Jordane
Download as pptx, pdf0 likes221 views
Time Entertainment would be a suitable distributor for the film "Face Your Fears" because it is categorized as a local film. Local films have small, independent production and distribution companies with limited budgets and target UK audiences using homegrown stars. As an independent production also using UK companies and talent, Time Entertainment would be a good fit as a local distributor for the film.
1 of 6
Download to read offline
Ad
Recommended
Institutions two
Institutions twodilaratasd
油
The UK Film Council, Film Four, and Vertigo Films are three institutions that could potentially distribute the filmmakers' opening sequence. The UK Film Council distributes around 贈54 million annually from the lottery and government to support short films and film production. Film Four invests around 贈500,000 per film for their 20 films produced per year, making their budget suitable. Vertigo Films is an independent film company that funds films of varying budgets and allows films to be downloaded, helping redistribute films and provide new experiences, making them the best institution to exhibit the filmmakers' opening sequence.Mashud q6
Mashud q6haverstockmedia
油
The UK Film Council, BBC Films, Vertigo Films, and Film Four are major film institutions in the UK that support the production and distribution of British films. The UK Film Council has backed over 900 films to make the UK a global center for film and supports new directors. BBC Films finds and develops new talent to produce independent British films. Vertigo Films creates commercially driven independent films using new technologies while paying attention to budgets. Film Four showcases British and international films and partners with Warp X Films to challenge films budgets and expand niche audiences. These institutions would likely distribute a UK-based social realist film.What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?Stephanie
油
This document discusses different types of media institutions that could potentially distribute a film product. It explains that media institutions include companies that disseminate media products to audiences, such as distributing films to cinemas nationally or internationally, or later to stores to sell DVDs or soundtracks. It also notes that institutions can fund film projects by agreeing to back directors' or producers' pitches. The document then examines specific popular UK institutions like the BBC, UK Film Council, Vertigo Films, and Film4 that have distributed films like "Last Resort," "This is England," and "Half Nelson." It provides details on the goals and practices of each institution in identifying and supporting new filmmakers and projects.Mashud q3
Mashud q3haverstockmedia
油
The UK Film Council backs over 900 films to support upcoming British directors and make the UK a global center for film. They partner with other organizations to fund low-budget films appealing to niche audiences. BBC Films, Vertigo Films, and Film Four similarly produce and distribute independent British films, with an emphasis on authenticity and developing new talent on limited budgets. These institutions would be suitable to distribute a new UK-based social realist film.Warp film
Warp filmmcgeoghann
油
Warp Films is an independent film company based in London and Sheffield that produces low-budget films that often go on to critical and commercial success. They receive funding from various UK sources like the BFI and Film4. While their films have small budgets, many end up profitable at the box office and win numerous awards. Some of their most acclaimed films that found both success and acclaim include This is England and Submarine. Their ability to produce unique films on tight budgets that resonate with audiences is what makes Warp Films a successful independent studio.Warp film
Warp filmmcgeoghann
油
Warp Film is an independent British film company based in London and Sheffield. As an independent studio, it has more limited funding than major studios but seeks financing from various UK film councils and organizations. It stresses the importance of using short films to impress potential funders and get noticed. Some of Warp Film's biggest successes include This Is England, which won several awards, and Submarine, which had a small 贈1.2 million budget but made over 贈2 million in profits. However, some of its films like Bunny and the Bull and Grow Your Own were financial flops. Warp Film's success is attributed to securing funding from multiple UK sources and producing low-budget films that are acclaimed and commercially successful.What defines a British film?
What defines a British film?Rachel Jones
油
The Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) is responsible for setting policy to support the British film industry through funding, tax incentives, and the Cultural Test, which determines if a film qualifies as British; the DCMS works with organizations like the British Film Institute (BFI) and provides lottery funding and financial support for production. The DCMS also negotiates co-production agreements and issues film certificates to allow companies to claim tax relief.Evaluation 3
Evaluation 3mollysmith123
油
British independent films typically have lower budgets than Hollywood blockbusters because British production companies cannot afford large budgets. Most British films do not use many production and distribution companies either, as they cannot pay for production and distribution due to their small budgets. In contrast, Hollywood blockbusters have higher budgets as they are funded by major conglomerates like Disney, Universal, and Warner Bros. These large companies can afford big budgets to attract large audiences with famous actors and quality resources.Defining British Film
Defining British Filmrikhudson
油
The document discusses factors that define a British film, including whether the story/setting, director, cast, financing, and intended audience are British. It provides examples of films like "Control" and "This is England" that would qualify as British films according to recent UK government criteria focusing on cultural hubs (UK production), cultural practitioners (UK cast and crew), and cultural content (British setting and characters). Readers are asked to discuss films that meet these criteria in small groups.Evaluation Question 3- What kind of media instituion might distribute your me...
