Krashens theory of language learning (1).pdfTausifMasud1
油
Stephen Krashen developed a theory of language acquisition consisting of five main hypotheses: 1) the acquisition-learning hypothesis states that acquisition is subconscious while learning is conscious, 2) the monitor hypothesis explains that learning serves as an editor but overuse can inhibit acquisition, 3) the natural order hypothesis proposes that acquisition follows a natural progression, 4) the input hypothesis claims we acquire via comprehensible input just beyond our level, and 5) the affective filter hypothesis argues that factors like anxiety can block acquisition. Krashen's theory transformed language teaching in the 1980s and remains influential in second language acquisition theory today.
Krashen's five hypotheses on second language acquisition shifted the culture of language classrooms. The Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis proposes there are two independent ways to develop linguistic skills: acquisition, which is subconscious, and learning, which is conscious. The Input Hypothesis states that acquisition occurs when learners receive input just beyond their current level. The Monitor Hypothesis explains that acquired competence initiates utterances while learning edits for accuracy, but only under certain conditions. The Natural Order Hypothesis claims grammatical structures are acquired in a predictable order regardless of factors like age or language. Finally, the Affective Filter Hypothesis argues factors like anxiety and motivation can impede or facilitate language acquisition by raising or
The Natural Approach is a language teaching method based on theories of second language acquisition. It focuses on providing students with comprehensible input through meaningful communication activities. Students progress through three stages: pre-production, early production, and speech emergence. The teacher acts as a source of input, manager of the learning environment, and director of classroom activities. The key principles are that language acquisition occurs naturally through communication, errors are accepted, and students should not be forced to produce language before they are ready.
Stephen Krashen developed five hypotheses about second language acquisition:
1. The Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis distinguishes natural language acquisition from conscious learning. Acquisition is unconscious while learning involves formal instruction and conscious learning of rules.
2. The Monitor Hypothesis states that acquired competence initiates utterances while learned competence acts as an editor. Over-reliance on editing can hinder language production.
3. The Natural Order Hypothesis posits that certain grammatical structures are acquired earlier than others in a predictable order regardless of factors like age or language.
4. The Input Hypothesis claims we acquire language by understanding input that is slightly beyond our current level of competence.
5.
Krashen's theory of second language acquisition consists of six main hypotheses: the Acquisition-Learning hypothesis, the Monitor hypothesis, the Natural Order hypothesis, the Input hypothesis, the Affective Filter hypothesis, and the Reading Hypothesis. The document then provides explanations of how each hypothesis can apply to second language teaching, with a focus on creating opportunities for natural communication, balancing accuracy and fluency, teaching language in the order it is naturally acquired, providing comprehensible input, establishing a low-anxiety classroom environment, and incorporating reading.
Krashen's Monitor Model theorizes that second language is acquired similarly to first language acquisition. It involves two processes: acquisition, which is subconscious learning similar to a child's first language development, and learning, which is formal classroom instruction. The model also proposes that language is acquired in a natural order, is facilitated by comprehensible input, and can be filtered by affective factors like anxiety. While influential, the model has been criticized for its lack of empirical evidence and downplaying of output and grammar instruction.
1. Stephen Krashen developed five central hypotheses about language acquisition in the 1980s that transformed language teaching, including the acquisition-learning hypothesis, monitor hypothesis, natural order hypothesis, input hypothesis, and affective filter hypothesis.
2. The acquisition-learning hypothesis distinguishes between conscious learning and unconscious acquisition of a language and claims learning does not necessarily become acquisition.
3. The monitor hypothesis states that learned knowledge only functions as an editor and acquisition initiates fluency, with three problematic conditions for monitor use.
109Learning OutcomesBy the end of this chapter you will BenitoSumpter862
油
109
Learning Outcomes
By the end of this chapter you will be able to accomplish the following objectives:
1. In the context of Krashens input hypothesis, analyze and interpret the importance of compre-
hensible language input.
2. Explain how affective factors can interfere with learning and how teachers can help to reduce
their impact.
3. Define the interaction hypothesis and assess its role in language teaching and learning.
4. Summarize the principle characteristics of communicative language teaching and explain its
relationship to communicative competence.
5. Identify and evaluate the factors that contribute to ELLs becoming long-term language
learners.
5Teaching English Language Learners
Monkeybusinessimages/iStock/Thinkstock
CO_TX
CO_NL
CO_CRD
CT CN
pip82223_05_c05_109-134.indd 109 6/30/15 11:12 AM
息 2015 Bridgepoint Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Not for resale or redistribution.
