This document summarizes strategies for preparing for mediation of disputed health insurance claims. It provides tips for mediators, in-house counsel, and outside counsel. Key steps include understanding expectations, identifying non-monetary barriers, and allowing plaintiffs to tell their story. The background section describes a hypothetical disputed claim involving denial of coverage for a deceased spouse's medical bills and the surviving spouse's subsequent hospitalization.
2. MEDIATING DISPUTED
HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS
2
Mariam Zadeh Nancy T. Poblenz, RN, BSN, DDS, JD,
Mediator CPHRM
First Mediation Corporation Director Litigation and Loss Prevention
16501 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 606 CHRISTUS Health - Risk Management
Encino, CA 91436 Direct Dial 281.936.3673
Tel: 818.784.4544 Fax: 818.784.1836 Mobile 281.788.5441
Email: mzadeh@firstmediation Email: nancy.poblenz@christushealth.org
Robert R. Pohls Forrest Latta
Pohls & Associates Burr & Forman LLP
10940 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 41 West I-65 / Service Road N.
1600 Colonial Bank Centre, Suite 400
Los Angeles, California 90024 Mobile, Alabama 36608
Tel: 310.694.3092 Fax: Tel: 251.345-8212 Fax: 251.345.9696
310.694.3093 E-mail: forrest.latta@burr.com
Email: rpohls@califehealth.com
3. MEDIATING DISPUTED
HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS
3
Preparing for Litigation In-House Perspective
Step 1: Document Retention and Litigation Hold Notice
Step 2: Evaluate the Claim File
Step 3: Evaluate the Writing Agent
Step 4: Coordinate with Outside Counsel
STOP, LOOK and LISTEN!
Early Case Assessment
Jurisdiction/Forum-Selection
Evaluate Plaintiffs Counsel
Establish a Case Budget
4. MEDIATING DISPUTED
HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS
4
Preparing for Litigation Outside Counsel Perspective
Step 1: Collect Information
Step 2: Evaluate Claim Handling
Step 3: Develop a Litigation Strategy
Step 4: Identify the Clients True Objectives
Are there case-specific goals?
What settlement terms are essential?
Are there other business considerations?
5. MEDIATING DISPUTED
HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS
5
Preparing for Mediation Practice Tips
Understand the Expectation Gap
Adjust the parties needs and expectations
Adjust the plaintiff attorneys needs and
expectations
Remember the 3 most important jury motivators:
Fear: Evidence of pattern or practice
Anger: Arrogance, mistakes or incompetence
Love: A worthy plaintiff who has been imperiled
If all 3 are present, plaintiff will win BIG.
If any 1 is missing, plaintiff may win small.
6. MEDIATING DISPUTED
HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS
6
Preparing for Mediation A Mediators Perspective
Know When to Stop Trying the Case at the Mediation
Identify and Remove the Non-Monetary Road Blocks
When Needed, Ask to Talk to Plaintiff's Counsel
Directly
Make Nice with the Folks Next Door
When All Else Fails Find Ways to Keep the Dialogue
Open
7. MEDIATING DISPUTED
HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS
7
Preparing for Mediation A Mediators Perspective
Prepare Early by exchanging benefit and damage
calculations
Every Plaintiff has a Story Let them tell it
The Mediator is an Ally Collaborate Together in
Caucus
Timing is Everything Be Strategic About the Pace of
the Process
Read In Between the Lines
8. MEDIATING DISPUTED
HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS
8
Background Facts Communications with Agent
Surviving Insured owns and operates a restaurant in San
Francisco
Surviving Insured and Deceased Insured applied for
coverage with Insurance Company on April 6, 2007
Surviving Insured told Agent she was planning to marry
in a few weeks and wanted health insurance in place for
her and her fianc辿 before their honeymoon
Agent suggested coverage through an association group
policy offered to members of the local Chamber of
Commerce
9. MEDIATING DISPUTED
HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS
9
Background Facts Application
Agent reviewed and completed a short form application
with Surviving Insured
In the application, Surviving Insured denied any
symptoms of (or treatment for) any health conditions
Surviving Insured signed the application in Agents
presence, immediately below pre-printed text which
stated that each statement in the application was true
and correct to the best of [her] knowledge and belief
Insurance Company issued the policy standard without
riders or rate ups, effective April 15, 2009
10. MEDIATING DISPUTED
HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS
10
Background Facts The Deceased Insureds Injury
Surviving insured and Deceased Insured were married
on
June 1, 2009
After their wedding, Surviving Insured and Deceased
Insured held a private reception at Surviving Insureds
restaurant
Around 6 p.m., Deceased Insured lost control of his
motorcycle, drove off the road and sustained serious
head injuries
Deceased Insured was airlifted from the scene of the
accident to Hospital
11. MEDIATING DISPUTED
HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS
11
Background Facts Claim for Deceased Insureds Medical
Care
Deceased Insured died 2 days after admission to
Hospital as a result of the head trauma he suffered in the
accident
Deceased Insured had received $35,000 in hospital care
and services
In June 2009, Hospital submitted Deceased Insureds
bills to Insurance Company
Intoxication exclusion provides: No benefits are
payable for losses which result, directly or indirectly, from
the insureds intoxication.
