NANCY GENOVESE VS SOUTH HAMPTON NEW YORK
1 like880 views
The document appears to be a legal case filing that spans 39 pages. It includes a case number, filing date and party information but no other contextual details that would help summarize the key information or purpose of the filing are provided in the document.
1 of 41
Download to read offline
Ad
Recommended
ZapGo Letter of Intent
ZapGo Letter of IntentHindenburg Research
?
The document outlines the terms of a settlement agreement between two parties to resolve legal claims. It specifies that one party will pay the other a confidential amount, and in return both parties will release each other from any current or future claims related to the described issues. They agree the settlement is a compromise and not an admission of liability. The document is signed by representatives of both parties.Ex A: Nancy Genovese v Town of Southampton Complaint
Ex A: Nancy Genovese v Town of Southampton Complaintmurthalaw
?
The document appears to be a legal case filing that includes numerous pages of procedural documentation related to a civil lawsuit. It includes case numbers, document numbers, filing dates and page numbers but does not provide any descriptive details about the nature of the case or issues involved.Deported U.S. citizen Sues Feds For Unlawful Imprisonment
Deported U.S. citizen Sues Feds For Unlawful ImprisonmentBryan Johnson
?
This document is a filing related to case 1:16-cv-02199-dli-rlm, submitted on May 3, 2016. It spans 14 pages and includes details relevant to the case proceedings. The content specifics are not detailed in the provided text.Charlie white civil rights complaint
Charlie white civil rights complaintAbdul-Hakim Shabazz
?
The document appears to be a legal case filing that spans 65 pages. It includes a case number, filing date, and page numbers but no other discernible information. The document does not provide any details about the nature of the case, parties involved, or essential facts in dispute. It is a legal document but the summary cannot offer more context without reviewing its full contents.Victor Rivera lawsuit
Victor Rivera lawsuitHonolulu Civil Beat
?
The document appears to be a legal case filing that spans 29 pages. It includes a case number, filing date, and page numbers but does not provide any descriptive details about the nature of the case, parties involved, or central issues. As such, the document could not be meaningfully summarized due to the lack of essential information.Cleveland Police Report Regarding Tamela Eaton
Cleveland Police Report Regarding Tamela EatonDylan Hock
?
The document appears to be a court case filing that spans 24 pages. It includes headers indicating the case number, document number, and page numbers. However, the content of the filing is not provided, so the high level topic and essential details cannot be determined from the information given.Antkowiak number 2
Antkowiak number 2 Bryan Johnson
?
This document pertains to case number 2:85-cv-04544-dmg, specifically filing number 141-1. The filing includes a total of five pages, with each page identified by a unique page ID. The document was filed on April 24, 2015.Ex E: Deposition Transcript of Robert Carlock
Ex E: Deposition Transcript of Robert Carlockmurthalaw
?
The document appears to be a legal case filing that spans 37 pages. It includes a case number, document number, and date, but no other contextual information. It is difficult to summarize as it does not provide any clear topics, issues or conclusions in the limited text provided.Ex C1: Deposition of Nancy Genovese
Ex C1: Deposition of Nancy Genovesemurthalaw
?
The document appears to be a legal case filing that spans 54 pages. It includes a case number, document number, and date, but no other contextual information about the nature or purpose of the filing is provided in the excerpt. The filing seems to contain only procedural documentation with page numbers and no substantive legal arguments or details.Ex B: Nancy Genovese 50-h Transcript
Ex B: Nancy Genovese 50-h Transcriptmurthalaw
?
The document appears to be a legal case filing that includes 95 pages of procedural documentation related to a civil lawsuit. It includes a case number, document number, filing date and page numbers but no other contextual details that would help summarize the essential information or high-level purpose of the document.Ex D: Deposition of Southampton Police Lieutenant Robert Iberger
Ex D: Deposition of Southampton Police Lieutenant Robert Ibergermurthalaw
?
The document appears to be a legal case filing containing 98 pages. It includes a case number, document number, date, and page numbers but no other descriptive information. Therefore, the essential information and high-level summary is limited due to the lack of context provided in the document.Ex C2: Deposition of Nancy Genovese
Ex C2: Deposition of Nancy Genovesemurthalaw
?
The document appears to be a legal case filing that includes 98 numbered pages. It does not provide much contextual information on its own. The document details various case, document, and page identifiers, but no other summarizable content.Dowkin 2010 Complaint
Dowkin 2010 ComplaintHonolulu Civil Beat
?
The document appears to be a case filing with 55 pages that includes a case number, filing date, and page numbers but no other discernible information. There is no clear purpose, parties involved, or essential details provided in the document.COMPLAINT Daniel Parisi vs Larry Sinclair
COMPLAINT Daniel Parisi vs Larry SinclairVogelDenise
?
The document appears to be a legal case filing consisting of 18 numbered pages. It was filed on May 28, 2010 under case number 1:10-cv-00897-RJL. However, as the document only lists the page numbers and headers, it does not provide any other context or details about the nature of the case, parties involved, or claims.Oculus jury response
Oculus jury responseAnatol Alizar
?
The document appears to be a court filing related to a civil case. It consists of 90 pages of legal documentation including references to case numbers, parties involved, dates and page numbers. However, without more context around the specific nature and details of the case, it is difficult to provide a high-level summary of the essential information and issues in only 1-3 sentences from this legal document.Oculus Jury Response
Oculus Jury ResponseAnatoly Budko
?
This document is a court filing related to case 3:14-cv-01849-k, containing 90 pages. It was filed on February 1, 2017, but does not provide information about the content of the case or the specific details included in the filing. The pages are numbered sequentially, indicating it is a complete documentation of this particular filing.American society of media photographers, inc. et al. v. google inc.
