際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo

History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09

Download as PPTX, PDF
Christopher Toal
Christopher Toal

The document summarizes the history of opposition to national health insurance (NHI) in the United States from the early 20th century. It describes how the American Medical Association (AMA) and other groups consistently opposed proposals for compulsory health insurance and government expansion into healthcare. The AMA argued such policies would lead to "socialism" and reduce physicians to "cogs" in a government system. While some saw organized community healthcare as inevitable, the AMA and its allies fought proposals to establish national health insurance throughout the 1900s.

1 of 46
Download to read offline
The History of Opposition to NHI in the United StatesOctober 24, 2009Theodore M. BrownProfessor of History, Community and Preventive Medicine, and Medical Humanities at the University of Rochester
History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09
Labor InsuranceIsaac Max Rubinow, MD. Journal of Political Economy. 1904; 12: 362-381.
History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09
Progressive Party Convention in Chicago, 1912Copyright 息2003 American Public Health Association
History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09
Frederick L. Hoffman
History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09
Edward H. Ochsner, MDRepresentative of the Chicago Medical Society, and the only one opposed to compulsory health insurance in Dec, 1916 discussion
James F. Rooney, M.D.Albany physician representing the NYS Medical Society
History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09
Saturday, December 3, 1932 EDITORIALTHE COMMITTEE ON THE COSTS OF MEDICAL CARE"The majority report recommends extension of all basic public health services to make them available to more and more people. [by] forces representing public health officialdom, social theory even socialism and communism inciting to revolutionThe minority report views with alarm further invasion of governmental agencies into the practice of medicine. And what a curse such invasion has been! Who today fails to realize the menace inherent in the expansion of the Veterans' Bureau?These two reports represent the difference between incitement to revolution and a desire for gradual evolution based on analysis and study, principles found through the centuries to be necessary for the sound practice of medicineThe physicians of this country must not be misled by utopian fantasies of a form of medical practice which would equalize all physicians by placing them in groups under one administration. The Journal urges, after careful consideration, support of the minority report signed by the representatives of the AMA in the committee. "
Saturday, December 10, 1932 EDITORIALTHE REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE COSTS OF MEDICAL CARE"Physicians throughout the country are reacting vigorously and well-nigh unanimously against the recommendation of the majority report. Intent on their daily and nightly task of preventing disease, healing the sick and ministering to the afflicted, they have given scant attention and little of their time to a consideration of the way in which their work was being invaded by the octopus of big business. Now the time has come when they can no longer overlook the problems created by this invasion. There is, moreover, a far greater concern than the rights of the physician to practice as his knowledge and training indicate. There is the question of Americanism versus sovietism for the American people.Let the efficiency engineers who would make doctors the cogs of their governmental machines give a little of their 60-horse-power brains to realization that Americans prefer to be human beings."
History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09
Socialized Medicine By Morris FishbeinApril 25, 1928 Vol. 126(3277)"The mechanization of medicine is an evil recognized by every physician as a menace to sound medical practice. Come what may, the intimate personal relationship of physician and patient is essential to complete relief of the patient's ills. Even the periodical physical examination is unsatisfactory when applied on an impersonal basis. State medicine might provide a standardized diagnosis and treatment for a standardized citizen; but it means the death of individualism, of humanitarianism, and of scientific practice. Until we become a nation of robots with interlocking, replaceable and standardized parts, there will be little need of completely standardized doctors."
Who Fights Health Insurance?By Geraldine SartainJune 23, 1945"The trade association of organized medicine, the American Medical Association has long been the spearhead in the fight against both compulsory national health insurance and state legislation providing the same benefits. It has now united with some drug manufacturers and casualty-insurance companies, and seeks to woo big business in general. In California the State Medical Society, with the help of chambers of commerce and other business groups, was able to bottle up in committee both Gov. Earl Warren's compulsory health-insurance bill and a similar bill put forward by organized labor.The National Physicians' Committee for the Extension of Medical Service, sponsored by the AMA, has for some time been engaged in a double-barreled, three-year campaign, for which it is raising $1.5 million dollars to kill the Wagner-Murray-Dingell bill and to push health insurance coverage by commercial insurance companies."
History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09
History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09
History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09
History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09
History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09
History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09
Isidore Sydney Falk
History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09
History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09
History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09
History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09
History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09
History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09
History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09
History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09
History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09
History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09
History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09
Crazy Quilt
History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09
History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09
Charles - Edward A. Winslow
The habit of condemning any attempt at intelligent community action by labeling it as "socialistic" and "bureaucratic" is for example unworthy of serious-minded men. Some things are better done by the individual, some better by the state; and catchwords will not help us to determine to which class a given activity belong..
.Whether we like it or not, however, the tendency of the times makes it clear that some form, or forms, of organized community medical service are coming, as surely as the sun will rise tomorrow. While we hesitate and consider, the thing is happening all around us. If we place our heads in the sand like the ostrich, or if we emulate King Canute and order back the tides the inevitable will still occur.C-EA Winslow. Public Health at the Crossroads. Am Journal of Public Health. 1926. 16(11):1075
History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09
History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09
History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09
History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09
History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09
History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09

