This document discusses assessing the value of knowledge organization (KO) skills in information literacy (IL). It defines KO as building and appraising tools for information retrieval and defines IL as being able to recognize when information is needed and locate, evaluate, and effectively use needed information. The research aims to investigate the value of KO skills in IL among postgraduate students at Robert Gordon University. Primary data collection will involve interviews and a case study, while secondary data will include screenshots and course content from library schools. Interviews allow collection of large amounts of qualitative data quickly but can be time-consuming. Limitations include time and financial costs of equipment and printing.
1 of 9
Download to read offline
More Related Content
Monday presentation
1. Topic: Assessing the value of
knowledge organization skills in
information literacy
Bello Ahmadu 1217477
2. Definition of key terms
Hjorland (2007) defines KO as being
concerned with building and appraising
semantic tools for information retrieval (IR)
To be information literate, a person must be
able to recognise when information is needed
and have the ability to locate, evaluate, and
use effectively the needed information. (ALA,
1998)
3. The research rationale
The advantages of adopting classification schemes
are: to enhance browsing and navigation of
database; Possibility of offering multiple access to
information; Interoperability with other services;
partitioning of large databases; Making search
easier across databases (Singh 2013)
6. Data collection
Primary data
interviews - individuals - (structured)
case study
Secondary data
data that already exist e.g. Screen shot of
desk top, My document or folders and
course content of KO/IL from Library
schools
7. Interview
Advantages
Can obtain large amounts of qualitative data in a short period of time
Interviewer can immediately answer the interviewees questions about research
Disadvantages
Can be time-consuming (e.g. arranging interviews; conducting interviews;
transcribing and analysing interviews, etc.)
Interviewers should be skilled at framing questions, personal interaction, and
listening
9. References:
AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, 1998. A progress report on information literacy:
an update on the american library association presidential committee on
information literacy: Final Report. American Library Association, Chicago. Available
at: http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlpubs/whitepapers/progressreport.htm.
BROUGHTON, V., 2010. The fall and rise of knowledge organization: new
dimensions of subject description and retrieval. Aslib Proceedings, 62(4/5), pp.
349-354.
HJORLAND, B. 2008. What is knowledge organization (KO)? Knowledge
organization. international journal devoted to concept theory, classification,
indexing and knowledge representation, 35(2/3), pp. 86-101.
GNOLI, C., 2008. Ten Long-Term Research Questions in Knowledge Organization.
Knowledge Organization, 35.2-3, pp. 137-149.
SINGH, J. 2013. Knowledge organization. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information
Technology, 33(4), pp. 261-263.
WEBBER S. & JOHNSTON, B. 2003. Information Literacy in Higher Education: a
review and case study. Studies in Higher Education 28 (3): 335-352