American society of media photographers, inc. et al. v. google inc.Harrison Weber
?
The document appears to be a legal case filing consisting of 22 numbered pages. It was filed on April 7, 2010 in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. However, the document contains no other descriptive information, such as the names of parties involved or the nature of the case.CHARLES DYER WROTE THIS TO DEBORAH SWAN MARCH 2014
CHARLES DYER WROTE THIS TO DEBORAH SWAN MARCH 2014Deborah Swan
?
This letter is proof that the rumors and lies which have been told to Charles Dyer about Deborah Swan , while he has been in prison without the ability to verify anything are all lies. The very fact that Charles is comparing Deborah's dedication and efforts of her support that she previously was doing for Charles, Charles states that that Deborah is the only other person, other than his mom, who has ever fought hard for him. This clearly proves that Charles has started to see through the deception. The previous information that was given to Charles by his mother,the U. S. Observer, Ed Snook, and his mothers "trusted" militia leaders, that caused Charles to believe Deborah was doing things to hurt his case and his support, which was the complete opposite. This group has been the closest to Janet Dyer since the beginning. The so called "support group" have intentionally helped to spread disinformation to intentionally create a public hate and a hate between Charles and Deborah. Why would Janet Dyer want her son to hate Deborah? If you are Janet Dyer , and you have been working for 4 years with this group of so called Patriots, trying to work through the system, while trusting the system to give your son a fair and just chance to show his innocence, then in the end you loose? The group you have tr How would you deal with the fact that during the 4 years you were going through all this, that a woman named Deborah Swan was warning you about each and every stage of what was happening? Deborah would attempt to start a public support effort for Charles, and then this same group would start to publicly destroy this support efforts Deborah was trying to raise for Charles. While at the same time working directly with Charles by making videos, petitions, Facebook support pages, forensic evidence, making and recording phone call of the public officials including the people who Janet was trusting? Deborah was warning Janet about the events that were going to take place with the case , but Janet would only ignore and ridicule Deborah. The same group would begin lie and spread false information about the efforts of Deborah Swan, accusing Deborah of the exact behaviors that this group has been doing against Deborah for the entire 4 years! This is self evident when you begin to learn and verify the support efforts that Deborah did for Charles. All Deborah has ever done is what Charles wanted her to do. This group and Janet has never signed any of the 4 petitions that Deborah has attempted. This group tells the public supporters not to sign the petitions. When the public would witness Janet not respond or actually add too the lies and rumors about Deborah, this has created a lot of questions about the group that Janet has trusted all the way through. All anyone has to do is take a look at how hard Janet Dyer has defended this group, allowing this group to destroy every effort of support. Then in the end her son receives a 30 year conviction. Https _ecf.okwd.uscourts.gov_cgi-bin_show_temp.pl_file=1708178-0--893
Https _ecf.okwd.uscourts.gov_cgi-bin_show_temp.pl_file=1708178-0--893Deborah Swan
?
The document consists of jury instructions provided to jurors in the case of the United States v. Charles Alan Dyer, detailing their duties, the burden of proof, and the definitions of legal terms relevant to the trial. It charges Dyer with possessing an unregistered firearm, outlining the elements the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt for a guilty verdict, along with guidelines on evaluating evidence and witness credibility. The instructions emphasize the presumption of innocence and provide procedural rules for the jurors during their deliberation process.CHARLES DYER AKA JULY 4 PATRIOT FEDERAL CHARGE CRIMINAL JURY TRIAL
CHARLES DYER AKA JULY 4 PATRIOT FEDERAL CHARGE CRIMINAL JURY TRIALDeborah Swan
?
A criminal jury trial took place for the case United States v. Charles Alan Dyer on April 12, 2010, involving multiple witness testimonies from both the plaintiff and defendant. The jury rendered a verdict with mixed results, declaring the defendant not guilty on certain counts while a mistrial was declared on others. The court ordered the defendant to be released from custody and referred the case for further probation considerations.CHARLES DYER'S NOT GUILTY VERDICT FOR THE FEDERAL WEAPONS CHARGE!
CHARLES DYER'S NOT GUILTY VERDICT FOR THE FEDERAL WEAPONS CHARGE! Deborah Swan
?
This court document provides jury instructions for the trial of Charles Alan Dyer, who is charged with possession of an unregistered firearm, specifically a grenade launcher, in violation of federal law. The instructions outline the jurors' responsibilities, including the presumption of innocence, the burden of proof on the government, and guidance on evaluating evidence and witness credibility. Jurors are instructed to consider only the evidence presented in court and to reach a unanimous verdict based on the law and their deliberations.CHARLES DYER'S TRANSCRIPT OF HIS 2ND TRIAL HELD OF JANUARY 23, 2012.
CHARLES DYER'S TRANSCRIPT OF HIS 2ND TRIAL HELD OF JANUARY 23, 2012.Deborah Swan
?
