This case study presents a 69-year old male with spinal cord injuries who underwent surgery to repair a pseudomenigocele. During surgery, long-latency motor evoked potentials (LLMEPs) over 100ms were detected in addition to typical short-latency responses under 35ms. LLMEPs disappeared when the patient was positioned prone but returned when reversed to supine. This demonstrates that expanding the recording window to 200ms can reveal LLMEPs, though their clinical utility requires further study. The author encourages documenting and sharing LLMEP findings to advance understanding of this phenomenon.
1 of 1
Download to read offline
More Related Content
Long-Latency Motor Evoked Potentials During An Intraoperative Sentinel Event
1. Title: Long-Latency Motor Evoked Potentials (LLMEPs): Single-Limb Loss and Return of Motor Evoked Potentials
Author: David Barnkow, Au.D., D.ABNM, CCC-A, Medsurant Health, Denver, Colorado
The Case Presentation: A 69 year-old male with diagnoses of C3 incomplete tetraplegia, S/P spinal cord untethering, lower extremity central neuropathic
pain and pseudomenigocele presented with complaints of progressive weakness, increased spasticity, and emerged upper extremity neuropathic pain. The
surgical treatment was posterior cervical exploration and repair pseudomenigocele.
Table 1. Motor Strength Assessment
Figure 1. Sensory Assessment Pin Prick
Figure 2. Right APB TceMEP while supine on bed prior to positioning.
Note the presence of complex, large-amplitude response at 103 ms in
addition to the anticipated biphasic, low-amplitude response at 35 ms.
Figure 4. Right APB TceMEPs while patient returned to supine on bed
and anesthesia reversed. Note the LLMEPs return prior to TceMEPs
Discussion: SSEPs from the upper and lower extremities remained within acceptable limits throughout this procedure. TceMEPs from bilateral lower
extremities and the left upper extremity remained within acceptable limits throughout the procedure. This case study demonstrates that expanding
the recording window of current standard TceMEP protocols to 200 ms can reveal another category of motor evoked potentials, the LLMEP. While
the underlying mechanisms and clinical utility of LLMEPs have not been described, this author encourages all clinicians to consider expanding their
recording window to collect possible LLMEPs, and to publish and share their LLMEP findings for a greater meta-analysis of this interesting, yet
essentially undescribed, phenomenon.
Figure 3. Right APB TceMEP after positioned prone on OR table and
prior to incision. Surgeon was alerted and interventions failed to
restore the response.
Figure 5. Right APB TceMEP while patient in left lateral decubitus position on
operating table. Pre-incision (11:33), Post-incision (13:02) and Closing (13:29).
Figure 2. Lateral MRI