Six bacterial strains were tested against six antibacterial agents using agar plates. Hydrogen peroxide showed the largest and most consistent zones of inhibition, indicating it was the most effective agent. Spic and Span and bleach were also effective against some strains. The hypothesis that all agents would inhibit all strains was rejected, as some agents like mouthwash showed no inhibition. Hydrogen peroxide was concluded to be the most broad-spectrum antibacterial agent tested.
2. 6 Bacterial Strains
6 Antibacterial Agents
Hypothesis:That all of the
antiseptic and disinfectant agents
will be effective against all of the
bacterial strains
5. AntibacterialAgent Zone of Inhibition (mm)
Bacterial
Strain E. Coli S. Aureus P. aerugin P.Vulgaris B. Cereus E. Faecilis
Hand Sanitizer 12.5 0 0 0 0 0
Hydrogen
Peroxide
1 15.5 2 14 9 15
Mouth Wash 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rubbing Alcohol 0 0 0 0 0 0
10% Bleach 0 0 1 3 0 2
Spic & Span 2 2 0 0 6.5 0
6. 0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
E. Coli S. Aureus P. aerugin P. Vulgaris B. Cereus E. Faecilis
DiameterofZoneofInhibition(mm)
Bacterial Strain
Hand Sanitizer
Hydrogen Peroxide
Mouth Wash
Rubbing Alcohol
10% Bleach
Spic & Span
7. Hydrogen Peroxide was, comparatively, the most
consistently and highly effective antibacterial agent tested
Spic and Span as well as bleach come in second and third
Average Zones of Inhibition
AntibacterialAgent Average Zone of Inhibition
Hand Sanitizer 2.1
Hydrogen Peroxide 9.4
Mouth Wash 0.0
RubbingAlcohol 0.0
10% Bleach 1.0
Spic & Span 1.75
8. Antibacterial Agent Average Zone of Inhibition
Consistency Coefficient
(# of bacterial strains
effective against/total
bacterial strains)
Total Efficacy
Rating
((Coefficient)
( Avg. Zone))
Hand Sanitizer 2.1 0.17 0.35
Hydrogen Peroxide 9.4 1 9.42
MouthWash 0.0 0 0.00
Rubbing Alcohol 0.0 0 0.00
10% Bleach 1.0 0.5 0.50
Spic & Span 1.75 0.5 0.88
10. Lab Group
Kelly Cinelli
Eric Carpizo
Dan Dehelian
Lab Instructor
Dr. E. Dawley
T.A.
Chris Frymoyer
UC Biology Department
11. Image Credits in Order of Appearance
Bacteria pictures:
http://www.freedrinkingwater.com/Images-Test/E-Coli01.jpg
http://www.vanderbilt.edu/exploration/resources/staph_aureus_800.jpg
http://pseudomonas.com/images/paeruginosa.jpg
http://www.ciriscience.org/thumbimage.php?id=155
https://encrypted-tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT2cuGZgkF4U7SA7yRW3HDoopkUlbqd-
FVmuN6AlHIarWFIJJiYXA
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/4a/Enterococcus_faecalis20023-300.jpg/220px-
Enterococcus_faecalis20023-300.jpg
Antibacterial Pictures:
https://encryptedtbn2.google.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSfNvZpXJob0xfyOAzGAO1NQdtMSAb5IGrU
6TpxE0jc89A1RiYn
http://substuff.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/spicspancleaner.jpg
http://www.germx.com/data/photos/8oz_Aloe.jpg
http://www.mcguffmedical.com/Images/Images550/003208%20Hydrogen%20Peroxide%203%20Percen
t,%20Topical%20USP,%2016%20Ounce%20Bottle,%20Each%20McGuffMedical.com.jpg
http://www.scopemouthwash.com/images/crest-products/large/scope-white-mouthwash-mint-
splash.png
http://maryl.uibcsites.com/files/2011/05/Alcohol-Isopropyl.jpg
Zone of Inhibition Diagram:
Ursinus Bio Department Lab 4 instructions
12. Lab 2.3 & 2.4 Procedure from the Ursinus Bio Department
Material Consulted for Discussion
Hand Gels Falter C. B. Science News ,Vol. 169, No. 23 (Jun. 10, 2006), p. 366
http://zack2.ursinus.edu:2075/stable/pdfplus/10.1086/503455.pdf?acceptTC=true
Efficacy of AlcoholBased Hand SanitizersAgainst Fungi andViruses E. Fendler and P. Groziak
InfectionControl and Hospital Epidemiology ,Vol. 23, No. 2 (February 2002), pp. 61-62
Editor's Notes
#8: As it had at least some zone of inhibition against each bacterial strain, as well as the largest zone of inhibition in all cases but one
Spic and Span is effective in that it inhibited the growth of colonies in one half of the bacterial strains tested, and Bleach also inhibited colony growth
It can be seen in the average zones of inhibition table that Hydrogen peroxide had the largest average zone of inhibition, but that hand sanitizer has the second highest average may be deceiving, because it is less consistent than bleach and spic and span, as it only produced a zone of inhibition against E. Coli bacteria, and because it was a relatively large zone comparative to other results from this experiment, its average is not representative of the overall efficacy.
#10: Mouthwash is designed to fight oral bacteria, whereas the other antibacterials are more general in use, so that could explain its ineffectiveness
These three agents share alcohol as an active ingredient