The researchers are conducting a project to document the history of the Musicians' Union in the UK. They are using archival research, interviews, and secondary sources to analyze the MU's role in influencing the music industry and policies affecting musicians. Some initial themes they have identified include viewing musicians as workers, the MU's external relations, copyright issues, responses to new technologies, and changes in relevant laws. The researchers aim to publish their findings in books, articles, and other formats to provide a comprehensive history of the MU.
1 of 21
Download to read offline
More Related Content
Mu230713
1. +
RESEARCHING The musicians¡¯ UNION: SOME initial
observations
Researching the Musicians¡¯ Union: Some Initial Observations
Martin Cloonan and John Williamson
MU Conference, Manchester
23rd July 2013
2. Introduction
? Background to the project
? Approach and Methods
? Some themes
? Outcomes
http:// www.muhistory.com
3. Project and Background
? ¡®full account of history of MU. . .¡¯
? ¡®ways in which the MU has influenced British music and
musicians¡¯
? ¡®an account of the changes in the career of the professional
musician in Britain¡¯
? ¡®role of the MU in influencing policies of institutions &
industries¡¯
http:// www.muhistory.com
4. Project and Background
? ¡®interviews with key current and former MU members,
activists, staff. . ¡®
? Dissemination of findings via collaboration with academic and
non-academic institutions
http:// www.muhistory.com
5. Origins
? Previous work on the music industries and history of live music
in the UK
? Domination of recording industry and post-1955 music
industries
? Importance of pre-1955 agreements that MU was party to &
? Importance of live music for working musicians
http:// www.muhistory.com
6. Origins
? MU¡¯s role understated or derided in pop music / jazz studies
? Awareness of MU archive - first access 2010; subsequent
article on jazz ¡°ban¡± written with Matt Brennan.
? Successful application to AHRC; John appointed to work full-
time on project
http:// www.muhistory.com
7. Methods and Approach / Starting Points
? Website: http://www.muhistory.com
? Outside of Union¡¯s archive little material about MU hsitory
? Official Histories: ES Teale (1929); Mike Jempson (1993)
? Labour and Music Histories: specific eras or aspects of MU¡¯s
work; musicians¡¯ unions in US and Australia written about in
more depth
http:// www.muhistory.com
8. Methods and Approach / Starting Points
? Frith: ¡°out of touch with the particular needs of rock
musicians¡± (1978: 162)
? Street: ¡°inspired by a desire to protect members, the MU¡¯s
policy appears as merely reactionary¡± (1986: 147)
? Media: assorted attacks on Union most famously in Melody
Maker, Sunday Times and various broadsheets circa 2001
http:// www.muhistory.com
9. Methods and Approach / Starting Points
? Sweeting: ¡°a left wing, doctrinaire organisation as secretive
and tight-lipped as the KGB¡± (The Guardian)
? Mendick: ¡°the glorious, unreconstructed ways of the
Musicians¡¯ Union, where you have a scenario that would make
Arthur Scargill weap with nostalgia¡± (The Independent)
? Out of touch? Bureaucratic? Protectionist? Extremist?
Reactionary?
http:// www.muhistory.com
10. Methods and Approach / Other Archives
? BBC Written Archives @ Caversham
? TUC Archive @ London Metropolitan University
? Orchestral Employers¡¯ Association @ University of York
? Henry Farmer Collection @ University of Glasgow
? FIM and AFM archives
http:// www.muhistory.com
11. Methods and Approach / Interviews
? Over a dozen interviews so far ¨C former elected and salaried
officials; branch / regional organisers; EC members; musicians,
DJs, record company personnel; more to follow . .
http:// www.muhistory.com
12. Methods and Approach / Steering Group
Matt Brennan (University of Edinburgh), Chris Burgess (People¡¯s
History Museum), Keith Gildart (University of Wolverhampton),
Penny King (freelance arts consultant), Tony Lucas (MU activist),
Robert Noakes (Neon Productions/ MU Exec Committee), Karl
McGee (University of Stirling), Mark Pemberton (Association of
British Orchestras), John Smith (Musicians¡¯ Union), Matt Stahl
(University of Western Ontario)
http:// www.muhistory.com
13. Themes
? Musicians as workers
? External relations
? Copyright
? Technology
? Gender, race, politics, genre, etc. etc.
http:// www.muhistory.com
14. Themes: Musicians as workers
? Musicians widely portrayed as artists, creators, entrepreneurs,
celebrities, stars.
? What is a musician? For the union this was a practical
consideration.
? ¡°Anyone following the profession of music¡±
? Those allowed to join; those forced to join & those who choose
to join
http:// www.muhistory.com
15. Themes: Musicians as workers
? Diversity of musical occupations - lives shaped by instruments
they play but also genres, spaces & ensembles they work in
? Implications for organisation: regionally; by occupation and by
genre
? Working conditions have implications for their organisation
within a Union
? Musicians as particular types of worker
http:// www.muhistory.com
16. Themes: Labour Markets
? Initial threat to employment from amateurs, police and
military bands, foreign musicians
? Amateurs ¨C undercutting; reminder of need for payment
? Military / Police ¨C historic threat / used at public events
? Foreign musicians ¨C lengthy resistance in all genres, came to a
head in jazz
? All reactions = protecting employment of its own members
http:// www.muhistory.com
17. Themes: New Technology
? The Talkies: mass unemployment, opposition, powerlessness
? (radio) broadcasting: cautious support for radio ¨C ¡°has not
reduced employment . .but increased it¡± (1925) ¨C agreements
with BBC
? Gramophone / Recording Industry: combination of control
and regulation; deals with PPL and BBC
? Union saw opportunities as well as threats
http:// www.muhistory.com
18. Themes: Changes in the Law
? Legislation that impacts on (e.g. trade union legislation) and is
instigated by the Union (e.g. copyright)
? Monopolies and Mergers Commission (1988), Broadcasting Act
(1990) had direct impact ¨C govt. opposition to ¡®restrictive
practices¡¯
? Lobbying on performers¡¯ rights throughout post-War period
? Alignment of interests, at different times with different
employers
http:// www.muhistory.com
19. Conclusions
? Archive has allowed us unique insight and to consider new
approaches to union & music industries¡¯ history
? Musicians as workers helps explain the union¡¯s position on a
number of historical issues
? MU is worthy of detailed study ¨C unique set of circumstances,
history and industrial relations
http:// www.muhistory.com
20. Outcomes
? So far . . Website, conference papers, articles
? Journal and magazine articles
? Book / Books
? Radio / TV programmes
? Conference, exhibition and gig ¨C Glasgow 2016
http:// www.muhistory.com