Evaluation Question 3- What kind of media instituion might distribute your me...fran3002
油
Vertigo Films would be the most suitable media institution to distribute a low-budget British film because:
1) Vertigo Films is a UK media company that specializes in creating and distributing commercially viable independent cinema projects.
2) They focus on addressing audiences in a careful way and producing films within tight budgets.
3) Their approach to budgets and technology allows them to effectively distribute low-budget British films to targeted audiences.What makes a film british
What makes a film britishmopish
油
To be considered a British film, a film must pass a cultural test administered by the UK film council. The test contains 31 points across 4 sections - cultural content, cultural contribution, cultural hubs, and cultural practitioners. A film needs at least 16 points to pass the test. Being designated a British film provides tax relief for film production companies of up to 25% for films spending less than 贈20 million or 20% for films spending more. In addition to passing the cultural test, British films must be intended for theatrical release and have minimum UK production spending of 25%.Evaluation question 2
Evaluation question 2Rumfordian
油
The document discusses potential distributors for an independent, low-budget film with a dark tone and 15 rating. It analyzes Warner Bros, Disney, Film4, and Microwave. Warner Bros and Disney are ruled out as they focus on big-budget blockbusters. Film4 and Microwave are presented as the most viable options as they specialize in smaller, British films and have experience supporting independent productions through funding and distribution. Microwave in particular offers financing up to 贈25,000 and has successfully distributed similar small, local films to UK audiences.British cinema since 1990 (2)
British cinema since 1990 (2)Armthorpe Media
油
The document discusses several key aspects of British cinema:
1) There are debates around whether British films should represent British culture to domestic audiences through public funding, or compete internationally by attracting wide audiences.
2) The UK Film Council was set up in 2000 to centralize public support for film through various funding programs.
3) There are discussions around whether British cinema should receive any public money given some films' financial performances. British films must balance representing national culture with finding international distribution.What kind of media institution might distribute your media products and why?
What kind of media institution might distribute your media products and why?Emily Erskine
油
The document discusses film distribution and which media institutions might distribute a horror media production. It analyzes the distributors of films like Psycho, Silence of the Lambs, and Insidious - mainly American companies like Paramount Pictures and Orion Pictures. It also looks at British distributors like Artificial Eye, Entertainment, and Lionsgate UK, concluding that Lionsgate UK would be the best choice as it specializes in horror films. Distributing the media production first in movie theaters would generate publicity and interest before releasing it on DVD, online, and television.Presentation1
Presentation1eekmedia
油
Warp Films would be the best media institution to distribute the filmmaker's independent media product. Warp Films is a UK-based independent film production company that has successfully produced and distributed independent films through partnerships with Studio Canal. As an independent production located in the UK, the filmmaker's project would be of most interest to Warp Films, as it would help keep the film independently British. Studio Canal, formerly known as Optimum Releasing, is also suggested as they specialize in distributing independent British films in the UK and Ireland.The DCMS Jan 2012 Film Policy Review
The DCMS Jan 2012 Film Policy ReviewRachel Jones
油
The document summarizes the key points from the 2012 UK Film Policy Review conducted by Lord Smith. The review recommended that 1) producers should recoup funding from financially successful films to reinvest in future productions, 2) broadcasters like Sky and ITV should increase investment in British films, and 3) film education should be brought into every British school to develop new audiences. Some concerns about the review included that it may sideline independent films and focus funding only on commercial successes, which are difficult to predict. The overall goal appeared to continue supporting a wide range of British films and improve audiences for local films.An introduction to British Cinema
An introduction to British Cinema Naamah Hill
油
Defining a 'British' film is complex due to diverse characteristics and criteria established by the UK Film Council, such as filming location, cast and crew nationality, and thematic relevance to British culture. The document discusses various films like 'The Bourne Ultimatum' and 'Harry Potter,' assessing their eligibility as British films based on industry definitions and financial backing. It also addresses the challenges of producing British films, the need for government support, and the importance of distributing companies in promoting British cinema.Film4[1]
Film4[1]jessicasquires
油
1. Film4 is a free digital television channel in the UK owned by Channel 4 that screens films.
2. It was originally a subscription service but became free-to-air in 2006 to increase its availability from 300,000 households to 18 million.
