ºÝºÝߣ

ºÝºÝߣShare a Scribd company logo
Integrative Learning
Design Framework (ILDF)
for online learning for the
CHECET -2013
Eunice Ivala
Rita Kizito



Prepared for the CHEC Emerging Technologies Course April 2013
Integrative Learning Design Framework (ILDF) for online learning


                          1. Exploration




                           Instructional
         4. Reflection       Designer        2. Enactment




                          3. Evaluation




                  Adapted from Dabbagh and Bannan-Ritland (2005)
The ILDF framework
 A constructivist-based instructional design model that
  offers a systematic process of online learning
  development.
 A design process in which views and feedback from all
  participants in the design, development and
  implementation process are considered.
 End products ( interventions) which are based on the
  needs and perspectives of all role players - students as
  well as the experiences and epistemological convictions of
  the developer/designer.
Integrative learning design framework (ildf)  for the checet 2013 course
The 4 phases are informed by…

 Contextual factors which may affect design, development
  & implementation.
 ICT affordances-learning strategies.
 Sound pedagogical models .




                           … what goes on in each phase ?
Exploration phase                1

Investigate the context within which the online
learning activity will be designed and implemented
  › Teacher and learner needs.
  › Teaching and learning challenges.
  › Theory and instructional strategies used to (identify
    problems/gaps/opportunities).
  › Social, cultural and organisational factors that may constraint
    design, development and implementation.
  › Designer beliefs, attitudes, biases, experience, assumptions,
    educational philosophy.
  › Literature review on ICTs available, their affordances and the
    pedagogical models and instructional strategies they support.
Enactment phase                    2

Informed by all the information gathered in
exploration phase

   Select (an) ICT tool(s)that best address your T&L challenge
     ( identify their
         affordances .
         pedagogical models and
         instructional strategies they support).
   Design the prototype/intervention.
Overlapping Instructional strategy clusters
     Diverge towards promoting self-directed learning




                               Dialogical
               Exploratory


                        Supportive




              Converge towards promoting
                  authentic learning
Critical design mapping questions




  Instructional   Pedagogic       ICT
    strategy        model     affordance
Evaluation phase                      3

Assess if the designed prototype/ intervention is
user friendly, valid & relevant to address the T&L
challenge and instructional outcomes it is
intended for
 Formative-done in the development stages of the prototype to judge
  the strengths and weaknesses of the prototype-results are used to
  revise/refine the prototype /instruction to improve its effectiveness
  and appeal
   -expert reviews
   -one-on-one with colleagues
   -small group of students
 Summative – done after the implementation of the prototype to
  measure the impact of the prototype on teaching and learning
Reflection phase           4

Critically think of the experiences you went
through in the whole process of designing the
prototype
  The design model
  Lessons learnt
  Possible applications of the prototype

   Lessons learnt in the whole process could be used to
   redesign the intervention or other new interventions
Integrative learning design framework (ildf)  for the checet 2013 course

More Related Content

Integrative learning design framework (ildf) for the checet 2013 course

  • 1. Integrative Learning Design Framework (ILDF) for online learning for the CHECET -2013 Eunice Ivala Rita Kizito Prepared for the CHEC Emerging Technologies Course April 2013
  • 2. Integrative Learning Design Framework (ILDF) for online learning 1. Exploration Instructional 4. Reflection Designer 2. Enactment 3. Evaluation Adapted from Dabbagh and Bannan-Ritland (2005)
  • 3. The ILDF framework  A constructivist-based instructional design model that offers a systematic process of online learning development.  A design process in which views and feedback from all participants in the design, development and implementation process are considered.  End products ( interventions) which are based on the needs and perspectives of all role players - students as well as the experiences and epistemological convictions of the developer/designer.
  • 5. The 4 phases are informed by…  Contextual factors which may affect design, development & implementation.  ICT affordances-learning strategies.  Sound pedagogical models . … what goes on in each phase ?
  • 6. Exploration phase 1 Investigate the context within which the online learning activity will be designed and implemented › Teacher and learner needs. › Teaching and learning challenges. › Theory and instructional strategies used to (identify problems/gaps/opportunities). › Social, cultural and organisational factors that may constraint design, development and implementation. › Designer beliefs, attitudes, biases, experience, assumptions, educational philosophy. › Literature review on ICTs available, their affordances and the pedagogical models and instructional strategies they support.
  • 7. Enactment phase 2 Informed by all the information gathered in exploration phase  Select (an) ICT tool(s)that best address your T&L challenge ( identify their  affordances .  pedagogical models and  instructional strategies they support).  Design the prototype/intervention.
  • 8. Overlapping Instructional strategy clusters Diverge towards promoting self-directed learning Dialogical Exploratory Supportive Converge towards promoting authentic learning
  • 9. Critical design mapping questions Instructional Pedagogic ICT strategy model affordance
  • 10. Evaluation phase 3 Assess if the designed prototype/ intervention is user friendly, valid & relevant to address the T&L challenge and instructional outcomes it is intended for  Formative-done in the development stages of the prototype to judge the strengths and weaknesses of the prototype-results are used to revise/refine the prototype /instruction to improve its effectiveness and appeal -expert reviews -one-on-one with colleagues -small group of students  Summative – done after the implementation of the prototype to measure the impact of the prototype on teaching and learning
  • 11. Reflection phase 4 Critically think of the experiences you went through in the whole process of designing the prototype  The design model  Lessons learnt  Possible applications of the prototype Lessons learnt in the whole process could be used to redesign the intervention or other new interventions