its own class loader, making it
possible for two bundles to depend on the same
bundle with different versions
8. OSGi service
importing and exporting of packages are
static contracts
services are used to facilitate dynamic
collaboration
10. OSGi implementations
Equinox, Felix, Knop鍖er鍖sh, Snippets
Equinox: OSGi standard + extension/
extension point + fragment
Usages: Eclipse, Spring DM Server, NASA,
embedded system
13. Discussions
Why can OSGi decouple dependencies?
Whats the difference between OSGis dependency
control and Mavens dependency management?
Can they replace each other? Or can they
combine together to be a powerful match?
Whats the difference between OSGis service
injection and Springs dependency injection? Can
they replace each other? Or can they combine
together to be a powerful match?
14. Reference
OSGi and Equinox: Creating Highly
Modular Java Systems
Modular Java: Creating Flexible Applications
with Osgi and Spring
Getting Started with OSGi: Declarative
Services and Dependencies
Editor's Notes
#3: Why OSGi? Because of Java’s limitations on modularity.
Nowadays an application is normally constructed by multiple modules. Modules are appeared as JAR files in Java. Here is an abstraction hierarchy of Java: application is composed of JARs; JARs are composed of packages; packages are composed of types; and types are composed of methods
But...somehow JARs are just simply a delivery mechanism with no runtime semantics.
First of all, why are JARs just a delivery mechanism? Probably you already can tell from the abstraction hierarchy: methods, types and packages all have visibility controls, but there is no such thing in JARs! At the application level, all JARs are public!
As we all know, visibility control is important in decoupling dependencies. Think about information hiding. Since there is no such thing in JAR files, they are easily coupled to each other.
#4: The 2nd problem with JAR files is, it simply go on a flat classpath and it fight for position on the classpath. The classpath pays no attention to code versions, it simply adopts a first-come first-serve algorithm, whichever comes first wins! Let’s take a look at the picture, classes are merged at runtime. This is the so-called class overlaying. It makes supporting different versions of classes at runtime impossible. Just to remind you, maven is kind of special, if two JARs have the same group id and artifact id, the one with the higher version always wins.
To summarize...
The consequence is...
#5: OSGi (Open Service Gateway initiative) is a dynamic module system for Java
It adds a few key elements, in particular, it talks about bundles instead of JARs
A bundle is a self-describing JAR. It adds identity and dependency information on top of the JAR file. This simple idea has two effects, producers and consumers both have an opportunity to express their side of the contract, and the runtime has the information it needs to enforce these expectations.
#6: Now we need to slightly modify the abstraction hierarchy. Under the OSGi framework, bundles replace JARs as modules.
#7: So what exactly is a bundle?
First of all, it has identity information, it requires to have an unique id and version combination
And it also has dependency information, it requires that packages containing...
The producers tell the customers what they have, and the customers ask for what they need from the producers. Fair enough.
#8: with these visibility...
each bundle has its...
Now the Spring problem is fixed, right? The Symantec code can has its own Spring dependency without being affected by the Spring from the elasticpath OFTB code.
#9: Another key concept that OSGi introduces is service.
while importing and exporting of packages are only static contracts, OSGi uses service to facilitate dynamic collaboration. A service is simply an object that implements a contract, that is registered with the OSGi service registry, and with its package visible to the world. The consumer bundle only need to query the service implementation from the service registry. We will have an example in the end.
The latest OSGi implementation also supports dynamically registering and injecting these services.