3. Film4 funds between 15-20 films per year through financing, production, distribution and broadcasting on both free and pay TV. It supports new talent through subsidiaries like FilmFour Lab.Fyf slideshare
Fyf slideshareericaprince
油
Hollywood film industries like Fox, Paramount, Sony, Disney, Universal, and Time Warner dominate the film market in America and Canada, collectively owning over 50% of the market share. British film industries rely on funding from organizations like the BFI, Film 4, and BBC as well as private investors and lotteries. They promote their films at international film festivals. Local film industries have low budgets, feature homegrown stars, and promote their films at UK and international film festivals to appeal to domestic audiences and get noticed by distributors. The document suggests that a local film industry would be best suited to distribute the media product "FYF" due to its low budget and use of homegrown stars.Film4 factfile
Film4 factfileSianLynes
油
Film4 is a production house and channel owned by Channel 4 Television Corporation. It has a budget of 贈15 million per year to produce around 6 films. Film4 is committed to enhancing the British film industry by funding new talent and offering both mainstream and alternative films. It was originally launched as a subscription channel in 1998 but became free-to-air in 2006 in order to appeal to more viewers. Notable films it has produced include East is East, Last King of Scotland, Four Lions, and Never Let Me Go.Question 3
Question 3Rumfordian
油
Film 4 and Warner Bros are traditional distributors that handle marketing and exhibition of films. Warner Bros is suited to larger budget blockbuster films while Film 4 focuses on smaller, British films. Microwave, funded by the BFI and BBC Films, helps produce and distribute independent films with budgets up to 贈25,000. They have had successful films that made returns despite small budgets. Given the dark tone, 15 rating, and low budget of the document's film, Film 4 and Microwave would be most viable to distribute it as they have experience with similar independent, local audience-targeted films.Institutions brooke
Institutions brooke brooooke
油
Film 4 is being considered as the institution to distribute the film group's new possessive horror film. Film 4 specializes in independent and international films, including horror, and has been successful in launching similar low-budget British films to wider audiences. It also targets the key teenage demographic that the film aims for. Research shows that Film 4 has a history of supporting possessive horror films and helping small production companies like Warp Films to make and distribute films. For these reasons, Film 4 appears well-suited to distribute the group's new film.British film ppt
British film pptMr Smith
油
The document discusses key aspects of the British film industry, including its structure, institutions, and the criteria for classifying films as British. It evaluates audience engagement through different typologies and highlights the importance of tax relief and cultural representation. Ultimately, it questions the reasons for maintaining a British film industry, emphasizing cultural promotion, job creation, and economic factors.Institutions brooke
Institutions brooke brooooke
油
Film 4 is a suitable institution for the filmmakers' opening because it produces similar possessive horror films that share characteristics with their film. Film 4 has experience creating low-budget British films through partnerships like Warp Films. It also has a target audience of teenagers, which matches the filmmakers' intended viewers. Research on Film 4's viewership and catalog of possessive horror films indicates it would provide a good platform to showcase their new film and help expand the genre's audience.Film 4 Productions Case Study - G322 Institution & Audience
Film 4 Productions Case Study - G322 Institution & Audiencelaneford
油
Film4 Productions was formed in 1982 by Channel 4 Television to produce independent films that provide diverse, original, and challenging programming as an alternative to major studios. Being owned by a publicly-owned television station means Film4 produces films that are independent, daring, and appeal to both national and local audiences in the UK. The increasing use of digital technology and convergence across media has affected Film4's production and distribution strategies, allowing them to use new media like social networks to attract audiences and distribute films through various digital platforms.Film 4 presentation
Film 4 presentationHeath Park, Wolverhampton
油
Film4 Productions is a UK film production company that has been owned by Channel 4 television since 1982. They produce around 12 films per year, funding their projects through Channel 4, co-productions with other companies, deals with distributors, and government funds. Notable films include This Is England, In Bruges, Slumdog Millionaire, and Submarine. As a leading UK producer, Film4 competes for cinema and DVD sales against all other releases, but benefits from guaranteed distribution on its parent company Channel 4's Film4 channel.Presentation1
Presentation1eekmedia
油
Warp Films would be the best media institution to distribute the media product discussed in the document. Warp Films is an independent UK-based film production and distribution company that has experience successfully producing and distributing independent films. While major studios like 20th Century Fox and Warner Bros focus on larger budget films, Warp Films and related companies like Studio Canal specialize in independent films and have networks for distribution in the UK and sometimes internationally. For these reasons, Warp Films would be most likely to distribute an independent British film like the one discussed.Pragmatic Code Coverage
Pragmatic Code CoverageAlexandre (Shura) Iline
油
Code coverage is a measure of how much source code is covered during testing. It is not a goal in itself but can be used pragmatically to improve testing in several ways. Coverage data should be filtered and combined with other metrics to prioritize test development and focus on the most important or risky code. While 100% coverage may not be needed or prove quality, coverage is a useful tool when used properly along with other techniques rather than in isolation or as the only metric.Ticsle7aldean
油
El documento habla sobre un curso de Tecnolog鱈as de la Informaci坦n y la Comunicaci坦n (TICS) impartido a un grupo de 1ro "A". Menciona las ventajas de estudiar TICS como el aprendizaje de herramientas digitales y habilidades del futuro, pero tambi辿n se単ala posibles desventajas como la dificultad de algunos temas.More Related Content
What's hot (19)
Defining British Film
Defining British Filmrikhudson
油
The document discusses factors that define a British film, including whether the story/setting, director, cast, financing, and intended audience are British. It provides examples of films like "Control" and "This is England" that would qualify as British films according to recent UK government criteria focusing on cultural hubs (UK production), cultural practitioners (UK cast and crew), and cultural content (British setting and characters). Readers are asked to discuss films that meet these criteria in small groups.Evaluation Question 3- What kind of media instituion might distribute your me...
