Final version of presentation to "Social Media in Government" conference in Edmonton, Canada on January 27th 2010
1 of 40
More Related Content
Getting More People Involved: Keeping More People Involved
1. Getting more people involved: Keeping more people involvedDealing with the 90-9-1 ruleDr Crispin ButterissFounding Partner, Bang the Table Pty Ltdbangthetable.comonlinecommunityengagement.com twitter.com/bangthetablefacebook.com/bangthetableslideshare.net/bangthetable
2. WHAT AM I TALKING ABOUT?Me & Bang the Table90-9-1 RuleOur dataThree case studiesTen principles for removing barriers to entry
4. 90-9-1 RULEStates that... 90% of visitors are voyeurs9% of visitors get a little involved1% of visitors do most of the workMost people dont have a lot to say
5. MORE A GUIDING PRINCIPLE THAN A LAW...10% of Twitter users make 90% of Tweets10% of Social Network users provide 30% of content15% of Wikipedia editors make 90% of edits5% of all Internet users blogInequality is universal...and not limited to the web (just more measurable)
6. IS IT A PROBLEM? Obviously, if you want to assess the "feelings of the community" it's highly unfair if one subgroup's [smaller group of] members have the same representation as another subgroup's [larger group of] members. More importantly, such inequities would give you a biased understanding of the community, because many differences almost certainly exist between people who post a lot and those who post a little. And you would never hear from the silent majority of lurkers.Name withheld
7. IS THIS PROBLEM?Obviously, if you want to assess the "feelings of the community" it's highly unfair if one subgroup's [smaller group] members have the same representation as another subgroup's 580,000 members. More importantly, such inequities would give you a biased understanding of the community, because many differences almost certainly exist between people who post a lot and those who post a little. And you would never hear from the silent majority of lurkers. It isnt obvious to me
8. LETS TAKE ANOTHER LOOKObviously, if you want to assess the "feelings of the community" it's highly unfair if one subgroup's [smaller group] members have the same representation as another subgroup's [larger group] members. More importantly, such inequities would give you a biased understanding of the community, because many differences almost certainly exist between people who post a lot and those who post a little. And you would never hear from the silent majority of lurkers.
10. DOES PARTICIPATION INEQUALITY CREATE A BIASED UNDERSTANDING?No.Policy is (or should be) created based on the strength of an argument, not the number of times it is repeated.
11. BUT WHAT ABOUT THE SILENT MAJORITY?Not a problem.Experience shows us that people will get involved if they feel strongly enough and that the web opens up the conversation to marginalised majorities.As long as there are no deliberate or inadvertent barriers to entry.
12. Participation inequality is only a problem if barriers prevent people from participating....Otherwise it is simply free will