Introduction
Introduction
Whatever their age and grade level, whatever their first language, ELLs have one goal in com-
mon: communicative competencethe ability to function effectively in English in both social
and academic settings. Helping them to reach that goal is the teachers main objective. We
ended the last chapter with a description of how the concept of communicative competence
contributed to the development of communicative teaching approaches. One of the more
prominent of these was developed by Stephen Krashen in the 1980s and was called the natu-
ral approach. This approach was based on five hypotheses about language acquisition (see
Krashens Five Hypotheses), and while theorists have taken issue with the scope and details
of some of them, two of the hypotheses have influenced second language teaching for the
past several decades and are widely accepted as pillars of communicative language teaching.
These are the input hypothesis (Chapter 2) and the affective filter hypothesis, which we will
examine along with the interaction hypothesis proposed by Michael Long (1996). To under-
stand how these three hypotheses are realized in classroom practice, we will examine the
four defining characteristics of communicative language teaching.
As we delve deeper into communicative teaching practices, we begin with a basic question:
What is the teachers main objective in teaching ELLs? Simply stated, it is to help ELLs acquire
all the English they need for social and academic purposes while simultaneously learning the
content knowledge appropriate to their grade level. With some young learners, and under
certain conditions, teachers can meet this objective fairly quickly, sometimes within the
school year. For others, especially those who begin later than kindergarten or first grade, it
takes longer, and although the authors of most accountability measures assume that it takes
three years (Chapter 3), that is not the case for all learners. The overarching goal in teaching
ELLs, then, is to keep them fr ...
109Learning OutcomesBy the end of this chapter you will SantosConleyha
油
109
Learning Outcomes
By the end of this chapter you will be able to accomplish the following objectives:
1. In the context of Krashens input hypothesis, analyze and interpret the importance of compre-
hensible language input.
2. Explain how affective factors can interfere with learning and how teachers can help to reduce
their impact.
3. Define the interaction hypothesis and assess its role in language teaching and learning.
4. Summarize the principle characteristics of communicative language teaching and explain its
relationship to communicative competence.
5. Identify and evaluate the factors that contribute to ELLs becoming long-term language
learners.
5Teaching English Language Learners
Monkeybusinessimages/iStock/Thinkstock
CO_TX
CO_NL
CO_CRD
CT CN
pip82223_05_c05_109-134.indd 109 6/30/15 11:12 AM
息 2015 Bridgepoint Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Not for resale or redistribution.
Introduction
Introduction
Whatever their age and grade level, whatever their first language, ELLs have one goal in com-
mon: communicative competencethe ability to function effectively in English in both social
and academic settings. Helping them to reach that goal is the teachers main objective. We
ended the last chapter with a description of how the concept of communicative competence
contributed to the development of communicative teaching approaches. One of the more
prominent of these was developed by Stephen Krashen in the 1980s and was called the natu-
ral approach. This approach was based on five hypotheses about language acquisition (see
Krashens Five Hypotheses), and while theorists have taken issue with the scope and details
of some of them, two of the hypotheses have influenced second language teaching for the
past several decades and are widely accepted as pillars of communicative language teaching.
These are the input hypothesis (Chapter 2) and the affective filter hypothesis, which we will
examine along with the interaction hypothesis proposed by Michael Long (1996). To under-
stand how these three hypotheses are realized in classroom practice, we will examine the
four defining characteristics of communicative language teaching.
As we delve deeper into communicative teaching practices, we begin with a basic question:
What is the teachers main objective in teaching ELLs? Simply stated, it is to help ELLs acquire
all the English they need for social and academic purposes while simultaneously learning the
content knowledge appropriate to their grade level. With some young learners, and under
certain conditions, teachers can meet this objective fairly quickly, sometimes within the
school year. For others, especially those who begin later than kindergarten or first grade, it
takes longer, and although the authors of most accountability measures assume that it takes
three years (Chapter 3), that is not the case for all learners. The overarching goal in teaching
ELLs, then, is to keep them fr ...
Krashen's Monitor Model of second language acquisition consists of five hypotheses: 1) Language is acquired through meaningful interaction, not formal instruction. 2) Grammatical structures are acquired in a predictable order. 3) People acquire language best from messages just beyond their current level. 4) Conscious learning acts as an editor but not the primary means of acquisition. 5) Affective factors like anxiety and motivation can impede or enable acquisition by raising or lowering an affective filter.
This document summarizes Stephen Krashen's Monitor Model Theory of second language acquisition, which includes five main hypotheses:
1) The Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis distinguishes between subconscious language acquisition and conscious language learning.
2) The Natural Order Hypothesis claims language is acquired in a predictable order regardless of teaching.
3) The Monitor Hypothesis describes the role of learned grammar rules in monitoring spoken output.
4) The Input Hypothesis states that language is acquired through comprehensible input at one's current level.
5) The Affective Filter Hypothesis proposes positive affect leads to more language acquisition by lowering the mental block to input.