12. MEDIATING DISPUTED
HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS
12
Background Facts Surviving Insureds Depression
Surviving Insured suffered severe depression in the
months after Deceased Insureds death
In October 2009, Surviving Insured was lethargic,
contracted a fever and went to a local acute care facility
When Surviving Insureds renal function continued to
worsen, she was transferred to Hospital
At admission, Hospital contacted Insurance Company to
verify that Surviving Insured had coverage
Insurance Company verified coverage, but refused to
guarantee payment
13. MEDIATING DISPUTED
HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS
13
Background Facts Evidence of Pre-Existing Condition
Surviving Insured was discharged from Hospital on
October 6, 2009
Discharge Summary: Never take acetaminophen-
containing products again since her current and past
hospitalizations both were likely due to chronic
acetaminophen toxicity.
On March 28, 2010, Hospital faxed Surviving Insureds
bills to Insurance Company for payment
Insurance Company begins claim investigation by
requesting medical records from Surviving Insureds
internist and other providers
14. MEDIATING DISPUTED
HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS
14
Background Facts Claim for Surviving Insureds
Depression
Insurance Company denied Surviving Insureds claim
due to lack of information about a possible pre-existing
condition
Denial letter also mentioned Hospitals failure to provide
written notice of claim within the 90-day period required
by the policy
Surviving Insured, Estate of Deceased Insured and
Hospital filed their complaint 3 weeks after receiving
Insurance Companys denial letter
15. MEDIATING DISPUTED
HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS
15
Background Facts Claims Against the Insurer
By Surviving Insured (and Deceased Insureds
Estate)
Breach of Contract
Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair
Dealing
By Hospital
Negligent Verification (Hospital)
Fraud
Unfair Competition
16. MEDIATING DISPUTED
HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS
16
Surviving Insureds Claim for Breach of Contract
Exclusion: Expenses that result from care or
treatment of a Pre-Existing Condition will not be
covered as Covered Charges.
Pre-Existing Condition: a Sickness or Injury for
which a person has during the 6 months just prior
to his enrollment date under this plan: a) received
medical care, advice, or treatment; or b) had drugs
or medicines prescribed whether taken or not; or c)
had diagnostic tests ordered whether performed or
not.
17. MEDIATING DISPUTED
HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS
17
Surviving Insureds Claim for Breach of Contract
Insurers Position:
Surviving Insureds claims were incurred for Vicodin and
acetaminophen abuse
Surviving Insured had pre-application history of Vicodin
and acetaminophen abuse
Surviving Insureds Claims were properly denied on the
basis of the Insurance Certificates pre-existing condition
exclusion
Surviving Insureds Position:
No evidence of pre-existing condition
Post-Claim Underwriting
18. MEDIATING DISPUTED
HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS
18
Post-Claim Underwriting Plaintiffs Perspective
If the insurer has a right to investigate the
applicants eligibility, it should not be allowed to
ignore important information until a claim arises.
By then, the applicant will have relied on the
issuance of a policy by not seeking insurance from
another source.
If the insurer is allowed to rescind the policy based
on information discovered after the claim arises, the
applicant may have no opportunity to obtain any
coverage for the loss.
