ºÝºÝߣ

ºÝºÝߣShare a Scribd company logo
Litseminar 121121
Table of Contents
¡ö

¡ö

¡ö
Amine and us                                                   Named reactions
                                                               Gabriel synthesis
                                                               Delepine synthesis
                             nitrogen content
                                                               Ullmann-Goldberg reaction
                          2.6wt% (1.8 kg/70 kg)                Buchwald-Hartwig reaction
                                                               Leuckart-Wallach reaction
                                                               Eschweiler-Clarke reaction
                                                               Hofmann rearrangement
                                                               Curtius rearrangement
                                                               Lossen rearrangement
                                                               Schmidt rearrangement
                                            nicotinic acid     Bamberger rearrangement
                        nicotine
                                                               Overman rearrangement
                                                               Neber rearrangement
                                                               Mannich reaction
                                                               Strecker reaction
                                                               Chichibabin reaction
                                                               Bechamp reaction
                                                               Aza-Wittig reaction
    ibotenic acid                                    quinine   Staudinger reaction
                              cocaine                          ¡­..AND SO FORTH!!
Annals of the ICRP Publication 1972, 23, 273 (Table 110).
¡°N¡± nucleophile + ¡°C¡± electrophile
¨C Traditional methodology

                                        e.g. Gabriel amine synthesis




Direct C¨CH bond amination
¨C An extremely attractive alternative

                                         How does achieve this?
Pioneering work
¨C Breslow (1983), cytochrome mimetic reaction of iminoiodinane




¨C Reaction requirement
? Hypervalent iodine(III) species (iodinane, TsN=IPh)
? Strong EWG on nitrogen


             - Difficult to prepare
                                             So what to do?
             - Thermally unstable

                                                    Breslow et al. JACS 1983, 105, 6728.
               Mechanism of cytochrome P450 catalyzed oxidn: Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 3947.
In situ preparation of iminoiodinane
¨C Che (2000)




¨C Du Bois (2001)




 ? Substrate generality was            stereospecific!
   enlarged to many amide analogues.
                                            Che et al. OL 2000, 2, 2233.
                                       Du Bois et al. ACIE 2001, 40, 598.
Diastereoselective variant
¨C M¨¹ller, Dodd, Dauban (2008)




Enantioselective variant
¨C Davies (2006), intramolecular




¨C Du Bois (2008), intermolecular




                                        Mueller, Dodd, Dauban et al. JACS 2008, 130, 343.
                      Davies et al. OL 2006, 8, 5013. Du Bois et al. JACS 2008, 130, 9220.
Catalytic cycle



? Concerted mechanism
? Similar to carbenoid
  C¨CH insertion


How to generates metal nitrenoid?




                         Mechanistic insight: Du Bois et al. JACS 2007, 129, 562.
Table of Contents
¡ö

¡ö

¡ö
The robust one
¨C ¡°No reaction was observed under a variety of reaction conditions;
  azidoformate was remarkably stable in the presence of various
  transition-metal complexes.¡± (Lebel, 2005)

¨C ¡°The direct rhodium-catalyzed decomposition of azides is not an
  effective method for generating rhodium nitrenes.¡± (Davies, 2006)




 ? EWG-bound azide does not have sufficient coordinating ability?


                                             Lebel et al. JACS 2005, 127, 14198.
                                                 Davies et al. OL 2006, 8, 5013.
First successful example
¨C Driver (2007), aryl sp2 C¨CH amination




 ? Strong EWG ligand on Rh complex is the important feature.


                                             ? Deuterium-labeled
                                               experiments suggest
                                               stepwise mechanism.




                                            Driver et al. JACS 2007, 129, 7500.
Complementary solution
¨C Driver (2008), vinyl sp2 C¨CH amination




? Both aryl and vinyl C¨CH amination was suggested to occur
  through same stepwise pathway.


   Actual mechanism?



                                            Driver et al. ACIE 2008, 47, 5056.
Key observation




? Rh catalyst is involved in the C¨CN bond-forming step.




? Differences between Rh arylnitrenoid and arylnitrene suggest that
  arylnitrenes might not be the best models for Rh arylnitrenoids.


                                               Driver et al. JOC 2009, 74, 6442.
Working hypothesis
¨C Rh arylnitrenoid might be similar to an arylnitrenium ion.