This document discusses Stephen Krashen's Monitor Model of second language acquisition. It provides background on Krashen, including that he is an American linguist who developed five hypotheses around second language learning. One of the hypotheses is the Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis, which distinguishes between acquiring a language naturally through use (acquisition) versus learning a language through formal instruction. Another is the Affective Filter Hypothesis, which proposes that learners can be mentally blocked from learning if they have a high "affective filter" due to anxiety or other affective factors. The document provides examples of how teachers can lower students' affective filters to optimize language learning.
The Natural Approach is a language teaching method developed by Tracy Terrell and Stephen Krashen that claims language is acquired similarly to a first language through meaningful communication. It focuses on providing comprehensible input through activities that are slightly above students' current language level. Students first develop comprehension skills through listening and reading before speaking. Speaking emerges gradually without early emphasis on grammatical accuracy. The approach is based on Krashen's theories including the Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis, the Natural Order Hypothesis, the Input Hypothesis, and the Affective Filter Hypothesis.
The document discusses the Natural Approach developed by Tracy Terrell and Stephen Krashen. Some key points:
- The Natural Approach focuses on teaching communicative abilities through meaningful input and a low-anxiety environment.
- Krashen's theories that underlie this approach include the acquisition/learning distinction, the monitor hypothesis, the natural order hypothesis, the input hypothesis, and the affective filter hypothesis.
- Learners' role is to process comprehensible input, while teachers' role is to provide a constant flow of comprehensible input through a variety of activities and a low-anxiety classroom environment.
- Total Physical Response is a suitable method as it maintains a constant flow of comprehensible
Krashen's hypotheses propose theories about second language acquisition. The Acquisition-Learning hypothesis distinguishes between acquiring a language unconsciously through exposure versus consciously learning rules. The Monitor hypothesis explains that the acquisition system initiates speech while the learning system monitors for errors. The Natural Order hypothesis suggests learners acquire language structures in a predictable sequence regardless of teaching order. The Input hypothesis proposes that acquisition occurs through comprehensible messages beyond one's current level. The Affective Filter hypothesis indicates that emotional variables like anxiety can prevent input from reaching the acquisition system.
Krashen's Monitor Model has five main hypotheses about second language acquisition:
1) The Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis proposes there are two independent systems - acquired and learned language. Acquired language is subconscious while learned is conscious.
2) The Monitor Hypothesis states that learned language is used as an editor or monitor of acquired language only in formal situations when focusing on correctness.
3) The Natural Order Hypothesis claims the rules of a second language are acquired in a predictable order, not taught order.
4) The Input Hypothesis argues we acquire language by understanding messages a little beyond our current skills.
5) The Affective Filter Hypothesis refers to affective variables
Second Language Acquisition: An IntroductionJane Keeler
油
The document discusses various theories and hypotheses about second language acquisition, including Krashen's theories that acquisition requires meaningful interaction, occurs gradually through exposure to comprehensible input, and can be hindered by a high affective filter in the learner. It also explores the differences between natural and classroom environments for second language learning.
This document compares and contrasts second language acquisition theory and second language pedagogy. It discusses Stephen Krashen's Monitor Model theory, which posits that language is acquired through meaningful interaction rather than formal instruction. Language acquisition is a subconscious process, whereas learning is a conscious process. It also notes differences in how children and adults acquire a second language. Overall, it finds that while acquisition happens naturally, learning requires formal instruction and benefits from teaching methods, but acquisition allows for near-native fluency.
This document summarizes Stephen Krashen's theory of second language acquisition, which formed the basis for bilingual education in the US. The theory consists of 5 main hypotheses: 1) Acquisition-Learning, 2) Monitor, 3) Natural Order, 4) Input, and 5) Affective Filter. It explains that acquisition is subconscious while learning is conscious, the role of monitoring, that structures are acquired in a predictable order, comprehensible input drives acquisition, and affective variables like anxiety and motivation impact the learning process.
The Natural Approach focuses on acquiring language through meaningful communication and interaction, without explicit grammar instruction. It is based on Krashen's theories of language acquisition, including the idea that acquisition is subconscious and separate from conscious learning. The approach emphasizes understanding messages in the target language through modified input from the teacher.
Presentation_The 5 hypotheses of Krashen's Theory of Second.pptxDrYasser Gomaa
油
Krashen's theory of second language acquisition consists of 5 main hypotheses: 1) Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis which distinguishes between acquired and learned systems, 2) Monitor Hypothesis which defines the relationship between acquisition and learning, 3) Input Hypothesis which states that acquisition occurs when learners receive comprehensible input above their current level, 4) Affective Filter Hypothesis which describes how affective variables impact acquisition, and 5) Natural Order Hypothesis which proposes that acquisition follows a predictable order. Krashen believes acquisition, not learning, is crucial for language development and occurs through meaningful interaction and comprehensible input in a low-anxiety environment.
1. The document discusses Stephen Krashen's Natural Approach to language teaching. The Natural Approach focuses on acquiring language through meaningful communication and emphasizes using context and extra linguistic cues to understand language.