19. MEDIATING DISPUTED
HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS
19
Post-Claim Underwriting Insurers Perspective
Contacting all applicants to thoroughly review
application responses is time consuming
Contacting Healthcare providers is expensive and time
consuming
Must distinguish post-claim underwriting from post-
claim investigation
Every applicant has a duty to disclose material facts
Surviving Insured gave no information in application
No opportunity to investigate undisclosed health
history
20. MEDIATING DISPUTED
HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS
20
Possible Rescission Claim
On application, Surviving Insured represented that she
had not taken any prescription drugs during the prior 5
years
Surviving Insured also represented that in the prior 5
years, her medical care had been limited to annual
consultations with her OB/GYN all of which were
Normal
Surviving Insured signed application which stated that
the representations and statements made in the
application were true and complete to the best of [her]
knowledge and belief
21. MEDIATING DISPUTED
HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS
21
Possible Rescission Claim
Surviving Insured had an undisclosed health history of
Vicodin and Soma use and low-back pain and
fibromyalgia
Surviving Insureds undisclosed pre-application
medical history was material to the Insurance
Companys risk assumed: Insurance Company would
not have issued coverage for Surviving Insured if this
history had been disclosed on the application
22. MEDIATING DISPUTED
HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS
22
Possible Rescission Claim
If a representation is false in a material point, whether
affirmative or promissory, the injured party is entitled to
rescind the contract from the time the representation
becomes false. Cal. Ins. Code 則359
Whether the representation was intentionally or
unintentionally false does not alter the injured party's right
to rescind the policy. Telford v. New York Life Ins. Co., 9
Cal.2d 103, 105 (1937); Contra, Union Bankers Ins. Co. v.
Shelton, 889 S.W.2d 278, 282 (Tex. 1994) [In Texas, an
intent to deceive must be proved . . . to cancel a health
insurance policy within two years of the date of its issuance
when the cancellation is based on the insureds
misrepresentation in the application.].
23. MEDIATING DISPUTED
HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS
23
Possible Rescission Claim
Insured has a duty to read the contract and the
application in accordance with her representations and to
report to the company any misrepresentations or
omissions. Telford v. New York Life Ins. Co., 9 Cal.2d
103, 107 (1937); See also, Lunardi v. Great-West Life
Assurance Co., 37 Cal.App.4th 807, 826 (1995).
Insurers therefore have an unquestioned right to rely on
the person who would be insured for such information
as it desires as a basis for its determination to the end
that a wise discrimination may be exercised in selecting
its risks. Robinson v. Occidental Life Ins. Co., 131
Cal.App.2d 581, 586 (1955).
24. MEDIATING DISPUTED
HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS
24
Possible Rescission Claim
Hailey v. California Physicians Service, Case No.
G035579 (Cal. App. 2007)
Cal. Health & Safety Code Section 1389.3 prohibits
post-claim underwriting a practice involving a plans
failure to complete medical underwriting and resolve all
reasonable questions arising from written information
submitted on or with an application.
Cal. Health & Safety Code Section 1389.3 gives a health
care service plan the duty to make reasonable efforts to
ensure it has all the necessary information to accurately
assess the risk before issuing the contract.
25. MEDIATING DISPUTED
HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS
25
Bad Faith Claim
A mere refusal to pay benefits due under a policy is not, by
itself, bad faith.
See, California Shoppers, Inc. v. Royal Globe Ins. Co. 175
Cal.App.3d 1, 15, 54 (1985)
An insurers actions constitute a breach of the implied
covenant only if:
benefits are due under the policy and
the insurer withheld the benefit unreasonably and
without proper cause
California Shoppers, supra, 175 Cal.App.3d at 15, 54; See
also, Gruenberg v. Aetna Ins. Co., 9 Cal.3d 566, 573-575
(1973).
26. MEDIATING DISPUTED
HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS
26
Bad Faith Claim
If reasonable or based on a legitimate dispute, a mistaken or
erroneous withholding of benefits does not expose the insurer to bad
faith liability.
Tomaselli v. Transamerica Ins. Co., 25 Cal.App.4th 1269, 1280-81
(1984)
Opsal v. United Services Auto. Assn, 2 Cal.App.4th 1197, 1205-06
(1991)
Lunsford v. American Guar. & Liab. Ins. Co., 18 F.3d 653, 656 (9th
Cir. 1994)
A delay in payment does not breach the implied covenant if insurer
was investigating a genuine issue.
Fraley v. Allstate Insurance Co., 81 Cal.App.4th 1282 (2000)
Estate of Grant v. State Farm Life Ins. Co., No. 05-CV-02389
27. MEDIATING DISPUTED
HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS
27
Hospitals Claim for Fraud/Negligent Verification
A medical provider has standing to sue for damages when
relying on an insurance companys verification of health
insurance benefits. See, Herman Hospital v. National
Standard Ins. Co., 776 S.W.2d 249, 253 (Tex. App. Houston
[1st Dist.] 1989, no writ); Memorial Hospital v. Northbrook Life
Ins. Co., 904 F.2d 236, 246 (5th Cir. 1990).
