際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
Measurement of eGovernment user satisfaction and impacteGovMoNetSebastiaan van der Peijl (Deloitte)Hungary, 26 March 2009
Introduction to the study approach and objectives  Results of the pilot study Next steps: implementing user satisfaction measurement in eGovernment AGENDA
- 2 -Study approach and objectives
- 3 -Study approach and objectives: the policy context
- 4 -Study approach and objectives: a five-step process
Pilot study results: testing the instrument- 5 -
- 6 -Pilot study results: supply-use gap for citizensGap between eGovernment supply and use differentiates between services
- 7 -Pilot study results: supply-use gap for businessGap between eGovernment supply and use is less within a business environment
Pilot study results: Non-use of eGovernment by level of trust (Citizens)- 8 -Non-use of the Internet for contact with public administrations by level of trust in the Internet and in public administrations: when trust is low % of non-use is higher
Pilot study results: Reasons for non-use of the Internet  (Citizens)- 9 -Creation of Awareness
Pilot study results: satisfaction with e-services (Citizens)eGovernment is lagging behind in use and satisfaction compared to non-government eServices- 10 -
Pilot study results: satisfaction with e-services  (Business)The difference within the business environment is less- 11 -
Pilot study results: impact of level of sophistication (Citizens)Satisfaction goes up with the level of interaction of the service- 12 -
Pilot study results: impact of level of sophistication (Business)The higher the level of interaction the more  objectives are achieved- 13 -
Pilot study results: perceived benefits by citizensPerceived impacts are time-saving, flexibility and simplification- 14 -
Pilot study results: perceived benefits by businessesPerceived impacts by business are  equal- 15 -
- 16 -Pilot study results: key findings
- 17 -Next steps: implementation
- 18 -Next steps: implementation
- 19 -Next steps: implementation
Next steps: implementation- 20 -

More Related Content

Measurement of eGovernment user satisfaction and impact

  • 1. Measurement of eGovernment user satisfaction and impacteGovMoNetSebastiaan van der Peijl (Deloitte)Hungary, 26 March 2009
  • 2. Introduction to the study approach and objectives Results of the pilot study Next steps: implementing user satisfaction measurement in eGovernment AGENDA
  • 3. - 2 -Study approach and objectives
  • 4. - 3 -Study approach and objectives: the policy context
  • 5. - 4 -Study approach and objectives: a five-step process
  • 6. Pilot study results: testing the instrument- 5 -
  • 7. - 6 -Pilot study results: supply-use gap for citizensGap between eGovernment supply and use differentiates between services
  • 8. - 7 -Pilot study results: supply-use gap for businessGap between eGovernment supply and use is less within a business environment
  • 9. Pilot study results: Non-use of eGovernment by level of trust (Citizens)- 8 -Non-use of the Internet for contact with public administrations by level of trust in the Internet and in public administrations: when trust is low % of non-use is higher
  • 10. Pilot study results: Reasons for non-use of the Internet (Citizens)- 9 -Creation of Awareness
  • 11. Pilot study results: satisfaction with e-services (Citizens)eGovernment is lagging behind in use and satisfaction compared to non-government eServices- 10 -
  • 12. Pilot study results: satisfaction with e-services (Business)The difference within the business environment is less- 11 -
  • 13. Pilot study results: impact of level of sophistication (Citizens)Satisfaction goes up with the level of interaction of the service- 12 -
  • 14. Pilot study results: impact of level of sophistication (Business)The higher the level of interaction the more objectives are achieved- 13 -
  • 15. Pilot study results: perceived benefits by citizensPerceived impacts are time-saving, flexibility and simplification- 14 -
  • 16. Pilot study results: perceived benefits by businessesPerceived impacts by business are equal- 15 -
  • 17. - 16 -Pilot study results: key findings
  • 18. - 17 -Next steps: implementation
  • 19. - 18 -Next steps: implementation
  • 20. - 19 -Next steps: implementation