This is the actual court transcript of Charles Dyer's 2nd trial. This is the conversation that took place within the judges chambers before the trials started. This conversation is between Judge Enos, the District Attorney Carrie Hicks, and Charles criminal defense attorney Albert Hoch. You will learn how Judge Enos withheld Charles witnesses and evidence that should be allowed into the trial. The main responsibility of a Judge during a "trial by jury" is to make sure ALL witnesses and evidence is presented during the trial by both sides. This is critical to protect the accused rights of his due process. When a judge holds back evidence or witnesses from being presented during a trial, this is a direct violation of due process and should be brought up in the appeal if the accused is convicted. This only purpose of an appeal is to correct any violations that occurred during the trial. This is how an innocent person wins on his appeal, is to show the appeal judges how the trial judge did not follow his rules of his court. The appeal judges are required by law to correct the errors of the judge (court). This is how convictions are reversed. When you review Charles Dyer's appeal he has turned in, he has not put any of his propositions against the Judge (court) This is why Charles Dyer's appeal has been denied. This is the critical information Deborah Swan was trying to share with Charles during the time he was preparing his appeal. Charles Dyer did not listen to the information and drafted his entire appeal around his attorney for "ineffective assistance off council" and "prosecutorial misconduct." These are issues that should be handled during the actual trial and pre trial, when the prosecutor violates and does not follow his rules of his position. This is critical for the appeal process. The ONLY issues that are allowed to be ruled (corrected) by the appeal judges, are the issues that were put on "record" during trial and pre trials.If there is not any actual record made pre trial and during the actual trial, then you cannot bring it in on an appeal. The appeal judges are not allowed to correct any proposition in an appeal, unless there is an actual record that was preserved. This is why is critical for an attorney to OBJECT to all violations that occur during the trial. This is how you preserve and create a record to use if the innocent is convicted. This is why Charles Dyer's attorney Albert Hoch made ZERO objections during his trial. If Albert Hoch would of objected to the violations that were happening during the trial, then Charles appeal he turned in would of been accepted.20121001160133408
20121001160133408Deborah Swan
?
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for both physical and mental health. It notes that regular exercise can reduce the risk of diseases like heart disease and diabetes, improve mood, and reduce feelings of stress and anxiety. The document recommends that adults get at least 150 minutes of moderate exercise or 75 minutes of vigorous exercise per week to gain these benefits.FBI LAUNCHED NATIONWIDE MANHUNT FOR CHARLES DYER
FBI LAUNCHED NATIONWIDE MANHUNT FOR CHARLES DYER Deborah Swan
?
The manhunt for fugitive Charles Allan Dyer, who has been missing since August 15 after failing to appear for a trial on charges of child sexual abuse, has expanded to include southern Texas state parks. Investigators have received reports of Dyer asking for rides in the Wallis area and are actively searching near Texas 36 and railroad tracks. Dyer, who is believed to be armed and has ties to the militia movement, is under a federal warrant for unlawful flight to avoid prosecution, prompting increased caution from law enforcement.List of Evidence given to Ed Snook when Deborah Swan first hired him.
List of Evidence given to Ed Snook when Deborah Swan first hired him.Deborah Swan
?
This document contains a list of evidence that Swan gave to Snook related to the case of Charles Dyer, including DNA reports, video logs, timelines, recorded conversations, photographs, affidavits, draft complaints, and copies of correspondence. The list contains over 40 individual pieces of evidence documenting Dyer's interactions with law enforcement and accusations made against Swan by a "support team".More Related Content
Similar to NANCY GENOVESE VS SOUTH HAMPTON NEW YORK (10)
Ex E: Deposition Transcript of Robert Carlock
Ex E: Deposition Transcript of Robert Carlockmurthalaw
?
The document appears to be a legal case filing that spans 37 pages. It includes a case number, document number, and date, but no other contextual information. It is difficult to summarize as it does not provide any clear topics, issues or conclusions in the limited text provided.Ex C1: Deposition of Nancy Genovese
Ex C1: Deposition of Nancy Genovesemurthalaw
?
The document appears to be a legal case filing that spans 54 pages. It includes a case number, document number, and date, but no other contextual information about the nature or purpose of the filing is provided in the excerpt. The filing seems to contain only procedural documentation with page numbers and no substantive legal arguments or details.Ex B: Nancy Genovese 50-h Transcript
Ex B: Nancy Genovese 50-h Transcriptmurthalaw
?
The document appears to be a legal case filing that includes 95 pages of procedural documentation related to a civil lawsuit. It includes a case number, document number, filing date and page numbers but no other contextual details that would help summarize the essential information or high-level purpose of the document.Ex D: Deposition of Southampton Police Lieutenant Robert Iberger
Ex D: Deposition of Southampton Police Lieutenant Robert Ibergermurthalaw
?
The document appears to be a legal case filing containing 98 pages. It includes a case number, document number, date, and page numbers but no other descriptive information. Therefore, the essential information and high-level summary is limited due to the lack of context provided in the document.Ex C2: Deposition of Nancy Genovese
Ex C2: Deposition of Nancy Genovesemurthalaw
?
The document appears to be a legal case filing that includes 98 numbered pages. It does not provide much contextual information on its own. The document details various case, document, and page identifiers, but no other summarizable content.Dowkin 2010 Complaint
Dowkin 2010 ComplaintHonolulu Civil Beat
?
The document appears to be a case filing with 55 pages that includes a case number, filing date, and page numbers but no other discernible information. There is no clear purpose, parties involved, or essential details provided in the document.COMPLAINT Daniel Parisi vs Larry Sinclair
COMPLAINT Daniel Parisi vs Larry SinclairVogelDenise
?
The document appears to be a legal case filing consisting of 18 numbered pages. It was filed on May 28, 2010 under case number 1:10-cv-00897-RJL. However, as the document only lists the page numbers and headers, it does not provide any other context or details about the nature of the case, parties involved, or claims.Oculus jury response
Oculus jury responseAnatol Alizar
?
The document appears to be a court filing related to a civil case. It consists of 90 pages of legal documentation including references to case numbers, parties involved, dates and page numbers. However, without more context around the specific nature and details of the case, it is difficult to provide a high-level summary of the essential information and issues in only 1-3 sentences from this legal document.Oculus Jury Response
Oculus Jury ResponseAnatoly Budko
?
This document is a court filing related to case 3:14-cv-01849-k, containing 90 pages. It was filed on February 1, 2017, but does not provide information about the content of the case or the specific details included in the filing. The pages are numbered sequentially, indicating it is a complete documentation of this particular filing.American society of media photographers, inc. et al. v. google inc.
