This document discusses the doctrine of repugnancy in Indian law. It explains that under Article 254 of the Indian Constitution, if a central law conflicts with a state law on a subject in the Concurrent List, the central law will prevail. It provides examples of direct conflicts, occupied fields, and intended occupation that can result in repugnancy. Key court cases are discussed that have established conditions for applying the doctrine and interpreted how it is to be implemented. The conclusion emphasizes that the doctrine preserves integrity and avoids conflicting laws on the same subjects between central and state legislatures.