際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo

FOSS CON Korea 2018

Minsuk Lee
Minsuk Lee

This document discusses why companies should adopt open source software. It notes that open source allows companies to multiply their investments, benefit from recent advances, spread software knowledge, increase developer bases, upgrade skills, and build reputation. It also discusses how open source allows for faster startups, projects, and addressing customer needs through collaboration with the community. The document advocates that companies should openly contribute their work to avoid duplicating efforts and accruing technical debt when adopting open source.

1 of 14
Downloaded 29 times
Open Source Software Laboratory, Kookmin University Open Source Software, From Why to How Minsuk Lee School of Software, Kookmin University minsuk@kookmin.ac.kr
KMU OSS Lab. Why Open Source Software ? Multiplying the companys investment Benefitting from the most recent advance Spreading knowledge of the software Increasing the developer base Upgrading internal developer skills Building reputation Recruiting and retaining developers Faster startup of new companies and projects Ref. Open Source in the Enterprise, Andy Oram & Zaheda Bhorat (http://opensource.amazon.com) 蠍 貉る~~ in http://bit.ly/OSS-ENT
KMU OSS Lab. BUSINESS WITHOUT OPEN SOURCE BUSINESS WITH OPEN SOURCE T Tech. Debt aka. RISK (COST) Why Open Source?
KMU OSS Lab. Top Contributing Companies to GitHub 2018.5, $7.5B # of REPOs # of Github User MICROSOFT GOOGLE REDHAT FACEBOOK UBER IBM GITHUB 2018.10, $34.0B
REDHAT MICROSOFT GOOGLE NASDAQ ORACLE :-) When MICROSOFT said We love LINUX When IBM bought REDHAT When MS bought GITHUB (ref, Yahoo Finance)
KMU OSS Lab. At this point, Our customer also needs e, f, and feature Ais the same as a, but API is different Why Open Source? (even with permissive licenses) Community Our Company (with innovative customer) v1.0 V1.0a (a) +a +b,c v1.1 (bc) V1.1d (abcd) +a,d X2.0 v1.2 (Abce) +A,e V1.2f (abcdef) +e,f Fork v1.0 and Fix bugs, customize for our customer Add new feature a Add feature b, c Our customer needs feature b, d Fork v1.1 and, Fix bugs again, customize again Add feature a again, add feature d Add feature aas A, Add feature e Add feature e, f Branch out to a new version Or, fork v1.2 and, Fix bugs again, customize again Add feature dagain, add feature f, Modify other module using a for A Add features d,f,g,h,i,j Now v2.0 v2.0 (AbcDefghij) +dfghij +d,f BAD CHOICE
KMU OSS Lab. Why Open Source? (even with permissive licenses) Community 巽 Our Company (with innovative customer) v1.0 v1.01 (a) +a +b,c v1.1 (abc) v1.11 (abcd) +d v1.2 (abcde) +e V1.21 (abcdef) Fork v1.0, Fix bugs, customize for our customer Add new feature a, and Pull-Request to merge Add feature b, c Our customer needs feature b, d Fork v1.1, add feature d, and Pull-Request to merge Add feature e Add features g, h, I ,j Now v2.0 v2.0 (abcdefghi) +ghij +f GOOD CHOICE Our customer needs feature e, f Fork v1.2 and add feature f, and Pull-Request to merge No Technical Debt, No Redundant Work
KMU OSS Lab. What is so called OPEN? Open to community The Project : Source Code, Documents, Roadmap The Governance (process) : Decision Making, Contributing The People : Developers, Tech Evangelist, Open internally first (for yourself) Contributing the works based-on open source to the open source Any technical works on the open source are Works Some non-technical works on the open source are also Works If any of our project is open, keep it open really By the way, there needs something called governance
KMU OSS Lab. Why we hesitate? Competition? Then, open early !! Win the technology ownership by keeping the originality Based on the ownership, lock users in with the community Immature Code? Then, open early !! Developers and the community will do the right thing Peer review always works Security? Then, open early !! Serious users will look and watch your codes line by line Let good hackers work earlier than bad hackers
KMU OSS Lab. Korea in the open source world In 2017 Datamation (ref, http://bit.ly/top35oss-2017) among top 35 open source companies Only Samsung : mainly for Linux kernel contribution In 2017 Github (ref, http://bit.ly/github-top2017) No Korean company listed on top 76 companies In 2016 onalytica report for top 100 brand/person NONE In Ventureradar.com for open source software NONE
KMU OSS Lab. If you are in charge, KEEP CALM and OPEN
KMU OSS Lab. What / When / How to open? What What your competitors want When Before your competitors open Open as early as possible (at the beginning stage of the project) How Open really. Open and do the marketing Open and communicate Open and help community, especially newbies Open and see what happen
KMU OSS Lab. If you are not in charge, the TODOs are: Tell your employer, manager, colleagues We are using OPEN SOURCE Its the main source of our INNOVATION We need 100K more DEVELOPERS without it It helps our BUSINESS a lot We have to help the COMMUNITIES for us We need time with the COMMUNITIES Lets OPEN our CODE Lets START PROJECTS with COMMUNITY Lets OPEN OURSELVES Ill quit if our company is not going to ILoveOPENSOURCE
Minsuk Lee School of Software, Kookmin University http://hl1itj.tistory.com 覓殊 襴危磯 貉る┝讀 [-觜襴-殊＾蟇企蟆渚 2.0 覩手記 殊伎] 磯 伎 給.