American society of media photographers, inc. et al. v. google inc.Harrison Weber
?
The document appears to be a legal case filing consisting of 22 numbered pages. It was filed on April 7, 2010 in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. However, the document contains no other descriptive information, such as the names of parties involved or the nature of the case.More from Deborah Swan (15)
CHARLES DYER WROTE THIS TO DEBORAH SWAN MARCH 2014
CHARLES DYER WROTE THIS TO DEBORAH SWAN MARCH 2014Deborah Swan
?
This letter is proof that the rumors and lies which have been told to Charles Dyer about Deborah Swan , while he has been in prison without the ability to verify anything are all lies. The very fact that Charles is comparing Deborah's dedication and efforts of her support that she previously was doing for Charles, Charles states that that Deborah is the only other person, other than his mom, who has ever fought hard for him. This clearly proves that Charles has started to see through the deception. The previous information that was given to Charles by his mother,the U. S. Observer, Ed Snook, and his mothers "trusted" militia leaders, that caused Charles to believe Deborah was doing things to hurt his case and his support, which was the complete opposite. This group has been the closest to Janet Dyer since the beginning. The so called "support group" have intentionally helped to spread disinformation to intentionally create a public hate and a hate between Charles and Deborah. Why would Janet Dyer want her son to hate Deborah? If you are Janet Dyer , and you have been working for 4 years with this group of so called Patriots, trying to work through the system, while trusting the system to give your son a fair and just chance to show his innocence, then in the end you loose? The group you have tr How would you deal with the fact that during the 4 years you were going through all this, that a woman named Deborah Swan was warning you about each and every stage of what was happening? Deborah would attempt to start a public support effort for Charles, and then this same group would start to publicly destroy this support efforts Deborah was trying to raise for Charles. While at the same time working directly with Charles by making videos, petitions, Facebook support pages, forensic evidence, making and recording phone call of the public officials including the people who Janet was trusting? Deborah was warning Janet about the events that were going to take place with the case , but Janet would only ignore and ridicule Deborah. The same group would begin lie and spread false information about the efforts of Deborah Swan, accusing Deborah of the exact behaviors that this group has been doing against Deborah for the entire 4 years! This is self evident when you begin to learn and verify the support efforts that Deborah did for Charles. All Deborah has ever done is what Charles wanted her to do. This group and Janet has never signed any of the 4 petitions that Deborah has attempted. This group tells the public supporters not to sign the petitions. When the public would witness Janet not respond or actually add too the lies and rumors about Deborah, this has created a lot of questions about the group that Janet has trusted all the way through. All anyone has to do is take a look at how hard Janet Dyer has defended this group, allowing this group to destroy every effort of support. Then in the end her son receives a 30 year conviction. Https _ecf.okwd.uscourts.gov_cgi-bin_show_temp.pl_file=1708178-0--893
Https _ecf.okwd.uscourts.gov_cgi-bin_show_temp.pl_file=1708178-0--893Deborah Swan
?
The document consists of jury instructions provided to jurors in the case of the United States v. Charles Alan Dyer, detailing their duties, the burden of proof, and the definitions of legal terms relevant to the trial. It charges Dyer with possessing an unregistered firearm, outlining the elements the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt for a guilty verdict, along with guidelines on evaluating evidence and witness credibility. The instructions emphasize the presumption of innocence and provide procedural rules for the jurors during their deliberation process.CHARLES DYER AKA JULY 4 PATRIOT FEDERAL CHARGE CRIMINAL JURY TRIAL
CHARLES DYER AKA JULY 4 PATRIOT FEDERAL CHARGE CRIMINAL JURY TRIALDeborah Swan
?
A criminal jury trial took place for the case United States v. Charles Alan Dyer on April 12, 2010, involving multiple witness testimonies from both the plaintiff and defendant. The jury rendered a verdict with mixed results, declaring the defendant not guilty on certain counts while a mistrial was declared on others. The court ordered the defendant to be released from custody and referred the case for further probation considerations.CHARLES DYER'S NOT GUILTY VERDICT FOR THE FEDERAL WEAPONS CHARGE!
CHARLES DYER'S NOT GUILTY VERDICT FOR THE FEDERAL WEAPONS CHARGE! Deborah Swan
?
This court document provides jury instructions for the trial of Charles Alan Dyer, who is charged with possession of an unregistered firearm, specifically a grenade launcher, in violation of federal law. The instructions outline the jurors' responsibilities, including the presumption of innocence, the burden of proof on the government, and guidance on evaluating evidence and witness credibility. Jurors are instructed to consider only the evidence presented in court and to reach a unanimous verdict based on the law and their deliberations.CHARLES DYER'S TRANSCRIPT OF HIS 2ND TRIAL HELD OF JANUARY 23, 2012.
CHARLES DYER'S TRANSCRIPT OF HIS 2ND TRIAL HELD OF JANUARY 23, 2012.Deborah Swan
?
