ݺߣ

ݺߣShare a Scribd company logo
Military Benefits for
Same-Sex Couples
Jeff Criss
Walden University
Dr. April Adams
Organizations, Innovation & Change
EDUC 6105
Purpose
• The purpose of this presentation is
to examine a change process that
took place permitting the extension
of military benefits to same-sex
couples.
History of the Department
of Defense (DOD)
• Traces its roots back to our
Nation’s infancy
• Established Army, Navy, and Marine
Corps in 1775
• Consists of an all-
volunteer force
Mission
• Provide the military forces needed to
deter war and protect the U.S.(“Organizations
and Functions”, 2012)
• Support and defend the Constitution
• Use war to attain a
political objective
• Promote and spread
democracy
DOD Structure
Navy Major
Commands
President of the
United States
Secretary of Defense
Department of the
Army
Secretary of the
Army
Department of the
Navy
Secretary of the
Navy
Commandant of
Marine Corps
Department of the
Air Force
Secretary of the
Air Force
Chief of Staff
Army
Chief of Naval
Operations
Chief of Staff
Air Force
Army Major
Commands
Air Force Major
Commands
Marine Corp
Major Commands
Culture
• Found in the revolutionary spirit
which brought life to a new Nation
• Steeped in customs and courtesies
• Common elements include
a high standard of
discipline that helps
organize and structure
the armed forces
(Bateman, 2011)
Background
• In 1993, President William J. Clinton issued
a directive preventing gay service members
from being questioned about their sexual
orientation
• This policy became known as “Don’t Ask, Don’t
Tell (DADT)”
• Gay service members were permitted to serve
in the armed forces provided they did not
reveal their sexual orientation
• This policy remained in effect for 17 years.
DADT
• In Feb 2010, the Senate Armed
Services Committee began
hearings concerning the repeal
of DADT
• The DOD was charged with
developing a survey for service
members seeking input
DADT Hearings
Results
• Of the 400,000 survey members
polled, 27% responded
• 60% responded saying openly gay
members would have no impact on
mission effectiveness
• The issue of DADT repeal was
never addressed in the survey
DADT Hearings
Repeal of DADT
• In Dec 2010, the House and Senate voted
to repeal DADT
• This change repealed a
17 year standing policy
• President Obama
elected to use the
democratic process
as opposed to
executive action
Extension of Benefits
• President Obama directed
Secretary Leon Panetta to issue
a memorandum extending
42 benefits to domestic
partners of military
members
Extension of Benefits
• Change occurred 17 months after
the repeal of a 17 year policy
• Accomplished through
executive action
• No congressional
hearing or study
Rationale for Change
• Discrimination has no place in
the military
• Ensure fairness and equal
treatment to all service members
and their families
• Benefits are
allowable under
current law
(Panetta, personal communication, 2013)
Sample Benefits
• Benefits Include:
– Dependent ID cards
– Commissary
privileges
– Emergency Leave
– Child Care
– Beneficiary Status
– Legal Assistance
• Benefits not
Included:
– Medical Insurance
– Housing Privileges
Change Analysis
• Change was revolutionary (Beach, 2006)
• President sought no input
• Change was political
– DADT was repealed just prior to
President Obama’s re-election
– Extension of benefits granted after
beginning of second term
– Change was put in place just prior to
the Supreme Court’s ruling on the
Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)
Change Effectiveness
• Created a new form of
discrimination
• Aimed at approximately 2% of
military members
• Thrust upon the military
• Viewed as a social experiment
Recommendations
• Process should have included
congressional and DOD approval
• More time should have elapsed to
embrace the DADT repeal
• Members who oppose the change
should be permitted to
voluntarily separate from the DOD
References
Bateman, G.W. (2011). Military Culture: United States. GLBTQ
Social Sciences, 1-6.
Beach, L. (2006). Leadership and the art of change. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Farkas, M.(Producer).(2010, February 15). Don’t ask, don’t tell
policy on gays in the military. Washington, D.C: Cable-
Satellite Public Affairs Network.
Organizational and management planning. (2012). Retrieved from
http.www.odam.defense.gov