Evaluation Question 3- What kind of media instituion might distribute your me...fran3002
油
Vertigo Films would be the most suitable media institution to distribute a low-budget British film because:
1) Vertigo Films is a UK media company that specializes in creating and distributing commercially viable independent cinema projects.
2) They focus on addressing audiences in a careful way and producing films within tight budgets.
3) Their approach to budgets and technology allows them to effectively distribute low-budget British films to targeted audiences.What makes a film british
What makes a film britishmopish
油
To be considered a British film, a film must pass a cultural test administered by the UK film council. The test contains 31 points across 4 sections - cultural content, cultural contribution, cultural hubs, and cultural practitioners. A film needs at least 16 points to pass the test. Being designated a British film provides tax relief for film production companies of up to 25% for films spending less than 贈20 million or 20% for films spending more. In addition to passing the cultural test, British films must be intended for theatrical release and have minimum UK production spending of 25%.Evaluation question 2
Evaluation question 2Rumfordian
油
The document discusses potential distributors for an independent, low-budget film with a dark tone and 15 rating. It analyzes Warner Bros, Disney, Film4, and Microwave. Warner Bros and Disney are ruled out as they focus on big-budget blockbusters. Film4 and Microwave are presented as the most viable options as they specialize in smaller, British films and have experience supporting independent productions through funding and distribution. Microwave in particular offers financing up to 贈25,000 and has successfully distributed similar small, local films to UK audiences.British cinema since 1990 (2)
British cinema since 1990 (2)Armthorpe Media
油
The document discusses several key aspects of British cinema:
1) There are debates around whether British films should represent British culture to domestic audiences through public funding, or compete internationally by attracting wide audiences.
2) The UK Film Council was set up in 2000 to centralize public support for film through various funding programs.
3) There are discussions around whether British cinema should receive any public money given some films' financial performances. British films must balance representing national culture with finding international distribution.What kind of media institution might distribute your media products and why?
What kind of media institution might distribute your media products and why?Emily Erskine
油
The document discusses film distribution and which media institutions might distribute a horror media production. It analyzes the distributors of films like Psycho, Silence of the Lambs, and Insidious - mainly American companies like Paramount Pictures and Orion Pictures. It also looks at British distributors like Artificial Eye, Entertainment, and Lionsgate UK, concluding that Lionsgate UK would be the best choice as it specializes in horror films. Distributing the media production first in movie theaters would generate publicity and interest before releasing it on DVD, online, and television.Presentation1
Presentation1eekmedia
油
Warp Films would be the best media institution to distribute the filmmaker's independent media product. Warp Films is a UK-based independent film production company that has successfully produced and distributed independent films through partnerships with Studio Canal. As an independent production located in the UK, the filmmaker's project would be of most interest to Warp Films, as it would help keep the film independently British. Studio Canal, formerly known as Optimum Releasing, is also suggested as they specialize in distributing independent British films in the UK and Ireland.The DCMS Jan 2012 Film Policy Review
The DCMS Jan 2012 Film Policy ReviewRachel Jones
油
The document summarizes the key points from the 2012 UK Film Policy Review conducted by Lord Smith. The review recommended that 1) producers should recoup funding from financially successful films to reinvest in future productions, 2) broadcasters like Sky and ITV should increase investment in British films, and 3) film education should be brought into every British school to develop new audiences. Some concerns about the review included that it may sideline independent films and focus funding only on commercial successes, which are difficult to predict. The overall goal appeared to continue supporting a wide range of British films and improve audiences for local films.An introduction to British Cinema
An introduction to British Cinema Naamah Hill
油
Defining a 'British' film is complex due to diverse characteristics and criteria established by the UK Film Council, such as filming location, cast and crew nationality, and thematic relevance to British culture. The document discusses various films like 'The Bourne Ultimatum' and 'Harry Potter,' assessing their eligibility as British films based on industry definitions and financial backing. It also addresses the challenges of producing British films, the need for government support, and the importance of distributing companies in promoting British cinema.Film4[1]
Film4[1]jessicasquires
油
1. Film4 is a free digital television channel in the UK owned by Channel 4 that screens films.
2. It was originally a subscription service but became free-to-air in 2006 to increase its availability from 300,000 households to 18 million.
