際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo

froileen

Download as PPTX, PDF
Froileen Villacruz
Froileen Villacruz

This document discusses genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and the author's perspective on them. It provides background on what GMOs are and how genetic engineering techniques are used to create them. The author expresses that they are not entirely "pro-GMO" or "anti-GMO" because each situation needs to be examined individually considering the positives and negatives. Many factors like environmental, economic, and psychological need to be weighed for each case. The author believes blanket views for or against GMOs do not account for the complexities of individual situations where a GMO solution may sometimes be good and other times not.

1 of 16
Download to read offline
Camarines Norte State College DAET, CAMARINES NORTEBACHELOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATIONPREPARED BY:FROILEEN VILLACRUZBSED 1-CSUBMITTED TO:MS. KATS POBRE; INSTRUCTOR
GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMA genetically modified organism (GMO) or genetically engineered organism (GEO) is an organism whose genetic material has been altered using genetic engineering techniques. These techniques, generally known as recombinant DNA technology, use DNA molecules from different sources, which are combined into one molecule to create a new set of genes.
This DNA is then transferred into an organism, giving it modified or novel genes. Transgenic organisms, a subset of GMOs, are organisms which have inserted DNA that originated in a different species. Some GMOs contain no DNA from other species and are therefore not transgenic but cisgenic.
WhyIm not pro-GMO (in the way anti-GMO people think)
Science and technology have provided humans with many advances. Some have been very been horribly destructive, with everything in between. Many advances have both positive and negative aspects, which can make discussing and implementing them really complicated. Im not the first one to say that science is neutral, and humans are the ones that implement it in good or bad ways.
The various methods of generating electricity are a great example. Humans have become dependent on energy for so many things, some frivolous and some necessary (depending on your point of view). Unless we are all willing to forego electricity, we must find some way to power our lives. Current methods, including coal, have harmful unintended consequences that many of us would say outweigh the positives that we get from the electricity that is generated. Water power, once thought to be one of the cleanest methods of generating electricity, has been found to cause problems big and small. Nuclear has its own set of problems, as does wind.
Because each solution has positive and negative effects, the best we can do is examine each situation individually using the best science available and decide how to achieve the most positive effects while decreasing the negatives.Plant genetics is no different from power generation in this respect.
Every individual plant trait obtained with biotechnology, mutagensis, wide crosses, etc has its own set of positives and negatives. This means that sometimes a biotech solution will work well, sometimes a low-tech traditional solution is best, sometimes the necessary solution is totally out of the box. It makes no sense at all to be pro-GMO or anti-hybrid
or anything like that because those stances dont take into account the intricacies of individual situations. There might be times when using a hybrid is a bad idea and times when using a GMO is a good idea, but there will also be times when the opposite cases are true!
To complicate things further, plant traits cant just be considered on their own merit. There will usually also be a complex set of factors including psychology in the form of tradition, fears, education, and so on. Theres economic factors from the individual level all the way up to local, national, and global levels
Current methods, including coal, have harmful unintended consequences that many of us would say outweigh the positives that we get from the electricity that is generated. Water power, once thought to be one of the cleanest methods of generating electricity, has been found to cause problems big and small. Nuclear has its own set of problems, as does wind.
Theres environmental factors of course, since any agricultural methods can have an effect on ecosystems near and far. And thats just a few of the many factors that might be involved. We also have to consider what our goals are and how they fit into the big picture.
Considering all of these factors isnt easy, which I think is a big part of why some people like to sum things up and be anti this or pro that. Easy isnt always right, though.By; Froileen puwa Villacruz
TRIVIAGloFish the first genetically modified animal to be sold as a pet
thank you forreading
The end

More Related Content

froileen

  • 1. Camarines Norte State College DAET, CAMARINES NORTEBACHELOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATIONPREPARED BY:FROILEEN VILLACRUZBSED 1-CSUBMITTED TO:MS. KATS POBRE; INSTRUCTOR
  • 2. GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMA genetically modified organism (GMO) or genetically engineered organism (GEO) is an organism whose genetic material has been altered using genetic engineering techniques. These techniques, generally known as recombinant DNA technology, use DNA molecules from different sources, which are combined into one molecule to create a new set of genes.
  • 3. This DNA is then transferred into an organism, giving it modified or novel genes. Transgenic organisms, a subset of GMOs, are organisms which have inserted DNA that originated in a different species. Some GMOs contain no DNA from other species and are therefore not transgenic but cisgenic.
  • 4. WhyIm not pro-GMO (in the way anti-GMO people think)
  • 5. Science and technology have provided humans with many advances. Some have been very been horribly destructive, with everything in between. Many advances have both positive and negative aspects, which can make discussing and implementing them really complicated. Im not the first one to say that science is neutral, and humans are the ones that implement it in good or bad ways.
  • 6. The various methods of generating electricity are a great example. Humans have become dependent on energy for so many things, some frivolous and some necessary (depending on your point of view). Unless we are all willing to forego electricity, we must find some way to power our lives. Current methods, including coal, have harmful unintended consequences that many of us would say outweigh the positives that we get from the electricity that is generated. Water power, once thought to be one of the cleanest methods of generating electricity, has been found to cause problems big and small. Nuclear has its own set of problems, as does wind.
  • 7. Because each solution has positive and negative effects, the best we can do is examine each situation individually using the best science available and decide how to achieve the most positive effects while decreasing the negatives.Plant genetics is no different from power generation in this respect.
  • 8. Every individual plant trait obtained with biotechnology, mutagensis, wide crosses, etc has its own set of positives and negatives. This means that sometimes a biotech solution will work well, sometimes a low-tech traditional solution is best, sometimes the necessary solution is totally out of the box. It makes no sense at all to be pro-GMO or anti-hybrid
  • 9. or anything like that because those stances dont take into account the intricacies of individual situations. There might be times when using a hybrid is a bad idea and times when using a GMO is a good idea, but there will also be times when the opposite cases are true!
  • 10. To complicate things further, plant traits cant just be considered on their own merit. There will usually also be a complex set of factors including psychology in the form of tradition, fears, education, and so on. Theres economic factors from the individual level all the way up to local, national, and global levels
  • 11. Current methods, including coal, have harmful unintended consequences that many of us would say outweigh the positives that we get from the electricity that is generated. Water power, once thought to be one of the cleanest methods of generating electricity, has been found to cause problems big and small. Nuclear has its own set of problems, as does wind.
  • 12. Theres environmental factors of course, since any agricultural methods can have an effect on ecosystems near and far. And thats just a few of the many factors that might be involved. We also have to consider what our goals are and how they fit into the big picture.
  • 13. Considering all of these factors isnt easy, which I think is a big part of why some people like to sum things up and be anti this or pro that. Easy isnt always right, though.By; Froileen puwa Villacruz
  • 14. TRIVIAGloFish the first genetically modified animal to be sold as a pet
  • 15. thank you forreading