ITI Solutions - Comparative Information
0 likes311 views
Inland Technology provides non-hazardous cleaning solutions and equipment for parts washing, painting equipment cleaning, surface cleaning, pressure washing, and weapon cleaning. Their solutions are more sustainable and cost-effective than conventional hazardous chemicals. Their microfiltration systems filter out particulates to maintain quality and extend solvent life, while their consumable solutions have no service costs and produce less waste than rental/service options or self-owned mineral spirits.
More Related Content
Viewers also liked (15)
Similar to ITI Solutions - Comparative Information (20)
ITI Solutions - Comparative Information
- 1. Inland Technology, Inc. Solutions Comparison Information Against Conventional Products
- 3. Partswashing Model Comparison Solvent Hazardous? Chemical Acquisition Comparison? Method for Extending Solvent Life? Frequency of Service? Service Cost? Quality? Solvent Usage Life? Waste? VOC Benefit? Odor? Warranty Information? Estimated Operating Costs? (Ongoing) Inland Technology, Inc. Non-Hazardous Consumable Solution As Needed Dual-Stage Microfiltration System Adjusts to Production Levels No Charge Where Representation Filters Out Particulates for Assured Production Quality 18 24 MONTHS (AVG) Non-Hazardous, typically Low-Vapor Pressure for VOC Control Odorless / Slight Citrus Odor Lifetime Warranty on Parts, while using ITI Solutions $22 - $75 / per month (or less) Rental / Service Company Likely Hazardous Perpetual Rental / Service Cost Loop NONE 4-12 Week Cycle, Regardless of Production Use $200 - $1,300 / per service NO FILTRATION Likely 4-12 WEEKS (EST) Hazardous, likely NONE Strong Chemical Odor, typically NONE $200 - $1,300 / per month, service (or more) Self Owned, Mineral Spirits / NAPTHA Likely Hazardous Consumable Solvent As Needed NONE Adjusts to Production Levels No Service Offered, Production Cost NO FILTRATION Likely 4-12 WEEKS (EST) Hazardous, likely NONE Strong Chemical Odor, typically NONE $191 - $575 / per month (or more)
- 4. Comparative Painting Application Equipment Cleaning Information
- 5. Painting Application Equipment Cleanup Comparison Solvent Used? Chemical Concerns? Flashpoint? NESHAPs? Diluent? Re-Usable? Filterable? OSHA 29CFR 1910.107 (g) (5) ? Waste Comparison? Cost Comparison? Equipment Warranty Info? Inland Technology, Inc. EP-921 Solution Non-Hazardous, Non-Toxic, No HAPs, Low-VOC, Safe 146 F / 63 C Compliant No Yes, Multiple Times Yes, with Inland Reclamation Equipment Compliant 60% Less, or Better Comparatively 60% Less, or Better Comparatively Lifetime Warranty while Using Inland Solutions Conventional Methods MEK / MPK / Toluene / Paint Thinner / Acetone Hazardous, Toxic, Possible HAPs, High- VOC, Flammable -4 F (-20 C) to 43 F (6 C) Often NESHAPs Concerns Yes No, Single Use No Not Compliant, Likely -------- ------- Not Applicable, typically Painting Application Equipment Cleanup: Comparison
- 6. Comparative Surface Cleaning Solution Information
- 7. Surface Cleaning Comparison Solvent Used? Chemical Concerns? Flashpoint? NESHAPs? VOCs? Residue? Evaporation? Comparative Usage Potential? Cost Comparison? Equipment Warranty Info? Inland Technology, Inc. Iso Prep, Partsmaster Type I, Teksol EP, Citra Safe, AV-Ops Non-Toxic, No HAPs, Low-VOC, Safe, Not Flammable High Flashpoint, All Over 100 F (38 C) Compliant Low-Vapor Pressure for VOC Control Clean, Residue Free After Drying Slower Evaporation for Chemical Consumption Control 5 18 Times More Surface Wipe Down Per Gallon, Estimated 30% - 60% Less, in Controlled Use Lifetime Warranty while Using Inland Solutions Conventional Methods MEK / MPK / Toluene / Paint Thinner / Acetone Hazardous, Toxic, Possible HAPs, High- VOC, Flammable Could be Highly Flammable, Low Flashpoint Potential Often NESHAPs Concerns High-Vapor Pressure, High VOC Potential Clean, Residue Free After Drying Faster Evaporation, Encourages High Consumption Rate of Chemical ------- -------- Not Applicable, typically
- 8. Comparative Pressure Wash / Aqueous Cleaning Solution Information
- 9. Pressure Wash / Aqueous Cleaning Comparison Material Used? Chemical Concerns? PH? Emulsification? Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) Benefit for Disposal? Corrosion Concerns? VOCs? Inland Technology, Inc. Millennium, Samurai, Safety Prep, Freedom Kleen Typically Neutral at Dilution Does not Emulsify, Helps Prevent Oil & Grease from Mixing Yes, Separation Promotes Oil / Water Separation and Benefits COD Issues in Disposal Can be non-Corrosive at Dilution No VOC Potential Conventional Methods Sodium Hydroxide, Caustic Materials, Other Detergents, Etc Hazardous, Toxic, Possible HAPs, High- VOC, Flammable Could be High, Could be Low, Varies Emulsifies, Allows Oil & Grease to Mix No, Mixing with Oil & Grease Causes Issues for Oil / Water Separation and Creates COD Disposal Issues Typically Corrosion Issues Probable VOCs
- 11. Weapon Cleaning Comparison Material Used? Chemical Concerns? How is it used? Benefits of Technology? MIL PRF-680 Qualifications? (Department of Defense Specification) Inland Technology, Inc. Breakthrough, Skysol, Skysol 100, Partsmaster Type I Non-Hazardous, Non-Toxic, Odorless, Safe Equipment based partswasher with micro-filtration to remove particulates and maintain integrity of quality for precision cleaning 50% Reduction in Chemical Use & Costs Expected, Major Increase in Productivity Yes, MIL PRF-680 Type I, II, IV Listed on Qualified Products List (QPL) Conventional Methods Mineral Spirits, NAPTHA, PD-680, Generic Cleaners Hazardous, Toxic, Concerns for Human Exposure, Strong Odor Spray & Wipe, Manual Cleaning with no re-use potential Labor Intensive Process, Consumes a Great Amount of Chemical No, Not Typically Listed