The Canadian Diabetes Association reviewed the use of glycated hemoglobin (A1C) for diagnosing diabetes and recommends adding it as a diagnostic criterion. An A1C level of 6.5% or higher confirms a diagnosis of diabetes. A1C testing has advantages over glucose tests as it can be done at any time and reflects average glucose levels over several months. However, A1C levels may be affected by certain medical conditions and ethnic groups. The document provides guidelines on using A1C for diagnosis and confirms the use of traditional glucose tests remain valid options.
1 of 13
Downloaded 50 times
More Related Content
Use of Glycated Hemoglobin (A1C) in the Diagnosis ofType 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Adults
1. Use of Glycated Hemoglobin (A1C) in the
Diagnosis of
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Adults
Shahid Nawaz Malik
Researcher
KSU
2. Ronald M. Goldenberg1 MD FRCPC FACE, Alice Y.Y. Cheng2 MD FRCPC,
Zubin Punthakee3 MD FRCPC,
Maureen Clement4 MD CCFP
1-North York General Hospital and LMC Endocrinology Centres, Toronto,
Ontario
2-Division of Endocrinology & Metabolism, St. Michaels Hospital and Credit
Valley Hospital and Department of Medicine,
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
3-Department of Medicine and Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University,
Hamilton, Ontario
4-University of British Columbia, Vancouver and Diabetes Education Centre,
Vernon Jubilee Hospital, Vernon, British Columbia
3. The Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA) reviewed the
use of glycated hemoglobin (A1C) in the diagnosis of
diabetes mellitus. An International Expert Committee, the
American Diabetes Association, a joint statement from the
American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American
College of Endocrinology, and a World Health Organization
Consultation each recommend an A1C of 6.5% or higher as
a criterion for the diagnosis of diabetes (1-4).
The relationship between A1C and retinopathy is similar
to that of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) or 2-hour plasma
glucose
(2hPG) with a threshold at around 6.5% (5-8). Although
the diagnosis of diabetes is based on an A1C threshold for
developing microvascular disease, A1C is also a continuous
cardiovascular risk factor and a better predictor of
macrovascular events than FPG or 2hPG (9,10).-
4. While many people identified as having diabetes using
A1C ,will not be identified as having diabetes by
traditional glucose criteria, and vice versa, there are
several advantages to using A1C for diabetes
diagnosis (4).
- A1C can be measured at any time of day and is
more convenient than FPG or 2-hour oral glucose
tolerance test (OGTT).
-A1C testing also avoids the problem of day- to-day
variability of glucose values, as it reflects the average
plasma glucose over the previous 2 to 3 months (2).
5. -In order to use this diagnostic criterion, A1C must be measured
using a validated assay standardized to the National
Glycohemoglobin Standardization ProgramDiabetes Control and
Complication Trials reference.
It is important to note that A1C may be misleading in individuals with
various hemoglobinopathies, iron deficiency, hemolytic anemias,
and severe hepatic and renal disease (2,3,11) (Table 1).
6. In addition, studies of various ethnicities indicate that
African Americans, American Indians, Hispanics and Asians
have A1C values up to 0.4% higher than white patients at
similar levels of glycemia (12,13). Further research is
required to determine if specific ethnic-based A1C cut-
points for diabetes diagnosis are warranted. A1C values
are also affected by age, rising by up to 0.1% per decade
(14-16). More studies may help determine if age-adjusted
A1C thresholds are required for diabetes diagnosis in the
elderly.
7. The CDA recommends the addition of A1C as a diagnostic
criteria for type 2 diabetes in adults as follows:
1. A1C can be used as a diagnostic test for diabetes using
a standardized, validated assay when there are no conditions
that preclude its accurate measurement.
2. A1C 6.5% is one of the diagnostic criteria for diabetes
that should be confirmed by repeat testing on a subsequent
day.
3. A1C <6.5% does not exclude diabetes that may be diagnosed
using standard glucose tests (Table 2).
4. Traditional diagnosis using FPG, random glucose with
symptoms, or 2hPG during an OGTT are still recommended
options for diagnosing diabetes (Table 2).
8. 5. A1C is not recommended for diagnostic purposes in
children,
adolescents, pregnant women or people with type 1
diabetes.
6. A1C may be misleading and therefore should not be
used
as a diagnostic tool in the setting of hemoglobinopathies,
hemolytic anemia, thalassemias, iron deficiency,
spherocytosis,
and severe hepatic or renal failure.
7. A1C may be misleading in certain ethnicities and in the
elderly, and therefore its utility as a diagnostic tool in
these populations is unclear
9. The decision as to which test to use for diabetes diagnosis
(Table 2) is left to clinical judgment. In the absence of
unequivocal hyperglycemia accompanied by acute metabolic
decompensation, a repeat confirmatory laboratory test (FPG,
casual PG, 2hPG in a 75-g OGTT, A1C) must be done in all
cases on another day. It is preferable that the same test be
repeated for confirmation. If results of two different tests
are
available, and both are above the diagnostic cut-points, the
diagnosis of diabetes is confirmed. When results of more
than one test are available and are discordant, the test with
a
result above the diagnostic cut-point should be repeated
and
the diagnosis made on the basis of the repeat test
10. The CDA does not recommend specific A1C criteria for
the diagnosis of prediabetes. While there is a continuum of
risk for diabetes with A1C levels <6.5%, further research is
required to determine whether A1C can be used to identify
people at risk for diabetes (currently comprising people with
impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance).
12. Factor
Increase A1C Decreased A1C Variable change in
A1C
Erythropoiesis
Iron deficiency
B12 deficiency
Use of erythropoietin,iron or
B12 Reticulocytosis
Altered hemoglobin Fetal hemoglobin
Hemoglobinopathies
Methemoglobin
Genetic determinants
Glycation Alcoholism chronic renal failure
Decreased erythrocyte pH
Ingestion of aspirin, vitamin C
or vitamin E
Hemoglobinopathies
Increased erythrocyte pH
Erythrocyte
destruction
Increased erythrocyte lifespan:
Splenectomy
Decreased erythrocyte lifespan:
Chronic renal failure
Hemoglobinopathies
Splenomegaly
Rheumatoid arthritis
Antiretrovirals ,Ribavirin
Dapsone
Assays Hyperbilirubinemia
Carbamylated hemoglobin
Alcoholism
Large doses of aspirin
Chronic opiate use
Hypertriglyceridemia Hemoglobinopathies
Table 1. Factors that can affect A1C (adapted from 11)
13. Table 2. Diagnostic criteria for diabetes (adapted from 17)
FPG 7.0 mmol/L
Fasting = no caloric intake for at least 8 hours
Or Casual PG 11.1 mmol/L + symptoms of diabetes
Casual = any time of the day, without regard to the interval
since the last meal Classic symptoms of diabetes = polyuria, polydipsia and
unexplained weight loss
Or 2hPG in a 75-g OGTT 11.1 mmol/L
Or A1C 6.5%
Using a standardized, validated assay, in the absence of conditions that affect the
accuracy of the A1C
A repeat confirmatory laboratory test (FPG, casual PG, 2hPG in a 75-g OGTT, or A1C) must be done in all cases
on another day in the absence of unequivocal hyperglycemia accompanied by acute metabolic decompensation.
It is preferable that the same test be repeated for confirmation. However, in individuals in whom type 1
diabetes is likely (younger or lean or symptomatic hyperglycemia, especially with ketonuria or ketonemia),
confirmatory testing should not delay initiation of treatment to avoid rapid deterioration.