dzϳ֪
?
16 likes?2,509 views
The document contains charts and graphs showing performance test results for different key-value store systems. A line graph shows the number of requests per second for Viver, Runes and V-Field systems with varying request sizes. Another set of line graphs show the latency percentage for different request sizes on two systems. The document also includes URLs and diagrams showing the architecture of different systems.
dzϳ֪
- 1. 18-E-5
- 14. 3,500 3,000 3,076 2,500 2,000 2,053 1,500 1,000 500 901 922 0
- 15. VIVER RUNES V-FIELD 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2
- 42. 100% 10% 1% 0% 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 512
- 43. 100% 10% 1% 0% 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 512
- 85. kumofs
- 87. Server Server Manager Gateway
- 88. Server Server Server Manager Server Server Manager Server Gateway Gateway Gateway Application Application Application
- 89. Server Server Manager Server Server Manager Server Gateway Gateway Gateway Application Application Application
- 90. Server Manager Server Server Manager Server Gateway Gateway Gateway Application Application Application
- 91. Server Server Server Manager Server Gateway Gateway Gateway Application Application Application
- 93. Server Server Server localhost:11211 Gateway RPC / Application
- 94. Server Server Server RPC /
- 95. Server Server Server Manager RPC /
- 97. 110,000 req/sec 114,000 req/sec 114,000 85,500 Linux 2.6.27.10 x86_64 AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ 57,000 Linux 2.6.27.19 x86_64 AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ 28,500 key 32 value 1KB 8 32 key 960,000 key 0 memcached kumofs
- 98. (requests/sec) 3,200,000 kumofs 2,400,000 Linux 2.6.27.21 i686 Intel Pentium 4 3.20GHz Linux 2.6.27.21 x86_64 Intel QuadCore Xeon X3350 1,600,000 50 10 60 key 8 value 32 32 800,000 256 key 51,200,000 key 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 ( )
- 99. Demo