This document summarizes the findings of analyzing citations to an original article about evidence for magmatic evolution and diversity on Mars from infrared observations. The analysis assessed citations for biases related to authors of the original article and their affiliations. It found predominant type A bias, where citations included authors from the original article. One instance of type C bias was also found, where a citing author had previously worked with an original author. Most citations were published in peer-reviewed journals with impact factors around 3, reflecting the specialized nature of the research. Media coverage of the citations was limited to journal PR due to the esoteric geology topics.