際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo

Jongeren en sociale media: de dood van privacy?

Download as PPTX, PDF
Mediaraven vzw
Mediaraven vzw

Als het gaat over nieuwe media en vooral dan sociale media, maken velen zichzorgen over de mogelijke privacyproblemen. Sommigen gaan zelfs zo ver dat ze beweren dat privacy een sociaal construct is dat de 21steeeuw niet zal overleven. Jongeren worden in zon discours veelal verweten dat ze niet (meer) geven om hun privacy en zowat alles over hun leven online te grabbel gooien. Aan de hand van recente onderzoeksbevindingen wil Ralf De Wolf dit beeld bijstellenen nuanceren. Hij zal ingaanop de handelingen van jongeren in de context van sociale media en hoe zij privacy percipi谷ren.

1 of 14
Download to read offline
JONGEREN EN SOCIALE MEDIA: DE DOOD VAN PRIVACY? Ralf De Wolf
Living the public life is the new default Transparency will replace privacy as the social norm and ideal Privacy is a passing artefact of the industrial age
De grootste helpdesk van Vlaanderen Stelling: 95% van de jongeren maakt geen gebruik van de privacy instellingen op sociale media. Moeten jongeren hun privacy beter beschermen? 3
Privacy paradox Gebruikers zeggen dat ze zich veel zorgen maken over hun privacy (attitude), maar delen tegelijkertijd heel wat persoonlijke informatie online (gedrag)
Jongeren en sociale media: de dood van privacy?
I. Belang van definitie Je bent niet de klant maar het product dat wordt verkocht Big brother is watching you
Institutionele versus sociale privacy Institutionele privacy: privacy vis--vis derde partijen (overheden, bedrijven, etc.) Sociale privacy: privacy vis--vis andere personen 7
II. Verder kijken dan alleen privacy instellingen Alleen focus op privacy instellingen = heel gelimiteerd Subtiele privacy management strategie谷n: - Unlimited sharing - Sociale steganografie 8
Unlimited sharing In a world in which posting updates is common, purposeful, and performative, sharing often allows teens to control a social situation more than simply opting out. It also guarantees that others cant define the social situation. Sitting in an afterschool program in Los Angeles, I casually asked a teen participant why she shared so many embarrassing photos of herself on her profile. She laughed and told me that it was a lot safer if she shared her photos and put them in context by what she wrote than if she did not because she knew that her friends also had embarrassing photos. Theyd be happy to embarrass her if she let them. But by taking preemptive action and mocking herself by writing dismissive messages on photos that could be interpreted problematically, she undermined her friends ability to define the situation differently. After explaining her logic, she continued on to explain how her apparent exhibitionism left plenty of room for people to not focus on the things that were deeply intimate in her life. (Boyd, 2014) 9
Sociale steganografie = hiding in plain sight Bv. posten van emotionele lyrics in het nieuwsoverzicht van Facebook 10
III. Genetwerkte context in rekening brengen 11
Privacy defaitisme what can I really do? 12
Conclusie Is privacy dood? Geven jongeren om privacy? Belang van definitie (wat is privacy?) In rekening brengen van subtiele privacy strategie谷n Belang van context 13
Dr. Ralf De Wolf Doctor Assistent Korte Meer 9, 2V ralf.dewolf@ugent.be

More Related Content

Jongeren en sociale media: de dood van privacy?

  • 1. JONGEREN EN SOCIALE MEDIA: DE DOOD VAN PRIVACY? Ralf De Wolf
  • 2. Living the public life is the new default Transparency will replace privacy as the social norm and ideal Privacy is a passing artefact of the industrial age
  • 3. De grootste helpdesk van Vlaanderen Stelling: 95% van de jongeren maakt geen gebruik van de privacy instellingen op sociale media. Moeten jongeren hun privacy beter beschermen? 3
  • 4. Privacy paradox Gebruikers zeggen dat ze zich veel zorgen maken over hun privacy (attitude), maar delen tegelijkertijd heel wat persoonlijke informatie online (gedrag)
  • 6. I. Belang van definitie Je bent niet de klant maar het product dat wordt verkocht Big brother is watching you
  • 7. Institutionele versus sociale privacy Institutionele privacy: privacy vis--vis derde partijen (overheden, bedrijven, etc.) Sociale privacy: privacy vis--vis andere personen 7
  • 8. II. Verder kijken dan alleen privacy instellingen Alleen focus op privacy instellingen = heel gelimiteerd Subtiele privacy management strategie谷n: - Unlimited sharing - Sociale steganografie 8
  • 9. Unlimited sharing In a world in which posting updates is common, purposeful, and performative, sharing often allows teens to control a social situation more than simply opting out. It also guarantees that others cant define the social situation. Sitting in an afterschool program in Los Angeles, I casually asked a teen participant why she shared so many embarrassing photos of herself on her profile. She laughed and told me that it was a lot safer if she shared her photos and put them in context by what she wrote than if she did not because she knew that her friends also had embarrassing photos. Theyd be happy to embarrass her if she let them. But by taking preemptive action and mocking herself by writing dismissive messages on photos that could be interpreted problematically, she undermined her friends ability to define the situation differently. After explaining her logic, she continued on to explain how her apparent exhibitionism left plenty of room for people to not focus on the things that were deeply intimate in her life. (Boyd, 2014) 9
  • 10. Sociale steganografie = hiding in plain sight Bv. posten van emotionele lyrics in het nieuwsoverzicht van Facebook 10
  • 11. III. Genetwerkte context in rekening brengen 11
  • 12. Privacy defaitisme what can I really do? 12
  • 13. Conclusie Is privacy dood? Geven jongeren om privacy? Belang van definitie (wat is privacy?) In rekening brengen van subtiele privacy strategie谷n Belang van context 13
  • 14. Dr. Ralf De Wolf Doctor Assistent Korte Meer 9, 2V ralf.dewolf@ugent.be