More Related Content

Military benefits for same sex couples for flv

  • 1. Military Benefits for Same-Sex Couples Jeff Criss Walden University Dr. April Adams Organizations, Innovation & Change EDUC 6105
  • 2. Purpose • The purpose of this presentation is to examine a change process that took place permitting the extension of military benefits to same-sex couples.
  • 3. History of the Department of Defense (DOD) • Traces its roots back to our Nation’s infancy • Established Army, Navy, and Marine Corps in 1775 • Consists of an all- volunteer force
  • 4. Mission • Provide the military forces needed to deter war and protect the U.S.(“Organizations and Functions”, 2012) • Support and defend the Constitution • Use war to attain a political objective • Promote and spread democracy
  • 5. DOD Structure Navy Major Commands President of the United States Secretary of Defense Department of the Army Secretary of the Army Department of the Navy Secretary of the Navy Commandant of Marine Corps Department of the Air Force Secretary of the Air Force Chief of Staff Army Chief of Naval Operations Chief of Staff Air Force Army Major Commands Air Force Major Commands Marine Corp Major Commands
  • 6. Culture • Found in the revolutionary spirit which brought life to a new Nation • Steeped in customs and courtesies • Common elements include a high standard of discipline that helps organize and structure the armed forces (Bateman, 2011)
  • 7. Background • In 1993, President William J. Clinton issued a directive preventing gay service members from being questioned about their sexual orientation • This policy became known as “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell (DADT)” • Gay service members were permitted to serve in the armed forces provided they did not reveal their sexual orientation • This policy remained in effect for 17 years.
  • 8. DADT • In Feb 2010, the Senate Armed Services Committee began hearings concerning the repeal of DADT • The DOD was charged with developing a survey for service members seeking input
  • 10. Results • Of the 400,000 survey members polled, 27% responded • 60% responded saying openly gay members would have no impact on mission effectiveness • The issue of DADT repeal was never addressed in the survey
  • 12. Repeal of DADT • In Dec 2010, the House and Senate voted to repeal DADT • This change repealed a 17 year standing policy • President Obama elected to use the democratic process as opposed to executive action
  • 13. Extension of Benefits • President Obama directed Secretary Leon Panetta to issue a memorandum extending 42 benefits to domestic partners of military members
  • 14. Extension of Benefits • Change occurred 17 months after the repeal of a 17 year policy • Accomplished through executive action • No congressional hearing or study
  • 15. Rationale for Change • Discrimination has no place in the military • Ensure fairness and equal treatment to all service members and their families • Benefits are allowable under current law (Panetta, personal communication, 2013)
  • 16. Sample Benefits • Benefits Include: – Dependent ID cards – Commissary privileges – Emergency Leave – Child Care – Beneficiary Status – Legal Assistance • Benefits not Included: – Medical Insurance – Housing Privileges
  • 17. Change Analysis • Change was revolutionary (Beach, 2006) • President sought no input • Change was political – DADT was repealed just prior to President Obama’s re-election – Extension of benefits granted after beginning of second term – Change was put in place just prior to the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)
  • 18. Change Effectiveness • Created a new form of discrimination • Aimed at approximately 2% of military members • Thrust upon the military • Viewed as a social experiment
  • 19. Recommendations • Process should have included congressional and DOD approval • More time should have elapsed to embrace the DADT repeal • Members who oppose the change should be permitted to voluntarily separate from the DOD
  • 20. References Bateman, G.W. (2011). Military Culture: United States. GLBTQ Social Sciences, 1-6. Beach, L. (2006). Leadership and the art of change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Farkas, M.(Producer).(2010, February 15). Don’t ask, don’t tell policy on gays in the military. Washington, D.C: Cable- Satellite Public Affairs Network. Organizational and management planning. (2012). Retrieved from http.www.odam.defense.gov