This document summarizes and compares different paradigms for intercultural communication research: positivistic, interpretive, and critical. The positivistic paradigm provides basic foundations of cross-cultural differences but may perpetuate stereotypes. The interpretive paradigm is well-suited for language studies through in-situ observation, though it may not be practical in all cases. The critical paradigm examines unexplored social issues related to culture but requires advanced language and analytical skills. Suggested readings are provided for each paradigm to further understanding of their strengths and challenges.
1 of 29
More Related Content
Keynote Presentation for KU-TU-MU-CU 2014 Conference on Intercultural Communication
1. Assistant Professor Suwichit Chaidaroon, Ph.D.
(Facebook, LinkedIn, 際際滷share)
Keynote Presentation for KU-TU-MU-CU 2014 Conference on New Perspectives on
Intercultural Communication:Localization and Globalization in English)
July 30, 2014
5. Upward Dissent
Solution presentation
Direct-factual appeal
Circumvention
Threatening resignation
Repetition
Organizational Culture (Employees)
Tan, Y., Seow, Y. N., Chia, H., Kim, H. J., & Chaidaroon, S. S. (2012) Differences in perceived effectiveness of
upward dissent strategies between employees and managers: Evidence from Singapore. Proceedings for the
Corporate Communication Institute Conference, New York, USA.
6. H1: Employees will perceive solution
presentation strategy as the most effective
upward dissent strategy
H2: Employees will perceive threatening
resignation strategy as the least effective
upward dissent strategy.
Hypotheses
9. IndividualismVS Collectivism
Power Distance
Uncertainty Avoidance
Task Orientation vs. Social
Orientation
Short-Term Orientation vs.
Long-Term Orientation
Hofstedes Model (geert-hofstede.com)
12. Knutson,T. J., Komolsevin, R., Chatiketu, P., & Smith,V. R. (2002).
Comparison of Thai and U.S. American willingness to communicate. Journal
of Intercultural Communication Research, 31(1), 3-12.
Knutson,T. J., Komolsevin, R., Chatiketu, P., & Smith,V. R. (2003). A cross-
cultural comparison of Thai and US American rhetorical sensitivity:
Implications for intercultural communication effectiveness. International
Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, 63-78.
Komin, S. (1990). Culture and work related-values in Thai organization.
International Journal of Psychology, 25, 681-704.
Sriussadaporn-Charoenngam, N., & Jablin, F. M. (1999). An exploratory
study of communication competence in Thai organizations. The Journal of
Business Communication, 36, 382-418.
Suggested Readings from Positivistic
Paradigm
16. Chaidaroon, S. S., & Mak, A. K.Y. (2012). Engaging local
stakeholders in CSR efforts: Perspective of MNCs in Asian
developing countries. Paper presented at the Annual
Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management
Conference, Perth, WA.
Chaidaroon, S. S., & Polyorat, K. (2013). CSR and
stakeholder dialogue: A case study of sugar cane
company in Thailand. International Journal of Business
and Social Research, 3(8). 57-65.
CSR & Marketing Communications
19. Chaidaroon, S. S. (2003). When shyness is not incompetence: A case of Thai
communication competence. Journal of Intercultural Communication Studies,
12(4), 195-208.
Philipsen, G. (1992). Speaking culturally: Explorations in Social
Communication. Albany, NY: State University of NewYork Press.
Suggested Readings from Ethnographic
Approach
24. Chaidaroon, S. S., & Mak, A. K. Y. (2013). Cultural perspective on social entrepreneurship: A case study
of social media usage by a community-based cancer treatment center in rural Thailand. In C. Wankel & L.
Pate (Eds.), Social Entrepreneurship as a Catalyst for Social Change (pp. 87-116). Charlotte, NC:
Information Age Publishing.
28. Nakayama, T. K., & Halualani, R. T. (Eds.) (2010). The handbook of critical
intercultural communication. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell
Suggested Readings for Critical
Approach
29. Strengths Challenges
Positivistic Research Provide basic foundations of
cross-cultural differences
May perpetuate stereotypes
Interpretive Research Is compatible with language
studies given the nature of
methodology
In-situ observation may not
be practical in certain
circumstances
Critical Research Allows researchers to critically
examine unexplored social
issues pertaining to the
broader notion of culture
Requires advanced language
and analytical skills
Summary of Intercultural Communication
Research Paradigms in English Language Studies