This is the actual court transcript of Charles Dyer's 2nd trial. This is the conversation that took place within the judges chambers before the trials started. This conversation is between Judge Enos, the District Attorney Carrie Hicks, and Charles criminal defense attorney Albert Hoch. You will learn how Judge Enos withheld Charles witnesses and evidence that should be allowed into the trial. The main responsibility of a Judge during a "trial by jury" is to make sure ALL witnesses and evidence is presented during the trial by both sides. This is critical to protect the accused rights of his due process. When a judge holds back evidence or witnesses from being presented during a trial, this is a direct violation of due process and should be brought up in the appeal if the accused is convicted. This only purpose of an appeal is to correct any violations that occurred during the trial. This is how an innocent person wins on his appeal, is to show the appeal judges how the trial judge did not follow his rules of his court. The appeal judges are required by law to correct the errors of the judge (court). This is how convictions are reversed. When you review Charles Dyer's appeal he has turned in, he has not put any of his propositions against the Judge (court) This is why Charles Dyer's appeal has been denied. This is the critical information Deborah Swan was trying to share with Charles during the time he was preparing his appeal. Charles Dyer did not listen to the information and drafted his entire appeal around his attorney for "ineffective assistance off council" and "prosecutorial misconduct." These are issues that should be handled during the actual trial and pre trial, when the prosecutor violates and does not follow his rules of his position. This is critical for the appeal process. The ONLY issues that are allowed to be ruled (corrected) by the appeal judges, are the issues that were put on "record" during trial and pre trials.If there is not any actual record made pre trial and during the actual trial, then you cannot bring it in on an appeal. The appeal judges are not allowed to correct any proposition in an appeal, unless there is an actual record that was preserved. This is why is critical for an attorney to OBJECT to all violations that occur during the trial. This is how you preserve and create a record to use if the innocent is convicted. This is why Charles Dyer's attorney Albert Hoch made ZERO objections during his trial. If Albert Hoch would of objected to the violations that were happening during the trial, then Charles appeal he turned in would of been accepted.20121001160133408
20121001160133408Deborah Swan
?
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for both physical and mental health. It notes that regular exercise can reduce the risk of diseases like heart disease and diabetes, improve mood, and reduce feelings of stress and anxiety. The document recommends that adults get at least 150 minutes of moderate exercise or 75 minutes of vigorous exercise per week to gain these benefits.FBI LAUNCHED NATIONWIDE MANHUNT FOR CHARLES DYER
FBI LAUNCHED NATIONWIDE MANHUNT FOR CHARLES DYER Deborah Swan
?
The manhunt for fugitive Charles Allan Dyer, who has been missing since August 15 after failing to appear for a trial on charges of child sexual abuse, has expanded to include southern Texas state parks. Investigators have received reports of Dyer asking for rides in the Wallis area and are actively searching near Texas 36 and railroad tracks. Dyer, who is believed to be armed and has ties to the militia movement, is under a federal warrant for unlawful flight to avoid prosecution, prompting increased caution from law enforcement.List of Evidence given to Ed Snook when Deborah Swan first hired him.
List of Evidence given to Ed Snook when Deborah Swan first hired him.Deborah Swan
?
This document contains a list of evidence that Swan gave to Snook related to the case of Charles Dyer, including DNA reports, video logs, timelines, recorded conversations, photographs, affidavits, draft complaints, and copies of correspondence. The list contains over 40 individual pieces of evidence documenting Dyer's interactions with law enforcement and accusations made against Swan by a "support team".Ed Snook with the US Observer threatens to put a Deborah Swan in prison becau...
Ed Snook with the US Observer threatens to put a Deborah Swan in prison becau...Deborah Swan
?
The document details a conversation between Clay and Ed regarding Deborah Swan and her involvement in a legal case. They express distrust towards her actions, suggesting she may be working with federal authorities and harming the interests of others, specifically Charles Dyer. They recount various interactions with Swan, expressing frustration over her attempts to manipulate situations and her alleged financial exploitation of others.Jan Dyer's (mother of Charles Dyer) Demand Letter to stop defaming Deborah ...
Jan Dyer's (mother of Charles Dyer) Demand Letter to stop defaming Deborah ...Deborah Swan
?
The document is a cease and desist letter directed at Mrs. Dyer, demanding the immediate cessation of defamatory statements about Deborah Kay Swan. It outlines various false accusations and insists that further defamation will result in legal action for monetary damages and equitable relief. The letter accuses Dyer of spreading harmful rumors and emphasizes the legal ramifications of her actions under Oklahoma law.ED SNOOK WHO OWN US OBSERVER HAS SPREADS LIES AND SLANDER
ED SNOOK WHO OWN US OBSERVER HAS SPREADS LIES AND SLANDER Deborah Swan
?
Deborah Swan alleges that an article and radio show published by Ed Snook contain false and defamatory statements about her, harming her reputation and safety as a public figure associated with Charles Dyer. She demands a retraction and public apology, presenting multiple examples of what she claims are lies damaging her character and public perception. Swan asserts that the statements made against her are baseless and intended to incite public distrust and hatred towards her.Ad
Recently uploaded (20)
最新版意大利卡梅里诺大学毕业证（鲍狈滨颁础惭毕业证书）原版定制
最新版意大利卡梅里诺大学毕业证（鲍狈滨颁础惭毕业证书）原版定制taqyea
?