2. Key aspects of the Natural Approach discussed include the acquisition/learning distinction, the monitor hypothesis, the natural order hypothesis, the input hypothesis, and the affective filter hypothesis.
3. Total Physical Response is considered a suitable method as it maintains a constant flow of comprehensible input through gestures, context, and repetition, allowing students to understand language without pressure to produce perfect grammar.
1. The document discusses Stephen Krashen's Natural Approach to language teaching. The Natural Approach focuses on acquiring language through meaningful communication and emphasizes using context and extra linguistic cues to understand language.
2. Key aspects of the Natural Approach discussed include the acquisition/learning distinction, the monitor hypothesis, the natural order hypothesis, the input hypothesis, and the affective filter hypothesis.
3. Total Physical Response is considered a suitable method as it maintains a constant flow of comprehensible input through gestures, context, and repetition, allowing students to understand language without pressure to produce perfect grammar.
1. Stephen Krashen developed five central hypotheses about language acquisition in the 1980s that transformed language teaching, including the acquisition-learning hypothesis, monitor hypothesis, natural order hypothesis, input hypothesis, and affective filter hypothesis.
2. The acquisition-learning hypothesis distinguishes between conscious learning and unconscious acquisition of a language and claims learning does not necessarily become acquisition.
3. The monitor hypothesis states that learned knowledge only functions as an editor and acquisition initiates fluency, with three problematic conditions for monitor use.
109Learning OutcomesBy the end of this chapter you will BenitoSumpter862
油
109
Learning Outcomes
By the end of this chapter you will be able to accomplish the following objectives:
1. In the context of Krashens input hypothesis, analyze and interpret the importance of compre-
hensible language input.
2. Explain how affective factors can interfere with learning and how teachers can help to reduce
their impact.
3. Define the interaction hypothesis and assess its role in language teaching and learning.
4. Summarize the principle characteristics of communicative language teaching and explain its
relationship to communicative competence.
5. Identify and evaluate the factors that contribute to ELLs becoming long-term language
learners.
5Teaching English Language Learners
Monkeybusinessimages/iStock/Thinkstock
CO_TX
CO_NL
CO_CRD
CT CN
pip82223_05_c05_109-134.indd 109 6/30/15 11:12 AM
息 2015 Bridgepoint Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Not for resale or redistribution.
Introduction
Introduction
Whatever their age and grade level, whatever their first language, ELLs have one goal in com-
mon: communicative competencethe ability to function effectively in English in both social
and academic settings. Helping them to reach that goal is the teachers main objective. We
ended the last chapter with a description of how the concept of communicative competence
contributed to the development of communicative teaching approaches. One of the more
prominent of these was developed by Stephen Krashen in the 1980s and was called the natu-
ral approach. This approach was based on five hypotheses about language acquisition (see
Krashens Five Hypotheses), and while theorists have taken issue with the scope and details
of some of them, two of the hypotheses have influenced second language teaching for the
past several decades and are widely accepted as pillars of communicative language teaching.
These are the input hypothesis (Chapter 2) and the affective filter hypothesis, which we will
examine along with the interaction hypothesis proposed by Michael Long (1996). To under-
stand how these three hypotheses are realized in classroom practice, we will examine the
four defining characteristics of communicative language teaching.
As we delve deeper into communicative teaching practices, we begin with a basic question:
What is the teachers main objective in teaching ELLs? Simply stated, it is to help ELLs acquire
all the English they need for social and academic purposes while simultaneously learning the
content knowledge appropriate to their grade level. With some young learners, and under
certain conditions, teachers can meet this objective fairly quickly, sometimes within the
school year. For others, especially those who begin later than kindergarten or first grade, it
takes longer, and although the authors of most accountability measures assume that it takes
three years (Chapter 3), that is not the case for all learners. The overarching goal in teaching
ELLs, then, is to keep them fr ...
109Learning OutcomesBy the end of this chapter you will SantosConleyha
油
109
Learning Outcomes
By the end of this chapter you will be able to accomplish the following objectives:
1. In the context of Krashens input hypothesis, analyze and interpret the importance of compre-
hensible language input.
2. Explain how affective factors can interfere with learning and how teachers can help to reduce
their impact.
3. Define the interaction hypothesis and assess its role in language teaching and learning.
4. Summarize the principle characteristics of communicative language teaching and explain its
relationship to communicative competence.
5. Identify and evaluate the factors that contribute to ELLs becoming long-term language
learners.
5Teaching English Language Learners
Monkeybusinessimages/iStock/Thinkstock
CO_TX
CO_NL
CO_CRD
CT CN
pip82223_05_c05_109-134.indd 109 6/30/15 11:12 AM
息 2015 Bridgepoint Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Not for resale or redistribution.
