Reformist and feminist scholars have developed frameworks for progressive Islam by challenging traditional interpretations of women's roles and sexuality embodied in sharia. They argue that sharia does not directly reflect God's will but is a product of human interpretations influenced by historical social values. Feminist scholars also point out that sharia and Quran interpretations were carried out mostly by men and reflect a male understanding, resulting in gender bias against women. Reformists believe putting sharia in its socio-political context allows for more progressive Quran interpretations on gender and sexuality, as Muslims are not bound to exclusive historical interpretations. Feminists have used techniques like women reinterpreting Quranic verses in light of their socio-historical context to develop frameworks for
1 of 2
Download to read offline
More Related Content
Gender islam
1. sexuality, gender and islam
Frameworks for Progressive Islam
It is important to look at the work of (reformist and feminist) scholars who have
explored the topics of andsexuality and gender in Islam. They have developed
viewpoints that challenge traditional ideas about womens roles and sexuality that are
embodied in the shariah. For example, the idea that men are superior and therefore
should be privileged over women (gender bias) has been challenged and new
interpretations of the verses that gave rise to these opinions have been made. This
movement by scholars, activists and others to challenge the injustice and inequality that
exists in Muslim laws and societies has been called progressive Islam, reformist Islam
as well as by other names. The Safra Project will use the term progressive Islam and
we will use the term frameworks to talk about the various structures, techniques and
methods used in the progressive Islam movement. These frameworks also give us with
a context in which to look at the topic of same-sex sexuality(and gender identity) and
Islam.
Reformists and feminists have proposed to move away from the shariah. They have
devised several reasons for this and developed various methodologies to devise
frameworks for progressive Islam. Some scholars believe that shariah, unlike the
Qur'an, does not directly reflect Gods will but is a collection of interpretations of the
Qur'an developed over time. According to this reformist viewpoint shariah is merely an
understanding of Islamthat has been influenced by traditional customs and social values
of the historical time in which it was formed. These reformists believe that
challenging shariah is therefore only challenging a particular understanding of Islam,
rather than challenging Islam itself (An-Naim and Rahman).
Feminist scholars have also pointed out that interpretations of the Qur'an and
formulation of shariah have been carried out mostly by men, and therefore reflect a
male understanding of Islam based on a male experience of life. This has led to the
existence of gender bias in Muslim laws and to patriarchal practices in Muslim societies
(Wadud, Mernissi, An-Naim,). This gender bias towards men to the detriment of
women is reflected in commentaries of the Qur'an, which, feminists argue, have
become more and more restrictive of womens rights over time (Stowasser).
The formulation of Muslim laws that enforce male superiority over women has been
particularly influenced by the spread and use of hadith that talk about women
negatively. However, the reliability of hadith, particularly,hadith talking about gender
(roles) and sexuality, has been questioned by a number of scholars. Muslims
individually and collectively have different opinions on which hadith can be relied on
and which cannot. Even so-called true hadith have been found to contain authors
whose characters do not hold up to careful scrutiny. The Qur'an is the only text that is
2. agreed upon by Muslims as a trustworthy source. This has been talked about in detail
by a number of scholars (see Mernissi, Hassan, Wadud for more information). As a
result of this debate over the (un)reliability of hadith, we will not talk about hadith here
in detail.
Reformists and feminist scholars argue that more progressive interpretations of the
Qur'an on topics aboutgender and sexuality become possible, once shariah is put in its
socio-political and historical context. This means acknowledging shariah as a product of
human (largely male) interpretations, particularly when questioning the reliability
of hadith on gender (roles) and sexuality. They therefore believe that, Muslims are not
bound to one set of historical and exclusive interpretations of the Qur'an. In this way
Muslims can themselves take part in the development of frameworks for progressive
Islam.
In order to develop these frameworks feminists have used various techniques. These
include the re-interpretation of Qur'anic verses by women themselves, conducted in the
light of the socio-historical context in which they were revealed. This method aims to
make sure that the interpretation reflects womens perspectives and understanding of
the Qur'an. (Wadud, Hassan, Ali, Mernissi, An-Naim). Many Muslim feminist scholars
believe that Islam began a new era envisaging equality for all, including gender
equality. These feminists believe that the Qur'an formed the basis on which women
could achieve full empowerment. However, this development, they argue, was and
continues to be impeded by the privileged position of men over women (patriarchy)
leading to gender bias in Muslim societies and Muslim laws (Mernissi).
www.safraproject.org/sgi-genderroles.htm