際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
Visualising	
 data	
 	
 why/how	
 
    Involving	
 schools?	
 
      disinterested	
 use	
 of	
 open	
 data	
 

     @paul0evans1	
 &	
 @tobyblume	
 
             #visualdata
Understanding	
 what	
 were	
 trying	
 to	
 
 achieve	
 with	
 data/visualisaCons
Notes on the schools data visualisation localgovcamp session
Noisy	
 opinion	
 
≒ UnrepresentaCve	
 	
 small	
 numbers	
 -足	
 
   intermediaries	
 
≒ Time-足rich	
 	
 heavy	
 engagement	
 
≒ Prejudiced	
 (ideology,	
 religion,	
 tribalism	
 
   etc)	
 
≒ Self-足interested	
 	
 not	
 public	
 interest	
 
                                                                    Down with this
≒ GeOng	
 more	
 abundant	
 (free	
 publishing)	
             sort of thing!
                                    Heavy	
 preferences	
 &	
 
   DistorCon	
 &	
                 passionate	
 views	
 
  disinformaCon	
 

                 Coercion:	
 Campaigning	
 
                     &	
 vote-足driving
Good	
 digital	
 policymaking	
 tree	
 
                                            OpCmal	
 
                                             Policy	
 
                           NaConal	
 
                          Government	
 

                                           Councillors	
 

        Evidence	
                                                    Opinion	
 
                                                              Newspapers,	
 pressure	
 
Experience	
 +	
 research	
 +	
                           groups,	
 FOI	
 requests	
 +	
 
disinterested	
 armchair	
               ConsultaCons	
          Bloggers	
 
 auditors,	
 hyperlocals
We	
 want	
 
≒ Disinterested	
 analysis	
 -足	
 not	
 inducCve	
 
≒ Many	
 minds	
 	
 diversity	
 of	
 perspecCves	
 /	
 
   invenCon	
 /	
 conversaCon	
 starters	
 
≒ Issues	
 made	
 more	
 a^racCve	
 to	
 engage	
 with	
 	
 
   infographics	
 /	
 walk-足throughs	
 etc	
 
≒ Folksy	
 descripCon	
 of	
 council	
 work	
 	
 not	
 
   o鍖cer-足speak
PenalCes	
 of	
 being	
 hard	
 to	
 deal	
 with	
 
≒ Price	
 parCcipaCon	
 at	
 贈0	
 =	
 mostly	
 fanaCc	
 
   respondents	
 
≒ Hard-足to-足get	
 informaCon	
 (FOI)	
 rewards	
 hard-足
   to-足avoids	
 	
 and	
 loses	
 control	
 of	
 how	
 
   informaCon	
 is	
 released	
 
≒ Having	
 a	
 monopoly	
 in	
 describing	
 your	
 service	
 
   =	
 bureaucraCc	
 voice/distrust	
 (spin)
h^p://dharma鍖y.com/localbusiness
SuggesCons	
 from	
 the	
 session	
 
≒ Review	
 required	
 skills	
 for	
 LocalGov	
 employment	
 
≒ Co-足ordinate	
 visualisaCon	
 skills	
 within	
 local	
 government	
 be^er	
 
≒ Lower	
 expectaCons	
 on	
 corporate	
 style	
 	
 go	
 for	
 authenCcity	
 rather	
 
   than	
 branding	
 
≒ Encourage	
 people	
 other	
 than	
 formal	
 employees	
 to	
 present	
 
   informaCon	
 	
 its	
 more	
 authenCc	
 	
 enable	
 and	
 curate	
 rather	
 than	
 
   just	
 create	
 
≒ Make	
 a	
 clearer	
 link	
 between	
 parCcipaCon	
 &	
 decisionmaking	
 
≒ Make	
 organisaCons	
 more	
 permissive	
 in	
 comms	
 terms	
 	
 making	
 
   everything	
 go	
 through	
 the	
 corporate	
 鍖lter	
 doesnt	
 work	
 
≒ When	
 we	
 inform	
 	
 say	
 WHY	
 were	
 informing	
 
≒ Curate	
 walk-足throughs	
 of	
 how	
 people	
 do	
 good	
 data-足visualisaCon	
 	
 
   dotgovlabs	
 /	
 skunkworks	
 
≒ Visual	
 media	
 surgeries!!!

More Related Content

Notes on the schools data visualisation localgovcamp session

  • 1. Visualising data why/how Involving schools? disinterested use of open data @paul0evans1 & @tobyblume #visualdata
  • 2. Understanding what were trying to achieve with data/visualisaCons
  • 4. Noisy opinion ≒ UnrepresentaCve small numbers -足 intermediaries ≒ Time-足rich heavy engagement ≒ Prejudiced (ideology, religion, tribalism etc) ≒ Self-足interested not public interest Down with this ≒ GeOng more abundant (free publishing) sort of thing! Heavy preferences & DistorCon & passionate views disinformaCon Coercion: Campaigning & vote-足driving
  • 5. Good digital policymaking tree OpCmal Policy NaConal Government Councillors Evidence Opinion Newspapers, pressure Experience + research + groups, FOI requests + disinterested armchair ConsultaCons Bloggers auditors, hyperlocals
  • 6. We want ≒ Disinterested analysis -足 not inducCve ≒ Many minds diversity of perspecCves / invenCon / conversaCon starters ≒ Issues made more a^racCve to engage with infographics / walk-足throughs etc ≒ Folksy descripCon of council work not o鍖cer-足speak
  • 7. PenalCes of being hard to deal with ≒ Price parCcipaCon at 贈0 = mostly fanaCc respondents ≒ Hard-足to-足get informaCon (FOI) rewards hard-足 to-足avoids and loses control of how informaCon is released ≒ Having a monopoly in describing your service = bureaucraCc voice/distrust (spin)
  • 9. SuggesCons from the session ≒ Review required skills for LocalGov employment ≒ Co-足ordinate visualisaCon skills within local government be^er ≒ Lower expectaCons on corporate style go for authenCcity rather than branding ≒ Encourage people other than formal employees to present informaCon its more authenCc enable and curate rather than just create ≒ Make a clearer link between parCcipaCon & decisionmaking ≒ Make organisaCons more permissive in comms terms making everything go through the corporate 鍖lter doesnt work ≒ When we inform say WHY were informing ≒ Curate walk-足throughs of how people do good data-足visualisaCon dotgovlabs / skunkworks ≒ Visual media surgeries!!!