This document discusses hydraulic fracturing (fracking) and debates around its environmental and economic impacts. It covers topics like the technical process of fracking, potential issues like water contamination and air pollution, benefits for energy production and jobs, and policy options for regulating the practice. Critics argue fracking can harm the environment and public health if not properly managed, while proponents say it can provide economic gains if risks are addressed through rules and safeguards. The document examines these various perspectives on the risks and rewards of increased shale gas development through hydraulic fracturing.
1 of 13
Downloaded 31 times
More Related Content
Hydraulic fracturing presentation
1. Robert Sittman
Christopher Conway
Guadalupe Candanedo
Einav Henenson
Justin Pfledderer
4. Enormous potential for both the economy and the
environment
Jobs!!!
Greenhouse gas advantages
National security benefits
Lower costs to consumers
A safe process
7. Intragenerational inequality-
certain people suffer while
others benefit
Intergenerational inequality-
contaminated water
resources for the future
Interspecies inequality
animals are harmed
10. Pass the 2012 Frac Act
Technological based performance standard
Performance bond
Quasi option value
12. References
Adams, G., Hayes, S., Wejerter, S. and Boyd, J. (2007, October 24). Regulatory Capture: Managing the Risk. ICE Australia, International
Conferences and Events. Retrieved April 14, 2011
Arthur, J.D. (2008, September 21). Hydraulic Fracturing Considerations for Natural Gas Wells in Marcellus Shale. Presented to The Ground
Water Protection Council September 21-24, 2008. Retrieved from Google Scholar
Cavner, R. (2011, February 8). Responding to the Hydraulic Fracturing Issue. Daily Hurricane.
Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-l-cavnar/responding-to-the-hydraul_b_820215.html
Chesapeake Energy (2010). Natural gas Water Usage Facts. Retrieved from: http://www.hydraulicfracturing.com/Pages/information.aspx
Environmental Protection Agency. (2004). EPA Study on Hydraulic Fracturing. Retrieved from
http://www.epa.gov/ogwdw/uic/pdfs/cbmstudy_attach_uic_ch07_conclusions.pdf
Energy in Depth. (2010, June 9). Debunking Gasland. Retrieved from http://www.energyindepth.org/2010/06/debunking-gasland/
Fox, J. (Director). (2009). Gasland [Motion Picture]. United States: Docuramafilms.
Fox, J. (2010, July 12) Affirming Gasland: A De-debunking Document in Response to Specious and Misleading Gas Industry Claims against the
Film. Retrieved from
http://1trickpony.cachefly.net/gas/pdf/Affirming_Gasland_Sept_2010.pdf
Keohane, N. & Olmstead, S. (2007). Markets and the Environment. Washington: Island Press
Kerr, R. (2011, August 11). Federal Committee: Shale Gas Needs Openness, Better Data. Science Insider
http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2011/08/federal-committee-shale-gas-need.html?ref=hp
Lustgarden, A. (2011, January 25). Buried Secrets: Gas Drillings Climate Benefits May Overstated and Possible Environmental Threat. Pro
Publica: Journalism in the Public Interest. Retrieved from
http://www.propublica.org/article/natural-gas-and-coal-pollution-gap-in-doubt
13. References
Montgomery, C. & Smith, M. (2010, December). Hydraulic Fracturing: History of an Enduring
Technology. Journal of Petroleum Technology (Society of Petroleum Engineers) 62 (12): 26-32
Nadar, L. (2010). The Energy Reader. Malden, MA: Willey-Blackwell Publishing
Nelson, P. (2011, July 18) Resources for the future. RFF Launches New Initiative on Risks and Regulations of Shale Gas. Retrieved from:
http://www.rff.org/News/Press_Releases/Pages/RFF-Launches-New-Initiative-on-Risks-and-Regulation-of-Shale-Gas.aspx
Rubinkan, M. & Caruso, D. (2011, April 12). Fracking Shale for Gas brings Wealth, Concerns. The Huffington
Post.http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20110412/us-gas-drilling-impact/
Urbana, I. (2011, February 26). Regulation Lax as Gas Wells tainted water Hits River. The New York Times.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/27/us/27gas.html?_r=1&hp
Walsh, B. (2011, March 31). Could Shale Gas Power the World. Time Magazine. Retrieved
from:http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,2062331-4,00.html
Wilson, W. (2007, October 4). Letters from EPA Fracking Study Whistleblower. Earthworks: Protecting Communities and the Environment.
Retrieved from: http://www.earthworksaction.org/publications.cfm?pubID=372
Wiseman, H. J. (2008, September 23) Untested Waters: The Rise of Hydraulic Fracturing in Oil and Gas Production and the Need to Revisit
Regulation. Fordham Environmental Law Review. Vol 20. P. 115, 2009. SSRN: http://ssrn.com/adstract=1595092
#4: Explain the changes that took place the past 10 years in regards to HF - Horizontal Drilling - Right to patent chemicals that are added to HF water (preventing from society to investigate the damage associated with them) - 2005 signing of the Energy Act to exempt Gas and oil companies for compiling with Clean Water Act.
#7: Degraded landscapes/ecosystems1 to 7 million gallons of water used per well (each well is fracked an average of 18 times)Emissions released to air and waterPolluted ground waterSurface spillsProduction water? What to do with it. Methane released into the air.
#8: Intragenerational inequality (most damage is absorbed bypeople who live next to the wells,however all the country use the gas and oil, as well as people who lives nextto other people who leased their property for wells also suffer from the pollution but receive no money or compensation for it) - Intergenerational inequality (Contaminated resources will live no resources for new generation) - Interspecies inequality (Animals suffer- lose hair, health issues..)