際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
Le Pumps Case Study
Alex Koehler
Anita Sayyed
Ronald Honse Jr.
Brief Explanation of Case
 Ferguson (US)/Le Pumps (UK)
 Functional currency determination
 Necessary adjusting entries for consolidation
Determination of Functional Currency
 Functional Currency: currency of the primary economic
environment in which the entity operates (ASC 830-10-
45-2)
 ASC 830-10-45-3
 Le Pumps day-to-day operations not dependent on
economic environment of dollar
 Le Pumps cash flow can be converted into dollars and paid
back to parent company, Ferguson
 Functional currency: Pounds
Determination of Functional Currency
(Continued)
 ASC 830-10-55-5
Economic Factors Functional Currency
Cash flows Pound
Sales price Pound
Sales market Pound
Expense Pound
Financing Dollar
Intra-entity and
arrangements Pound
Authoritative Support
Topics
 810 Consolidation
 830 Foreign Currency Matters
 323 InvestmentsEquity Method and Joint
Ventures
Purpose
 ASC 810-10-10-1
 To presentthe results of operations and
financial position of a parent and all its
subsidiaries as if the consolidated group were a
single economic entity.
 For the benefit of owners and creditors of the parent
entity.
 Consolidated financial statements are more meaningful
than separate financial statements.
Intra-Entity Transactions and Balances
 ASC 810-10-45-1
 Intra-Entity balances and transactions shall be
eliminated upon consolidation.
 Includes:
Intra-entity open account balances
Intra-entity sales and purchases
Intra-entity profits and losses on assets remaining
within the consolidated group
Translation Adjustments
 ASC 830-30-45-12
 Result from translating subsidiarys functional currency
into the reporting currency.
 Not included in determining Net Income
 Reported in Other Comprehensive Income
Recognition of Subsidiarys Earnings
 ASC 323-10-35-4
 Investor shall recognize its share of the earnings or
losses of an investee in income.
 Investors share is based on the shares of common stock
and in-substance common stock held by the investor.
 Le Pumps, Ltd > wholly owned by Ferguson Pumps,
Inc.
Consolidation Process
ASSETS
LIABILITIES
Equity
ASSETS
LIABILITIES
EQUITY
-
=
Investment
in Sub
ASSETS
LIABILITIES
EQUITY
FERGUSONS
CONSOLIDATED ENTITY
LEPUMPS
=+
Steps to Consolidation
 STEP 1: Inclusion of profits of Subsidiary
in Parents income
A. Translation of investment Account.
B. Including income of LePumps Inc.
B1 Record translation gain on income
Steps to Consolidation (Continued)
STEP 2: Elimination of subsidiarys Equity
C. Elimination of Le Pumps Equity
Consolidation Process
ASSETS
LIABILITIES
Equity
ASSETS
LIABILITIES
EQUITY
-
=
Investment
in Sub
ASSETS
LIABILITIES
EQUITY
FERGUSONS
CONSOLIDATED
ENTITY
LEPUMPS
=
+
Purchases
Unrealized
Profits
Sales
Steps to Consolidation (Continued)
STEP 3: Elimination Of Intercompany
Transactions
D. Elimination of unrealized profits
I. Elimination of Intercompany sales and purchases
Consolidation Process
ASSETS
LIABILITIES
Equity
ASSETS
LIABILITIES
EQUITY
-
=
Investment
in Sub
ASSETS
LIABILITIES
EQUITY
FERGUSONS
CONSOLIDATED
ENTITY
LEPUMPS
=
+
Intercompany
Receivable/
Payable
Steps to Consolidation (Continued)
STEP 4: Elimination Of Intercompany
Balances
E. Translation Gain/Loss on intercompany
receivable/payables
F. Elimination of Intercompany receivables
G. Long term Receivable/Payable translation gain/Loss
H. Elimination of long term receivable/ Payables
Quick Recap of Case
Loan forgiveness of $2000,000
Fergusons:
Loss of $2000,000 in in P&L
LePumps:
Loan recorded @ .6307GBP:$
Loan forgiven @.614GBP:$
gain of GBP 1,227,974 on loan forgiveness and a translation
gain of GBP33,370. Both will be included in the profit for the
year.
Special Thanks to:
Mr. Guy M. Gross
Mr. Robert E. Stoettner
Partners from McGladrey

More Related Content

McGladrey Case Study Presentation