ºÝºÝߣ

ºÝºÝߣShare a Scribd company logo
Ocean Acidification:	
 ?
What it is, and why it matters¡­	
 ?
	
 ?

Meg Chadsey
December 3, 2013
New meg chadsey northwest school presentation with credits dec27
Image	
 ?courtesy	
 ?of	
 ?Jack	
 ?Cook,	
 ?
Woods	
 ?Hole	
 ?Oceanographic	
 ?Ins<tute	
 ?
What is Ocean Acidification?
Climate change

CO2

(Carbon Dioxide)

The ocean absorbs ~25% of
carbon dioxide we¡¯re pumping
into the atmosphere.

Ocean acidification

Sarah	
 ?Cooley,	
 ?Woods	
 ?Hole	
 ?Oceanographic	
 ?Ins<tute	
 ?
The pH Scale

??H2O	
 ? +	
 ?CO2	
 ? ¨¤?	
 ?H2C03	
 ?
Seawater	
 ?
Carbonic	
 ?
Acid	
 ?

Source:	
 ?Dr.	
 ?Simone	
 ?Alin,	
 ?NOAA	
 ?PMEL	
 ?
h>p://www.pmel.noaa.gov/co2/story/A+primer+on+pH	
 ?
Washington is Particularly Vulnerable
to Acidification
Appearing decades sooner than
anticipated.
Regional factors exacerbating
the problem:
Upwelling along the coast¨¤?
Excess nutrients¨¤?blooms
Decay of organic material
Acidifying gasses (NOX and SOX)
Washington	
 ?Coast	
 ?photo:	
 ?Russ	
 ?McMillan	
 ?
Ocean Acidification means¡­..
less calcium carbonate for building shells
Pteropods, or ¡®sea butterflies¡¯

are dissolving¡­
Normal pteropod shell

Corroded pteropod shell in acidic seawater

Live	
 ?pteropod	
 ?image:	
 ?Dr.	
 ?Russ	
 ?HopcroI,	
 ?UofA	
 ?Fairbanks;	
 ?Shell	
 ?images:	
 ?Dr.	
 ?Nina	
 ?Bednarsek,	
 ?NOAA	
 ?PMEL	
 ?
Also vulnerable to OA¡­

Ecosystems

Fish
Food

People Food
Potential Food Web Impacts
Paci?c	
 ?Salmon	
 ?

Coccolithophores	
 ?

Pteropods	
 ?

Copepods	
 ?
U.S. Commercial Fisheries
Affected by Ocean Acidification
Primary fishery revenue ~ $4 billion/year*
*2007 U.S. domestic ex-vessel revenue (USD)

Mollusks
(shellfish)

5%
10%

About half comes
from calcifiers
(mollusks and
crustaceans)
Crustaceans
(lobster,crabs
and shrimp)
Top Predators
Other calci?ers

26%

3%
1%
1%
10%

11%

24%
9%

Calci?ers¡¯ predators
Oysters & mussels

Lobsters
Scallops

About a quarter
comes from species
that eat calcifiers
Crabs
Clams

Shrimp

Unin?uenced

Cooley	
 ?&	
 ?Doney	
 ?
Environment	
 ?Research	
 ?Le>ers,	
 ?2009	
 ?
What¡¯s at Stake for our Economy?

Photos:	
 ?Benjamin	
 ?Drummond	
 ?(leI	
 ?and	
 ?right);	
 ?Bryan	
 ?PenWla	
 ?(center)	
 ?

Washington commercial shellfish industry:
?? Most productive on the West Coast
?? Accounts for almost 85% of West Coast annual sales
?? Generates $270 million annually
?? Supports 3,200 jobs
What¡¯s at Stake for our Economy? (cont¡¯d)

Photos:	
 ?	
 ?U.S.	
 ?Dept.	
 ?Agriculture;	
 ?	
 ?City	
 ?of	
 ?SeaXle;	
 ?WA	
 ?Assn.	
 ?of	
 ?Conserva<on	
 ?Districts	
 ?	
 ?

Valuable wild and recreational fisheries
?? Food web impacts could ripple through Washington¡¯s
seafood industry
??

42,000 state jobs

??