Potential mechanisms




                                                 Driver et al. JOC 2009, 74, 6442.
Kinetic isotope effect (KIE)




? C¨CH bond cleavage occurs after
  product-determining step.
? Concerted insertion is not occurring.

                                          Adam et al. JACS 1994, 116, 3296.
                                            Driver et al. JOC 2009, 74, 6442.
Effect of electron density of aryl group - I.
¨C on C¨CN bond formation: Hammett ¦Òm vs. product ratio




                       ? Ar-fused product was favored when R = EDG,
                         but nonlinear correlation with ¦Òm value.
                       ? C¨CN bond formation does not occur by SEAr.

                                             Driver et al. JOC 2009, 74, 6442.
Effect of electron density of aryl group - II.
¨C on Rh nitrenoid formation:
  Hammett ¦Ò+ vs. product ratio




                       ? Hammett plot gave V-shaped correlation.
                       ? R substituent assists in the extrusion of N2
                         from initial Rh-azide complex.

                                               Driver et al. JOC 2009, 74, 6442.
Plausible mechanism
¨C 4¦Ð-Electron-5-atom electrocyclization



                                1. Electronic donation by the biaryl
                                   ¦Ð-system to form the Rh nitrenoid.

                                2. The planar nature of quinoid 35
                                   enables a 4¦Ð-electron-5-atom
                                   electrocyclization to form C¨CN bond.

                                3. Upon formation of 8aH-carbazole 38,
                                   1,5-H shift then provides carbazole.




                                               Driver et al. JOC 2009, 74, 6442.
Substrate dependent reactivity
¨C EWG-nitrenoid likes carbenoid: concerted mechanism




¨C Arylnitrenoid likes arylnitrenium: stepwise mechanism




                                               Driver et al. JOC 2009, 74, 6442.
Table of Contents
¡ö

¡ö

¡ö
Can azide decomposes to form nitrene?
¨C In current method, substrate should equip EWG on the azide.




¨C Decomposition catalyst is required redox activity (?)




   Example of redox-driven azido decomposition, see: Zhang et al. Organometallics 2010, 29, 389.
Electron-neutral azide as N-atom source




  ? Current method




                     ? Strong EWG or strong oxidant
  ? This work          is not requierd.
Screening of catalysts
¨C Table 1.




                    ? Only Rh2(II) complexes gave indoline.
Screening of additives
¨C Table 1.
                         ? Control experiment revealed
                           that oxidative decomposition
                           of the indoline occurred during
                           purification.

                         ? In situ protection by Boc or Ac
                           improved yield.

                         ? Aniline was formed when the
                           stronger acid byproducts were
                           produced.
para-Aryl and ortho-alkyl substituent
   ¨C Table 2, 3.




? Both electron-rich or poor aryl azides
  were suitable substrate.
? Most reactions proceeded in
  a highly diastereoselective manner.
Reactivity trend




? Electron-rich aryl azides were more reactive..




? The increased reactivity could be due to either above reasons.
Again, isotope labeling study




¨C If concerted: insertion would produce only two products.
¨C If stepwise: ¦Â-stereocenter could scramble to racemize,
               four product would be formed.

 ? In support of stepwise mechanism, two diastereomers and
   two isotopomers were observed.
   ? H-abstraction: KIE = 12 to 14
   ? H-shift: KIE = approx. 2
Possible mechanism


                     1. Coordination of Rh to azide, then
                        extrusion of N2 form nitrenoid 8.

                     2. H-shift or H-abstraction to form
                        9 or 10 followed by reconbination
                        produces the C¨CN bond.

                     3. Finally, indoline is produced upon
                        dissociation of Rh complex.
¨C Efficient and diastereoselective aliphatic C¨CH amination
  that uses an aryl azide as the N-atom source.

 ? Strong EWG on the N-atom is not required.

 ? Reaction occurred stepwise with the syn-C¨CH bond
   investigated by using D-leveled azide.
Litseminar 121121
? ¡°Hydroxylation reactions catalyzed by P450s are NOT
  always stereospecific.¡±




                                             Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 3947.
Unusual reactivity of methoxy azidoacrylates




           EAS = SEAr




                                Driver et al. JOC 2009, 74, 6442.
Requirement for a contiguous array of ¦Ð-orbitals




         >95% recovery


    ? ¡°The lack of reactivity of 40 agrees with our proposed
      electrocyclization mechanism and is inconsistent with an
      electrophilic aromatic substitution mechanism, which would
      not require a contiguous ¦Ð-system.¡±




                                               Driver et al. JOC 2009, 74, 6442.
Temperature dependence of kH/kD

                ? Isokinetic temperature was
                  approx. 43 deg C.
Exceptional behavior of strained azide




? The spatial constraints of this reaction override these isotope effects.