A Party cannot justifiably rely on pre-contractual
representations that are directly contrary to the parties
written, integrated agreement. Hadland v. NN Investors life
Ins. Co., 24 Cal App.4th 1578 (1994); Hackethal v. National
Casualty Company, 189 Cal.App.3d1102 (1987).
28. MEDIATING DISPUTED
HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS
28
Hospitals Unfair Competition Claim
California Business & Prof. Code 則17200, et seq.
enacted to protect consumers and competitors by
promoting fair competition in commercial markets for
goods and services [See, Kasky v. Nike, Inc., 27
Cal.4th 939, 949 (2002)]
generally prohibits any unlawful, unfair or fraudulent
business act or practice [Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code
則17200]
virtually anything that can properly be called a
business practice and, at the same time, is forbidden
by law can serve as a predicate for an action under
the UCL [Smith v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 93
29. MEDIATING DISPUTED
HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS
29
Hospitals Unfair Competition Claim
Original standing requirements
Actions for any relief pursuant to this chapter shall
be prosecuted exclusively . . . by the Attorney
General or any district attorney or by any county
counsel . . . or any city attorney or by any person
acting for the interests of itself, its members or the
general public. [Former Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code
則17204]
A private plaintiff who suffered no injury could sue to
obtain relief for others [See, Stop Youth Addiction,
Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc., 17 Cal.4th 553, 561 (1998)]
30. MEDIATING DISPUTED
HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS
30
Hospitals Unfair Competition Claim
Proposition 64
Only plaintiffs who have suffered an injury in fact and have
lost money or property as a result of unfair competition may
prosecute claims under the UCL [Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code
則17204]
Private parties may bring representative action only if comply
with class action certification requirements [Cal. Bus. & Prof.
Code 則17203]
Applies to all cases pending on (or filed after) November 2,
2004
Californians for Disability Rights v. Mervyns LLC, Case
S31798 (Cal. 2006)
Starr-Gordon v. MassMutual Life Ins. Co., Case No. C03-
31. MEDIATING DISPUTED
HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS
31
Estates Claims for Breach of Contract/Bad Faith
Toxicology report revealed that Deceased Insureds blood
alcohol content at the time of the accident was 0.15 nearly
twice the legal limit
Intoxication exclusion provides: No benefits are payable for
losses which result, directly or indirectly, from the insureds
intoxication.
Insurance Company denied claims based on the intoxication
exclusion
Intoxication Exclusion did not require proof that Deceased
Insureds intoxication was the sole proximate cause of the
accident, but only a proximate cause of the accident
Ober v. CUNA Mutual Society, 645 So.2d 231 (La. Ct.
32. MEDIATING DISPUTED
HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS
32
Possible Claims Against Agent
Fraud
Negligent Misrepresentation
Negligence
Insurance agent acting within the course and scope
of his or he employment with a disclosed principal
insurer cannot be personally liable to the insured
Lippert v. Bailey, 241 Cal.App.376,382 (1966)
Surviving Insured and Deceased Insured had duty to
read insurance certificate upon receipt Hadland
and Hackethal
33. MEDIATING DISPUTED
HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS
33
QUESTIONS?
Mariam Zadeh Nancy T. Poblenz, RN, BSN, DDS, JD,
Mediator CPHRM
First Mediation Corporation Director Litigation and Loss Prevention
16501 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 606 CHRISTUS Health - Risk Management
Encino, CA 91436 Direct Dial 281.936.3673
Tel: 818.784.4544 Fax: 818.784.1836 Mobile 281.788.5441
Email: mzadeh@firstmediation Email: nancy.poblenz@christushealth.org
Robert R. Pohls Forrest Latta
Pohls & Associates Burr & Forman LLP
10940 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 41 West I-65 / Service Road N.
1600 Colonial Bank Centre, Suite 400
Los Angeles, California 90024 Mobile, Alabama 36608
Tel: 310.694.3092 Fax: Tel: 251.345-8212 Fax: 251.345.9696
310.694.3093 E-mail: forrest.latta@burr.com
Email: rpohls@califehealth.com