This document summarizes the development of a prototype for a mobile food map application called "foodMAP" for Tufts University. It describes user feedback that indicated grad students had limited knowledge of campus food options. The prototype aimed to allow users to search for and filter food options, view routes, and leave reviews. Early testing of the prototype in Keynote gathered feedback, such as needing a search button and showing filters after food selection. The testing provided useful insights despite prototype limitations, and highlighted differences between an automated design perspective versus users preferring more manual control.
1 of 15
Download to read offline
More Related Content
Project: Food map
1. foodMAP
ENP 162 Human Factors in Human-Machine Design
Leonardo Madariaga
Assignment 3
November 2013
2. ¡°I?m not familiar with
the buildings i?m not
using¡±
¡°The hill is steeper than it
looks in maps¡±
¡°I would like to know
where there are other
spaces to study in buildings¡±
¡°People doesn?t know all
the food places around
campus¡±
¡°We stay in campus and
know where everything is,
but grad students may not
be connected¡±
Context
4. foodMAP
Predefined
FOOD ?TYPES
LIST
link ?
to ?actual ?
website
Add ?
REVIEWS
PATH
search
FILTERS
Idea
overall score: 4.5
Balou Hall
Commons Deli & Grill
Design
Adapt to the
current design
layout
Figure out ?lters
to display
different layers of
search results
Give people the
opportunity to
review the food
services around
campus
7. Test scenario
¡°You are a grad student at Tufts and a
local Burger fan. Today you will be
meeting in campus two potential
investors for your research project
coming directly from Dubai. You are
expecting to talk in an informal
context, therefore you are searching
for the best place for local and
delicious burgers.¡±
Task 1: Find the best rated burger near campus
Task 3: Rate the place you visited
Task 2: Explore the ¡°how to get there function¡±
Tasks using foodMAP
Testers Setting
task
page
ipad
laptop
12. Outcomes
Dimension Question Average Rating
Positioning buttons/links 1.Was the initial link to food map easy to ?nd? 4,67
Positioning buttons/links 2.Were the buttons and links clear and intuitive? 3,33
Positioning labels/headings 3.Were the labels and headings to be where you expected
them?
3,33
Information hierarchy 4.Was the hierarchy of the information displayed useful? 4
Navigation 5.Was ?nding the ¡°best burger¡± near campus easy to ?nd? 4,67
Navigation 6.Was the reviewing process easy to accomplish? 4,67
Tester Task 1 Task 2 Task 3
Tester 1 1.09 min N/I 1.52 min
Tester 2 2.04 min N/I 2.10 min
Tester 3 1.41 min 1.5 min 2.36 min
Average 1.51 min 1.5 min 2 min
Likert Scale:
1: Strongly Disagree
2:Disagree
3: Neutral
4:Agree
5: Strongly Agree
¡°A search button could be useful, instead fo the
type of food menu¡±
¡°Show the ?lters after the type of food has
been selected¡±
¡°Could I get to the review
section in less clicks¡±
15. Final ideas
Since automation is based largely in data storage and
retrieval, prototyping in keynote, made impossible to
address more reality to the navigation of the map.
Early testing is very helpful to assess the design, even due
to it?s limited functionality.
The view of the system designer about automation is very different
from the users perspective, this last one can experience a less degree
of freedom if everything is automated.
More manual control, increases input functionality over the interface,
which can confuse the user.