2025原版卡梅里诺大学毕业证书pdf电子版【q薇1954292140】意大利毕业证办理UNICAM卡梅里诺大学毕业证书多少钱？【q薇1954292140】海外各大学Diploma版本，因为疫情学校推迟发放证书、证书原件丢失补办、没有正常毕业未能认证学历面临就业提供解决办法。当遭遇挂科、旷课导致无法修满学分，或者直接被学校退学，最后无法毕业拿不到毕业证。此时的你一定手足无措，因为留学一场，没有获得毕业证以及学历证明肯定是无法给自己和父母一个交代的。
【复刻卡梅里诺大学成绩单信封,Buy Università degli Studi di CAMERINO Transcripts】
购买日韩成绩单、英国大学成绩单、美国大学成绩单、澳洲大学成绩单、加拿大大学成绩单（q微1954292140）新加坡大学成绩单、新西兰大学成绩单、爱尔兰成绩单、西班牙成绩单、德国成绩单。成绩单的意义主要体现在证明学习能力、评估学术背景、展示综合素质、提高录取率，以及是作为留信认证申请材料的一部分。
卡梅里诺大学成绩单能够体现您的的学习能力，包括卡梅里诺大学课程成绩、专业能力、研究能力。（q微1954292140）具体来说，成绩报告单通常包含学生的学习技能与习惯、各科成绩以及老师评语等部分，因此，成绩单不仅是学生学术能力的证明，也是评估学生是否适合某个教育项目的重要依据！
我们承诺采用的是学校原版纸张（原版纸质、底色、纹路）我们工厂拥有全套进口原装设备，特殊工艺都是采用不同机器制作，仿真度基本可以达到100%，所有成品以及工艺效果都可提前给客户展示，不满意可以根据客户要求进行调整，直到满意为止！
【主营项目】
一、工作未确定，回国需先给父母、亲戚朋友看下文凭的情况，办理毕业证|办理文凭: 买大学毕业证|买大学文凭【q薇1954292140】卡梅里诺大学学位证明书如何办理申请？
二、回国进私企、外企、自己做生意的情况，这些单位是不查询毕业证真伪的，而且国内没有渠道去查询国外文凭的真假，也不需要提供真实教育部认证。鉴于此，办理意大利成绩单卡梅里诺大学毕业证【q薇1954292140】国外大学毕业证, 文凭办理, 国外文凭办理, 留信网认证The Best Criminal Defense Attorneys in Los Angeles for Misdemeanors and Felonies
The Best Criminal Defense Attorneys in Los Angeles for Misdemeanors and FeloniesChesley Lawyer
?
The Best Criminal Defense Attorneys in Los Angeles for Misdemeanors and FeloniesMens Rea & Actus Reus in Criminal Law.pptx
Mens Rea & Actus Reus in Criminal Law.pptxBarrister Amna (A Levels Academy Islamabad)
?
The Concept of Mens Rea and Actus Reus in Criminal Law:
In criminal law, two basic elements must be present for a person to be found guilty of a crime: Mens Rea and Actus Reus. These are Latin terms where Actus Reus means “guilty act” and Mens Rea means “guilty mind.” Both are essential for most criminal offences. A crime is generally not complete unless a person commits a wrongful act (Actus Reus) with a wrongful intention (Mens Rea).
Actus Reus refers to the physical act of the crime. It is the external action or conduct that is prohibited by law, such as killing, stealing, or hurting someone. For example, if a person hits another person with a stick, the physical act of hitting is the Actus Reus. This act must be voluntary; if the person was forced or acted unconsciously, then it may not be considered a crime. Actus Reus can also include omissions. In some cases, not doing something can be considered a criminal act if the law says there was a duty to act. For example, a parent not feeding their child could be an omission that causes harm, and thus a criminal act.
Mens Rea, on the other hand, is about the mental state of the accused. It refers to the intention or knowledge of wrongdoing. In simple words, it asks the question: Did the person mean to do wrong? If yes, they had Mens Rea. There are different levels of Mens Rea. The most serious is intention, where the person wanted the outcome to happen. Then comes knowledge, where they knew their actions were illegal or harmful. Recklessness involves knowing a risk but choosing to ignore it, and negligence means failing to take reasonable care, which results in harm.
For a crime to be legally proven, the accused must have both Actus Reus and Mens Rea at the same time. For example, if someone plans to kill another person and then actually kills them, both the guilty mind and guilty act are present. But if a person accidentally harms someone without bad intention, the Mens Rea may be missing, and the case may not qualify as a serious crime like murder.
There are some exceptions. In certain minor offences called strict liability offences, Mens Rea is not required. Just doing the act is enough for punishment. These usually relate to traffic rules, public safety, or health regulations.
In conclusion, Mens Rea and Actus Reus are two key elements in criminal law. One is the action, and the other is the intention. Both are usually required to establish criminal responsibility. Without proving both, the accused cannot be fairly punished under the law. This combination ensures that people are only held guilty when they have both done something wrong and meant to do it.Flat Fee vs. Hourly Billing: Comparison Tool for Law Firms
Flat Fee vs. Hourly Billing: Comparison Tool for Law FirmsAccurate Legal Billing
?
Flat Fee vs. Hourly Billing: Compare legal billing models to boost revenue, client trust & efficiency. Ideal guide for modern law firms.Court Hearing Kurchinski vs Kouskoutis.pdf
Court Hearing Kurchinski vs Kouskoutis.pdfVOLUNT?RIA CAUSA SOCIAL
?
I am Alessandra Kurchinski, the surviving spouse of Franklin Kurchinski and one of the beneficiaries of his Estate and Trust, along with my daughters, Jacqueline and Caroline. On October 26, 2023, I participated in a court hearing before Special Master Robert Persante regarding the trust and estate litigation involving attorney Michael Kouskoutis and my sister-in-law, Nancy Gorby, who was appointed as the Personal Representative and Successor Trustee.
This hearing, and everything leading up to it, has been one of the most emotionally and legally painful experiences of my life. I was simply trying to understand what happened to my husband's estate and make sure that our rights were respected. Instead, I was met with silence, avoidance, high legal bills, and a legal system that felt stacked against me.
I tried many times to communicate directly with Nancy. I even invited her to the bank with me to resolve things in person. She refused to come. I was told by Mr. Kouskoutis not to contact her directly, which meant every communication had to go through lawyers—raising legal costs unnecessarily. That was never what Franklin wanted.
Before we got married, Franklin and I signed a prenuptial agreement saying each of us would own 50% of everything. I never filed a lawsuit to undo the trust—I respected his estate plan—but I wanted the prenup to be followed. Instead, the court treated me like I was trying to invalidate the trust, which was not true. I just wanted the assets fairly divided according to our contract.