Introduction
Introduction
Whatever their age and grade level, whatever their first language, ELLs have one goal in com-
mon: communicative competencethe ability to function effectively in English in both social
and academic settings. Helping them to reach that goal is the teachers main objective. We
ended the last chapter with a description of how the concept of communicative competence
contributed to the development of communicative teaching approaches. One of the more
prominent of these was developed by Stephen Krashen in the 1980s and was called the natu-
ral approach. This approach was based on five hypotheses about language acquisition (see
Krashens Five Hypotheses), and while theorists have taken issue with the scope and details
of some of them, two of the hypotheses have influenced second language teaching for the
past several decades and are widely accepted as pillars of communicative language teaching.
These are the input hypothesis (Chapter 2) and the affective filter hypothesis, which we will
examine along with the interaction hypothesis proposed by Michael Long (1996). To under-
stand how these three hypotheses are realized in classroom practice, we will examine the
four defining characteristics of communicative language teaching.
As we delve deeper into communicative teaching practices, we begin with a basic question:
What is the teachers main objective in teaching ELLs? Simply stated, it is to help ELLs acquire
all the English they need for social and academic purposes while simultaneously learning the
content knowledge appropriate to their grade level. With some young learners, and under
certain conditions, teachers can meet this objective fairly quickly, sometimes within the
school year. For others, especially those who begin later than kindergarten or first grade, it
takes longer, and although the authors of most accountability measures assume that it takes
three years (Chapter 3), that is not the case for all learners. The overarching goal in teaching
ELLs, then, is to keep them fr ...
Krashen's Monitor Model of second language acquisition consists of five hypotheses: 1) Language is acquired through meaningful interaction, not formal instruction. 2) Grammatical structures are acquired in a predictable order. 3) People acquire language best from messages just beyond their current level. 4) Conscious learning acts as an editor but not the primary means of acquisition. 5) Affective factors like anxiety and motivation can impede or enable acquisition by raising or lowering an affective filter.
This document summarizes Stephen Krashen's Monitor Model Theory of second language acquisition, which includes five main hypotheses:
1) The Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis distinguishes between subconscious language acquisition and conscious language learning.
2) The Natural Order Hypothesis claims language is acquired in a predictable order regardless of teaching.
3) The Monitor Hypothesis describes the role of learned grammar rules in monitoring spoken output.
4) The Input Hypothesis states that language is acquired through comprehensible input at one's current level.
5) The Affective Filter Hypothesis proposes positive affect leads to more language acquisition by lowering the mental block to input.
This document discusses Stephen Krashen's Monitor Model of second language acquisition. It provides background on Krashen, including that he is an American linguist who developed five hypotheses around second language learning. One of the hypotheses is the Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis, which distinguishes between acquiring a language naturally through use (acquisition) versus learning a language through formal instruction. Another is the Affective Filter Hypothesis, which proposes that learners can be mentally blocked from learning if they have a high "affective filter" due to anxiety or other affective factors. The document provides examples of how teachers can lower students' affective filters to optimize language learning.
The Natural Approach is a language teaching method developed by Tracy Terrell and Stephen Krashen that claims language is acquired similarly to a first language through meaningful communication. It focuses on providing comprehensible input through activities that are slightly above students' current language level. Students first develop comprehension skills through listening and reading before speaking. Speaking emerges gradually without early emphasis on grammatical accuracy. The approach is based on Krashen's theories including the Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis, the Natural Order Hypothesis, the Input Hypothesis, and the Affective Filter Hypothesis.
The document discusses the Natural Approach developed by Tracy Terrell and Stephen Krashen. Some key points:
- The Natural Approach focuses on teaching communicative abilities through meaningful input and a low-anxiety environment.
- Krashen's theories that underlie this approach include the acquisition/learning distinction, the monitor hypothesis, the natural order hypothesis, the input hypothesis, and the affective filter hypothesis.
- Learners' role is to process comprehensible input, while teachers' role is to provide a constant flow of comprehensible input through a variety of activities and a low-anxiety classroom environment.
- Total Physical Response is a suitable method as it maintains a constant flow of comprehensible
Krashen's hypotheses propose theories about second language acquisition. The Acquisition-Learning hypothesis distinguishes between acquiring a language unconsciously through exposure versus consciously learning rules. The Monitor hypothesis explains that the acquisition system initiates speech while the learning system monitors for errors. The Natural Order hypothesis suggests learners acquire language structures in a predictable sequence regardless of teaching order. The Input hypothesis proposes that acquisition occurs through comprehensible messages beyond one's current level. The Affective Filter hypothesis indicates that emotional variables like anxiety can prevent input from reaching the acquisition system.
Krashen's Monitor Model has five main hypotheses about second language acquisition:
1) The Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis proposes there are two independent systems - acquired and learned language. Acquired language is subconscious while learned is conscious.
2) The Monitor Hypothesis states that learned language is used as an editor or monitor of acquired language only in formal situations when focusing on correctness.
