Matsushita was able to beat Philips in the consumer electronics market by centralizing its operations and pursuing a strategy of high-quality, low-cost products sold globally through licensing agreements and overseas sales and manufacturing. This polycentric approach allowed Matsushita to benefit from economies of scale, while Philips maintained a more decentralized, nationally focused structure that hampered its ability to compete effectively.
1 of 6
Download to read offline
More Related Content
Matsushita beats philips
1. Matsushita beats Philips
Account for the main strategic decision that
enables Matsushita to be ahead of Phillips in
the Neutral Competition.
Martin Kolek, Jindrich Faborsky, Peter Marcely and Vitazoslav Boltiziar
2. What is Matsushita
Matsushita Works was founded in 1918
Matsushita changed name to Panasonic in
2003
3. Strategic decisions
1. Licensing of best-known product (VHS) according to
article
2. Centralization
3. High-quality and low-price oriented
4. Innovative
5. Overseas Sales Export -> FDI
=> Change from Ethno-centric to Poly-Centric
=> Matsushita was able to beat the decentralized and
nationally responsive European Firms.
4. Other aspects
Desperate trouble of Phillips in 1980s
Protectionism and strong government protection
Phillips developed highly decentralized
structure
Phillips lacked economies of scale in the field
of consumer electronics
5. Current situation
2007 2008 2009
Phillips(1)
Revenue 26 793 26 385 23 189
Net income 488 -92 424
Employees 115 924
Panasonic(2)
Revenue 54 364 56 485 63 864
Net income -758 -2 756 1 985
Employees 384 586
Values are in millions of EUR
(1) Annual financial reports of Phillips
(2) Annual financial reports of Panasonic