ݺߣ

ݺߣShare a Scribd company logo
Endorsement, Worth and Well-Being What is it
for a life to go well?
Theories of well-being give
an account of what it is for
persons to fare well. They
state the general features
that make a life good for the
person who lives it.
They are the foundation for:
 rational decisions in
which only the interests
of the individual are
concerned
 what we have reason to
promote for the sake of a
friend or child
 the consideration of a
person’s interests in
moral argument
A Conceptual Question
Michel Hébert
PhD Candidate
Is there more to faring well than
pleasure and satisfaction?
Some suggest faring well
consists in feeling good,
getting what one wants, or
experiencing life as
rewarding and judging that
it measures up against one’s
values. These views are
common in the social
sciences.
Most parents hope the lives of
their children will go well, but
what does that mean?
Medical professionals are
often called on to assess the
“quality of a life”.
The problem of worth
Subjectivists confront the
problem that feelings,
desires and personal values
do not always track well-
being.
Others suggest faring well
consists in flourishing or of
functioning well according
to appropriate standards.
The problem of authority
The trouble is that
objectivists break the
connection between the
nature of well-being and
one’s concerns.
If this is right, then one can
fare well despite the fact
that one does not enjoy or
even dislikes the life one
lives provided one’s life
relate suitably to valuable
objects.
Martha Nussbaum is an
Aristotle believes faring well is
a matter of functioning well.
My research shows that the
core variable is not
exclusively subjective or
objective.
Faring well is a matter of
endorsing goods that are
worthy of concern.
So what is it for a life to go well?
Subjectivism
Objectivism

More Related Content

Michel Hébert -- Research Day Poster

  • 1. Endorsement, Worth and Well-Being What is it for a life to go well? Theories of well-being give an account of what it is for persons to fare well. They state the general features that make a life good for the person who lives it. They are the foundation for:  rational decisions in which only the interests of the individual are concerned  what we have reason to promote for the sake of a friend or child  the consideration of a person’s interests in moral argument A Conceptual Question Michel Hébert PhD Candidate Is there more to faring well than pleasure and satisfaction? Some suggest faring well consists in feeling good, getting what one wants, or experiencing life as rewarding and judging that it measures up against one’s values. These views are common in the social sciences. Most parents hope the lives of their children will go well, but what does that mean? Medical professionals are often called on to assess the “quality of a life”. The problem of worth Subjectivists confront the problem that feelings, desires and personal values do not always track well- being. Others suggest faring well consists in flourishing or of functioning well according to appropriate standards. The problem of authority The trouble is that objectivists break the connection between the nature of well-being and one’s concerns. If this is right, then one can fare well despite the fact that one does not enjoy or even dislikes the life one lives provided one’s life relate suitably to valuable objects. Martha Nussbaum is an Aristotle believes faring well is a matter of functioning well. My research shows that the core variable is not exclusively subjective or objective. Faring well is a matter of endorsing goods that are worthy of concern. So what is it for a life to go well? Subjectivism Objectivism