$1.7 billion annual contribution

?? Coastal communities depend on recreational shellfishing
What¡¯s at Stake for Washington¡¯s Tribes?

Photos:	
 ?Northwest	
 ?Indian	
 ?Fisheries	
 ?Commission	
 ?

Cultural and economic survival
?? Washington tribes depend upon shellfish for food,
income, and connection to their cultural heritage.

Photos:	
 ?Northwest	
 ?Indian	
 ?Fisheries	
 ?Commission	
 ?
The Blue Ribbon Panel on Ocean Acidification
?? Convened by Governor Christine
Gregoire in February 2012.
?? A first-of-a-kind state-level effort
?? Panel charge:
?? Review best available science
?? Recommendations for response
?? Included:
?? scientists
?? decision makers
?? industry stakeholders
?? tribal representatives
?? conservation community

Photo:	
 ?Puget	
 ?Sound	
 ?Partnership	
 ?

Gov. Gregoire and Bill Dewey of Taylor
Shellfish Company discuss oyster
farming in the tide flats in Samish Bay.
What should we do about OA?
¡°Nowhere on our planet is a local response to ocean
acidification more urgently and immediately needed than
here in Washington State.¡±
~ Dr. Jane Lubchenco, NOAA Administrator, Nov 27, 2012

	
 ?

¡°The cost of responding to ocean acidification may be
substantial, but it is still far less than the costs of inaction.
Responding to ocean acidification will require a sustained
effort ¨C there¡¯s no silver bullet solution.¡±
~ Bill Ruckelshaus, Blue Ribbon Panel co-chair, Nov. 27, 2012	
 ?

¡°Washington can lead.¡±

~ Governor Gregoire, Nov 27, 2012
Panel Recommendations
1.? Reduce CO2 emissions
2.? Reduce land-based pollutants that
worsen OA
3.? Foster adaptation and remediation
to protect the shellfish industry
and marine ecosystems;
4.? Increase research and monitoring
5.? Inform, educate, and engage
6.? Maintain a sustained and
coordinated focus on OA

Photo:	
 ?Dan	
 ?BenneX	
 ?
State Legislature Funds OA Response
$1.82 million for Washington Center on OA
?? Continued water quality monitoring at shellfish
hatcheries¡­ ($150K)
?? Expanded OA monitoring¡­ ($475K)
?? Laboratory studies to assess direct causes and
effects of OA¡­ ($170K)
?? Develop short-term forecasting ability¡­ ($325K)
?? Develop strategies to protect shellfish larvae in
hatcheries... ($100K)
Thank You!

Photo:	
 ?MaX	
 ?Chadsey	
 ?

