This presentation discusses a project to renovate the Australian Aboriginal Cultures Gallery (AACG) at the South Australian Museum. Volunteer visitors were tracked in the gallery to collect data on dwell times and movement patterns. The data was then analyzed to identify areas that were undervisited and biases in visitor routes. Insights from the data analysis were applied to improvements to the gallery, such as increasing light levels in undervisited sections, moving an introductory wall, and adding new interactive displays and seating areas. Lessons learned included the importance of visitor tracking and understanding the experience to improving exhibitions, and how volunteer-led projects can build relationships while providing valuable insights for the museum.
1 of 18
Download to read offline
More Related Content
Making the most of Corporate Social Responsibility and Volunteer-collected visitor data
1. Jenny Parsons, South Australian Museum
Regan Forrest, South Australian Museum
(UQ)
2. Presentation Overview
Project context
Volunteer data collection
What to do with the data?
Data analysis
Applying the findings
Lessons learned
3. Project context
The Opportunity
Official Reason
Unofficial Reason
Desired Outcomes
A better visitor experience
Relationship development
Institutional learning
4. Australian Aboriginal
Cultures Gallery (AACG)
10yr old gallery
What needed to be updated?
What was missing?
Or worse, what was broken..
Opening up our internal discussions in order to
consider the visitor experience
5. Volunteer-led data
collection
The idea: The Museum is Watching You, WSJ August 18, 2010
Consultation with Matt Sikora, Detroit Institute of
Arts' director of evaluation
Creating the map, evaluator letters, signage &
learning about stops
Dream Team: financial analysts
No budget, entrepreneurial approach
7. Descriptive Statistics
Sample size n=92, 59 males and 64 females (G Floor)
Mean Dwell Time: 9.1 minutes
13-18
Median Dwell Time: 5.0 minutes 19-39
40-65
Mode Dwell Time: 5.0 minutes 65+
Approx. SRI* = 600 sq.ft. / min
(*SRI= Sweep Rate Index as defined in Serrell, B. (1998) Paying Attention: Visitors and Museum
Exhibitions. Published by the American Association of Museums)
8. AACG Dwell Time
35
30
25
Number of visitors
20
15
10
5
0
1-3 4-6 7-9 10-12 13-15 16-18 19-21 22-24 25-27 28-30 30+
Minutes spent in gallery
11. Gallery zoning example
from the literature
Klein, HJ (1993) Tracking Visitor Circulation in Museum Settings. Environment and Behavior 1993 25:
782-800. p. 792
12. Zoning the AACG
1 entry
Direction =
90
2 entries
Direction = n/a
1 entry
Direction =
Overlay gallery plan to divide 135
into 24 zones
Count each entry into a zone as
1 entry
well as overall direction where Direction = n/a
applicable
Code direction numerically
(0, 45, 90, 135, 180, 235, 270, 315) 2 entries
Direction = 90
13. Number Crunching
Rest assured this looks
a lot nastier than it really
is!
Sum of
entries for
each zone Compare
Comparison Mode
reveals
with
to average
(Total entries most opposite
for all zones common direction
/24) direction
15. What this told us and how
we used it
Important sections were in visitation deserts
brought the light levels up
Clear biases in visitor routes
moved the new introductory wall
The first floor was a racetrack
new colourful display with seating & touchscreens
17. Lessons learned
Visitor tracking relies on expert knowledge
Its essential in understanding and improving the
experience of our visitors
It has given us a better gallery
It needs to reside somewhere in the Museum
Beta exercise. Activating Corporate Social
Responsibility takes strong collaboration internally
but can build relationships & lead to giving.