4. 4
The factors for the selection of the foundation
Types of the soil
The nature of the loading
The surface condition
The cost of the project
The level of groundwater
The climate condition
13. 13
Design of individual footing
Local erosion due to changing climate
The geological structure
Moisture level of the soil
Heat applied to the soil
Factors for selecting the minimum depth for
20. 20
Design of individual footing
Majd Tarraf, Ehsan Seyedi Hosseininia. Seismic bearing capacity of
strip footings placed on reinforced soil slopes using slip line
method. Geotextiles and Geomembranes. In Press.
29. 29
Abdoullah Namdar et al. Seismic Resistance and Displacement Mechanism of the Concrete
Footing. Shock and Vibration. Volume 2019, Article ID 5498505, 9 pages.
Design of individual footing
30. 30
Design of individual footing
Deflections at maximum response in one direction of the
optimal: a) fixed frame; b) frame on rocking footings.
Panagiotis E. Mergos. Sustainable and resilient seismic design of reinforced
concrete frames with rocking isolation on spread footings. Engineering Structures
292 (2023) 116605
31. 31
Design of individual footing
Experimental and numerical comparison of failure mode of specimen FC1.
Guangda Zhang et al. Numerical analysis and design method of UHPC grouted RC
column- footing socket joints. Engineering Structures 281 (2023) 115755
32. 32
Design of individual footing
Abdoullah Namdar. A numerical investigation on soil-concrete
foundation interaction. Procedia Structural Integrity, (2) 2016, 2803-2809
33. 33
Design of individual footing
Abdoullah Namdar. A numerical investigation on soil-concrete
foundation interaction. Procedia Structural Integrity, (2) 2016, 2803-2809
34. 34
Design of individual footing
Abdoullah Namdar. A numerical investigation on soil-concrete
foundation interaction. Procedia Structural Integrity, (2) 2016, 2803-2809
35. 35
Design of strip footing
Advantage of strip footing over individual footing
Better distribution of load
Minimizing settlement
Improve bearing capacity
Minimizing project costs compared to deep and mat
foundations
39. 39
Design of
strip footing
Majd Tarraf. Seismic bearing capacity of strip footings placed on
reinforced soil slopes using slip line method. Geotextiles and
An increase in the horizontal
seismic coefficient leads to a
decrease in the bearing
capacity factor, while an
increase in the soils internal
friction angle has the opposite
effect.
40. 40
Design of strip footing
Majd Tarraf. Seismic bearing capacity of strip footings placed on
reinforced soil slopes using slip line method. Geotextiles and
Geomembranes. In Press.
41. 41
Design of strip footing
Bearing capacity of strip footing on top of slope
Magdi El-Emam et al. Bearing capacity of strip footing on top of slope:
Numerical parametric study. Ain Shams Engineering Journal 14 (2023)
102522.
42. 42
Design of strip footing
Experimental for predict settlement of strip footing
Sarper Demirdogen et al. Performance of eccentrically loaded strip footings o
geocell-reinforced soil. Geotextiles and Geomembranes. In Press.
43. 43
Design of strip footing
Experimental for predict settlement of strip footing
Sarper Demirdogen et al. Performance of eccentrically loaded strip footings o
geocell-reinforced soil. Geotextiles and Geomembranes. In Press.
44. 44
Design of strip footing
Quang N. Pham et al. Limit load space of rigid strip footing on sand slope subjecte
to combined eccentric and inclined loading. Computers and Geotechnics
162 (2023) 105652