More Related Content

Litseminar 121121

  • 3. Amine and us Named reactions Gabriel synthesis Delepine synthesis nitrogen content Ullmann-Goldberg reaction 2.6wt% (1.8 kg/70 kg) Buchwald-Hartwig reaction Leuckart-Wallach reaction Eschweiler-Clarke reaction Hofmann rearrangement Curtius rearrangement Lossen rearrangement Schmidt rearrangement nicotinic acid Bamberger rearrangement nicotine Overman rearrangement Neber rearrangement Mannich reaction Strecker reaction Chichibabin reaction Bechamp reaction Aza-Wittig reaction ibotenic acid quinine Staudinger reaction cocaine ¡­..AND SO FORTH!! Annals of the ICRP Publication 1972, 23, 273 (Table 110).
  • 4. ¡°N¡± nucleophile + ¡°C¡± electrophile ¨C Traditional methodology e.g. Gabriel amine synthesis Direct C¨CH bond amination ¨C An extremely attractive alternative How does achieve this?
  • 5. Pioneering work ¨C Breslow (1983), cytochrome mimetic reaction of iminoiodinane ¨C Reaction requirement ? Hypervalent iodine(III) species (iodinane, TsN=IPh) ? Strong EWG on nitrogen - Difficult to prepare So what to do? - Thermally unstable Breslow et al. JACS 1983, 105, 6728. Mechanism of cytochrome P450 catalyzed oxidn: Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 3947.
  • 6. In situ preparation of iminoiodinane ¨C Che (2000) ¨C Du Bois (2001) ? Substrate generality was stereospecific! enlarged to many amide analogues. Che et al. OL 2000, 2, 2233. Du Bois et al. ACIE 2001, 40, 598.
  • 7. Diastereoselective variant ¨C M¨¹ller, Dodd, Dauban (2008) Enantioselective variant ¨C Davies (2006), intramolecular ¨C Du Bois (2008), intermolecular Mueller, Dodd, Dauban et al. JACS 2008, 130, 343. Davies et al. OL 2006, 8, 5013. Du Bois et al. JACS 2008, 130, 9220.
  • 8. Catalytic cycle ? Concerted mechanism ? Similar to carbenoid C¨CH insertion How to generates metal nitrenoid? Mechanistic insight: Du Bois et al. JACS 2007, 129, 562.
  • 10. The robust one ¨C ¡°No reaction was observed under a variety of reaction conditions; azidoformate was remarkably stable in the presence of various transition-metal complexes.¡± (Lebel, 2005) ¨C ¡°The direct rhodium-catalyzed decomposition of azides is not an effective method for generating rhodium nitrenes.¡± (Davies, 2006) ? EWG-bound azide does not have sufficient coordinating ability? Lebel et al. JACS 2005, 127, 14198. Davies et al. OL 2006, 8, 5013.
  • 11. First successful example ¨C Driver (2007), aryl sp2 C¨CH amination ? Strong EWG ligand on Rh complex is the important feature. ? Deuterium-labeled experiments suggest stepwise mechanism. Driver et al. JACS 2007, 129, 7500.
  • 12. Complementary solution ¨C Driver (2008), vinyl sp2 C¨CH amination ? Both aryl and vinyl C¨CH amination was suggested to occur through same stepwise pathway. Actual mechanism? Driver et al. ACIE 2008, 47, 5056.
  • 13. Key observation ? Rh catalyst is involved in the C¨CN bond-forming step. ? Differences between Rh arylnitrenoid and arylnitrene suggest that arylnitrenes might not be the best models for Rh arylnitrenoids. Driver et al. JOC 2009, 74, 6442.
  • 14. Working hypothesis ¨C Rh arylnitrenoid might be similar to an arylnitrenium ion. Potential mechanisms Driver et al. JOC 2009, 74, 6442.
  • 15. Kinetic isotope effect (KIE) ? C¨CH bond cleavage occurs after product-determining step. ? Concerted insertion is not occurring. Adam et al. JACS 1994, 116, 3296. Driver et al. JOC 2009, 74, 6442.
  • 16. Effect of electron density of aryl group - I. ¨C on C¨CN bond formation: Hammett ¦Òm vs. product ratio ? Ar-fused product was favored when R = EDG, but nonlinear correlation with ¦Òm value. ? C¨CN bond formation does not occur by SEAr. Driver et al. JOC 2009, 74, 6442.