I asked for a reimbursement of family expenses. Instead of honoring that request, they filed a legal petition for a "family allowance" without my approval—just to bill more fees.
The legal team filed important documents like fee motions and billing logs the day before the hearing. I had no time to read or respond. I was representing myself and had no attorney. This has happened more than once. It felt like a tactic to keep me confused and unprepared.
Summary of What I Faced (2022–2025)
Nancy and her lawyer took my husband’s original wills from me and never returned them.
I filed multiple police reports about missing documents and financial mismanagement.
I was trespassed from the lawyer’s office after asking for my husband’s documents.
I was Baker Acted and humiliated in front of my daughters and neighbors.
While I was hospitalized, my home was entered without consent.
They filed civil litigation against me and my daughters using trust funds.
They filed excessive and unexplained legal fees and charged for every step.
They ignored the prenup, cut me off from information, and tried to isolate me.
I am a grieving widow, a mother, and a woman trying to protect what’s rightfully mine and my daughters’.
I only want justice, transparency, and for the Trust and Estate to follow what Franklin and I agreed on. I want this to end, so we can heal and move forward.K Royal, JD, PhD for Top Cyber News MAGAZINE May 2025
K Royal, JD, PhD for Top Cyber News MAGAZINE May 2025Dr. Ludmila Morozova-Buss
?
The Lex Lumina of Privacy Law
Who claimed beauty, brains, and heart don't belong together with cybersecurity and law?
The Grace and the Law. The Charisma and the Leadership. The Privacy and the Influence. Meet the pageant queen who masters the world stage in law, cybersecurity, and pageants - currently holding the title of South Carolina Classic Universe Woman... Not just a title of beauty, but a symbol of brilliance.
In a world awash with data - where surveillance shadows every click and compliance guides every move - a new light has risen: the Lex Lumina, the luminous spirit of privacy law. She knows no borders yet shapes global governance. She is passionate, authentic and vibrant in the boardroom and the battlefields of public trust.
Her name? …K Royal, JD, PhD
She moves with the grace of justice - not cloaked in robes, but in clarity. Her presence is found in firm governance and the gentle nudge of ethical innovation. Her charisma is not loud – it is magnetic, drawing the best minds in law, policy, and purpose into her orbit.
In the May edition, we invite you to step into her presence and witness her story. Privacy is not a checkbox. It is a force. A protector of dignity. A strategic compass in an uncertain digital age. This month, you are not a spectator. You are the voice she defends. The future she empowers. The decision-maker she enlightens.
Step into the radiance of Lex Lumina. Experience the fusion of privacy, leadership, and law - like never before!
'Privacy is the Right. Data Privacy Law is how we Protect that Right in the Digital Age.’ ~ K Royal, JD, PhD
Kathleen Campbell Davis - The Stages of Civil Litigation
Kathleen Campbell Davis - The Stages of Civil LitigationKathleen Campbell Davis
?
Civil litigation refers to a series of legal processes that seek to resolve disputes between individuals, organizations, and businesses. Unlike criminal litigation, which often involves the state and a private entity, civil litigation primarily involves private entities seeking redress or remedies for specific performance or financial compensation. It consists of stages, such as pre-filing and evidence gathering.英国成绩单范本利物浦大学成绩单复刻鲍翱尝尝别迟迟别谤2025年新版
英国成绩单范本利物浦大学成绩单复刻鲍翱尝尝别迟迟别谤2025年新版taqyed
?
鉴于此，办理UOL大学毕业证利物浦大学毕业证书【q薇1954292140】留学一站式办理学历文凭直通车（利物浦大学毕业证UOL成绩单原版利物浦大学学位证假文凭）未能正常毕业？【q薇1954292140】办理利物浦大学毕业证成绩单/留信学历认证/学历文凭/使馆认证/留学回国人员证明/录取通知书/Offer/在读证明/成绩单/网上存档永久可查！
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
【办理利物浦大学成绩单Buy University of Liverpool Transcripts】
购买日韩成绩单、英国大学成绩单、美国大学成绩单、澳洲大学成绩单、加拿大大学成绩单（q微1954292140）新加坡大学成绩单、新西兰大学成绩单、爱尔兰成绩单、西班牙成绩单、德国成绩单。成绩单的意义主要体现在证明学习能力、评估学术背景、展示综合素质、提高录取率，以及是作为留信认证申请材料的一部分。
利物浦大学成绩单能够体现您的的学习能力，包括利物浦大学课程成绩、专业能力、研究能力。（q微1954292140）具体来说，成绩报告单通常包含学生的学习技能与习惯、各科成绩以及老师评语等部分，因此，成绩单不仅是学生学术能力的证明，也是评估学生是否适合某个教育项目的重要依据！Termination of Employment - presentation under construction
Termination of Employment - presentation under constructionNatan Elkin
?
Presentation under constructionInter-faith-couple-BAIL-order19-may-2025-604173.pdf
Inter-faith-couple-BAIL-order19-may-2025-604173.pdfsabranghindi
?
Supreme Court viewed the matter through the lens of personal liberty and marital autonomy, reiterating that the right of adult individuals to live together cannot be curtailed by the state on the ground of religious difference.最新版美国犹他大学毕业证（U of U毕业证书）原版定制
最新版美国犹他大学毕业证（U of U毕业证书）原版定制Taqyea
?
