2. Webb 2.0 辰r... Web 2.0 , a phrase coined by O'Reilly Media in 2004, [1] refers to a perceived second generation of web-based services such as social networking sites , wikis , communication tools, and folksonomies that emphasize online collaboration and sharing among users. O'Reilly Media, in collaboration with MediaLive International , used the phrase as a title for a series of conferences, and since 2004 the term has been widely adopted. []In this context, Tim O'Reilly 's characterization of Web 2.0 is clarifying: " Web 2.0 is the business revolution in the computer industry caused by the move to the internet as platform, and an attempt to understand the rules for success on that new platform. " [3]
4. Vad ska vi g旦ra nu d奪? Hembes旦k hos n奪gra filosofer f旦r att diskutera webb 2.0
5. Men vad skulle andra sagt? Karl Marx Adam Smith Ludvig Wittgenstein Friedrich von Hayek Ferdinand T旦nnies Niklas Luhmann Jacques Lyotard ...och, f旦rst奪s, Nietzsche.
7. Karl Marx och webb 2.0 The development of Modern Industry, therefore, cuts from under its feet the very foundation on which the bourgeoisie produces and appropriates products. What the bourgeoisie therefore produces, above all, are its own grave-diggers. Its fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable.
13. Karl Marx och webb 2.0 Private property has made us so stupid and one-sided that an object is only ours when we have it when it exists for us as capital, or when it is directly possessed, eaten, drunk, worn, inhabited, etc., in short, when it is used by us.
16. Karl s辰ger: Webb 2.0 辰r en sj辰lvklar utveckling d辰r produktionsmedlen demokratiseras och kommer det stora flertalet till godo. Bourgoisien f旦rlorar kontrollen och revolutionen 辰r runt h旦rnet! (Go Piratbyr奪n!)
18. Adam Smith och webb 2.0 ...every individual necessarily labours to render the annual revenue of the society as great as he can. He generally, indeed, neither intends to promote the public interest, nor knows how much he is promoting it. [] he intends only his own gain, and he is in this, as in many other cases, led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention. Nor is it always the worse for the society that it was no part of it. By pursuing his own interest he frequently promotes that of the society more effectually than when he really intends to promote it. I have never known much good done by those who affected to trade for the public good.
21. Adam Smith och webb 2.0 The greatest improvement in the productive powers of labor, and the greater part of the skill, dexterity, and judgment with which it is anywhere directed, or applied, seem to have been the effects of the division of labor.
25. Adam s辰ger: Webb 2.0 辰r en oundviklig konsekvens av att den osynliga handen. Kunskap koordineras av en m奪ngfald individer som bara str辰var efter egen vinning och kan sk旦rdas av intelligenta entrepren旦rer som maximerar arbetsf旦rdelningen som de nya verktygen m旦jligg旦r. (Marknadsekonomi rules!)
26. Friedrich l辰gger till Och alla dessa spontana system v辰xer fram utan planering, utan central kontroll och visar att central planering alltid 辰r s辰mre 辰n koordinerad, kollaborativ kunskap (Told you so!)
28. Ludvig Wittgenstein och webb 2.0 Wir sind unf辰hig, die Begriffe, die wir gebrauchen, klar zu umschreiben - nicht, weil wir ihre Definition nicht wissen, sondern weil sie keine wirkliche Definition haben . Die Annahme, da sie eine solche Definition haben m端ssen, w辰re wie die Annahme, da ballspielende Kinder grunds辰tzlich nach strengen Regeln spielen.
31. Ludvig s辰ger: Webb 2.0 utnyttjar i folksonomier det faktum att ingen sj辰lv kan hitta p奪 vad ord betyder och kartl辰gger olika spr奪kspel, skapar folksonomier som utforskar ett begrepps grammatik, hur det r旦r sig i spr奪ket, i st辰llet f旦r att str辰va efter d旦da definitioner.
35. Ferdinand s辰ger: I webb 2.0 l辰mnar vi webbens stora, kalla gesellschaft och skapar oss mindre gemenskaper, mindre n辰tverk som p奪minner om byns gemeinschaft .
40. Niklas s辰ger: Webb 2.0 bygger p奪 f旦rtroende mellan fr辰mlingar och vilar p奪 de tekniker f旦r att bygga rykten som finns. Webb 2.0 辰r en social konstruktion mer 辰n en teknisk!
44. Lyotard s辰ger: Webb 2.0 辰r den tid d奪 webben faller i bitar, den stora webben faller samman i fragment och dessa pillar vi ihop som vi vill i stora bricolage eller, som ni s辰ger, mash-ups
45. Sammanfattningsvis Webb 2.0 k辰nnetecknas av... ...att produktionsmedlen demokratiseras ...att egendom definieras om ...att vi sk旦rdar individens egenintresse f旦r kollektiv nytta ...att vi f旦rdelar arbete b辰ttre 辰n n奪gonsin tidigare ...att vi odlar spr奪ket i st辰llet f旦r att definiera det ...att vi bygger gemeinschaft i st辰llet f旦r gesellschaft ...att f旦rtroendet st奪r i centrum ...att webben faller i bitar och sedan kan sammanfogas i st辰ndigt nya bricolage
![Webb 2.0 辰r... Web 2.0 , a phrase coined by O'Reilly Media in 2004, [1] refers to a perceived second generation of web-based services such as social networking sites , wikis , communication tools, and folksonomies that emphasize online collaboration and sharing among users. O'Reilly Media, in collaboration with MediaLive International , used the phrase as a title for a series of conferences, and since 2004 the term has been widely adopted. []In this context, Tim O'Reilly 's characterization of Web 2.0 is clarifying: " Web 2.0 is the business revolution in the computer industry caused by the move to the internet as platform, and an attempt to understand the rules for success on that new platform. " [3]](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/idg-200703213127/85/IDG-20070321-2-320.jpg)
![Adam Smith och webb 2.0 ...every individual necessarily labours to render the annual revenue of the society as great as he can. He generally, indeed, neither intends to promote the public interest, nor knows how much he is promoting it. [] he intends only his own gain, and he is in this, as in many other cases, led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention. Nor is it always the worse for the society that it was no part of it. By pursuing his own interest he frequently promotes that of the society more effectually than when he really intends to promote it. I have never known much good done by those who affected to trade for the public good.](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/idg-200703213127/85/IDG-20070321-18-320.jpg)
![Niklas Luhmann och webb 2.0 A complete absence of trust would prevent [one] even getting up in the morning.](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/idg-200703213127/85/IDG-20070321-37-320.jpg)