More Related Content

New meg chadsey northwest school presentation with credits dec27

  • 1. Ocean Acidification: ? What it is, and why it matters¡­ ? ? Meg Chadsey December 3, 2013
  • 3. Image ?courtesy ?of ?Jack ?Cook, ? Woods ?Hole ?Oceanographic ?Ins<tute ?
  • 4. What is Ocean Acidification? Climate change CO2 (Carbon Dioxide) The ocean absorbs ~25% of carbon dioxide we¡¯re pumping into the atmosphere. Ocean acidification Sarah ?Cooley, ?Woods ?Hole ?Oceanographic ?Ins<tute ?
  • 5. The pH Scale ??H2O ? + ?CO2 ? ¨¤? ?H2C03 ? Seawater ? Carbonic ? Acid ? Source: ?Dr. ?Simone ?Alin, ?NOAA ?PMEL ? h>p://www.pmel.noaa.gov/co2/story/A+primer+on+pH ?
  • 6. Washington is Particularly Vulnerable to Acidification Appearing decades sooner than anticipated. Regional factors exacerbating the problem: Upwelling along the coast¨¤? Excess nutrients¨¤?blooms Decay of organic material Acidifying gasses (NOX and SOX) Washington ?Coast ?photo: ?Russ ?McMillan ?
  • 7. Ocean Acidification means¡­.. less calcium carbonate for building shells
  • 8. Pteropods, or ¡®sea butterflies¡¯ are dissolving¡­ Normal pteropod shell Corroded pteropod shell in acidic seawater Live ?pteropod ?image: ?Dr. ?Russ ?HopcroI, ?UofA ?Fairbanks; ?Shell ?images: ?Dr. ?Nina ?Bednarsek, ?NOAA ?PMEL ?
  • 9. Also vulnerable to OA¡­ Ecosystems Fish Food People Food
  • 10. Potential Food Web Impacts Paci?c ?Salmon ? Coccolithophores ? Pteropods ? Copepods ?
  • 11. U.S. Commercial Fisheries Affected by Ocean Acidification Primary fishery revenue ~ $4 billion/year* *2007 U.S. domestic ex-vessel revenue (USD) Mollusks (shellfish) 5% 10% About half comes from calcifiers (mollusks and crustaceans) Crustaceans (lobster,crabs and shrimp) Top Predators Other calci?ers 26% 3% 1% 1% 10% 11% 24% 9% Calci?ers¡¯ predators Oysters & mussels Lobsters Scallops About a quarter comes from species that eat calcifiers Crabs Clams Shrimp Unin?uenced Cooley ?& ?Doney ? Environment ?Research ?Le>ers, ?2009 ?
  • 12. What¡¯s at Stake for our Economy? Photos: ?Benjamin ?Drummond ?(leI ?and ?right); ?Bryan ?PenWla ?(center) ? Washington commercial shellfish industry: ?? Most productive on the West Coast ?? Accounts for almost 85% of West Coast annual sales ?? Generates $270 million annually ?? Supports 3,200 jobs
  • 13. What¡¯s at Stake for our Economy? (cont¡¯d) Photos: ? ?U.S. ?Dept. ?Agriculture; ? ?City ?of ?SeaXle; ?WA ?Assn. ?of ?Conserva<on ?Districts ? ? Valuable wild and recreational fisheries ?? Food web impacts could ripple through Washington¡¯s seafood industry ?? 42,000 state jobs ?? $1.7 billion annual contribution ?? Coastal communities depend on recreational shellfishing
  • 14. What¡¯s at Stake for Washington¡¯s Tribes? Photos: ?Northwest ?Indian ?Fisheries ?Commission ? Cultural and economic survival ?? Washington tribes depend upon shellfish for food, income, and connection to their cultural heritage. Photos: ?Northwest ?Indian ?Fisheries ?Commission ?
  • 15. The Blue Ribbon Panel on Ocean Acidification ?? Convened by Governor Christine Gregoire in February 2012. ?? A first-of-a-kind state-level effort ?? Panel charge: ?? Review best available science ?? Recommendations for response ?? Included: ?? scientists ?? decision makers ?? industry stakeholders ?? tribal representatives ?? conservation community Photo: ?Puget ?Sound ?Partnership ? Gov. Gregoire and Bill Dewey of Taylor Shellfish Company discuss oyster farming in the tide flats in Samish Bay.
  • 16. What should we do about OA? ¡°Nowhere on our planet is a local response to ocean acidification more urgently and immediately needed than here in Washington State.¡± ~ Dr. Jane Lubchenco, NOAA Administrator, Nov 27, 2012 ? ¡°The cost of responding to ocean acidification may be substantial, but it is still far less than the costs of inaction. Responding to ocean acidification will require a sustained effort ¨C there¡¯s no silver bullet solution.¡± ~ Bill Ruckelshaus, Blue Ribbon Panel co-chair, Nov. 27, 2012 ? ¡°Washington can lead.¡± ~ Governor Gregoire, Nov 27, 2012
  • 17. Panel Recommendations 1.? Reduce CO2 emissions 2.? Reduce land-based pollutants that worsen OA 3.? Foster adaptation and remediation to protect the shellfish industry and marine ecosystems; 4.? Increase research and monitoring 5.? Inform, educate, and engage 6.? Maintain a sustained and coordinated focus on OA Photo: ?Dan ?BenneX ?
  • 18. State Legislature Funds OA Response $1.82 million for Washington Center on OA ?? Continued water quality monitoring at shellfish hatcheries¡­ ($150K) ?? Expanded OA monitoring¡­ ($475K) ?? Laboratory studies to assess direct causes and effects of OA¡­ ($170K) ?? Develop short-term forecasting ability¡­ ($325K) ?? Develop strategies to protect shellfish larvae in hatcheries... ($100K)