More Related Content

History Of Opposition To Nat. Health Ins. 10 24 09

  • 1. The History of Opposition to NHI in the United StatesOctober 24, 2009Theodore M. BrownProfessor of History, Community and Preventive Medicine, and Medical Humanities at the University of Rochester
  • 3. Labor InsuranceIsaac Max Rubinow, MD. Journal of Political Economy. 1904; 12: 362-381.
  • 5. Progressive Party Convention in Chicago, 1912Copyright 息2003 American Public Health Association
  • 9. Edward H. Ochsner, MDRepresentative of the Chicago Medical Society, and the only one opposed to compulsory health insurance in Dec, 1916 discussion
  • 10. James F. Rooney, M.D.Albany physician representing the NYS Medical Society
  • 12. Saturday, December 3, 1932 EDITORIALTHE COMMITTEE ON THE COSTS OF MEDICAL CARE"The majority report recommends extension of all basic public health services to make them available to more and more people. [by] forces representing public health officialdom, social theory even socialism and communism inciting to revolutionThe minority report views with alarm further invasion of governmental agencies into the practice of medicine. And what a curse such invasion has been! Who today fails to realize the menace inherent in the expansion of the Veterans' Bureau?These two reports represent the difference between incitement to revolution and a desire for gradual evolution based on analysis and study, principles found through the centuries to be necessary for the sound practice of medicineThe physicians of this country must not be misled by utopian fantasies of a form of medical practice which would equalize all physicians by placing them in groups under one administration. The Journal urges, after careful consideration, support of the minority report signed by the representatives of the AMA in the committee. "
  • 13. Saturday, December 10, 1932 EDITORIALTHE REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE COSTS OF MEDICAL CARE"Physicians throughout the country are reacting vigorously and well-nigh unanimously against the recommendation of the majority report. Intent on their daily and nightly task of preventing disease, healing the sick and ministering to the afflicted, they have given scant attention and little of their time to a consideration of the way in which their work was being invaded by the octopus of big business. Now the time has come when they can no longer overlook the problems created by this invasion. There is, moreover, a far greater concern than the rights of the physician to practice as his knowledge and training indicate. There is the question of Americanism versus sovietism for the American people.Let the efficiency engineers who would make doctors the cogs of their governmental machines give a little of their 60-horse-power brains to realization that Americans prefer to be human beings."
  • 15. Socialized Medicine By Morris FishbeinApril 25, 1928 Vol. 126(3277)"The mechanization of medicine is an evil recognized by every physician as a menace to sound medical practice. Come what may, the intimate personal relationship of physician and patient is essential to complete relief of the patient's ills. Even the periodical physical examination is unsatisfactory when applied on an impersonal basis. State medicine might provide a standardized diagnosis and treatment for a standardized citizen; but it means the death of individualism, of humanitarianism, and of scientific practice. Until we become a nation of robots with interlocking, replaceable and standardized parts, there will be little need of completely standardized doctors."
  • 16. Who Fights Health Insurance?By Geraldine SartainJune 23, 1945"The trade association of organized medicine, the American Medical Association has long been the spearhead in the fight against both compulsory national health insurance and state legislation providing the same benefits. It has now united with some drug manufacturers and casualty-insurance companies, and seeks to woo big business in general. In California the State Medical Society, with the help of chambers of commerce and other business groups, was able to bottle up in committee both Gov. Earl Warren's compulsory health-insurance bill and a similar bill put forward by organized labor.The National Physicians' Committee for the Extension of Medical Service, sponsored by the AMA, has for some time been engaged in a double-barreled, three-year campaign, for which it is raising $1.5 million dollars to kill the Wagner-Murray-Dingell bill and to push health insurance coverage by commercial insurance companies."
  • 38. Charles - Edward A. Winslow
  • 39. The habit of condemning any attempt at intelligent community action by labeling it as "socialistic" and "bureaucratic" is for example unworthy of serious-minded men. Some things are better done by the individual, some better by the state; and catchwords will not help us to determine to which class a given activity belong..
  • 40. .Whether we like it or not, however, the tendency of the times makes it clear that some form, or forms, of organized community medical service are coming, as surely as the sun will rise tomorrow. While we hesitate and consider, the thing is happening all around us. If we place our heads in the sand like the ostrich, or if we emulate King Canute and order back the tides the inevitable will still occur.C-EA Winslow. Public Health at the Crossroads. Am Journal of Public Health. 1926. 16(11):1075