3) The Natural Order Hypothesis claims the rules of a second language are acquired in a predictable order, not taught order.
4) The Input Hypothesis argues we acquire language by understanding messages a little beyond our current skills.
5) The Affective Filter Hypothesis refers to affective variables
Second Language Acquisition: An IntroductionJane Keeler
油
The document discusses various theories and hypotheses about second language acquisition, including Krashen's theories that acquisition requires meaningful interaction, occurs gradually through exposure to comprehensible input, and can be hindered by a high affective filter in the learner. It also explores the differences between natural and classroom environments for second language learning.
This document compares and contrasts second language acquisition theory and second language pedagogy. It discusses Stephen Krashen's Monitor Model theory, which posits that language is acquired through meaningful interaction rather than formal instruction. Language acquisition is a subconscious process, whereas learning is a conscious process. It also notes differences in how children and adults acquire a second language. Overall, it finds that while acquisition happens naturally, learning requires formal instruction and benefits from teaching methods, but acquisition allows for near-native fluency.
This document summarizes Stephen Krashen's theory of second language acquisition, which formed the basis for bilingual education in the US. The theory consists of 5 main hypotheses: 1) Acquisition-Learning, 2) Monitor, 3) Natural Order, 4) Input, and 5) Affective Filter. It explains that acquisition is subconscious while learning is conscious, the role of monitoring, that structures are acquired in a predictable order, comprehensible input drives acquisition, and affective variables like anxiety and motivation impact the learning process.
The Natural Approach focuses on acquiring language through meaningful communication and interaction, without explicit grammar instruction. It is based on Krashen's theories of language acquisition, including the idea that acquisition is subconscious and separate from conscious learning. The approach emphasizes understanding messages in the target language through modified input from the teacher.
Presentation_The 5 hypotheses of Krashen's Theory of Second.pptxDrYasser Gomaa
油
Krashen's theory of second language acquisition consists of 5 main hypotheses: 1) Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis which distinguishes between acquired and learned systems, 2) Monitor Hypothesis which defines the relationship between acquisition and learning, 3) Input Hypothesis which states that acquisition occurs when learners receive comprehensible input above their current level, 4) Affective Filter Hypothesis which describes how affective variables impact acquisition, and 5) Natural Order Hypothesis which proposes that acquisition follows a predictable order. Krashen believes acquisition, not learning, is crucial for language development and occurs through meaningful interaction and comprehensible input in a low-anxiety environment.
1. The document discusses Stephen Krashen's Natural Approach to language teaching. The Natural Approach focuses on acquiring language through meaningful communication and emphasizes using context and extra linguistic cues to understand language.
2. Key aspects of the Natural Approach discussed include the acquisition/learning distinction, the monitor hypothesis, the natural order hypothesis, the input hypothesis, and the affective filter hypothesis.
3. Total Physical Response is considered a suitable method as it maintains a constant flow of comprehensible input through gestures, context, and repetition, allowing students to understand language without pressure to produce perfect grammar.
1. The document discusses Stephen Krashen's Natural Approach to language teaching. The Natural Approach focuses on acquiring language through meaningful communication and emphasizes using context and extra linguistic cues to understand language.
2. Key aspects of the Natural Approach discussed include the acquisition/learning distinction, the monitor hypothesis, the natural order hypothesis, the input hypothesis, and the affective filter hypothesis.
3. Total Physical Response is considered a suitable method as it maintains a constant flow of comprehensible input through gestures, context, and repetition, allowing students to understand language without pressure to produce perfect grammar.
Blind spots in AI and Formulation Science, IFPAC 2025.pdfAjaz Hussain
油
The intersection of AI and pharmaceutical formulation science highlights significant blind spotssystemic gaps in pharmaceutical development, regulatory oversight, quality assurance, and the ethical use of AIthat could jeopardize patient safety and undermine public trust. To move forward effectively, we must address these normalized blind spots, which may arise from outdated assumptions, errors, gaps in previous knowledge, and biases in language or regulatory inertia. This is essential to ensure that AI and formulation science are developed as tools for patient-centered and ethical healthcare.
APM People Interest Network Conference 2025
- Autonomy, Teams and Tension
- Oliver Randall & David Bovis
- Own Your Autonomy
Oliver Randall
Consultant, Tribe365
Oliver is a career project professional since 2011 and started volunteering with APM in 2016 and has since chaired the People Interest Network and the North East Regional Network. Oliver has been consulting in culture, leadership and behaviours since 2019 and co-developed HPTM速an off the shelf high performance framework for teams and organisations and is currently working with SAS (Stellenbosch Academy for Sport) developing the culture, leadership and behaviours framework for future elite sportspeople whilst also holding down work as a project manager in the NHS at North Tees and Hartlepool Foundation Trust.
David Bovis
Consultant, Duxinaroe
A Leadership and Culture Change expert, David is the originator of BTFA and The Dux Model.