  • 17. Effect of electron density of aryl group - II. ¨C on Rh nitrenoid formation: Hammett ¦Ò+ vs. product ratio ? Hammett plot gave V-shaped correlation. ? R substituent assists in the extrusion of N2 from initial Rh-azide complex. Driver et al. JOC 2009, 74, 6442.
  • 18. Plausible mechanism ¨C 4¦Ð-Electron-5-atom electrocyclization 1. Electronic donation by the biaryl ¦Ð-system to form the Rh nitrenoid. 2. The planar nature of quinoid 35 enables a 4¦Ð-electron-5-atom electrocyclization to form C¨CN bond. 3. Upon formation of 8aH-carbazole 38, 1,5-H shift then provides carbazole. Driver et al. JOC 2009, 74, 6442.
  • 19. Substrate dependent reactivity ¨C EWG-nitrenoid likes carbenoid: concerted mechanism ¨C Arylnitrenoid likes arylnitrenium: stepwise mechanism Driver et al. JOC 2009, 74, 6442.
  • 21. Can azide decomposes to form nitrene? ¨C In current method, substrate should equip EWG on the azide. ¨C Decomposition catalyst is required redox activity (?) Example of redox-driven azido decomposition, see: Zhang et al. Organometallics 2010, 29, 389.
  • 22. Electron-neutral azide as N-atom source ? Current method ? Strong EWG or strong oxidant ? This work is not requierd.
  • 23. Screening of catalysts ¨C Table 1. ? Only Rh2(II) complexes gave indoline.
  • 24. Screening of additives ¨C Table 1. ? Control experiment revealed that oxidative decomposition of the indoline occurred during purification. ? In situ protection by Boc or Ac improved yield. ? Aniline was formed when the stronger acid byproducts were produced.
  • 25. para-Aryl and ortho-alkyl substituent ¨C Table 2, 3. ? Both electron-rich or poor aryl azides were suitable substrate. ? Most reactions proceeded in a highly diastereoselective manner.
  • 26. Reactivity trend ? Electron-rich aryl azides were more reactive.. ? The increased reactivity could be due to either above reasons.
  • 27. Again, isotope labeling study ¨C If concerted: insertion would produce only two products. ¨C If stepwise: ¦Â-stereocenter could scramble to racemize, four product would be formed. ? In support of stepwise mechanism, two diastereomers and two isotopomers were observed. ? H-abstraction: KIE = 12 to 14 ? H-shift: KIE = approx. 2
  • 28. Possible mechanism 1. Coordination of Rh to azide, then extrusion of N2 form nitrenoid 8. 2. H-shift or H-abstraction to form 9 or 10 followed by reconbination produces the C¨CN bond. 3. Finally, indoline is produced upon dissociation of Rh complex.
  • 29. ¨C Efficient and diastereoselective aliphatic C¨CH amination that uses an aryl azide as the N-atom source. ? Strong EWG on the N-atom is not required. ? Reaction occurred stepwise with the syn-C¨CH bond investigated by using D-leveled azide.
  • 31. ? ¡°Hydroxylation reactions catalyzed by P450s are NOT always stereospecific.¡± Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 3947.
  • 32. Unusual reactivity of methoxy azidoacrylates EAS = SEAr Driver et al. JOC 2009, 74, 6442.
  • 33. Requirement for a contiguous array of ¦Ð-orbitals >95% recovery ? ¡°The lack of reactivity of 40 agrees with our proposed electrocyclization mechanism and is inconsistent with an electrophilic aromatic substitution mechanism, which would not require a contiguous ¦Ð-system.¡± Driver et al. JOC 2009, 74, 6442.
  • 34. Temperature dependence of kH/kD ? Isokinetic temperature was approx. 43 deg C.
  • 35. Exceptional behavior of strained azide ? The spatial constraints of this reaction override these isotope effects.