3. Film4 funds between 15-20 films per year through financing, production, distribution and broadcasting on both free and pay TV. It supports new talent through subsidiaries like FilmFour Lab.Fyf slideshare
Fyf slideshareericaprince
油
Hollywood film industries like Fox, Paramount, Sony, Disney, Universal, and Time Warner dominate the film market in America and Canada, collectively owning over 50% of the market share. British film industries rely on funding from organizations like the BFI, Film 4, and BBC as well as private investors and lotteries. They promote their films at international film festivals. Local film industries have low budgets, feature homegrown stars, and promote their films at UK and international film festivals to appeal to domestic audiences and get noticed by distributors. The document suggests that a local film industry would be best suited to distribute the media product "FYF" due to its low budget and use of homegrown stars.Film4 factfile
Film4 factfileSianLynes
油
Film4 is a production house and channel owned by Channel 4 Television Corporation. It has a budget of 贈15 million per year to produce around 6 films. Film4 is committed to enhancing the British film industry by funding new talent and offering both mainstream and alternative films. It was originally launched as a subscription channel in 1998 but became free-to-air in 2006 in order to appeal to more viewers. Notable films it has produced include East is East, Last King of Scotland, Four Lions, and Never Let Me Go.Question 3
Question 3Rumfordian
油
Film 4 and Warner Bros are traditional distributors that handle marketing and exhibition of films. Warner Bros is suited to larger budget blockbuster films while Film 4 focuses on smaller, British films. Microwave, funded by the BFI and BBC Films, helps produce and distribute independent films with budgets up to 贈25,000. They have had successful films that made returns despite small budgets. Given the dark tone, 15 rating, and low budget of the document's film, Film 4 and Microwave would be most viable to distribute it as they have experience with similar independent, local audience-targeted films.Institutions brooke
Institutions brooke brooooke
油
Film 4 is being considered as the institution to distribute the film group's new possessive horror film. Film 4 specializes in independent and international films, including horror, and has been successful in launching similar low-budget British films to wider audiences. It also targets the key teenage demographic that the film aims for. Research shows that Film 4 has a history of supporting possessive horror films and helping small production companies like Warp Films to make and distribute films. For these reasons, Film 4 appears well-suited to distribute the group's new film.British film ppt
British film pptMr Smith
油
The document discusses key aspects of the British film industry, including its structure, institutions, and the criteria for classifying films as British. It evaluates audience engagement through different typologies and highlights the importance of tax relief and cultural representation. Ultimately, it questions the reasons for maintaining a British film industry, emphasizing cultural promotion, job creation, and economic factors.Institutions brooke
Institutions brooke brooooke
油
Film 4 is a suitable institution for the filmmakers' opening because it produces similar possessive horror films that share characteristics with their film. Film 4 has experience creating low-budget British films through partnerships like Warp Films. It also has a target audience of teenagers, which matches the filmmakers' intended viewers. Research on Film 4's viewership and catalog of possessive horror films indicates it would provide a good platform to showcase their new film and help expand the genre's audience.Film 4 Productions Case Study - G322 Institution & Audience
Film 4 Productions Case Study - G322 Institution & Audiencelaneford
油
Film4 Productions was formed in 1982 by Channel 4 Television to produce independent films that provide diverse, original, and challenging programming as an alternative to major studios. Being owned by a publicly-owned television station means Film4 produces films that are independent, daring, and appeal to both national and local audiences in the UK. The increasing use of digital technology and convergence across media has affected Film4's production and distribution strategies, allowing them to use new media like social networks to attract audiences and distribute films through various digital platforms.Film 4 presentation
Film 4 presentationHeath Park, Wolverhampton
油
Film4 Productions is a UK film production company that has been owned by Channel 4 television since 1982. They produce around 12 films per year, funding their projects through Channel 4, co-productions with other companies, deals with distributors, and government funds. Notable films include This Is England, In Bruges, Slumdog Millionaire, and Submarine. As a leading UK producer, Film4 competes for cinema and DVD sales against all other releases, but benefits from guaranteed distribution on its parent company Channel 4's Film4 channel.Presentation1
Presentation1eekmedia
油
Warp Films would be the best media institution to distribute the media product discussed in the document. Warp Films is an independent UK-based film production and distribution company that has experience successfully producing and distributing independent films. While major studios like 20th Century Fox and Warner Bros focus on larger budget films, Warp Films and related companies like Studio Canal specialize in independent films and have networks for distribution in the UK and sometimes internationally. For these reasons, Warp Films would be most likely to distribute an independent British film like the one discussed.Viewers also liked (9)
Pragmatic Code Coverage
Pragmatic Code CoverageAlexandre (Shura) Iline
油
Code coverage is a measure of how much source code is covered during testing. It is not a goal in itself but can be used pragmatically to improve testing in several ways. Coverage data should be filtered and combined with other metrics to prioritize test development and focus on the most important or risky code. While 100% coverage may not be needed or prove quality, coverage is a useful tool when used properly along with other techniques rather than in isolation or as the only metric.Ticsle7aldean
油
El documento habla sobre un curso de Tecnolog鱈as de la Informaci坦n y la Comunicaci坦n (TICS) impartido a un grupo de 1ro "A". Menciona las ventajas de estudiar TICS como el aprendizaje de herramientas digitales y habilidades del futuro, pero tambi辿n se単ala posibles desventajas como la dificultad de algunos temas.Modern鱈 kuchyn a interi辿ry na zak叩zku - Alnus.cz
