New Possibilities For Research Communication
?Download as PPT, PDF?
1 like?322 views
This document discusses how Web 2.0 tools can be used for new forms of research communication beyond traditional one-way publication methods. It provides examples of how blogs, wikis, RSS feeds, and social bookmarking can facilitate discussion, collaboration, and sharing of information among researchers, partners, and the public. The document concludes that while these digital methods currently supplement traditional communication, they have huge potential to transform research communication in the coming years by allowing more dynamic and interactive forms of engagement.
New Possibilities For Research Communication
- 1. New possibilities for research communication with Web 2.0 tools Ole Bisbjerg Head of Music and Media Dept. State and University Library Aarhus, Denmark 1
- 2. agenda ? Research promotion now ? New digital means and media for communication and promotion ? Beyond one-way communication? ? Examples 2
- 3. The situation now ? Traditional channels of publication are still dominating research communication: periodicals, books. ? Digital research communication is not yet widely distributed ? OAI ! Growing fast ? Remediation (Richard Grusin, 2001) ¨C new digital media provides the researcher with the opportunity to expand communication 3
- 5. 5
- 6. 6
- 7. New digital possibilities ! ? Remee and friends 7
- 8. E-books ? Often as real copies of the printed edition, just with more possibilities to search and retrieve infomation ? More integrated possibilities 8
- 9. Read online for free, buy download 9
- 10. Digital possibilities / web 2.0 ? From push to pull ? Internet based technologies, that provide the user with the opportunity to retrieve information when she wants ? New media emerge ¨C and publication/communication becomes easier(collaboration/discussion) is a real possibility ¨C quality control? Copyright 10
- 11. ? Web 2.0 tools: Weblogs, Wikis, Rss, social bookmarking, pod- videocast, tagging, folksonomies, mashups 11
- 12. ¡±Lorin Anderson 2001 ¨C rev. Blooms Taxonomy¡± - here appl. to Web 2.0¡± 12
- 13. 13
- 14. Perspectives ? To develop new genres of research communication by using new media ? Challenge: to avoid triviliazation and flaws 14
- 15. Examples ¨C 3 scenarios ? 1. Research communication in the scientific world ? 2. Research communication to partners in institutions/organizations ? 3. Research communication to the public 15
- 16. 1. Scientific world ? Weblogs (blogging) ? A way to facilitate dialogue ? Continuing entries, rss ? Academic Blogs in music ? web-logs need to be legitimized, for example through peer-reviewing 16
- 17. ? RSS ¨C is a very useful technology in several ways: an example being the aspect of social bookmarking: ? Del.icio.us , connotea, furl.net ? RSS: an easy way of retriving relevant information, when you want 17
- 18. wiki ? Wikis ¨C excellent tools on collaboration ¨C often works in progress: ? Example: ? Scores wiki ? Trad. score library 18
- 19. 2. Research communication to partners ? Mutual needs for infomation and dynamic updates ? Often a joint web-site ? Digitalexperience 19
- 20. 3. ? Difficult to specify target groups ? Informed citizenship ¨C often a trad pull concept ¨C but weblogs from the political life has become increasingly popular ? Museum communication ¨C web 2.0 tools are very relevant ? Nationalmuseet 20
- 21. In Conclusion wiki Read and collaborate (Discuss) Weblogs Discuss and share Rss Recieve / read 21
- 22. In Conclusion ? Web 2.0 tools: ? communication with the option to have a dialogue/collaboration with the user ¨C push to pull - in all 3 scenarios ? Material may be used in different scenarios and towards different user groups ? ¨C at the moment a supplement to trad. communication but with huge potential for research communication in the years to come 22
- 23. Thanks for your attention! ? .pps is available on slideshare : tags iaml2009 ? Twitter: http://twitter.com/bissen ? Ole Bisbjerg ¨C ob@statsbiblioteket.dk ? 0045 40649783 23