This document discusses the benefits and challenges of data onboarding. It notes that directly onboarding consumer data from large platforms like Facebook and Google can have downsides, including privacy issues. It promotes using a data onboarder to help bring together offline and online data from various sources, including publishers, apps, TV providers and walled gardens, in a privacy-compliant way to power applications like CRM, personalization, and cross-device targeting. The document also provides examples of how data onboarding can help retailers by improving sales, cross-selling, and measuring the impact of digital efforts on physical store visits.
1 of 43
More Related Content
Keynote Emerce Engage 2017: Grow faster with Data onboarding
1. Harder groeien met data onboarding
Wouter Blok - Marketing Intrepreneur
linkedin.com/in/wouterblok
@wouterblok
1
20. DMP CRMAdvertising Marketing
Publisher Data
(Name, IP, Email, Cookies)
Cross-Device Data
(Name, Device ID)
TV set-top Data
(Name, Email, Address)
App Data
(Name, Device ID)
Walled Garden Data
(Impression Data)
Data Onboarder
20http://bit.ly/wberry16
37. Source: MasterCard SpendingPulse, ShopperTrak, Deloitte
Retail bezoek -57%, waarde per bezoek 2.5x
Footsteps in-store Sales
40B
16B
$641B
Digital
Influence
Digital
Influence
$750B
37
37
38. Source: Google/MBD 2015 Tech Wireless Shopper Study, May 2016. Clickstream January 2014 – September 2015
Consument zoekt minder op telco brand, meer op
device
Non-Brand
35%vs. 31% in 2015
Carrier
53%vs. 78% in 2015
OEM*
60%vs. 34% in 2015
% of converters who searched using keywords in the following buckets
*OEM terms can include Carrier (e.g. Sprint iPhone)
38
38
40. 5x
Offline vs online sales after an AdWords click.
ThinkwithGoogle: bit.ly/sprintomni
40
41. Incrementeel?
A median of
18%
of attributed Store Visits
were caused by Google
Search Ads*
*Based off of a study of 10 of the large footprint US retailers
*Mobile only
*7-day conversion window
41