With a Masters in Applied Neuroscience from the Institute of Organisational Neuroscience, he is widely regarded as the Go-To expert in the field, recognised as an inspiring keynote speaker and change strategist.
He has an industrial engineering background, majoring in TPS / Lean. David worked his way up from his apprenticeship to earn his seat at the C-suite table. His career spans several industries, including Automotive, Aerospace, Defence, Space, Heavy Industries and Elec-Mech / polymer contract manufacture.
Published in Londons Evening Standard quarterly business supplement, James Caans Your business Magazine, Quality World, the Lean Management Journal and Cambridge Universities PMA, he works as comfortably with leaders from FTSE and Fortune 100 companies as he does owner-managers in SMEs. He is passionate about helping leaders understand the neurological root cause of a high-performance culture and sustainable change, in business.
Session | Own Your Autonomy The Importance of Autonomy in Project Management
#OwnYourAutonomy is aiming to be a global APM initiative to position everyone to take a more conscious role in their decision making process leading to increased outcomes for everyone and contribute to a world in which all projects succeed.
We want everyone to join the journey.
#OwnYourAutonomy is the culmination of 3 years of collaborative exploration within the Leadership Focus Group which is part of the APM People Interest Network. The work has been pulled together using the 5 HPTM速 Systems and the BTFA neuroscience leadership programme.
https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/apm-people-network/about/
Useful environment methods in Odoo 18 - Odoo 際際滷sCeline George
油
In this slide well discuss on the useful environment methods in Odoo 18. In Odoo 18, environment methods play a crucial role in simplifying model interactions and enhancing data processing within the ORM framework.
How to Modify Existing Web Pages in Odoo 18Celine George
油
In this slide, well discuss on how to modify existing web pages in Odoo 18. Web pages in Odoo 18 can also gather user data through user-friendly forms, encourage interaction through engaging features.
How to Setup WhatsApp in Odoo 17 - Odoo 際際滷sCeline George
油
Integrate WhatsApp into Odoo using the WhatsApp Business API or third-party modules to enhance communication. This integration enables automated messaging and customer interaction management within Odoo 17.
Digital Tools with AI for e-Content Development.pptxDr. Sarita Anand
油
This ppt is useful for not only for B.Ed., M.Ed., M.A. (Education) or any other PG level students or Ph.D. scholars but also for the school, college and university teachers who are interested to prepare an e-content with AI for their students and others.
Finals of Kaun TALHA : a Travel, Architecture, Lifestyle, Heritage and Activism quiz, organized by Conquiztadors, the Quiz society of Sri Venkateswara College under their annual quizzing fest El Dorado 2025.
Research & Research Methods: Basic Concepts and Types.pptxDr. Sarita Anand
油
This ppt has been made for the students pursuing PG in social science and humanities like M.Ed., M.A. (Education), Ph.D. Scholars. It will be also beneficial for the teachers and other faculty members interested in research and teaching research concepts.
2. Stephen Krashen is a renowned American linguist,
educational researcher, and activist, known for his
groundbreaking contributions to the field of second language
acquisition (SLA). He is Emeritus Professor of Education at the
University of Southern California, having moved from the
Linguistics Department to the School of Education in 1994.
He is best known for developing five key hypothesis related
to Second Language Acquisition namely:
1. The Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis
2. The Monitor Hypothesis
3. The Natural Order Hypothesis
4. The Input Hypothesis
5. The Affective Filter Hypothesis
Stephen Krashen
3. The Acquisition Learning
Hypothesis
Acquisition is a subconscious
process, similar to how children
learn their first language, where
language is acquired naturally
through meaningful interaction.
According to Krashens Acquisition Learning Hypothesis, there are two independent
ways to develop our linguistic skills: ACQUISITION and LEARNING.
Acquisiti
on
Learnin
g
Learning, on the other hand, is a
conscious process that involves
explicit knowledge of grammar
and language rules
4. The Acquisition Learning
Hypothesis
A child who moves to a new country
learns to speak the language by
interacting with peers at school. The child
doesn't consciously study grammar but
gradually becomes fluent through
immersion and understanding everyday
conversations.
Example scenarios of the two independent ways to develop your linguistic
skills according to Krashens The Acquisition Learning Hypothesis:
Acquisiti
on
Learnin
g
An adult learner in a classroom studies a
language by learning grammar rules
explicitly, like memorizing verb
conjugations or practicing syntax drills. The
learning happens through structured
exercises and deliberate study.
