際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo

Jetzt rede ich kurz

peterpur
peterpur

The document discusses various issues related to increasing automation and artificial intelligence technologies, including their impacts on jobs, privacy, security, and ethics. It notes that automation has already eliminated many agricultural jobs and is projected to replace humans in other occupations like driving. Some experts argue that increased automation will lead to most jobs being replaced, while others believe certain jobs will remain safe from innovation. The document also examines privacy and surveillance concerns related to technologies, as well as security issues like malware infections. It discusses concepts like Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics and challenges around regulating advanced computer systems like robots and artificial intelligence.

1 of 26
Download to read offline
7 things we should be talking about
e鍖ciency privacy stupidity security vulnerability robot ethics malice
thesis: whenever machines become more e鍖cient at doing something than people, people will be replaced. e鍖ciency privacy stupidity security vulnerability robot ethics malice
損Two hundred years ago, 70% of American workers lived on the farm. Today automation has eliminated all but 1% of their jobs, replacing them (and their work animals) with machines.束 Will a robot take your job? [New Yorker] e鍖ciency privacy stupidity security vulnerability robot ethics malice
among others: soldier journalist farmer pharmacist 10 jobs robots already do better than you [MarketWatch] e鍖ciency privacy stupidity security vulnerability robot ethics malice
Robots replacing factory workers at faster pace [LA Times] e鍖ciency privacy stupidity security vulnerability robot ethics malice Cheaper, better robots will replace human workers in the world's factories at a faster pace over the next decade, pushing labor costs down 16%, a report Tuesday said.[] Robots will cut labor costs by 33% in South Korea, 25% in Japan, 24% in Canada and 22% in the United States and Taiwan. The cost of owning and operating a robotic spot welder, for instance, has tumbled from $182,000 in 2005 to $133,000 last year, and will drop to $103,000 by 2025
thesis: whenever machines become more e鍖cient at doing something than people, people will be replaced. observation: automation is a self- enhancing process e鍖ciency privacy stupidity security vulnerability robot ethics malice
conclusion: people will be replaced almost everywhere. e鍖ciency privacy stupidity security vulnerability robot ethics malice
Man vs. Machine: Are Any Jobs Safe from Innovation? [Spiegel] e鍖ciency privacy stupidity security vulnerability robot ethics malice 損There are approximately 4 million truck, taxi, limousine and bus drivers in the United States, not to mention gas station attendants and tra鍖c policemen, writes Posner, the University of Chicago scholar, in his essay on automation and employment. Not all these jobs will be eliminated overnight, he says, but they could go quite fast.溝
e鍖ciency privacy stupidity security vulnerability robot ethics malice 損I don't think we have to worry about autonomous cars, because that's sort of like a narrow form of AI. It would be like an elevator. They used to have elevator operators, and then we developed some simple circuitry to have elevators just automatically come to the 鍖oor that you're at ... the car is going to be just like that束 So what happens when we get there? Musk said that the obvious move is to outlaw driving cars. Its too dangerous. You can't have a person driving a two-ton death machine.溝 Elon Musk: cars you can drive will eventually be outlawed [Verge]
e鍖ciency privacy stupidity security vulnerability robot ethics malice
e鍖ciency privacy stupidity security vulnerability robot ethics malice 損Will Googles own Executives buy their self-driving car? Never!束 [Bruce Sterling]
e鍖ciency privacy stupidity security vulnerability robot ethics malice 損Surveillance as a Business Model束 [Bruce Schneier] 損It shouldn't come as a surprise that big technology companies are tracking us on the Internet even more aggressively than before. If [that doesnt] sound particularly bene鍖cial to you, it's because you're not the customer of any of these companies. You're the product, and you're being improved for their actual customers: their advertisers. Surveillance is the business model of the Internet束
e鍖ciency privacy stupidity security vulnerability robot ethics malice
e鍖ciency privacy stupidity security vulnerability robot ethics malice 損Robots and Privacy束 [Ryan Calo] An extensive literature in communications and psychology demonstrates that humans are hardwired to react to social machines as though a person were really present. [] People cooperate with su鍖ciently human-like machines, are polite to them, decline to sustain eye-contact, decline to mistreat or roughhouse with them, and respond positively to their 鍖attery. There is even a neurological correlation to the reaction; the same mirror neurons 鍖re in the presence of real and virtual social agents.
e鍖ciency privacy stupidity security vulnerability robot ethics malice
e鍖ciency privacy stupidity security vulnerability robot ethics malice malware in personal computers Report: 48% of 22 million scanned computers infected with malware [ZDnet] 32% of computers around the world are infected with viruses and malware [dotTech] Malware infects 30% of computers in the U.S. [InfoWorld]
e鍖ciency privacy stupidity security vulnerability robot ethics malice example: cryptolocker oct 2013 mid 2014 malware in personal computers
e鍖ciency privacy stupidity security vulnerability robot ethics malice
e鍖ciency privacy stupidity security vulnerability robot ethics malice 損In the world of malware threats, only a few rare examples can truly be considered groundbreaking and almost peerless. What we have seen in Regin is just such a class of malware. []it is one of the main cyberespionage tools used by a nation state []many components of Regin remain undiscovered and additional functionality and versions may exist.束 [symantec.com]
e鍖ciency privacy stupidity security vulnerability robot ethics malice
e鍖ciency privacy stupidity security vulnerability robot ethics malice
e鍖ciency privacy stupidity security vulnerability robot ethics malice Three Laws of Robotics [S. Lem] 1 A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. 2 A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings, except where such orders would con鍖ict with the First Law. 3 A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not con鍖ict with the First or Second Laws.
e鍖ciency privacy stupidity security vulnerability robot ethics malice Why it is not possible to regulate robots [Cory Doctorow] A robot is basically a computer that causes some physical change in the world. We can and do regulate machines, from cars to drills to implanted de鍖brillators. But the thing that distinguishes a power-drill from a robot-drill is that the robot-drill has a driver: a computer that operates it. Regulating that computer in the way that we regulate other machines by mandating the characteristics of their manufacture will be no more e鍖ective at preventing undesirable robotic outcomes than the copyright mandates of the past 20 years have been e鍖ective at preventing copyright infringement (that is, not at all).
e鍖ciency privacy stupidity security vulnerability robot ethics malice thesis: automation is a vicious circle that we need to break. goal: human-compatible automation. thesis: technology seldom plays out as planned. thesis: it is impossible to regulate computers. this also applies to AI and robots.
損The progress in AI research makes it timely to focus research not only on making AI more capable, but also on maximizing the societal bene鍖t of AI.束

More Related Content

Jetzt rede ich kurz