Modern鱈 kuchyn a interi辿ry na zak叩zku - Alnus.czAlnus.cz
油
Kuchysk辿 studio v Praze - Alnus.cz navrhuje a vyr叩b鱈 kompletn鱈 interi辿ry na m鱈ru. Studio navrhuje a vyr叩b鱈 modern鱈 kuchyn, interi辿ry, modern鱈 ob箪vac鱈 pokoje, lo転nice, atd. Nezbytnost鱈 je n叩vrh designu interi辿r哲 a vizualizace interi辿r哲 dle p叩n鱈 konkr辿tn鱈ho z叩kazn鱈ka. Studio m叩 k dispozici poboku pro vlastn鱈 zak叩zkovou v箪robu n叩bytku ve 邸pikov辿 kvalit.Content Marketing (March 2013)
Content Marketing (March 2013)adHOME
油
This document discusses content marketing and provides 8 tips for an effective content marketing strategy. It defines content marketing as content that entertains and provides value without a direct sales pitch, in order to attract or retain customers. Some key benefits mentioned are that it provides an alternative to intrusive advertisements and aligns a brand with thought leadership. It also discusses how search engines, social media, and mobile usage have changed the content marketing landscape. Finally, it provides 8 tips for an effective content marketing strategy such as understanding your goals, finding your niche, using storytelling, engaging followers, and regularly updating content.Racing
RacingJaime Konzelman
油
The author made a list of things they wanted to do after a breakup, which included becoming an athlete even though they were not athletic as a child. They started running and completed their first 5K in 2010, then took up triathlons in 2011-2012. By 2013 they had completed their first half Ironman triathlon, going from their first 5K to an Ironman in just 30 months. The multi-sport training has given the author confidence and a toolbox of skills that has allowed them to tackle obstacles in all areas of life.The role of technology in education.
The role of technology in education.clarisleis
油
Technology plays an important role in modern education by making the teaching and learning process more interactive, motivating students, and facilitating understanding. As education evolves over time, technology works with education to improve instruction through easier methods. Web 2.0 applications allow students and teachers to create and share content, making classes more participatory and facilitating the exchange of knowledge and ideas. Examples of Web 2.0 tools help enhance classroom learning.adHOME Foodservice Marketing
adHOME Foodservice MarketingadHOME
油
This document discusses a marketing agency that provides services to the food and consumer packaged goods industries, including integrated marketing campaigns and digital solutions. The agency helps clients with websites, apps, email marketing, search engine marketing, and search engine optimization to inspire collaboration and growth.Hype vs. Reality: The AI Explainer
Hype vs. Reality: The AI ExplainerLuminary Labs
油
The document discusses the current state and future potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in business, separating hype from reality. It emphasizes that AI will change job roles rather than eliminate them, and suggests five practical steps businesses can take to integrate AI in a meaningful way. Key points include starting with specific business problems, fostering empathy in the workforce, and ensuring a clear understanding of AI capabilities.Ad
Similar to Jordane (20)
Hollywood vs british film industry
Hollywood vs british film industryShannon Huntley
油
The document compares the film industries of Hollywood and Britain. Hollywood produces blockbuster films with large budgets of over $100 million each using profits from previous films. They focus on universal themes of action and CGI to appeal to global audiences. Major studios like Disney and Warner Bros. produce and distribute 10-20 films per year and keep all profits. Britain's film industry has a much smaller budget of $6.2 million from three government funds. British films focus more on social issues and are harder to categorize by genre. They are produced through collaboration between several companies and the BBC, with profits shared among contributors. While Hollywood faces piracy threats, Britain struggles more with limited funding for future films.Film distribution
Film distributionArmthorpe Media
油
Film distribution involves getting films from production to exhibition through deals with cinemas, television networks, and other outlets. Major film distributors in the UK control much of the industry and prioritize distributing large Hollywood blockbusters. This makes it difficult for smaller distribution companies to get their films shown widely, as they have fewer resources for prints and promotion. The digital age has also made film distribution more challenging for independent distributors.Hollywood vs british film industries
Hollywood vs british film industriesjevans_1
油
The document compares the film industries of Hollywood and Britain. Hollywood films have extremely large budgets of $110 million on average, allowing them to appeal globally with universal themes, action, CGI and minimal dialogue. They are produced and distributed by the "Big 6" major studios. Britain's film industry has much smaller budgets of 贈6.2 million from national funds. British films focus more on domestic themes and issues and have a collaborative production model with multiple companies. Both industries face challenges - Hollywood with piracy and Britain with obtaining sufficient funding to continue production.British Film
British FilmThomas Griffiths
油
This document provides an overview of the contemporary British film industry, including production, distribution, consumption and categorization of British films. It discusses the relationship between British and American films, and debates who holds the most power between audiences and film studios. The document also presents several case studies of specific British films as examples of production and funding models in the current film industry.Film distribution
Film distributiontwbsmediaconnell
油
This document defines key terms related to film distribution and explains the film distribution process. It discusses how distribution involves acquiring legal rights to show a film, marketing and releasing prints/files to cinemas and stores. Major aspects covered include ownership structures like vertical and horizontal integration, the role of major distributors in the UK/US, challenges for independent producers, and the transition from physical prints to digital distribution and projection.Film distribution
