Ina Soetebeer, Potentials and Limits of Urban Commons in the City of Lüneburg
?
1 like?706 views
This document outlines the research design for a project examining commons in Lüneburg, Germany in 2030. The research will proceed in two phases: first, a literature review, situational analysis, and stakeholder analysis will be conducted. Second, scenario analysis will be used to analyze potentials and hurdles for commons-based food production in Lüneburg. The research process will involve transect walks to identify available public spaces and resources, defining commons, and creating concept maps to address the research question of what conditions enable commons-based food production. References are provided on topics including urban commons, scenario analysis methods, knowledge as a global commons, and stakeholder analysis techniques.
Ina Soetebeer, Potentials and Limits of Urban Commons in the City of Lüneburg
- 1. Commons in Lüneburg 2030 - Potentials and hurdles – Potentials & hurdles Ina Soetebeer, PhD candidate Contact: ina.soetebeer@leuphana.de
- 2. Index ? Commons in Lüneburg – Research Project – Research Design – Research Process
- 4. Project Plan ?Urban Commons 2030“
- 6. Citizens` claims PHASE II ? Scenario - Analysis FOOD SOCIAL ISSUES HEALTH CULTURAL ISSUES KNOWLED GE PHASE I ? Literature Review ? Situational Analysis ? Stakeholder Analysis
- 8. PHASE I: Stakeholder Analysis (Reed et al 2009)
- 9. PHASE II: Scenario Analysis (Kosow et al 2008)
- 10. (Kosow et al 2008)
- 11. Research Process
- 12. 1. Transect Walks “Spaces, resources and services that are available for the general public. Restrictions exist. They are based on self-governance. Framework conditions do matter.” Ferguson 2014, Morisse-Schilbach 2012, Ostrom 2011) *restrictions:seasons, day period, age… 2. Definition
- 13. 3. Concept Maps RQ: Which conditions enable a commons-based food production in Lüneburg?
- 14. References ? Ferguson, F. (2014). Make_Shift City. Renegotiating the urban commons. Die Neuverhandlung des Urbanen. Berlin: Jovis Verlag GmbH. ? Kosnow, H., & Ga?ner, R. (2008). Methoden der Zukunfts- und Szenarioanalyse. ?berblick, Bewertung und Auswahlkriterien (Werkstattb). Berlin: Institut für Zukunftsstudien und Technologiebewertung. ? Morisse-Schilbach, M., & Halfmann, J. (2012). Wissen, Wissenschaft und Global Commons. Nomos. ? Ostrom, E. (2011). Was mehr wird, wenn wir teilen. Vom gesellschaftlichen Wert der Gemeingüter. München: Oekom. ? Reed S., M., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., … Stringer, L. C. (2009). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 1933–1949. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001