2025原版犹他大学毕业证书pdf电子版【q薇1954292140】美国毕业证办理U of U犹他大学毕业证书多少钱？【q薇1954292140】海外各大学Diploma版本，因为疫情学校推迟发放证书、证书原件丢失补办、没有正常毕业未能认证学历面临就业提供解决办法。当遭遇挂科、旷课导致无法修满学分，或者直接被学校退学，最后无法毕业拿不到毕业证。此时的你一定手足无措，因为留学一场，没有获得毕业证以及学历证明肯定是无法给自己和父母一个交代的。
【复刻犹他大学成绩单信封,Buy The University of Utah Transcripts】
购买日韩成绩单、英国大学成绩单、美国大学成绩单、澳洲大学成绩单、加拿大大学成绩单（q微1954292140）新加坡大学成绩单、新西兰大学成绩单、爱尔兰成绩单、西班牙成绩单、德国成绩单。成绩单的意义主要体现在证明学习能力、评估学术背景、展示综合素质、提高录取率，以及是作为留信认证申请材料的一部分。
犹他大学成绩单能够体现您的的学习能力，包括犹他大学课程成绩、专业能力、研究能力。（q微1954292140）具体来说，成绩报告单通常包含学生的学习技能与习惯、各科成绩以及老师评语等部分，因此，成绩单不仅是学生学术能力的证明，也是评估学生是否适合某个教育项目的重要依据！
我们承诺采用的是学校原版纸张（原版纸质、底色、纹路）我们工厂拥有全套进口原装设备，特殊工艺都是采用不同机器制作，仿真度基本可以达到100%，所有成品以及工艺效果都可提前给客户展示，不满意可以根据客户要求进行调整，直到满意为止！
【主营项目】
一、工作未确定，回国需先给父母、亲戚朋友看下文凭的情况，办理毕业证|办理文凭: 买大学毕业证|买大学文凭【q薇1954292140】犹他大学学位证明书如何办理申请？
二、回国进私企、外企、自己做生意的情况，这些单位是不查询毕业证真伪的，而且国内没有渠道去查询国外文凭的真假，也不需要提供真实教育部认证。鉴于此，办理美国成绩单犹他大学毕业证【q薇1954292140】国外大学毕业证, 文凭办理, 国外文凭办理, 留信网认证89th Legislative Session Debrief: Panel Discussion
89th Legislative Session Debrief: Panel Discussiontagdpa
?
This document provides an overview of the 89th Legislative Session, highlighting key outcomes and their implications for the water sector.INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE AND LEGISLATION CONCERNING SETTLEMENT OF INDUSTRIAL DISPUT...
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE AND LEGISLATION CONCERNING SETTLEMENT OF INDUSTRIAL DISPUT...apoorvexe
?
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE AND LEGISLATION CONCERNING SETTLEMENT OF INDUSTRIAL DISPUTESKairos Legal Advisors_Founders Capital Raising Packages.pdf
Kairos Legal Advisors_Founders Capital Raising Packages.pdfKairos Capital Legal Advisors,LLC
?
Last updated 6/17/25Official Biography, Headshot and Speaking Vita for Ms. Dar'shun Kendrick
Official Biography, Headshot and Speaking Vita for Ms. Dar'shun KendrickKairos Capital Legal Advisors,LLC
?
Official biography, headshot and vita for Ms. Dar'shun Kendrick.
Frequently Asked Questions Michigan Truck Accident
Frequently Asked Questions Michigan Truck Accidentbryan347388
?
Got questions after a truck accident in Michigan? This FAQ presentation breaks down what you need to know — from your legal options to dealing with insurance — all in simple, straightforward terms.Official Biography, Headshot and Speaking Vita for Ms. Dar'shun Kendrick
Official Biography, Headshot and Speaking Vita for Ms. Dar'shun KendrickKairos Capital Legal Advisors,LLC
?
Ad
NANCY GENOVESE VS SOUTH HAMPTON NEW YORK
- 1. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 1 of 39 PageID #: 1
- 2. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 2 of 39 PageID #: 2
- 3. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 3 of 39 PageID #: 3
- 4. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 4 of 39 PageID #: 4
- 5. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 5 of 39 PageID #: 5
- 6. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 6 of 39 PageID #: 6
- 7. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 7 of 39 PageID #: 7
- 8. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 8 of 39 PageID #: 8
- 9. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 9 of 39 PageID #: 9
- 10. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 10 of 39 PageID #: 10
- 11. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 11 of 39 PageID #: 11
- 12. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 12 of 39 PageID #: 12
- 13. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 13 of 39 PageID #: 13
- 14. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 14 of 39 PageID #: 14
- 15. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 15 of 39 PageID #: 15
- 16. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 16 of 39 PageID #: 16
- 17. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 17 of 39 PageID #: 17
- 18. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 18 of 39 PageID #: 18
- 19. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 19 of 39 PageID #: 19
- 20. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 20 of 39 PageID #: 20
- 21. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 21 of 39 PageID #: 21
- 22. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 22 of 39 PageID #: 22
- 23. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 23 of 39 PageID #: 23
- 24. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 24 of 39 PageID #: 24
- 25. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 25 of 39 PageID #: 25
- 26. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 26 of 39 PageID #: 26
- 27. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 27 of 39 PageID #: 27
- 28. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 28 of 39 PageID #: 28
- 29. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 29 of 39 PageID #: 29
- 30. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 30 of 39 PageID #: 30
- 31. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 31 of 39 PageID #: 31
- 32. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 32 of 39 PageID #: 32
- 33. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 33 of 39 PageID #: 33
- 34. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 34 of 39 PageID #: 34
- 35. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 35 of 39 PageID #: 35
- 36. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 36 of 39 PageID #: 36
- 37. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 37 of 39 PageID #: 37
- 38. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 38 of 39 PageID #: 38
- 39. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 39 of 39 PageID #: 39
- 40. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1-2 Filed 07/29/10 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 40
- 41. Case 2:10-cv-03470-JFB-AKT Document 1-2 Filed 07/29/10 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 41