Film distributionMissConnell
油
The document provides an overview of key concepts related to film distribution, including:
1) It defines film distribution as everything that happens between production and exhibition, including acquiring legal rights, marketing, and releasing prints/files to cinemas and stores.
2) It discusses major distributors that control much of the industry through vertical and horizontal integration, as well as the top 5 distributors in the UK.
3) It explains important distribution concepts like local distribution, the advantages of major studios over independent producers, and the transition to digital distribution and projection.British film vs american film
British film vs american filmA2mediashola
油
The document compares key differences between British and American films. It notes that British films often feature location shooting, wide shots, unknown actors, semi-improvised scripts, and explore social issues in a realistic way. They also have a combination of humor and seriousness. American films typically have higher budgets, use of studios over locations, feature professional actors, focus on romance and escapism, and employ special effects. It then provides details on major British and American film companies and funding sources for British films.Evaluation question 3
Evaluation question 3Faith Shaboo-Meere
油
The document discusses potential options for distributing an independent film without major production backing. It suggests using free platforms like YouTube and social media to promote the film globally. It also proposes submitting the film to local and national film festivals to gain attention from potential distributors. Finally, it recommends looking to British film companies like DNA Films, Heyday Films, BBC Films, or Warp Films for potential distribution, as they have experience distributing similar genres to the proposed film.Evaluation 3
Evaluation 3mollysmith123
油
British independent films typically have lower budgets than Hollywood blockbusters because British production companies cannot afford large budgets. Most British films do not use many production and distribution companies either, as they cannot pay for production and distribution due to their small budgets. In contrast, Hollywood blockbusters have higher budgets as they are funded by major conglomerates like Disney, Universal, and Warner Bros. These large companies can afford big budgets for popular films that attract large audiences.Evaluation 3
Evaluation 3mollysmith123
油
British independent films typically have lower budgets than Hollywood blockbusters because British production companies cannot afford large budgets. Most British films do not use many production and distribution companies either, as they cannot pay for production and distribution due to their small budgets. In contrast, Hollywood blockbusters have higher budgets as they are funded by major conglomerates like Disney, Universal, and Warner Bros. These large companies can afford big budgets for popular films that attract large audiences.Evaluation question 3
Evaluation question 3 Des Dube
油
My film, Interrogation, would be best distributed by a small, independent media institution because it has a small budget, niche audience, and less advertising than large, mainstream films. Specifically, Lionsgate would be a good fit as a distributor since they have experience with similar thriller genres and remain an active distributor. Other distribution options could include film festivals, which may help low-budget films gain exposure for their unique qualities, or short film competitions for upstarting directors. The BFI Film Forever institution in the UK supports and funds new filmmakers and could potentially assist in distribution.Institutions and Audiences: British Film
Institutions and Audiences: British FilmM Taylor
油
This document provides information about studying British film for AS Media Studies, including key learning outcomes and focus areas. It discusses what makes a film British and provides examples of British films that have been nominated for awards. It also covers the requirements of the exam, finance and funding of British films, the roles of production companies and distributors, and targeting audiences. Case studies are used to illustrate concepts around the production and distribution of independent British films.Notes from-the-textbook
Notes from-the-textbookadamrobbins
油
The film industry involves three main components: production, distribution, and consumption. Production is the making of films, distribution is promoting and releasing films in cinemas and home media, and consumption is audiences paying to view films. The US film industry has significant advantages over other countries due to its large domestic market and capital resources, dominating the global distribution of films. However, increased digital technologies have benefits for independent and low-budget filmmakers by enabling new forms of distribution outside the traditional system.Task
TaskEmma Leslie
油
The film industry works to maximize profits by reducing risks during production. Studios consider factors like previous films' successes, recognizable directors/actors, popular genres, and merchandising opportunities to attract audiences. The British film industry lacks major studios and relies on complex co-financing between government funds, distributors, broadcasters, and investors. To compete, British companies like Vertigo Films make low-budget films targeting commercial appeal through new technologies and financing from multiple investors.02 g322 section b film industry introduction 2014
02 g322 section b film industry introduction 2014Alleyn's School Film Studies Department
油
This document provides an overview of the film industry, focusing on production, distribution, and exhibition. It discusses how films are funded and made (production), marketed and released in cinemas and other formats (distribution), and consumed by audiences paying to view films (exhibition). The document outlines the key roles of major studios and distributors in controlling distribution deals and prioritizing large Hollywood blockbusters over independent and foreign films. It also notes the challenges that increased costs of production and distribution pose to Hollywood studios and independent filmmakers.Production funding.pdf
Production funding.pdf JoshuaDudusola
油
1. The film industry involves three stages: production, distribution, and exhibition. Production involves creating the film, distribution gets the film to audiences, and exhibition is when audiences view the film.