5. The Acquisition Learning
Hypothesis
This strategies listed below focuses on creating a
natural and engaging environment for language
acquisition, drawing heavily on Krashen's Input
Hypothesis and the Acquisition-Learning distinction:
A. Story Selection
B. Repetition and Chunking
C. Retelling of the story
D. Role Play
E. Low Anxiety Environment
Some teaching strategies to implement the two ways in developing
your linguistic skills:
Acquisiti
on
Learnin
g
This strategies listed below focuses on
conscious learning of grammar rules,
aligning with Krashen's "Learning" aspect
of his Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis:
A. Identify Target Grammar
B. Meaningful Context
C. Feedback and correction
6. The Monitor Hypothesis
This hypothesis explains the relationship between
acquisition and learning. Learning acts as a "monitor" or editor
to check and correct language output. The monitor is only used
when there is enough time, when the learner is focused on
form, and when the learner knows the rules.
7. The Monitor Hypothesis
Example scenario in the context of this hypothesis:
- A language learner writes an email in a foreign language. While
writing, they rely on their natural fluency (acquired knowledge) to
construct sentences but then stop to review what they wrote, using
their conscious knowledge of grammar rules (learned knowledge) to
correct any mistakes before sending the email.
- For instance, they might pause to check if they used the correct tense
or verb form.
8. The Monitor Hypothesis
Some teaching strategies to implement the monitor hypothesis:
Krashen's Monitor Hypothesis suggests that conscious learning of grammar rules
acts as a "monitor" to check and edit language output, but only when certain conditions
are met. These conditions are:
Knowledge of the rule: The learner must be aware of the grammatical rule they are trying
to apply.
Focus on grammatical form: The learner must be consciously thinking about the
correctness of their language.
Time to apply the rule: The learner must have sufficient time to reflect and make
corrections.
9. The Input Hypothesis
This hypothesis suggests that language is acquired through
exposure to "comprehensible input" that is just slightly beyond
the current level of competence (denoted as i+1). Learners
understand input by using context, visual cues, and prior
knowledge, and it leads to language acquisition when the input is
comprehensible.
10. The Input Hypothesis
Example scenario in the context of this hypothesis:
- A student studying Spanish at an intermediate level watches a Spanish TV
show with subtitles. Much of the conversation is understandable, but they
encounter a few new vocabulary words or sentence structures that are
slightly more advanced than what they know. Because they understand the
general context of the scene, they can grasp the meaning of the new words
and thus expand their language skills.
- This input (i+1) is just beyond their current level but still comprehensible,
which helps the learner acquire new language.
11. The Input Hypothesis
Some teaching strategies to implement the input hypothesis:
Krashen's Input Hypothesis states that language acquisition happens when
learners are exposed to comprehensible input, meaning language that is
slightly above their current level but still understandable. Here are some
teaching strategies to implement this:
1. Create a Language-Rich Environment
2. Storytelling and Reading
3. Listening and Watching
4. Conversations and Communication
12. The Natural Order
Hypothesis
Language learners acquire parts of a language in a
predictable order. Some grammatical structures
tend to be acquired before others, regardless of the
learners native language or the teaching order in
classrooms.
13. The Natural Order
Hypothesis
Example scenario in the context of this hypothesis:
A language learner acquires grammatical structures in a predictable
sequence, regardless of how they are taught in a classroom. For instance,
a learner of English might first correctly use simple plurals ("cats") and
then progress to using past tense forms ("walked"), even if the textbook
introduces the past tense first. The learner's natural acquisition order
may differ from the syllabus but is still predictable.
14. The Natural Order
Hypothesis
Some teaching strategies to implement natural order hypothesis:
Krashen's Natural Order Hypothesis suggests that language learners
acquire grammatical structures in a predictable order, regardless of
instruction. Here are some strategies to implement this:
1.Embrace the Natural Order
2. Limit Explicit Grammar Instruction
3. Differentiate Instruction
4. Manage Error Correction
15. The Affective Filter
Hypothesis
Emotional variables, such as motivation, anxiety, and
self-confidence, play a role in language acquisition.
When these factors are favorable, the "affective filter"
is low, allowing more input to reach the language
acquisition device. A high affective filter blocks input,
hindering acquisition.
16. The Affective Filter
Hypothesis
Example scenario in the context of this hypothesis:
- A high school student learning French feels nervous when speaking in class
because they are self-conscious and fear making mistakes. This anxiety
creates a high "affective filter," which blocks their ability to fully absorb the
language during lessons.
- Conversely, when that same student speaks with a supportive friend in a
casual setting, they feel relaxed, confident, and more open to learning. In
this case, the affective filter is low, and they acquire more of the language
effortlessly.
17. The Affective Filter
Hypothesis
Some teaching strategies to implement affective filter hypothesis:
Krashen's Affective Filter Hypothesis suggests that emotional factors like anxiety,
motivation, and self-confidence can act as a barrier to language acquisition. A high
affective filter can block language input, making it difficult for learners to acquire the
language. Here are some strategies to lower the affective filter:
1. Create a Safe and Supportive Learning Environment
2. Foster Motivation and Engagement
3. Reduce Anxiety and Build Confidence