More Related Content

FOSS CON Korea 2018

  • 1. Open Source Software Laboratory, Kookmin University Open Source Software, From Why to How Minsuk Lee School of Software, Kookmin University minsuk@kookmin.ac.kr
  • 2. KMU OSS Lab. Why Open Source Software ? Multiplying the companys investment Benefitting from the most recent advance Spreading knowledge of the software Increasing the developer base Upgrading internal developer skills Building reputation Recruiting and retaining developers Faster startup of new companies and projects Ref. Open Source in the Enterprise, Andy Oram & Zaheda Bhorat (http://opensource.amazon.com) 蠍 貉る~~ in http://bit.ly/OSS-ENT
  • 3. KMU OSS Lab. BUSINESS WITHOUT OPEN SOURCE BUSINESS WITH OPEN SOURCE T Tech. Debt aka. RISK (COST) Why Open Source?
  • 4. KMU OSS Lab. Top Contributing Companies to GitHub 2018.5, $7.5B # of REPOs # of Github User MICROSOFT GOOGLE REDHAT FACEBOOK UBER IBM GITHUB 2018.10, $34.0B
  • 5. REDHAT MICROSOFT GOOGLE NASDAQ ORACLE :-) When MICROSOFT said We love LINUX When IBM bought REDHAT When MS bought GITHUB (ref, Yahoo Finance)
  • 6. KMU OSS Lab. At this point, Our customer also needs e, f, and feature Ais the same as a, but API is different Why Open Source? (even with permissive licenses) Community Our Company (with innovative customer) v1.0 V1.0a (a) +a +b,c v1.1 (bc) V1.1d (abcd) +a,d X2.0 v1.2 (Abce) +A,e V1.2f (abcdef) +e,f Fork v1.0 and Fix bugs, customize for our customer Add new feature a Add feature b, c Our customer needs feature b, d Fork v1.1 and, Fix bugs again, customize again Add feature a again, add feature d Add feature aas A, Add feature e Add feature e, f Branch out to a new version Or, fork v1.2 and, Fix bugs again, customize again Add feature dagain, add feature f, Modify other module using a for A Add features d,f,g,h,i,j Now v2.0 v2.0 (AbcDefghij) +dfghij +d,f BAD CHOICE
  • 7. KMU OSS Lab. Why Open Source? (even with permissive licenses) Community 巽 Our Company (with innovative customer) v1.0 v1.01 (a) +a +b,c v1.1 (abc) v1.11 (abcd) +d v1.2 (abcde) +e V1.21 (abcdef) Fork v1.0, Fix bugs, customize for our customer Add new feature a, and Pull-Request to merge Add feature b, c Our customer needs feature b, d Fork v1.1, add feature d, and Pull-Request to merge Add feature e Add features g, h, I ,j Now v2.0 v2.0 (abcdefghi) +ghij +f GOOD CHOICE Our customer needs feature e, f Fork v1.2 and add feature f, and Pull-Request to merge No Technical Debt, No Redundant Work
  • 8. KMU OSS Lab. What is so called OPEN? Open to community The Project : Source Code, Documents, Roadmap The Governance (process) : Decision Making, Contributing The People : Developers, Tech Evangelist, Open internally first (for yourself) Contributing the works based-on open source to the open source Any technical works on the open source are Works Some non-technical works on the open source are also Works If any of our project is open, keep it open really By the way, there needs something called governance
  • 9. KMU OSS Lab. Why we hesitate? Competition? Then, open early !! Win the technology ownership by keeping the originality Based on the ownership, lock users in with the community Immature Code? Then, open early !! Developers and the community will do the right thing Peer review always works Security? Then, open early !! Serious users will look and watch your codes line by line Let good hackers work earlier than bad hackers
  • 10. KMU OSS Lab. Korea in the open source world In 2017 Datamation (ref, http://bit.ly/top35oss-2017) among top 35 open source companies Only Samsung : mainly for Linux kernel contribution In 2017 Github (ref, http://bit.ly/github-top2017) No Korean company listed on top 76 companies In 2016 onalytica report for top 100 brand/person NONE In Ventureradar.com for open source software NONE
  • 11. KMU OSS Lab. If you are in charge, KEEP CALM and OPEN
  • 12. KMU OSS Lab. What / When / How to open? What What your competitors want When Before your competitors open Open as early as possible (at the beginning stage of the project) How Open really. Open and do the marketing Open and communicate Open and help community, especially newbies Open and see what happen
  • 13. KMU OSS Lab. If you are not in charge, the TODOs are: Tell your employer, manager, colleagues We are using OPEN SOURCE Its the main source of our INNOVATION We need 100K more DEVELOPERS without it It helps our BUSINESS a lot We have to help the COMMUNITIES for us We need time with the COMMUNITIES Lets OPEN our CODE Lets START PROJECTS with COMMUNITY Lets OPEN OURSELVES Ill quit if our company is not going to ILoveOPENSOURCE
  • 14. Minsuk Lee School of Software, Kookmin University http://hl1itj.tistory.com 覓殊 襴危磯 貉る┝讀 [-觜襴-殊＾蟇企蟆渚 2.0 覩手記 殊伎] 磯 伎 給.