2. The document discusses funding methods for films, including studio funding, government funding, presales, and crowdfunding. It also discusses the differences between the Hollywood and British film industries.
3. The Hollywood system relies on large conglomerates and aims to produce big-budget, high-concept films to appeal to global audiences. The British industry is smaller and produces more low-budget, socially-focused films that target domestic audiences.Pp9 financing films (1)
Pp9 financing films (1)emmarogers
油
There are various methods for financing films, as it is difficult to predict a film's financial success. Producers must secure funding before filming begins. Government grants and subsidies are available to encourage creativity and support employment, culture, and tourism. Tax incentives also help attract productions by allowing investors to pay less tax. Pre-sales, or selling distribution rights before filming, is a common financing method, as it provides security for investors. However, it can limit creative control and require commercially viable elements like stars. Small independent studios rely more on grants due to the inability to offer secure returns or afford big budgets.The british film industry2
The british film industry2romanyangel4
油
The document discusses the British film industry and its relationship with Hollywood. It notes that British films have traditionally been reliant on Hollywood for funding and distribution, forcing filmmakers to sell intellectual property rights. More recently, British television and digital technologies are playing a larger role in the production and distribution of British films. The rise of social media and digital exhibition may allow British films more independence and autonomy in the future.Production funding1
Production funding1StefanDrumchiyski
油
The document discusses the film industry and provides details about the production and distribution stages. It focuses on the films Straight Outta Compton and I, Daniel Blake as case studies. Production involves creating the film and is handled by a production company. It notes that Straight Outta Compton had a larger budget since it was produced by a major Hollywood studio, while I, Daniel Blake likely had to use public funding sources common for British films. The distribution stage gets the completed film in front of audiences.Production funding
Production fundinglucasmcnally
油
The document discusses the film industry and provides details about the production and distribution stages. It focuses on the films Straight Outta Compton and I, Daniel Blake as case studies. Production involves creating the film and is handled by a production company. It notes that Straight Outta Compton had a larger budget since it was produced by a major Hollywood studio, while I, Daniel Blake likely had to use public funding sources common for British films. The distribution stage gets the completed film in front of audiences through theatrical release, home media, or digital distribution.Ad
Jordane
- 1. Q3. What kind of media institution might distribute your product & why? Jordane Davis
- 2. Face Your Fears production & distribution Candi Studios - Production Company Time Entertainment - Distribution
- 3. There are 3 types of film industry:
- 4. Hollywood The Hollywood film industry holds many conglomerate companies such as Fox, Paramount, Sony, Disney, Universal, Time Warner. The Hollywood industry promises Big stars Big budget Dominating Cinema chains Lots of money to spend on advertisement Global viewing Digital
- 5. British The British film industry receive money from: BFI (British Film Industry) Film 4 Lottery Film Culture Fund Private Investors They get television releases on: BBC Film 4 The British film industry receive a smaller budget for producing there films and advertisement, but they do get money in order to travel to different film festivals and therefore get there films noticed by distributors. British film industry mainly get there views from UK audiences, they also have home grown stars in there movies.
- 6. Local The local film industry is much the same as the British, but local films usually tend to have small independent companies supporting them. Local films always use home grown stars, and always have UK audiences. They always receive the money to visit festivals to get there films noticed. Face Your Fears Face Your Fears is in the Local Industry as we have used small independent companies to produce and distribute our film. Using Candi Studio and Time Entertainment has meant we needed no budget. FYF also uses home grown stars and has a UK audience.