際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo

Non-Profit Business Evaluation Criteria for the Application of Internet Based Technologies

Download as PPTX, PDF
Ross Sivertsen
Ross Sivertsen

The document discusses developing standardized evaluation checklists to help small non-profit organizations (NPOs) evaluate internet-enabled applications. It proposes creating checklists based on models like CMMI and PMI that focus on requirements management, project planning, and risk management. The checklists would include common components like defining goals and stakeholders but details may vary based on the application. The process of developing the checklists collaboratively with stakeholders is emphasized as important as the checklists themselves. Limitations of the research like limited time and staff are acknowledged.

1 of 10
Download to read offline
By L. Ross Sivertsen
Small NPOs Need to reach constituency, the Internet and Internet-enabled applications facilitate this. Severely constrained by resources, and capital. The research focuses on developing a standard set of evaluation criteria through the use of checklists to fill all of these requirements
NPOs face the need to evaluate internet enables applications to gain reach NPOs typically have little or no technology staff Several IA considerations around confidentiality/integrity/availability The need for checklists preferred tool for evaluation and planning
Create the tools - Checklists Checklists are simple Checklists are easy to understand Checklists are repeatable Use standard practices to develop checklists CMMI/PMI used because of the maturity of the models Reduce practices down to three Requirements Management Project Planning Risk Management
There is no "one-size-fits-all" for checklists The differences centered on the application of the technology Common components exists but details vary Define the goal Define the stakeholders Define the requirements/success criteria/test parameters/exit controls
The process of developing the checklist content is as important as the checklist itself.
Use the standards to create the checklists Either PMI (PMBoK) or SEI (CMMI) suggest stating the goal, gather requirements, plan Develop the checklists through collaboration with the stakeholders
The limits of the researcher in the staff number One researcher, one staff member The limits on schedule Limited ted what is achievable in 12 weeks Limits on creating the checklists instead of executing the checklists De-scope research to limit to evaluating the process of creating checklists Small subset of CMMI De-scope to include only three CMMI process areas to facilitate reduced complexity
Best Practices Research the actual execution of this practice and measure effectiveness Privacy and Online Reputation Management/Online Identity Management Research needed to identify the issues surrounding "branding" of the online identity of the organization Web Services Integration Research needed to evaluate the need of integrating multiple internet-based applications into a single application infrastructure
Non-Profit Business Evaluation Criteria for the Application of Internet Based Technologies

More Related Content

Non-Profit Business Evaluation Criteria for the Application of Internet Based Technologies

  • 1. By L. Ross Sivertsen
  • 2. Small NPOs Need to reach constituency, the Internet and Internet-enabled applications facilitate this. Severely constrained by resources, and capital. The research focuses on developing a standard set of evaluation criteria through the use of checklists to fill all of these requirements
  • 3. NPOs face the need to evaluate internet enables applications to gain reach NPOs typically have little or no technology staff Several IA considerations around confidentiality/integrity/availability The need for checklists preferred tool for evaluation and planning
  • 4. Create the tools - Checklists Checklists are simple Checklists are easy to understand Checklists are repeatable Use standard practices to develop checklists CMMI/PMI used because of the maturity of the models Reduce practices down to three Requirements Management Project Planning Risk Management
  • 5. There is no "one-size-fits-all" for checklists The differences centered on the application of the technology Common components exists but details vary Define the goal Define the stakeholders Define the requirements/success criteria/test parameters/exit controls
  • 6. The process of developing the checklist content is as important as the checklist itself.
  • 7. Use the standards to create the checklists Either PMI (PMBoK) or SEI (CMMI) suggest stating the goal, gather requirements, plan Develop the checklists through collaboration with the stakeholders
  • 8. The limits of the researcher in the staff number One researcher, one staff member The limits on schedule Limited ted what is achievable in 12 weeks Limits on creating the checklists instead of executing the checklists De-scope research to limit to evaluating the process of creating checklists Small subset of CMMI De-scope to include only three CMMI process areas to facilitate reduced complexity
  • 9. Best Practices Research the actual execution of this practice and measure effectiveness Privacy and Online Reputation Management/Online Identity Management Research needed to identify the issues surrounding "branding" of the online identity of the organization Web Services Integration Research needed to evaluate the need of integrating multiple internet-based applications into a single application infrastructure